|
infernal machines posted:you have never updated sharepoint have you? infernal machines posted:there's a reason best practice for update deployment is to run a few weeks behind, deploying everything to your test lab first. it ain't just because of third party software infernal machines posted:i have a client that still has an NT4 server on their domain, running some old production DB that's never been updated infernal machines posted:actually, sometimes they do. *computer janitors for a living* "it's a stupid product that makes no sense and has no coherent usecase" fuckin lol
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
infernal machines whos job is to computer janitor microsoft products and believes that microsoft is untouchable thinks that an apple product is bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:34
|
|
|
cremnob, the guy using tasseomancy to DYP his apple stock is here to tell you about how aplle watch is beautiful jewelry
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:38
|
|
|
i might buy one of the cheap ones cuz why not i own every other thing apple makes might as well
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:39
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:cremnob, the guy using tasseomancy to DYP his apple stock is here to tell you about how aplle watch is beautiful jewelry lmao ur literally dropping DYP in every post because i told you to go back to IYG
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:40
|
|
|
DYP apple stock?????????????????????????????????????
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:41
|
|
|
cremnob posted:*computer janitors for a living* yea gross nerds said this about the iphone and ipad too im not saying its gonna be as successful as the iphone or ipad but we've definitely heard this record before
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:44
|
|
|
as the saying goes “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:47
|
|
|
THC posted:yea gross nerds said this about the iphone and ipad too wasn't cremnob just bitching about this truth is in the middle poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
also lol at you going all tory cmos on my post history and ignoring how much i defend apple here I've owned macs since the 90s, i can still spot a stupid market chasing product when i see one
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
those are all ur dumb posts in the latest microsoft thread also lol at market chasing when the entire "smart watch" category exists because of the rumors going back years that apple was working on some kind of wearable and then everyone rushed some lovely POS into the market
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
does cremnob normally freak out like this because i've kinda missed it every time if so also lol what an awful little nobody
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
Fabricated posted:what an awful little nobody
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:07
|
|
|
cremnob posted:everyone rushed some lovely POS into the market yes apple didn't rush I guess
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
man, I'm as pro-Apple as it gets, but all smart-watches are a dumb loving idea, it doesn't matter who makes them I'm also fairly certain the Apple watch will be a huge initial success
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:21
|
|
|
Tusen Takk posted:the only gold option that will look good on white people is the rose gold You're right but I still don't like yellow gold, wish they made a white gold.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
the apple watch is actual jewelry which is why people will want to wear it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVnqLPfm6zE&hd=1 this and everything else thats gotten pumped out recently is garbage and u can tell they are all crude products with lovely materials. literally babby's first time working with metals
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:49
|
|
|
s h u t u p c r e m n o b
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:man, I'm as pro-Apple as it gets, but all smart-watches are a dumb loving idea, it doesn't matter who makes them An incredibly precise timepiece. A more immediate, intimate way to connect. An intelligent health and fitness companion.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
not jewelry jewelry  
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:36
|
|
|
cremnob posted:An incredibly precise timepiece. shameful as gently caress
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
cremnob posted:not jewelry "we should put a big thick black plastic thing on the bottom to attempt to hide that our watch is thicker than an android fan"
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:50
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:shameful as gently caress
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
i'm RICO'S LUNCH
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:52
|
|
|
"the Apple Watch doesn't fit under my shirt cuff without serious effort, if at all" -the guy who took that RICO'S LUNCH picture
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:52
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:i'm RICO'S LUNCH I'm LON 6:09
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:53
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:I'm LON 6:09 if only there were ways to show a second time zone or an alarm without text, maybe some kind of pointy.... thing connected where the hands are
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:54
|
|
|
The Apple Watch is thin as a Rolex http://www.cultofmac.com/297331/apple-watch-thin-rolex/
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
does charlie rose's rolex fit under his sleeve? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 22:59
|
|
|
cremnob posted:The Apple Watch is thin as a Rolex which rolex because the deepsea is like 18mm thick
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
Then we looked at his Rolex up close and I suggested the Apple Watch might only be two or three millimeters thicker. Alex wears a Rolex Submariner 14060M so we looked up the specifics of and it comes in at 11 millimeters. That’s thicker than a Swatch, which starts at 8 millimeters, but there are also Swatch watches that go up to 10.5 millimeters, so it isn’t huge either. Then we looked up the specifics of the Apple Watch and to our surprise it turns out the Apple Watch is only 11.5 millimeters thick.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:16
|
|
|
nobody who wears a rolex is buying this
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
i still don't get why they're so fixated on this as a luxury product. the iphone and ipad were never "luxury" products per se, they were just best in class products that the wealthy decided to buy because they were the best even if some revolutionary new usecase appears out of the aether and there becomes and actual point to owning a smart watch, the iwatch could comfortably be the best in class smartwach without trying to compete with rolex and omega
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:26
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:nobody who wears a rolex is buying this or an omega or a bulova or a longines or a jeanrichard or any watch that uses moving parts to track the time
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:28
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:i still don't get why they're so fixated on this as a luxury product. the iphone and ipad were never "luxury" products per se, they were just best in class products that the wealthy decided to buy because they were the best the iPhone (and Moto Razr) were both considered "high-end" because when they came out the only way to get one was to pay the full price up front, no carrier would subsidize them. Then the carriers started subsidizing them and every clownshoe in town had one but the perception remained.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:nobody who wears a rolex is buying this they absolutely will. they'll wear their apple watch daily and the rolex will be left at home for *special occasions* but even that will slip away when they realize the utility they'll be giving up by not wearing the apple watch
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:30
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:i still don't get why they're so fixated on this as a luxury product. the iphone and ipad were never "luxury" products per se, they were just best in class products that the wealthy decided to buy because they were the best I'm not sure either, all this early access in fashion magazines and stuff is confusing if it's good it will become fashionable; trying to make it so before it's out seems pretty lame
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:31
|
|
|
cremnob posted:they absolutely will. they'll wear their apple watch daily and the rolex will be left at home for *special occasions* but even that will slip away when they realize the utility they'll be giving up by not wearing the apple watch lmao no
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:31
|
|
|
cremnob posted:they absolutely will. they'll wear their apple watch daily and the rolex will be left at home for *special occasions* but even that will slip away when they realize the utility they'll be giving up by not wearing the apple watch ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
people who will buy the ugly rear end gold watch: - persian men - black women - white trash housewives any of these groups may or may not have lots of credit card debt but want to own a gold watch that falls in their "affordable" price range but is a big brand name $2999. only at the apple store. also note that many poors own androids, often out of being dumb rather than not being able to afford them because you can get a 5s with the touch id and all for like $0 on contract now. by selling the gold watch to poors they will also have to get iphones for the things to be remotely useful. apple sells another few million.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:36
|
|