|
rrrrrrrrrrrt posted:scala is bad and I really hate it. it's plang Haskell. lol at saying this when clojure exists
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 22:30 |
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:emacs and gvim both have extensive mouse support i have yet to find a way to make mousewheel scrolling not garbage in emacs at least Notorious b.s.d. posted:emacs will never, ever support anything but elisp, (hopefully) scheme, and (hopefully) common lisp. at least one of these languages is good. if you just can't do what you need to do in elisp, which sometimes happens, emacs has pretty good subprocess management, so you can boot an external process and talk to it. this is how e.g. emacs/java and emacs/scala integration works -- the java/scala engines execute in an external process w/ reflection to get the AST lisp is bad. all lisps are bad, and elisp is the worst of the lisps. lua is pretty okay so maybe that will be good Notorious b.s.d. posted:you just like the defaults better in ST usable defaults is a meaningful advantage. not having to unbind literally every key combination and rebind them to something sane, as i did during the few months i used emacs, is a pretty big advantage Arcsech fucked around with this message at 00:58 on Feb 6, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
i guess learning emacs is ok if you want to be a developer for the rest of your life but holy lol @ that
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
two wrongs don't make a right
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
I use a text editor to edit text. vim is sufficient, I don't do much with it. for code use an ide. I don't see why anyone is launching processes and poo poo artisanally inside a text editor
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:lol at saying this when clojure exists ennnnh i don't get it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
Squinty Applebottom posted:i guess learning emacs is ok if you want to be a developer for the rest of your life but holy lol @ that you can use org mode and M-x tetris no matter what computer job you have
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
seriously though if you pay $70 for sublime text then just lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:oh jesus what's that thing where like you jerk off but you don't let it come out retrograde ejaculation
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 09:12
|
|
|
fleshweasel posted:seriously though if you pay $70 for sublime text then just lol well yeah cause you didn't expense it
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 09:15
|
|
|
loving around with a thing but i cant think up any good names for these objects there's a SourceGroup (say a book or a statue, some physical item) that contains multiple SourceItems (scans of pages, photos of the inscriptions on each side of the statues base) then there's a logical "SourceChunk" (a chapter in the book, the N+W inscriptions & the S+E inscriptions separately) so theres a many-to-many between SourceChunk and SourceItem. a SourceChunk may point to multiple SourceItems (long chapter), and a SourceItem may be pointed to by multiple SourceChunks (chapter ends & new starts on same page) SourceChunk is a poo poo name though, help pls
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:45
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:loving around with a thing but i cant think up any good names for these objects Have you tried butt or dong yet?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:49
|
|
|
thats not very helpful < >
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:51
|
|
|
name them after prominent apple ppl op
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:51
|
|
|
And also I don't really understand what you're trying to do with that schema not that it's wrong but maybe enumerating will help
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:51
|
|
|
i guess i want a word that means "logical part of something" that isnt so abstract that it loses all meaning
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:53
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:And also I don't really understand what you're trying to do with that schema not that it's wrong but maybe enumerating will help the logical chunks will have transcriptions of the text attached & other stuff
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:54
|
|
|
alternately, the chunks can be called SourceItem and then the sourceitems (pages/photos) can be called something else (but what)
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 11:55
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:alternately, the chunks can be called SourceItem and then the sourceitems (pages/photos) can be called something else (but what) SrcPaOrPho
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:01
|
|
|
enterpriseSourceBeanService
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:02
|
|
|
maybe just Group <->> Item <<->> Unit
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:02
|
|
|
SourcePart for logical parts, SourceItem for physical items? idk
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:03
|
|
|
i was actually trying that out when i posted im gonna postpone the decision until it becomes too difficult to change
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:19
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:im gonna postpone the decision until after it becomes too difficult to change
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:25
|
|
|
SourceElement?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
hmm i think Unit works best, it conveys that its discrete/unconnected to other units sorry for wasting yalls time
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:hmm i think Unit works best, it conveys that its discrete/unconnected to other units How dare you disrupt this bastion of productivity
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 13:48
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:enterpriseSourceDongService
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 13:49
|
|
|
call them blobs
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 17:19
|
|
|
all the years ive been using vim ive never installed a plugin once and my vimrc is 4 lines for syntax highlighting and setting tabs
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:all the years ive been using vim ive never installed a plugin once and my vimrc is 4 lines for syntax highlighting and setting tabs congratulations, you're using vim correctly it's not meaningfully extensible. so don't extend it
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
I have a plugin thing that runs the Erlang compiler when I save a file. then syntax highlighting, using a specific theme, tab/spaces, making trailing spaces, tabs, and nbsps show up as visible characters. then setting so search is case insensitive by default, new tabs = new buffers, and finally, the necessary undo tree visualisation.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:congratulations, you're using vim correctly extend this, pal ....................../´¯/) ....................,/¯../ .................../..../ ............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸ ........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\ ........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...') .........\.................'...../ ..........''...\.......... _.·´ ............\..............( ..............\.............\...
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:I have a plugin thing that runs the Erlang compiler when I save a file. you are not using vim correctly. this is a potentially serious illness i prescribe a strong dose of emacs, taken daily until the condition improves
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:03
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:you are not using vim correctly. this is a potentially serious illness Unfortunately, emacs would give me actual real world illnesses.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:25
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:you are not using vim correctly. this is a potentially serious illness maybe try this new fangled thing called a "GUI"
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
it would be cool if there was a good workhorse gui editor that was as good as vim or emacs
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:39
|
|
|
gvim
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 22:30 |
|
|
I challenge someone to race me in using EF to do something vs writing as proc and using ado.net because god damnit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2015 20:52
|
|