|
SYSV Fanfic posted:sudo sh nvidia-xx.x.xx.sh - who neds package management? I don't think you can do that on fedora because of selinux, i do use the nvidia installer on mint/ubuntu/debian though and its pretty simple Awia posted:i cant really remember now because it was a while ago, but i tried to install them using the package manager and it pulled down everything minus the 64bit poo poo, which i obvs needed so i had to go and find that myself i think you did something wrong, try http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia next time
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
Celexi posted:i think you did something wrong, try http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia next time
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:why would you need to install gfx drivers on a headless linux server? this is the Linux on the Dekstop thread, you illiterate dullard. GTFO
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:Linux, BSD, Solaris, etc all can run the same apps and UI so by definition one cannot really excel that far. Aside of critical missing pieces like running Microsoft Office well a lot of the problems come down to system integration and Linux always takes the lead due to more active development. Ironically BSD land will need a Systemd and pulse audio equivalent to improve their integration support. solaris and bsd can't run mainline gnome anymore.
Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 18:07 on Feb 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:04
|
|
|
cthulhoo posted:
kde takes an active interest in non-linux ports, so nothing stops you from being both a pcbsd crazy and an active contributor to kde.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
Smythe posted:this is the Linux on the Dekstop thread, you illiterate dullard. GTFO
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:kde takes an active interest in non-linux ports, so nothing stops you from being both a pcbsd crazy and an active contributor to kde. They're in the same boat we're in: systemd APIs own and are the best, if you want to port them to BSD, be my guest. http://blog.davidedmundson.co.uk/blog/systemd-and-plasma
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:They're in the same boat we're in: systemd APIs own and are the best, if you want to port them to BSD, be my guest. kde is evaluating systemd's impact on non-linux ports before diving in, instead of creating a hard dependency that renders the desktop suite useless for some fraction of users
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:14
|
|
|
gnome just told all non-linux users to go gently caress themselves, pre-emptively. that's a very different boat. see also: the thing about the minimize button 1. project states all bsd users can/should go gently caress themselves 2. bsd users and contributors disappear 3. well clearly we don't need bsd support, because there are no gnome users on bsd
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:14
|
|
|
GNOME never had a hard dependency on systemd and plenty of OpenBSD/FreeBSD contributors still exist (Antoine Jacoutot has been doing work on both).
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:32
|
|
|
Linux DRI is being ported over to *BSD as it develops in Linux, Wayland has some contributors that steadfastly delete Linux-isms from the code and replace them with OS abstraction layers (kqueue vs epoll, the usual poo poo), GLib recently said something like "look if we can't even test our poo poo on your platform then we're not going to carry the code in Git" and then got some more BSD contributors as a result BSD still needs some equivalent of logind though, and something like D-Bus needs to exist systemwide for the purposes of privilege separation, if nothing else.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:solaris and bsd can't run mainline gnome anymore. actually openbsd supports gnome 3 flawlessly, and as of a few months ago gnome 3 is live on freebsd as well but still a bit rough last I checked
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
why would openbsd support gnome flawlessly but freebsd be rough?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:why would openbsd support gnome flawlessly but freebsd be rough? Because they're more or less managed entirely separately, although they do exchange some code. Theo forked OpenBSD a long time ago, and they're quite different at this point. As I recall the port to OpenBSD was primarily due to one dude who did the bulk of the work; apparently most of their devs work on laptops with gnome; who knew?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
they seem more like an fvwm/xfce type crowd to me
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
Mr Dog posted:they seem more like an fvwm/xfce type crowd to me I dunno, they've never struck me as remarkably smart and attractive
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:I dunno, they've never struck me as remarkably smart and attractive its unbelievable to me that ppl with this opinion exist in the same reality as i do
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
Open bsd lol who even uses that trash
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
I could see using FVWM with rxvt and Midori actually after all, it turns out that nmcli doesn't suck horribly these days
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:41
|
|
|
netbsd is clearly the best bsd.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
OldAlias posted:netbsd is clearly the best bsd. unironically agree wuth thius post
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Let me also say that it is true that most of GNOME development happens on Linux, not BSD. And my personal opinion is that we should charge ahead with Linux as the kernel, not BSD, because it is better and more innovative, technology-wise. But that opinion has nothing to do with what we release as a project.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
I don't think the BSD community expects you to go to great lengths to deploy to their architecture. I expect eventually they'll work in compatibility with systemd of some sort, as right now it's a lot of work to port over.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 20:03
|
|
|
OldAlias posted:netbsd is clearly the best bsd. and notorious is the worst bsd
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:why would openbsd support gnome flawlessly but freebsd be rough? because openbsd, netbsd, and freebsd split in 1993
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:and notorious is the worst bsd ironically i hate bsd
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 20:37
|
|
|
why? bsds are very conservative, seems like it'd be right up ur alley
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 20:54
|
|
|
Mr Dog posted:why? bsds are very conservative, seems like it'd be right up ur alley packages patching ps -ef
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
OldAlias posted:netbsd is clearly the best bsd. gently caress that dragonfly master race
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
annapacketstormaya posted:gently caress that dragonfly master race dfbsd => dillon's freebsd
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:23
|
|
|
netbsd products
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:26
|
|
|
speecys corp confidential
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:ironically i hate bsd same but unironically *fartz*
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
  don't want to post the video it hurts
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:32
|
|
|
annapacketstormaya posted:gently caress that dragonfly master race but how will i run my critical production playstation 2 apache server
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
OldAlias posted:
pm me
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
in teh future everything will be a kawaii anime girl
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 23:49
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:solaris and bsd can't run mainline gnome anymore. You say this like its a bad thing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
it'll be a good thing if they start shipping with something other than gnome as default
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 00:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
kubuntu 15.04 and fedora 22 kde spin gonna use plasma 5 by default. If this is anything like KDE 4 it will be terrible.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2015 00:59
|
|
