|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJB3BAgCW10 Nosferatu man and fat bathtub baby broke up. 
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 16:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 06:19 |
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJB3BAgCW10 Aurini's take quote:First question: Did I waste all the dollars I spent on this? Beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 17:42
|
|
|
Oh my gosh manchild slapfight it's wonderful. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
Ahahahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
As it turns out, getting assholes to work together is difficult, who would have guessed?
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 19:41
|
|
|
This is gold. Pure loving gold. I thought this thread was petering out and here comes some drama to save the day.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
This reminds me of all the problems over the Atlas Shrugged movies, haha. What a bunch of douchbags. Aurini is obviously the worst with that Manosphere white supremicst bullshit, but I don't think I know much about this other guy. Apparently he's super against the kind of people Aurini is and associates with? Why the gently caress was he doing this to begin with? Of course, he's a Gamer Gater, so he obviously can't be much better.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 20:31
|
|
|
The other guy is a massive rear end in a top hat too. Aurini's explanation is breathtaking. Its one of the most childish things I've ever read.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
If nothing else, Owens tried to handle the break-up professionally while Aurini basically started claiming Owens was an incompetent loser virgin con man.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 21:53
|
|
|
1stGear posted:After the past two months of communiques with Jordan, I strongly suspect that he undermined this project because of an irrational jealously of Roosh, and any man who’s able to relate to women easily. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2015 22:22
|
|
|
I thought Nosferatu and the Oaf were a classic team-up. Shame to see it end in tears. Also sad to see the Oaf thrown under the PUA bus like that. More road kill on the Red Pill highway.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
quote:This project will see fruition, and it will be a palpable blow against the Social Justice movement. quote:A major feature of this project was that it would be apolitical,
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 00:50
|
|
|
 Apolitical is a synonym for conservative, since claiming to be apolitical is inherently an endorsement of the status quo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 00:53
|
|
|
I think he claims to be apolitical because he thinks only people with opinions he considers wrong can be political, while he's just being factual. What a loving rear end in a top hat. I can't wait till this either never comes(or his version never comes out or gets less attention then the other dude's), or it comes out and absolutely nothing happens. Is he seriously loving arrogant enough to think he's going to stop "Social Justice"(as vague and broad as that is) in it's tracks? Is he just trying to sell it better to get more money? Both?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
WickedHate posted:I think he claims to be apolitical because he thinks only people with opinions he considers wrong can be political, while he's just being factual. What a loving rear end in a top hat. Yeah, dude already said it was conservative. I don't see what you aren't getting.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
DStecks posted:
Which is bullshit. Apolitical reporting can be quite liberal, if you're actually informing people and not pulling a fox news, where you make your viewers dumber.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
1stGear posted:Aurini's take
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
DStecks posted:
ikanreed posted:Which is bullshit. Apolitical reporting can be quite liberal, if you're actually informing people and not pulling a fox news, where you make your viewers dumber. This isn't really what neoreactionaries mean by "apolitical." (Remember, they're reactionary, not conservative; they don't like the status quo and desire a radical return to something resembling a previous state, or at least resembling what they imagine to be a previous state.) They're saying it's outside of politics in the narrow sense, i.e., it's not primarily or directly about elections, political parties, legislatures, and the like (which neoreactionaries, like many radicals on the left, tend to think don't really change anything). The idea is to move things rightward by influencing long-term cultural trends instead. In practice, I suspect this attempt at culture-shaping is mostly futile, because it's done too overtly and from too far outside the Overton Window. Silver2195 has a new favorite as of 03:52 on Mar 4, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 03:44
|
|
|
If you look like a vampire, and tell the world about your plans to fight social justice...WITH A HUMAN SKULL IN THE BACKGROUND AT ALL TIMES... Congratulations! You are literally a supervillain.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
They might mean that 100% Body-Fat Danzig agreed not to bring up the fact that Lymphoma John Waters is a fascist, and Lymphoma John Waters agreed not to criticize democracy in return.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
neonnoodle posted:If you look like a vampire, and tell the world about your plans to fight social justice...WITH A HUMAN SKULL IN THE BACKGROUND AT ALL TIMES... Congratulations! No, he's more like a poor-to-need's-work-villain. A subparvillain if you will
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
Jack Gladney posted:No, he's more like a poor-to-need's-work-villain. A subparvillain if you will Yeah, the thing is, they think they're showing an image of power and strength. Supervillian is what they go for. What they actually get is much closer to "Complete loser who is also immoral"
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 04:02
|
|
|
If you don't know that "apolitical" means "cool with fascism/conservatism", you haven't hung around enough skinheads or listened to enough neofolk.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 04:34
|
|
|
Didn't the makers of Tropes Vs. Men run off with their Kickstarted funds too?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 04:46
|
|
|
p. sure "apolitical" just means "doesn't challenge any of my beliefs"
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
The Time Dissolver posted:Didn't the makers of Tropes Vs. Men run off with their Kickstarted funds too? Yup. I'm going to guess that, if nothing else, the raw footage of The Sarkeesian Effect will be released. But Anita is still currently winning the whole "crowd-funded professionally produced videos about feminism and video games" thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 05:22
|
|
|
