|
evilweasel posted:If you go back and read the initial discussion my argument is more on that people should understand where the popular support for charter schools comes from and that people here are too quick to dismiss why people might support them. I don't think that charter schools are the answer. I do, however, think that people who are attacking charter school supporters are generally missing why people believe what they do on charter schools and as a result won't ever convince anyone and will not understand how best to advocate for fixing the public school system instead. For what it's worth, I'm not sure the people pushing charter schools understand where the popular support for charter schools comes from, either, as that piece on Campbell Brown in NYMag illustrates.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 17:59 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 04:23 |
|
The Warszawa posted:For what it's worth, I'm not sure the people pushing charter schools understand where the popular support for charter schools comes from, either, as that piece on Campbell Brown in NYMag illustrates. Yeah but the enemy of my enemy is my friend, which in this case is a secret backroom conspiracy to both bust one of the last powerful unions in the country and dismantle the only really socialist program this nation has.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:03 |
|
zoux posted:Yeah but the enemy of my enemy is my friend, which in this case is a secret backroom conspiracy to both bust one of the last powerful unions in the country and dismantle the only really socialist program this nation has. It leads to quotes like this too: quote:For the naysayers, remember we already have school choice in Texas. If you’re rich enough you send your children to private school – if you’re mobile enough you move to the suburbs for a good school but if you’re one of the working poor in our inner cities, you don’t have money for private school, and you can’t move to the suburbs for a better school because you rely on the bus to get to work.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:09 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:It leads to quotes like this too: I mean Patrick is correct there but the solution isn't to gut the public education system it's to lavish money and resources on it.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:10 |
|
Apparently GOP responses to the SOTU had 'modified' meanings in English and Spanish: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/republican-sotu-responses-get-lost-translation quote:For the third consecutive year, the Republican Party’s official response to the State of the Union was actually split in two: one in English and one in Spanish.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:16 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Apparently GOP responses to the SOTU had 'modified' meanings in English and Spanish: I wonder if there's an appreciable number of Spanish-language viewers that consume enough news to care about SOTU responses, but not enough to find out that the Spanish language speech is substantially different. It seems to me that people you're translating for are only going to be alienated by blatant insincerity.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:43 |
|
So this is a bit odd, right? Georgia governor abruptly skips town for a secret trade meeting? http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2015/01/21/nathan-deals-mysterious-overseas-adventure/#__federated=1
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:50 |
|
MothraAttack posted:So this is a bit odd, right? Georgia governor abruptly skips town for a secret trade meeting? Southern governors disappearing to foreign countries with no forewarning? What could go wrong? E: Also, whoa Brian Williams is doing the Nightly News from Cuba tonight. zoux fucked around with this message at 18:57 on Jan 21, 2015 |
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:54 |
|
zoux posted:Southern governors disappearing to foreign countries with no forewarning? What could go wrong? I hear the Appalachian Trail is quite nice this time of year.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 18:59 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Apparently GOP responses to the SOTU had 'modified' meanings in English and Spanish:
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:16 |
|
MothraAttack posted:So this is a bit odd, right? Georgia governor abruptly skips town for a secret trade meeting? Deal is one of the most corrupt motherfuckers in the game, so this is no suprise.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:19 |
|
In my continuing series of loving hating individual states for their stupid racism, anyone here happen to know why Oregon is founded? http://gizmodo.com/oregon-was-founded-as-a-racist-utopia-1539567040 Yeah... Snippets quote:When Oregon was granted statehood in 1859, it was the only state in the Union admitted with a constitution that forbade black people from living, working, or owning property there. It was illegal for black people even to move to the state until 1926. Oregon's founding is part of the forgotten history of racism in the American west. quote:Today, while 13 percent of Americans are black, just 2 percent of Oregon's population is black. This is not some accident of history. It's a product of oppressive laws and everyday actions that deliberately excluded non-white people from a fair shot at living a life without additional obstacles being put in their way. quote:Even before it was a state, those in power in Oregon were trying to keep out non-white people. In the summer of 1844, for example, the Legislative Committee passed a provision that said any free black people who were in the state would be subject to flogging if they didn't leave within two years. The floggings were supposed to continue every six months until they left the territory. That provision was revised in December of 1845 to removed the flogging part. Instead, free black people who remained would be offered up "publicly for hire" to any white person who would remove them from the territory. quote:The constitution was put to a popular vote in the state in 1857 and included two referendums that were to be voted on independently. The first was whether they should reject slavery. Roughly 75 percent of voters opted to reject the adoption of slavery. The second measure was whether or not to exclude black people from the state. About 89 percent of voters cast their vote in favor of excluding black and mixed race people from the state. And thus, the exclusionary aspects of the state constitution were adopted. quote:it wouldn't be until 1973 (and with very little fanfare) that activists would get the state to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment yet again. That's some pretty impressive racism right there. Next on the plate: gently caress you already, Delaware.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:19 |
