|
Froghammer posted:I know this is just a thing that people say, but don't do that, it's just a shittier Eternal Witness. It's just a second Eternal Witness, you mean!
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 16:00 |
|
|
suicidesteve posted:It's just a second Eternal Witness, you mean! It technically doesn't care about Torpor Orb or Hushwing Gryff, either.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
Froghammer posted:I know this is just a thing that people say, but don't do that, it's just a shittier Eternal Witness. Its not a thing people say its just RME's thing to repeatedly say that in the last couple of days to every single spoiled card.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
bhsman posted:It technically doesn't care about Torpor Orb or Hushwing Gryff, either. Unfortunately it doesn't get back whatever spell you used to cheat it and 20 other creatures into play with.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
ungulateman posted:Well, now that there's Actual Evidencetm I'll happily admit I was wrong. Tis the season to be wrong about Magic. I think MTG would be way more fun if less people cared about being right or wrong about stuff 
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Mr. Peepers posted:Unfortunately it doesn't get back whatever spell you used to cheat it and 20 other creatures into play with. Eh, it's still another EWit effect for EDH.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
You think Magic would be more fun without winning or losing? Hmm. HMM.Angry Grimace posted:Its not a thing people say its just RME's thing to repeatedly say that in the last couple of days to every single spoiled card.  Yeah I can't tell if it's intentional parody, trolling or just being cute.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
Angry Grimace posted:Its not a thing people say its just RME's thing to repeatedly say that in the last couple of days to every single spoiled card. im sorry you dont have a baby themed deck with child of alara as your commander
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:52
|
|
|
Spiderdrake posted:You think Magic would be more fun without winning or losing? Hmm. HMM. It's so low effort it doesn't matter what it's supposed to be.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:52
|
|
|
Its like D- trolling. The Force of Will troll was a B and the trolling of buying the Force of Will troll and then talking about Force of Will's forthcoming impact on standard was like an A.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
Is this from a new mobile DotP or something?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
cams posted:Is this from a new mobile DotP or something? Probably from that Magic Duels: Origins game coming out (DotP 2016 replacement?)
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
Angry Grimace posted:Its like D- trolling. The Force of Will troll was a B and the trolling of buying the Force of Will troll and then talking about Force of Will's forthcoming impact on standard was like an A. hmm yes let me tell you my treatise on the nature of trolling in the wizard poker thread *puts pipe in mouth and blows out bubbles*
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
Could Stratus Dancer be playable in a control sideboard or a tempo deck? A Welkin Tern without the drawback is an OK turn two play, and then later on it can be a negate attached to a reasonable body.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
RME posted:im sorry you dont have a baby themed deck with child of alara as your commander Ok forget my stupid Ur-Dragon idea this is MUCH better
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:34
|
|
|
forbidden lesbian posted:hmm yes let me tell you my treatise on the nature of trolling in the wizard poker thread *puts pipe in mouth and blows out bubbles* Hey if it stops Angry Grimace posting about cards I say it's a good thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:35
|
|
|
forbidden lesbian posted:hmm yes let me tell you my treatise on the nature of trolling in the wizard poker thread *puts pipe in mouth and blows out bubbles* This post will go great in my EDH deck.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Could Stratus Dancer be playable in a control sideboard or a tempo deck? A Welkin Tern without the drawback is an OK turn two play, and then later on it can be a negate attached to a reasonable body. I actually think it's a good sideboard card against the mirror in control decks. The other control player would have likely sided out most of their removal, so either it hits a good spell, or it eats a Downfall, both of which are pretty solid value.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
Stratus Dancer looks really good at disrupting control fighting aggro, but control on control is an interesting dynamic for boarding it in. 3UU for a counter + a 3/2 flier is pretty solid if it hits a larger spell, and it eats two spells if it has to be removed. I kinda wonder if some silly Temur morph deck is going to show up. I bet that will make Count Bleck really excited.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:Hey if it stops Angry Grimace posting I say it's a good thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:13
|
|
|
 Feast of Dragons - 4RR Sorcery Sacrifice all creatures you control. For each creature sacrificed this way, put a 4/4 Dragon token with flying on to the battlefield. OR Destroy any number of target creatures, for each creature destroyed this way, its controller puts a 4/4 red dragon creature token into play. Not sure which is right.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:17
