|
Internet explorer has done that (since 7 I believe) and so does firefox.
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 22:11 |
|
|
firefox does the same thing on windows if you don't have the title bar enabled. only reason I keep the titlebar off tbh e:f;b
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:I actually legitimately did not know that was a feature. once you've got them visible you can just go to the view options and there's one to make them visible all the time the windows part of microsoft still cared about users in those days
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:how and why is x still a thing holy poo poo next are you going to tell me that xfree86 is too xfree86 still has two lonely guys who argue on the mailing list it's essentially dead though. they made a scary license change and X.org forked from the last version released under the original license
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 01:00
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:once you've got them visible you can just go to the view options and there's one to make them visible all the time
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 01:01
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:xfree86 is not a thing. killing x is my part-time job. I've had like three ideas for jokes based on this statemnt, and honestly none of them are worthy of the pos.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 01:08
|
|
|
Smythe posted:brasero cant add this mp4 to dvd author. other dvd tools UBUNTUFORUMS or the arch wiki or IDK are the most insane poo poo ever, what good dvd authoring tool? ubuntu.... linux.... ideally like for noobs. click file ... add... burn. u know. i dont watnt to make a video.ts and audio.ts then do a thing in terminal, hen burn them or whatever. wtf is that poo poo. jesus christ needs kdelibs though
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
k3b i think i need to.. like... add the video.ts and audio.ts? i cant find a way to just click the mp4 and have it author it. im loving retarded
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
have you tried imovie
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 07:51
|
|
|
.
Sassafras fucked around with this message at 09:09 on Mar 14, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 09:39
|
|
|
Sniep posted:no this is a 220 dpi screenshot its beautiful
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 11:07
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:lol why would you continue to paint a window while it's being moved desktop compositing? yeah we tried it, it made poo poo slower and there was even more tearing linux llol
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 12:04
|
|
|
cthulhoo posted:desktop compositing? yeah we tried it, it made poo poo slower and there was even more tearing Someone should compost the linux desktop honestly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 13:13
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:ah, yes, the one where the old menus appear as soon as you press alt so everyone who knows how to use a computer can carry on being productive? fwiw the menu bar is on by default in explorer.exe in windows 8(.1) afaict e: oic, it goes to the ribbons anyway welp not like I even remember what the old explorer.exe menus even looked like
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 16:49
|
|
|
ruby idiot railed posted:welp not like I even remember what the old explorer.exe menus even looked like like poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:04
|
|
|
lmao i just checked. the "Help" menu has an "Is this copy of Windows legal?" option
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:56
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:lmao i just checked. the "Help" menu has an "Is this copy of Windows legal?" option more anti counterfeit devices than a god damned $100 bill http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/howtotell/Software.aspx#Packaging
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
ah yes clearly anybody that has a pirated windows installation bought it unsuspecting from a wily criminal and was hoodwinked!
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:lmao i just checked. the "Help" menu has an "Is this copy of Windows legal?" option well, is it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
lol if your OS isn't free* *like beer. Apple operating system X
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:well, is it? clicking it sent me to a 404 on the microsoft website. so i still dont know!!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:ah yes clearly anybody that has a pirated windows installation bought it unsuspecting from a wily criminal and was hoodwinked! doesn't that menu option exist so employees rat out their companies?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
OP how do i tell if this copy is legal? i dont see anywhere in here to validate if this poo poo is Genuine or not
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
it's easier to tell if you use a real linux instead of that weak-rear end apple poo poo real linux is legal iff you have bought a license from sco for the stolen unix source code wait, you might need an ms patent license too I guess?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
is sco even alive yet lol if it is
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 20:21
|
|
|
cthulhoo posted:is sco even alive yet someone tried to get me to help them work on an actual sco unix machine last year money wasn't worth it
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 00:04
|
|
|
