|
cremnob posted:it would be funny to know if the average google employee realizes they work for the new microsoft or not. yes most of them are aware they work for a good company that isn't going away anytime soon.
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 12:39 |
|
|
cremnob posted:lol i owned you so hard all you can do is laugh.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:lol business insider lmfaoooooooooooooooo
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
Wootman posted:i owned you so hard all you can do is laugh. i lol cause android directly contributes to the ad margin decline
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 02:05
|
|
|
cremnob posted:google reports sites and network. sites is what they operate, network is everyone else they're structuring their earnings reports to bury declines in display ads inside the otherwise healthy search division
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
this is like when hp used to put their pc and printer earnings in the same division to hide the sea of red in PCs
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
u cant know that anyway with how they report it. mobile is dumpstering their CPC and thats going to be the same for adwords as well as display ads
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
It's like stymie thunderdome in here
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:07
|
|
|
firefox has yahoo search as default, google is dead
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
Microsoft will fork chrome and release a lighter version that blocks Google ads
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
wait I mean Facebook
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:38
|
|
|
The Management posted:Microsoft will fork chrome and release a lighter version that blocks Google ads why would they fork the worst current rendering engine
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
chrome is v bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:49
|
|
|
purge it from the earth
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
i like chrome
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
chrome is the best browser, easily.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
Smythe posted:chrome is the best browser, easily.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
i feel reall bad for the morons who dont use chrome (easily the best broser, by a country mile) out of some dumb idealogical idiocy. "hurrrr flurrr" *long string of drool rags on the floor before being retracted into mouth, with dirt and stuff on it)* " chrome sucks, its way worse than a browser that uses the same reendering engine but doesnt have good syncing, a good omnibar, or good plugins. plugins and funtcaionarily is for loser human being. *pulls long nose hairs into mouth with tongue to suck off the snot and boogers off them* "safari or firefox or whatever ftw"
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:06
|
|
|
chome
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:14
|
|
|
best browser, first place at the special olympics, etc
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
ie could theoretically be good if it wasn't being developed by Microsoft Firefox is absolute garbage Safari is ok but that's more because all other mac browsers are really bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:16
|
|
|
Who is going to get the post # of the beast 6666 oh, now that I chked the thread the beast this g doesn't work.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:chome
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:ie could theoretically be good if it wasn't being developed by Microsoft i had to use a mac last year and safari was dogshit. so loving slow. my needs were not suited
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:ie could theoretically be good if it wasn't being developed by Microsoft firefox is absolute garbage and still the best, its a fuckin shame
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:51
|
|
|
Firefox is absolute garbage and it's the 2nd worst browser lol.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:55
|
|
|
Smythe posted:i feel reall bad for the morons who dont use chrome (easily the best broser, by a country mile) out of some dumb idealogical idiocy. "hurrrr flurrr" *long string of drool rags on the floor before being retracted into mouth, with dirt and stuff on it)* " chrome sucks, its way worse than a browser that uses the same reendering engine but doesnt have good syncing, a good omnibar, or good plugins. plugins and funtcaionarily is for loser human being. *pulls long nose hairs into mouth with tongue to suck off the snot and boogers off them* "safari or firefox or whatever ftw" 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 04:58
|
|
|
The Management posted:Microsoft will fork chrome and release a lighter version that blocks Google ads Still waiting on some US based ISP to start offering router-based adblocking. a French ISP did it to force Google to the table and turned it off after getting blowback but also after apparently getting the talks they wanted. I do wonder if an ISP would fall afoul of any of the proposed net neutrality regulations by performing adblock that a customer requested. Any opinions Fishmech? Would allowing an opt out be enough? Perhaps just a first-connection landing page with links to adblockers for whatever useragent is detected? Perhaps just a fever dream of mine.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 05:02
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:Still waiting on some US based ISP to start offering router-based adblocking. a French ISP did it to force Google to the table and turned it off after getting blowback but also after apparently getting the talks they wanted. there are already "christian" isps out there with mandatory filtering for "adult content" so it's presumably legal. http://www.hisnet.org/home.htm
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
wow that looks totally rad
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:there are already "christian" isps out there with mandatory filtering for "adult content" so it's presumably legal. i'm the third of the screen devoted to a gradient
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
this thread have its own bingo card yet? it loving should
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 05:34
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 05:40
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:there are already "christian" isps out there with mandatory filtering for "adult content" so it's presumably legal. browsin from this right now itt
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
cremnob posted:
why don't you submit it to the site you lazy rear end, like I told you to on Twitter http://didgoogleshutdown.com/submit I basically made this site for you personally. you can type out this screed but not take 1 minute to put it on the site? it's like you have ADD.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 06:01
|
|
|
idk ill do it next t ime i guess
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Boxturret posted:i'm the third of the screen devoted to a gradient as legal as Mormon-friendly edits of major motion pictures (not at all legal but exists pending the MPAA finding out where Elder Larry is manufacturing and stockpiling the stuff) PleasureKevin fucked around with this message at 06:11 on Feb 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 06:09
|
|
|
do it loving now poo poo head its one link away and mobile friendly
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
cremnob posted:actually that very thought scares google to death which is why fuzzy mammal just ignores questions about whether googlers actually think they're working for an innovative tech company. some of them may be still deluded, but at least externally ppl are starting to become cognizant of the fact that they are the new microsoft. google x pr labs was designed to combat this very perception from taking hold to retain employees and still be an attractive place to work in the eyes of silicon valley cause they've bled lots of A-players to facebook and others for years (which is itself a microsoft tactic). "googley culture" is just generic internet startup culture because thats what google the company is. its a bunch of disparate groups operating separately with no real vision. here's the latest evidence of that did you type this with your left hand or your right one?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 06:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 12:39 |
|
|
cremnob died with steve jobs, naught is left but an angry shade, confused into thinking it can bring down the company he sees as repsonsible
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 06:16
|
|