|
Mr. Wookums posted:How is racial profiling effective? IIRC within similar demographics aren't whites more likely to be criminals per capita? the difference is that whites commit victimless minor crimes (weed) whereas blacks commit acts of brutal aggression (weed)
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 07:21 |
|
Joementum posted:Meanwhile in Idaho, a prosecutor is just askin' questions. The County plans to appeal apparently...
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:37 |
|
CommieGIR posted:The County plans to appeal apparently... Knowing the 2C they'll gently caress it up don't worry. They can't even plow arterial roads in loving December.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:39 |
|
Mr. Wookums posted:How is racial profiling effective? IIRC within similar demographics aren't whites more likely to be criminals per capita? Well racial profiling wouldn't be controlling for demographics for one.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:43 |
|
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:45 |
tsa posted:Well racial profiling wouldn't be controlling for demographics for one.
|
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:47 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:Comparing the height of the heel on Putin's shoes to Obama's Hey guys, maybe using the term "Jewish question" isn't such a good idea. Wikipedia on the Jewish Question posted:By far the most infamous use of this expression was by the Nazis in the early- and mid- twentieth century, culminating in the implementation of their "Final Solution to the Jewish question" during World War II. Just a suggestion. Feel free to keep shooting yourselves in the foot though.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:58 |
|
Bring it.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 20:58 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
Yeeeeeeeeeees.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:00 |
|
fade5 posted:Hey guys, maybe using the term "Jewish question" isn't such a good idea. The guy who used the term "Jewish question" in that statement is David Duke's campaign manager and regularly writes long, anti-Semitic screeds. He's not worried that you might interpret him as hating Jews, he's worried that you might not.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:00 |
|
fade5 posted:Ahaha holy poo poo I just realized that I'm the same height as Obama, so Putin would have to look up in order to talk to me. I find that far more hilarious than I should. Knight, who he is quoting, is a neo-Nazi. There was no inadvertent allusion to Hitler, that's exactly what he was talking about
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:01 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
Ohhhh NOoooooo, don't do THAAAATTTT
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:01 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
Open the bloodgates
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:02 |
|
Mr. Wookums posted:How is racial profiling effective? IIRC within similar demographics aren't whites more likely to be criminals per capita? While black people represent about 13% of the US pop, they commit over half of all homicides. And before you go calling the police racist, the numbers line up well with reports from victims. So if black people tend to commit the most heinous crimes the most often, you should profile them.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:02 |
copper rose petal posted:Yep selling cigarettes on the street is exactly the same as selling heroin to kids, another excellent analogy. Also, there was no evidence that Garner was actually illegally selling cigarettes. He had been caught for it before, but according to the video of the arrest he wasn't seen doing anything more concrete than giving a cigarette to "that other guy in the red shirt" (who has never been identified). Considering that the officer who strangled him to death already had one lawsuit settled and is in the process of another one, both over abusing suspects and arresting on spurious claims, I find it really drat likely that they had nothing to justify an arrest in the first place (let alone a conviction) and were more interested in harassing him. This would mesh really well with the documented history of racial harassment in the NYPD like stop-and-frisk and planting evidence.
|
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:02 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
His phone must be ringing off the hook from reporters looking to get names right now.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:03 |
|
Costa had a tweet out saying that it wasn't clear to him given the Boehner and Scalise statements whether Scalise would actually keep the position, but he's deleted it. Guess he's reading the tea leaves () to say he's sticking around. 'Course, if David Duke keeps doing his best to keep David Duke from being swept under the rug...
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:03 |
|
Teddybear posted:This was within, like, the last hour. Amazing. Boehner just might be underestimating this one, but hey it's not like the dude was being recorded like the Sterling was.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:04 |
|
I'm gonna be on the road the rest of the week so I'm gonna miss most of this stuff as it comes out I hope Julie Mason covers it some, there's nothing journos like more than scandal.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:04 |
|
Amergin posted:While black people represent about 13% of the US pop, they commit over half of all homicides. So you're saying strong, effective social programs like snap should expand to eliminate poverty?