|
Venom Snake posted:Well if the price of Oil keeps dropping we might not have to wait to long. Saudi Arabia can survive an oil price crash. Most US companies can't. That's why they're ramping up production to try and force a crash. You can even find the "low oil prices is good for you now BUT THE ECONOMY OH GOD WE'RE ALL hosed " horseshit in the news already. Perry's getting out of office early enough that he'll be able to dodge most/all claims of Texas being hosed in the future by pointing out how totally awesome things were under him so I guess the next guy hosed it up for you people. I hope when Texas starts to crumble that Austin's tech companies move to the East Coast if they don't go back to their previous locations instead. Venom Snake posted:Doesn't seem all that creepy to me If those things are like mud puppies then what you see is a small slippery demon.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:20 |
|
Texas is going to be fine, but hot, insightful take none the less. I mean relatively fine, economically, for white people. The status quo will remain unchanged.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:21 |
|
effectual posted:Well in a sense it is selfish; why don't they advocate to improve the local school instead of just building another semi-private one for the middle class kids? That's what parents want to happen. Even a majority of minorities want that. It's only in the Land of False Dichotomies, in which parents are given the non-choice of "keep your public school but we'll continue to starve the beast" vs. "throw buttloads of taxpayer money to private corps. to teach your kids" that charter schools might have the edge in public opinion.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:25 |
|
It's interesting that rich, rural whites are more supportive of public schools than anyone else. I guess they've got the best public schools, so makes sense.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:31 |
|
Ask non-parents, which statement do you agree more: "I would prefer to increase education spending by $x to have good quality public schools" "I would prefer to keep education spending the same and try adding charter schools"
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:32 |
|
Shageletic posted:In my continuing series of loving hating individual states for their stupid racism, anyone here happen to know why Oregon is founded? Oregon was also one of the states where the 1920s Klan was the strongest, right?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:33 |
|
I think that poor minorities are used to being completely failed by government so when given the choice between "hey maybe the legislature will fix your school at some point in the next, oh 50 years maybe" and "if this plan passes next year you will have a check in your pocket to send your kids to a private school where they will learn and be safe", what would you choose. KIPP academies, which are the charter model that the GOP is going to be trotting out because they are really good schools, serve 95% minority and 88% free-and-reduced lunch students.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:35 |
|
Aliquid posted:It's interesting that rich, rural whites are more supportive of public schools than anyone else. I guess they've got the best public schools, so makes sense. "Without question, the No. 1 factor that makes a great education system is great teachers. We have great teachers. I'd pay them more." ~ Mitt Romney, Monday.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:36 |
|
Gounads posted:Ask non-parents, which statement do you agree more: I don't know anyone who isn't a parent and agrees with the charter schools thing which makes sense because the city passed a bond issue last November for funding improvements to public schools in "those" parts of town (I.e. the town part of town rather than the sticks). Holy gently caress though, I got some racist-rear end canine pipe organ of a flyer stuck in my screen door during the campaign. I took a picture of it and should dig it up, it's Atwater as all hell.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:37 |
|
Willa Rogers posted:That's what parents want to happen. Even a majority of minorities want that. People want good public schools, but they support charters / vouchers because they think they aren't getting them. When asked specifically about the D.C. school voucher system in 2011 68% of D.C. residents (the most liberal and blackest "state" in the union) supported vouchers. It was something like 3/4 when you only polled people with school age children. I'm not in favor of vouchers at all, but you're misdiagnosing the source of their support when you view it exclusively through the lens of corporate critique. It's not a false choice for most parents who think that there is no way to fix schools before their kid graduates. I think you are missing the point that people are making about why charters are popular among even people who want strong public schools. Most parents want to feel more in control of their kid's education and that they are doing the best they can. Most people are not willing to sacrifice their kid's education at the alter of ideology. If you are misunderstanding the cause of this and seeing this issue as an exclusively elite venture, you're not going to be able to see why it has the support it does and from where. zoux posted:I think that poor minorities are used to being completely failed by government so when given the choice between "hey maybe the legislature will fix your school at some point in the next, oh 50 years maybe" and "if this plan passes next year you will have a check in your pocket to send your kids to a private school where they will learn and be safe", what would you choose. Basically, this.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:39 |
|
Evil Fluffy posted:Perry's getting out of office early enough that he'll be able to dodge most/all claims of Texas being hosed in the future by pointing out how totally awesome things were under him so I guess the next guy hosed it up for you people. I hope when Texas starts to crumble that Austin's tech companies move to the East Coast if they don't go back to their previous locations instead. You know what, that just made me feel even better about the oil crash. I get cheap gas (seriously saw a station selling it at $1.69/gal last weekend), people stop messing up the nation with new fracking, oh and now that Perry skipped town to get humiliated on the national circuit (again) we get to blame ALL of the oil woes on Abbot. After all, with much of the nation blaming Obama for the 2008 economic bust it means that the moment a public candidate is elected all woes are his fault. It doesn't matter if they were blatantly caused by his predecessor, or that he wasn't officially signed into office for months after the event: the moment you're voted in ALL issues are now your fault.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:40 |
|