1stGear posted:Yup. I wonder how much of that footage will be sound bites of Anita saying she doesn't even play videogames and awkward interviews with nerds talking about ethics in games journalism in what they think is presented in a very profound (red pill, if you would) way but just comes off as horrible entitled manbabying? I'm going to guess "all of it"
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
The Time Dissolver posted:Didn't the makers of Tropes Vs. Men run off with their Kickstarted funds too? It turns out whiny manbabies aren't actually very good at seeing projects through to conclusion. Who knew?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 07:11
|
|
|
From Orgy of the Will:quote:The microscientists claim that there "are" 4, or 6, or 27 dimensions, dispute each other's claims and try to "find" exactly how many dimensions there "are". But a dimension is not something that exists outside the brain, but a mere concept that the brain creates and projects onto its environment in order to "understand" it (i.e., as I'll be explaining shortly, predict its behavior with a view to shaping it for its wishes). The microscientists have once more mistaken their models for reality, and have confused the question of the number of dimensions of the universe (infinite — which is to say the same thing as one), with the number of dimensions in their models (the more the better). The more dimensions a brain can resolve, the more subtle, more powerful it is. Which is why the microscientists say that there "are" 4, or 6, or 27 of them — and I say infinite. This is, quite simply, empirically incorrect. Even without the contradiction inherent in declaring infinity to be equal to one. Fun fact: some models predict an extra time dimension. Which is super weird when you think about it. I am a math guy though, not a physicist, so I couldn't tell you exactly what that would mean because I don't quite get it. quote:Wittgenstein is — once you have got past "that hocus-pocus of mathematical form", in which, like Spinoza, he encased and masked his philosophy — utterly exasperating. Ethics is transcendental, aesthetics is transcendental, logic is transcendental! — everything is transcendental! But all these things are in the universe, you goddamn brainless twit, how can they be transcendental! The universe is everything, nothing is transcendental! that's just a word imbeciles use to signify that they are incapable of understanding something! — And sure enough, he understood neither logic, nor ethics, nor aesthetics — among a great many other things, practically everything! — partly because he didn't bother reading enough of what his predecessors wrote, but mainly because he was a little man with small experiences and therefore incapable of making any progress in psychology, which is where all these "transcendental" categories begin — and end. What a thorough and well argued take down of Wittgenstein. Edit: Also he hates the jews quote:Napoleon and Hitler: two faces of the same coin, with devastation following at the end in either case. Why the extra hatred for the latter? Partly the far greater scale and scope of WWII over the Napoleonic Wars, partly the increased power in the means of war and the ensuing devastation, partly Jewish lies and propaganda. That no one studies history any more and therefore has no clue who Napoleon was and more importantly what he did, is not exactly helping either. Nietzsche would be so disappointed. Hate Fibration has a new favorite as of 08:58 on Mar 4, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 08:56
|
|
|
neonnoodle posted:If you look like a vampire, and tell the world about your plans to fight social justice...WITH A HUMAN SKULL IN THE BACKGROUND AT ALL TIMES... Congratulations! He could at least be tactful enough to come up with a neologism of some sort that sounds spookier, to avoid turning absolutely everyone who doesn't already agree with him away. Pope Guilty posted:If you don't know that "apolitical" means "cool with fascism/conservatism", you haven't hung around enough skinheads or listened to enough neofolk. It's a derivative of the idea of "third position" politics. In short. We are not socialist/leftist, and we are not liberal/capitalist, therefore we are not political.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 10:49
|
|
|
We're independents who happen to hate people who aren't white, jews, asians who are white, and them god hatting commie faggots! The same kind of people who understand that being a republican is a bad thing, but don't understand why it is.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
Hate Fibration posted:From Orgy of the Will: I mean the best part is he's doing a bunch of  reality is just in your miiiind man poo poo to "counter" physicists like they never thought of that before or something and he obviously has no idea that there's entire massive branches of the philosophy of science that deal with this poo poo better than his half-baked-pot-brownie ideas.Also he pretty badly misses why things are argued to be "transcendental" and responds with a "but you thought of it and you're in-universe therefore it can't apply out-of-universe" like a goddamn philosophy 101 paper ugh this guy
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 23:47
|
|
|
Aurini's made a conversation between the two of them available!. In a twist, it turns out Tub Beast is the reasonable one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:09
|
|
|
Wait he released those logs hoping it would make him look good?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
It makes Aurini look good to all the MRA mutants he's hoping to court with the garbage he puts out. The Bathtub Oaf suspects that some women may actually qualify as human, so he's out of the club.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:27
|
|
|
I suspect that if you had a single person with Lardo's non confrontation and Baldie grimskull's hygiene, you'd have an almost tolerable person. A worse goon perhaps. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
Does the bald one really have a girlfriend? I mean, I don't believe it, but I want her to exist because she'd have to look like the Baroness from GI Joe or something, right? EDIT: no picture, but of course: http://www.torontosun.com/news/alberta/2010/11/08/16039256.html quote:In a decision released Monday, provincial court Judge Terry Semenuk said Davis Aurini was acting in self-defence when he assaulted Amanda Lockhart during a manic episode. The part that surprises me the most is that he apparently has a special movie-watching helmet, although I guess that shouldn't really be a surprise. I AM GRANDO has a new favorite as of 01:57 on Mar 6, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Aurini's made a conversation between the two of them available!. Denmark? Wait, Roosh was that guy? Holy poo poo, these guys live in a small world full of very small and pathetic people.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
Jack Gladney posted:Does the bald one really have a girlfriend?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 06:19 |
|
|
Jack Gladney posted:Does the bald one really have a girlfriend? I mean, I don't believe it, but I want her to exist because she'd have to look like the Baroness from GI Joe or something, right? Lol gently caress that judge
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:13
|
|