|
 hmmm.... touch targets significantly smaller than the finger you use to interact with them. where have we seen that before?
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 21:36 |
|
|
infernal machines posted:
pretty sure in the announcement video where they showed how they worked and why they shouldnt be poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 05:45
|
|
|
i'm waiting for the 1/8th inch jack do you think they might go for 'pro' audio on the beats edition and have a 1/4th inch jack on the watch?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 05:50
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:i'm waiting for the 1/8th inch jack nobody wants a drat cord hanging from their wrist to their head idiot
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
it's pretty stupid too since the thing doesn't work without an iphone really anyway playback controls, sure, but nobody's going to be loading their katie perry jams on their watch
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:03
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:playback controls, sure, but nobody's going to be loading their katie perry jams on their watch counterpoint - all the tons of people who modded old ipod nanos were they? into watches if they were msft they would have went full strike at bat with that and made wrist mp3 players galore but its apple so they actually understand what's going on so they didnt and wont
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:10
|
|
|
the watch is bad and stupid and they'll sell a bunch at first to morons and then no one will ever upgrade or buy any more. its apples version of glass
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
Sniep posted:nobody wants a drat cord hanging from their wrist to their head idiot you keep saying this but u know deep down that this is what a lot of people want
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:you keep saying this but u know deep down that this is what a lot of people want no. it's not. nobody wants that. maybe from the iphone in their pocket to their head so they can hear their choons interrupted when they get a call and take the call, but not from their wrist. nobody wants the cord going to their wrist.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:23
|
|
|
it's almost as if bluetooth doesn't exist
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:25
|
|
|
what if that same cord was the one going to their mophie XL pack that can keep the apple iwatch powered through an 8 hour day at work?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:25
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:it's almost as if bluetooth doesn't exist i also think BT should be redundant in your watch and your phone double the radios double the fun or should i say.. double the Beats™
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:27
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:the watch is bad and stupid and they'll sell a bunch at first to morons and then no one will ever upgrade or buy any more. its apples version of glass the hip, edgyt, unique opionon we needed on this, page fourteen of the aaple watch threasd
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:28
|
|
|
how big do u think the speaker in the apple iwatch BEATS edition will be? block rockin or just coffee-table-boombox sized?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
too bad apple couldnt solve the arm hair problem and deliver any of the unique health features they promised months ago
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:how big do u think the speaker in the apple iwatch BEATS edition will be? exactly the size of the hifi with a red b on the side
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:the hip, edgyt, unique opionon we needed on this, page fourteen of the aaple watch threasd your welcome I feel sometimes the pos gets too caught up in circlejerks sometimes and needs a contrarian edge
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:31
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:exactly the size of the hifi with a red b on the side sniep, do u think the new hifi will have a wireless connector for the watch or now do you see why you need that 1/8th in / 1/4th in / optical out jack so you can play your dope iTunes playlist to everybody in earshot?!?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:31
|
|
|
cremnob get out of this thread and go post on the flame thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:sniep, do u think the new hifi will have a wireless connector for the watch or now do you see why you need that 1/8th in / 1/4th in / optical out jack so you can play your dope iTunes playlist to everybody in earshot?!? i dont follow your question everyone's audio desires are different. some want bluetooth to their headphones, some want cabled inputs and some want to share their music nobody wants to do that from their watch in the context of the watch
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:38
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:too bad apple couldnt solve the arm hair problem and deliver any of the unique health features they promised months ago the health hires they made were months before the first announcement so they were never gonna ship them in the first one
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
Celexi posted:cremnob get out of this thread and go post on the flame thread he can't, it's too contrived for his organic shitposting style
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 06:45
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:too bad apple couldnt solve the arm hair problem and deliver any of the unique health features they promised months ago where'd you read that?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 13:34
|
|
|
redhotapplerumors.com
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 13:37
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:the watch is bad and stupid and they'll sell a bunch at first to morons and then no one will ever upgrade or buy any more. its apples version of glass glass failed more because google gave up on it than any issues with the product itself not to imply that there weren't issues with the product, just that they could've had it last a lot longer
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 13:56
|
|
|
computer parts posted:glass failed more because google gave up on it than any issues with the product itself looks like a clown wearing them, giant gently caress all ear piece that is conveniently hidden in any product shot has 20 minute battery life Nothing google could do was going to fix this pos and I'm glad they killed it because it makes a bunch of people who spent $1500 United States earth dollars look like even bigger chumps
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 14:22
|
|
|
Ah, yes!! my favorite organizational structure - the "pile"
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 16:00
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:where'd you read that? wsj I think
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 16:40
|
|
|
yah, google this url http://www.wsj.com/articles/challenge-of-apple-watch-defining-its-purpose-1424133615 end of the article
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 16:44
|
|
|
computer parts posted:glass failed more because google gave up on it than any issues with the product itself
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:too bad apple couldnt solve the arm hair problem and deliver any of the unique health features they promised months ago they promised step tracking which it has and a pulse meter and it has one*, the rest of that "oh they had to drop functionality" was idiots trying to make a story, the feature set for the thing was probably set close to a year ago *wrist pulse meters aren't very good
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 17:27
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:
for values of "accurate" worse than the cheapest quartz watch ever made
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 17:28
|
|
|
Sir Jony Ives posted:"the molecules are closer together in Apple gold." purestrain lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 18:08
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:purestrain lmao the gold used by apple is much more valuable than regular gold, it's 8 karat, the lower the number the better
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
qirex posted:they promised step tracking which it has and a pulse meter and it has one*, the rest of that "oh they had to drop functionality" was idiots trying to make a story, the feature set for the thing was probably set close to a year ago step trackers and pulse monitors already exist
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:step trackers and pulse monitors already exist yes and because they exist they are built-in to the new apple watch, this story that they promised anything beyond that is false
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:the gold used by apple is much more valuable than regular gold, it's 8 karat, the lower the number the better it's gold ceramic composite or some poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
qirex posted:for values of "accurate" worse than the cheapest quartz watch ever made mechanical watches are cool because they're fascinating devices, not because they're the best thing at their job
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fc1b9aaa-c31c-11e4-ac3d-00144feab7de.html#slide0 they compare it to the Lisa in the 4th paragraph
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 21:36 |
|
|
why not compare it to the 20th anniversary mac?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 19:12
|
|