Alkydere posted:You know what, that just made me feel even better about the oil crash. I get cheap gas (seriously saw a station selling it at $1.69/gal last weekend), people stop messing up the nation with new fracking, oh and now that Perry skipped town to get humiliated on the national circuit (again) we get to blame ALL of the oil woes on Abbot. After all, with much of the nation blaming Obama for the 2008 economic bust it means that the moment a public candidate is elected all woes are his fault. It doesn't matter if they were blatantly caused by his predecessor, or that he wasn't officially signed into office for months after the event: the moment you're voted in ALL issues are now your fault. Yeah it's kind of like how last year when everyone could demonstrably link the super bad economic problems to Sam Brownback in Kansas, and there was tons of press about it and even republicans came out and said how Brownback had tanked the state economy and the blame totally stuck to him and he didn't get re-elected.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:43 |
|
Joementum posted:"Without question, the No. 1 factor that makes a great education system is great teachers. We have great teachers. I'd pay them more." ~ Mitt Romney, Monday. How many months do you think until Mitt gives lip service to full communism?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:44 |
|
Joementum posted:"Without question, the No. 1 factor that makes a great education system is great teachers. We have great teachers. I'd pay them more." ~ Mitt Romney, Monday.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:49 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:How many months do you think until Mitt gives lip service to full communism? Mitt would become an unironic leftist if it would win him the election.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:50 |
|
Romney rushed to the left so fast after his primary that he blew out the brakes and just kept going
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:50 |
|
It should be interesting to note that Los Angeles has a Zone of Choice program for some of its more overpopulated high schools, allowing for access to one of several schools if a student lives within a geographic boundary. This, coupled with the trend to create Small Learning Communities (academies within larger schools, basically), or Pilot schools (programs with greater autonomy than regular public schools), gives students a bit more choice. I mean, it's largely packaged as "Attend school with Multimedia/performing arts/science/etc" focus, as opposed to "take all the multimedia/performing arts/science/etc classes I can at a huge comprehensive high school", but it's a rather neat example of cutting back on that CHARTER CHOICE poo poo. Raskolnikov38 posted:How many months do you think until Mitt gives lip service to full communism?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:51 |
|
I look forward to Communist Party Organizer Mitt Romneys run in the Republican primary alongside "Capitalism and trade solves nothing" - Narco Rubens
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:54 |
|
SubponticatePoster posted:Hmm, how long before this new OS conflicts with his base programming and causes him to BSOD? In the article he mentions that it's the teachers unions that are stopping pay raises. He's heightening the internal contradictions.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 19:58 |
|
Joementum posted:In the article he mentions that it's the teachers unions that are stopping pay raises. He's heightening the internal contradictions. LA's union wanted a 10%ish raise to make up for the years of frozen wages, stagnant COL adjustments, and the across the board paycut that teachers took during the Great Recession. The district threw them 2% retroactive, 2% this year, 2% next year. They argued that a raise that severe would trigger matching clauses in some of the other union contracts and would gently caress the budget further.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 20:02 |
|
Jerry Manderbilt posted:Oregon was also one of the states where the 1920s Klan was the strongest, right? Heavily. And based on the treatment of minorities (mostly Latinos) today, that sentiment hasn't really gone away as much as residents (even "the good ones" in the western part of the state) would like to hope.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 20:22 |
|
MothraAttack posted:So this is a bit odd, right? Georgia governor abruptly skips town for a secret trade meeting? Deal is like the platonic ideal of corruption
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 20:46 |
|
Joementum posted:"Without question, the No. 1 factor that makes a great education system is great teachers. We have great teachers. I'd pay them more." ~ Mitt Romney, Monday. He's wrong, though. The No. 1 factor that makes a great education system, by an order of magnitude, is parents interested in their kids' educations and having acquired high levels of education themselves. Teachers are important, but there's limited amounts they can do. You're actually better off being a top student in a crappy school than a good student in a top school, in terms of getting opportunities later and thereby achieving more. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic741392.files/BigFish.pdf http://www.researchgate.net/profile...9e3a6000000.pdf
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 20:55 |
|
Aliquid posted:It's interesting that rich, rural whites are more supportive of public schools than anyone else. I guess they've got the best public schools, so makes sense. Well their private options, if they even exist, tend to be unaccredited Dominionist madrassas.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 21:02 |
|
Joementum posted:"Without question, the No. 1 factor that makes a great education system is great teachers. We have great teachers. I'd pay them more." ~ Mitt Romney, Monday. *wipes tears from eyes, waits for sides to stop hurting*
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 21:04 |
|
Shageletic posted:That's some pretty impressive racism right there. Speaking as a DE resident, I'm sure that this will be magical
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 21:51 |
|
So there were some differences between Ernt's address and the Spanish translation.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 21:53 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 04:23 |
|
zoux posted:I think that poor minorities are used to being completely failed by government so when given the choice between "hey maybe the legislature will fix your school at some point in the next, oh 50 years maybe" and "if this plan passes next year you will have a check in your pocket to send your kids to a private school where they will learn and be safe", what would you choose. So why does the gop like kipp schools? Gets the blaugh people out of public schools?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 21:54 |