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:05 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
David Duke, feverishly poring over the rosters for white democratic congressmen from Dixie who he could implicate, is perplexed by the lack of results
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:05 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:Also, there was no evidence that Garner was actually illegally selling cigarettes. He had been caught for it before, but according to the video of the arrest he wasn't seen doing anything more concrete than giving a cigarette to "that other guy in the red shirt" (who has never been identified). Considering that the officer who strangled him to death already had one lawsuit settled and is in the process of another one, both over abusing suspects and arresting on spurious claims, I find it really drat likely that they had nothing to justify an arrest in the first place (let alone a conviction) and were more interested in harassing him. This would mesh really well with the documented history of racial harassment in the NYPD like stop-and-frisk and planting evidence. You know, the thing about this NYPD slowdown is, it's what Garner was asking for. In the video he says he wants the constant low level harassment over bullshit crimes to stop. And in some attempt to thumb their nose at people protesting and asking for what Garner wanted and was killed for, they are giving him and the protestors exactly what they want.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:05 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
Oh poo poo.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:07 |
|
Joementum posted:The guy who used the term "Jewish question" in that statement is David Duke's campaign manager and regularly writes long, anti-Semitic screeds. He's not worried that you might interpret him as hating Jews, he's worried that you might not. Fried Chicken posted:Knight, who he is quoting, is a neo-Nazi. There was no inadvertent allusion to Hitler, that's exactly what he was talking about HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:11 |
|
DemeaninDemon posted:So you're saying strong, effective social programs like snap should expand to eliminate poverty? Maybe but that's a red herring. I'm saying that enforcing the law doesn't all of a sudden become racist when the perp is not white.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:13 |
|
fade5 posted:Wait holy poo poo we actually busted through the Republican-Nazi barrier? I thought it was like Freep where you get infinitely close but never actually cross it. Wow. Duke is sort of an an institution unto himself, but was a big part of Louisiana politics in the nineties. I posted this upthread, but in case you were under any impression that Duke and Knight weren't neo-Nazis, here's the speech that Duke gave at the same event Scalise was speaking at in 2002.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:15 |
|
Amergin posted:Maybe but that's a red herring. I'm saying that enforcing the law doesn't all of a sudden become racist when the perp is not white. Law enforcement is selective by nature. Choosing to enforce the law against people of color more often than white people doesn't magically stop being racist just because you're enforcing the law.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:15 |
|
Fox News presents awards for the worst reporting... This whole video is magical.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:16 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:
So I'm guessing this means "To all the Republicans thinking about throwing him under the bus here, I'll throw you under the bus if you do." Interesting that THIS is the comment that Boehner waits until after to put out his "stand behind our guy" message.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:17 |
|
Amergin posted:Maybe but that's a red herring. I'm saying that enforcing the law doesn't all of a sudden become racist when the perp is not white. Yeah that's true but it ignores the underlying causes of crimes like cigarette tax evasion. Get to the source of the problem which, putting on your color canceling goggles®, is indeed poverty.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:18 |
Amergin posted:While black people represent about 13% of the US pop, they commit over half of all homicides. 1. Use systemic oppression and racism that you can deny is racism to put black people in a near-permanent state of poverty and deny them opportunities. Make sure to shoot lots of them, especially unarmed ones. 2. Decry any opportunities people try to give exclusively to black people as "racist" for not also being given to whites. Demand that White History Month be enacted. 3. Downtrodden blacks in ghettos turn to crime or join gangs to try and improve their lot in life when they're unable to advance legally. 4. "Well, looks like we're right to racially profile if all these blacks keep hurting people." 5. Cycle continues.
|
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:19 |
|
copper rose petal posted:Law enforcement is selective by nature. Choosing to enforce the law against people of color more often than white people doesn't magically stop being racist just because you're enforcing the law. I was gonna respond to Amergin, then I read his name and used my time for something more productive, like loudly picking my nose. Oh no, an NYPD work slowage!! Who will give out bullshit tickets, hassle innocent people and kill unarmed civilians now??
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:21 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:1. Use systemic oppression and racism that you can deny is racism to put black people in a near-permanent state of poverty and deny them opportunities. Make sure to shoot lots of them, especially unarmed ones. Except black victims are 93% of the time the victims of black offenders. White victims are only 85% of the time the victims of white offenders. So who is the victim of racial crime now?
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:22 |
|
Duke Igthorn posted:
That was my very first reaction, too. The cops are going to throw a temper tantrum and by doing so, they are actually creating a net benefit to society. I guess it shows just how ignorant they are if they think the public is going to respond negatively to this tactic.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:24 |
|
Amergin posted:Maybe but that's a red herring. I'm saying that enforcing the law doesn't all of a sudden become racist when the perp is not white. No, the red herring is believing that constant harassment for low-level crimes affects the murder rate. Amergin posted:Except black victims are 93% of the time the victims of black offenders. Black victims of black offenders are harassed by police just as much as the offenders are. amanasleep fucked around with this message at 21:29 on Dec 30, 2014 |
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:25 |
Amergin posted:Maybe but that's a red herring. I'm saying that enforcing the law doesn't all of a sudden become racist when the perp is not white.
|
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:26 |
|
Amergin posted:Except black victims are 93% of the time the victims of black offenders. I feel like you are telling me something, but I also feel like you are completed missing the point....
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:26 |
|
fade5 posted:Wait holy poo poo we actually busted through the Republican-Nazi barrier? I thought it was like Freep where you get infinitely close but never actually cross it. Wow. Man speaking of which, just how much overlap is there in the userbases of Freep and Stormfront?
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:27 |
|
Amergin posted:Except black victims are 93% of the time the victims of black offenders. 85% is still pretty high. Why can't whites act like civilized people instead of thugs?
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:30 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 07:21 |
Amergin posted:Except black victims are 93% of the time the victims of black offenders. quote:High criminal arrest and homicide mortality levels among young people are often attributed to biological and developmental flaws innate to adolescence. A special data run by the California Criminal Justice Statistics Center detailing arrests by offense, age, and race/ethnicity for 2006 provides new opportunities to examine the relationship From http://www.cjcj.org/uploads/cjcj/documents/Does_age.pdf
|
|
# ? Dec 30, 2014 21:31 |