|
Deadpool posted:I mean he could still be Reader with a completely different powerset and different origin, but that begs the question of why would they tell him to include the character and then make him completely different except for the blind thing? His role seems to be the same; To search for and guide newly-transformed Inhumans.
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 16:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 05:53 |
|
|
Soule might just have been told "eyeless dude guides noobs, work it in", and he came up with a much cooler, and impractical for TV concept.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
Isn't the reader the kid who created the Ms Marvel Pirate universe in her 2000s series?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 17:12
|
|
|
So if this Reader guy reads the Bible does the world flood? Does it revert back to pre-creation? Does he create God if God didn't exist already? I wanna know more about that, sounds like an interesting power that has to be artificially bound somehow...
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 18:45
|
|
|
Electromax posted:So if this Reader guy reads the Bible does the world flood? Does it revert back to pre-creation? Does he create God if God didn't exist already? Yes, it's not limitless. He carries braille plates around on his belt with certain words or power concepts on them to use in any given situation. He can only do three different things before his power is gone. And each of the three times he can do it he gets progressively weaker. He recharges by sleeping. He's one of several new characters that are really interesting like Iso and Frank McGee (he's the best) that Soule has created in Inhuman.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
Deadpool posted:Frank McGee (he's the best). He is, and the would really fit great into AoS.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 09:17
|
|
|
It's still so weird to me that they're doing a big Inhumans arc. Not just because the film is still years away, because the pertinent source material is no more than a year and a half old. But I do hope it works.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:21
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:It's still so weird to me that they're doing a big Inhumans arc. Not just because the film is still years away, because the pertinent source material is no more than a year and a half old. But I do hope it works. I doubt the Inhumans will sit idle. They could be a part of Guardians or Capt Marvel.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:It's still so weird to me that they're doing a big Inhumans arc. Not just because the film is still years away, because the pertinent source material is no more than a year and a half old. But I do hope it works. Inhumans were introduced in the 60s.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:52
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Inhumans were introduced in the 60s. Pertinent.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:07
|
|
|
At least 99% of all Inhumans stories prior to fall 2013 are about Attilan and/or the Royal Family characters, so unless you're expecting to see those on SHIELD before the 2019 film, they're not particularly pertinent. It's really only with Inhumanity that they've even attempted to develop any sort of Inhumans mythos that isn't entirely centered around those two things.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
Deadpool posted:Tom Ellis has been cast as Lucifer on the new Fox show. He's got a long list of TV credits on IMDB but I've never seen a single thing on it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 09:12
|
|
|
First look at Supergirl:
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:10
|
|
|
Nice cosplay
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
 I like it, looks as if it could easily fit in with either Man of Steel or Flash/Arrow.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
Well, it's already better than Smallville. Not like that's hard to accomplish though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
I think it looks great? I mean, thank god it's not the current crotch emblem version of her costume and maybe it'll sway the comics away from it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:I think it looks great? I mean, thank god it's not the current crotch emblem version of her costume and maybe it'll sway the comics away from it. wait what?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:19
|
|
|
Well c'mon I don't think "crotch emblem" can possibly be any clearer.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
Welp, now I can't unsee it. A framed S for "super" and framed lady parts for "girl"
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:28
|
|
|
Oh wow they're actually drawn as flesh colored tights in that one. I guess that's early? They don't bother anymore.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:Well c'mon I don't think "crotch emblem" can possibly be any clearer. I'm more upset about the exposed knees, why don't her boots cover her knees?!
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
And the boots that may have been intended by the designer (Lee?) to have knee-pad-y parts, but literally everyone else has seen, drawn and coloured as having absurd gaps. The TV outfit is pretty good. I'd say it's a bit dark, but all the DC live-action outfits are dark, so it's not exactly the Supergirl designer's fault.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
Gaz-L posted:And the boots that may have been intended by the designer (Lee?) to have knee-pad-y parts, but literally everyone else has seen, drawn and coloured as having absurd gaps. I think it might actually be that the upwards pointing parts are part of the pants design, and just the rest of the red is boots. TV: It's also a darkened photo so it's hard to say how it will look on TV.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:38
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:
Meh.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:42
|
|
|
I really like the leggings. More class than I expected. Would have liked a high collar, though. That comic version a few posts ago is terrible, but I love my Superpeople high collared like that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
It just seems so plain overall, but I'll take that over how DC designs most of their heroines. That skirt feels really old fashioned though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
I think they're just tights/hose, not actual leggings. Unless she's a 14 year old girl from when I was in school, where skirts over leggings and jeans was the poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
Hope the colors look a little brighter in daylight but looks good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
JT Smiley posted:It just seems so plain overall, but I'll take that over how DC designs most of their heroines. That skirt feels really old fashioned though. It's just the classic Supergirl costume with leggings. DC did design it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:It's just the classic Supergirl costume with leggings. DC did design it. Yeah, they used the tried and true design for a reason. That reason is that it's a good design.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
Looks fine to me. Not sure about the lack of yellow in the emblem, but I guess that's just what I'm accustomed to. There's no harm in trying something different.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:10
|
|
|
Seems to be a thing. Flash ditched the different coloured field on the emblem too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:13
|
|
|
True enough. Though I think if you look closely at Wells's future newspaper in the pilot episode, he seems to be wearing the bright red costume with the white background on his chest insignia.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
As far as I'm concerned as long as a costume isn't agressively bad it's fine. This is what we used to have to deal with BE GRATEFUL. Colors are darkened because irl people wearing tight bright colors look loving ridiculous.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:45
|
|
|
Guy Gardner: "In raging day, in fearful night..."
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
Gaz-L posted:Guy Gardner: "In raging day, in fearful night..." Yeah I have no idea why Blue Lantern and Killer Frost and uh...Poison Ivy? were in the 1997 Justice League pilot.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
Actually, that's a pretty decent, if cheap, Ice costume.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 00:00
|
|
|
I find crushed velvet works best for TV
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 05:53 |
|
|
Deadpool posted:Yeah, they used the tried and true design for a reason. That reason is that it's a good design. I don't remember the boots being so high. They kinda dominate the outfit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 00:01
|
|