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:
So this is basically Hellion Eruption except they fly? E: I can't quite tell, that's just a rare, right? TheKingofSprings fucked around with this message at 03:20 on Mar 6, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:18
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:
It looks like that Dragon's Maze Izzet card. E:dragonshift 
Rinkles fucked around with this message at 03:21 on Mar 6, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:18
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:E: I can't quite tell, that's just a rare, right?  Does lend credence to the theory Sarkhan is red / x though (or not a walker at all but I'm not holding my breath)
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
Spiderdrake posted:That appears to be our wacky red mythic, sorry Holy gently caress that's awful E: Hellion Eruption was just a rare, what the gently caress Wizards
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
I do dig the flavor of offering your creature's bodies for some dragon goodness, though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:Hey if it stops Angry Grimace posting about cards I say it's a good thing. Oh cool do I get to be mcmagic now?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
I prefer Angry Grimace to dumb poster call outs and empty posting.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:30
|
|
|
Angry Grimace posted:Oh cool do I get to be mcmagic now? Interesting note: So far this set is multicolor dragon mythics, multicolor dragon rares, dragon commands at rare, a multicolor walker and the one article implied there is a cycle of multicolor uncommons. Feels like only the dragons kept multicolor? Maybe?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:39
|
|
|
Terrible new player question. Been working on constructing a Sultai Control deck since I got an Ugin out of my first draft ever the other day. Looking around online, I see land looking a lot like this a lot: 2 Island 3 Swamp 2 Llanowar Wastes 4 Opulent Palace 4 Polluted Delta 2 Temple of Deceit 4 Temple of Malady 1 Temple of Mystery 2 Yavimaya Coast 1 Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth Often there's 1 Bloodstained Mire as well. What's the purpose for the Yavimaya, Llanowar and the Mire? Why not throw in different scry or the life gain lands? I actually have all of that except for the 4 Temple of Malady, which I'm replacing with a Jungle Hollow at the moment. Also, Mindscour Dragon is hilarious and has performed very well for me in my drafting so far.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:39
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Holy gently caress that's awful While it's still not a great mythic, there is worlds of difference between 4/4s and 4/4 flyers and it's at the same CMC. Just be glad one more mythic not making you pay for it!
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
Alaan posted:While it's still not a great mythic, there is worlds of difference between 4/4s and 4/4 flyers and it's at the same CMC. Just be glad one more mythic not making you pay for it! I will give it that it would make a hilarious finisher in Jeskai Ascendancy but still
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
Dohaeris posted:Terrible new player question. Been working on constructing a Sultai Control deck since I got an Ugin out of my first draft ever the other day. Looking around online, I see land looking a lot like this a lot: Usually pain lands in place of Scry or Gain lands is because you want a certain ratio of lands that come into play untapped in order to not lose tempo. If you need to cast a Bile Blight on Turn 2 or a 3-drop on Turn 3, that becomes hard when all but 5 of your lands come into play tapped. Bloodstained Mire is solely there to further enable your delve spells. Also provides a slight benefit when you have Courser out and need to shuffle away a useless card on top of your deck. qbert fucked around with this message at 03:48 on Mar 6, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:
MTGS says the correct language is the second one e.g. Battlefield Thaumaturge works on this.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:04
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:
nice i can play this in my Crosis, The Purger EDH deck where i also use dragonshift + hivemind, conspiracy, and xenograft to make it so that everyone MUST play dragons MUST.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:05
|
|
|
Minority Deport posted:
This will go great in RME's dragon EDH deck.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:05
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:This will go great in RME's dragon EDH deck. man i already said this
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:06
|
|
|
Man, so far this set seems super Timmy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:10
|
|
|
Angry Grimace posted:Man, so far this set seems super Timmy. It's Dragons: The Movie: the Set: The Game It kind of comes with the territory
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 16:00 |
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:It's Dragons: The Movie: the Set: The Game It does, but I'd like to think there'd at least be a few cards spoiled by now I'd be interested in building around.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 04:17
|
|