cthulhoo posted:is sco even alive yet the current incarnation of sco is a tiny company called xinuous. no, i don't know why they would take on a name that suggests snakes. it was formed by whoever bought unixware + opensewer when the previous sco got liquidated the "sco" that got famous for lawsuits was actually caldera linux systems. caldera, the linux people, bought the operating systems arm of the original sco group, then changed their name to "sco" after selling the OS business to caldera, the original sco changed their name to tarantella. tarentella in turn was sold to sun. their product is still technically offered for sale by oracle.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
ugh secure desktop is complete poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:Menu navigation was actually that regularly came up in user testing, and is something that regularly annoys me in Windows apps as well. Newer Windows apps don't have classic menubars anymore. you know where the “Preferences…” menu item is on OS X? in the application menu, in every app that follows the Human Interface Guidelines, which is virtually every single loving one of them that isn’t a lovely port—and even many of them that are. maybe you shouldn’t bother looking to utter poo poo operating systems like Windows for UI design inspiration. then again, I was saying that to the designers of X-Windows interfaces before X11R4 (and some yosposters) even existed. at least the Amiga and Atari ST tried to build on what the Lisa and Macintosh did. there’s a goddamn reason OS X has a menu bar across the top of the screen, just like the Lisa did 32 years ago, and it’s not “branding” or “momentum” or any such bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 06:46
|
|
|
eschaton posted:there’s a goddamn reason OS X has a menu bar across the top of the screen, just like the Lisa did 32 years ago, and it’s not “branding” or “momentum” or any such bullshit. having preferences under the apple menu was a good idea. why not be consistent for a thing every app has? the menu bar at the top of the screen is not. it made a lot of sense on a 640x400 lisa screen. it was loving stupid on a 1152x900 unix workstation. a single window title and menu bar at the top of the screen defeats the purpose of having multiple windows.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 06:49
|
|
|
by the way the actual reason for the bar is branding osx has no origins in macos at all. the early "rhapsody" releases didn't have the top-of-screen bar. they added that specifically to make it seem more like classic macos sure, it set back usability hugely, but it kept the ~*~ brand ~*~ intact
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 06:51
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:Cool, so you're saying that menubars are bad and you prefer a one menu that has everything. the menu bar is good. putting a menu bar in each window sucks. there’s a reason it was rejected during development of the Lisa in favor of a top-of-screen menu, and the ease of targeting objects with fine versus gross motor control in Homo sapiens has not magically changed over the last 35 years.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:04
|
|
|
eschaton posted:putting a menu bar in each window sucks. there’s a reason it was rejected during development of the Lisa in favor of a top-of-screen menu, and the ease of targeting objects with fine versus gross motor control in Homo sapiens has not magically changed over the last 35 years. it was rejected because the lisa had a primitive mouse and an extremely blurry 10" screen. homo sapiens is the same, our human interface devices have changed. rather, the affordability changed. good mice and large, sharp screens existed in 1983, but they didn't fit into the lisa's cost/price envelope Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 07:09 on Feb 28, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:07
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:having preferences under the apple menu was a good idea. why not be consistent for a thing every app has? windows have titles separate from the app, you're conflating the two. and don't you think Apple actually studied the acquirability of targets at the edges of a screen versus the interior? and the ease of use of a menu bar versus a pop-up menu under the mouse pointer? (hint: they did) I suppose if you're using a lovely system that doesn't have a reasonable mouse acceleration curve you might have trouble hitting the menu bar. on a Mac (or a NeXT or on BeOS, all of which actually handle mouse acceleration right) you can hit it just fine on even the biggest multi-screen systems, faster than any other alternatives.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:13
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:how and why is x still a thing holy poo poo next are you going to tell me that xfree86 is too what's xfree86, why does there need to be a separate X for BSD and Linux on the PC?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:14
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:by the way the actual reason for the bar is branding the nextstep menu isn't that different than osx. it was the same for all applications, just like macos
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:22
|
|
|
eschaton posted:what's xfree86, why does there need to be a separate X for BSD and Linux on the PC? xfree86 was where x used to be developed until one day it became closed-source so the community forked it and now we have xorg
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
what a loving joke bsd. a menu bar across the whole screen is a bad idea. like windows? like gnome? lol stfu
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:27
|
|
|
in fact gnome 3 is literally the worst offender because it has TWO full length bars on the top and bottom AND per-application menus lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 22:11 |
|
|
pram posted:in fact gnome 3 is literally the worst
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2015 07:34
|
|