|
TEAYCHES posted:Just to pick out the most important point here in partisan politics, if someone like Cheney had attempted to conduct all state email business on a homebrew server and Cheney's staff decided what to release - does it even have to be extrapolated further? Well... Also, Jeb Bush ran his own email server for official business while Governor of Florida. To his credit, he's released all of those emails to the public. In the true spirit of transparency, the released emails include Social Security numbers and other personal information of various constituents who emailed him about government business.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 02:31 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 15:29 |
|
Joementum posted:Well... Jeb's email open house bonanza was possibly even more retarded, but I am mostly railing against progressives who are going to attempt to defend Clinton for something indefensible.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 02:33 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:Jeb's email open house bonanza was possibly even more retarded, but I am mostly railing against progressives who are going to attempt to defend Clinton for something indefensible. Didn't see a lot of follow-up to this, but didn't someone earlier in the thread mention that the State Department has a separate system from any communications involving classified information, and that this @hilldog.com account would only have been used for stuff that wouldn't need to be transmitted on that network?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 02:42 |
|
AreWeDrunkYet posted:Didn't see a lot of follow-up to this, but didn't someone earlier in the thread mention that the State Department has a separate system from any communications involving classified information, and that this @hilldog.com account would only have been used for stuff that wouldn't need to be transmitted on that network? The only proof that Clinton's homebrew account was only used for communications that didn't need to be transmitted through official State Department channels is that Clinton's staff says that the homebrew account was never used for stuff that should have been transmitted through official State Department channels. That is the point. There is no one to verify this except Clinton's own staff.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 02:51 |
|
Joementum posted:Also, Jeb Bush ran his own email server for official business while Governor of Florida. To his credit, he's released all of those emails to the public. In the true spirit of transparency, the released emails include Social Security numbers and other personal information of various constituents who emailed him about government business. Bush/Musk 2016: Digital e-transparency in a post-privacy socially networked world
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 02:52 |
|
The good news is that Hillary clearly values personal email privacy and will end the NSA surveillance program as soon as she takes office
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 02:55 |
|
A Republican Senator who's running for President has a staffer who wrote for a neo-Confederate publication and (this is the real shocker) it's not Rand Paul (this time)! In case you don't want to click, it's Lindsey Graham.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:02 |
Joementum posted:A Republican Senator who's running for President has a staffer who wrote for a neo-Confederate publication and (this is the real shocker) it's not Rand Paul (this time)! Dude, that's not even the worst story about Lindsey Graham to break today. I'd say that whoever did that oppo dump should have waited till a day when Lindsey wasn't shooting himself in the foot, but that would be a long wait . . . http://www.vox.com/2015/3/11/8193751/lindsey-graham-military-coup
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:08 |
|
I see some of us are ready for the transition to the Imperial phase of our history. I guess Graham is Marius?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:18 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:Well when Chaney did it, it was a minor kerfuffle that didn't go anywhere because he started claiming the VP was neither part of the executive nor part of the legislative branch. Yeah, and it wasn't just that. The Bush administration spent 6 years running email through GOP-run email servers and those emails were just plain gone, not archived, nothing. Between that and Jeb running his governor email through a private server the double standard is absolutely stark here. I think the Bush 43 stuff came up as a result of the US Attorneys firing scandal investigation. Oddly enough, Chris Christie was appointed as a federal attorney by Bush in 12/01, which might be the timeframe in which the firings happened (so they could hire people like him).
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:20 |
|
Okay so, let's just entertain a hypothetical. Debate season starts and, by Super Tuesday, Walker and Bush have imploded. Like, utter catastrophe. Think "Rick Perry's "Oops" multiplied by Herman Cain's sexual harassment" level of collapse. Rubio, meanwhile, fails to get off the ground despite the only other feasibly electable candidates running have become total jokes, and has dropped out. Who does the GOP nominate? Because I honestly think at that point they'd go "gently caress it" and nominate Ted Cruz.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:22 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Okay so, let's just entertain a hypothetical. Kasich. He's Christie without the baggage.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:23 |
|
What Fried Chicken said. Although if the wheels had come off the cart that badly, I imagine we'd see a lot of third-tier candidates jumping in to exploit the chaos. I wouldn't bet against Tennessee governor Bill Haslam: he's won his state by crushing margins each time, yet he's managed to govern as a moderate and wrangle his insane Tea Party legislature, and he's disgustingly wealthy (somewhere around 10x Romney wealth). He would be a tough contender, even if he doesn't have much of a national profile right now.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:26 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Okay so, let's just entertain a hypothetical. I'd say that's an unlikely hypothetical. And speaking of things that are unlikely... Willard 'Mitt' Romney posted:After putting considerable thought into making another run for president, I’ve decided it is best to give other leaders in the Party the opportunity to become our next nominee.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:27 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:The only proof that Clinton's homebrew account was only used for communications that didn't need to be transmitted through official State Department channels is that Clinton's staff says that the homebrew account was never used for stuff that should have been transmitted through official State Department channels. That is the point. There is no one to verify this except Clinton's own staff. The state department and DoD have their own 'internet' for classified stuff and unless someone from state/dod/nsa went to where the server was and hooked it in, classified material could not have been sent to it unless she saved it to a flash drive and moved it to a regular computer.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:30 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:The state department and DoD have their own 'internet' for classified stuff and unless someone from state/dod/nsa went to where the server was and hooked it in, classified material could not have been sent to it unless she saved it to a flash drive and moved it to a regular computer. She could have burned it to a CD and written "Lady Gaga" on it with a sharpie.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:34 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Okay so, let's just entertain a hypothetical. Rand Paul. Last man standing.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:49 |
|
Joementum posted:A Republican Senator who's running for President has a staffer who wrote for a neo-Confederate publication and (this is the real shocker) it's not Rand Paul (this time)! Tbf you try finding qualified Republican staff from South Carolina who haven't written for a neo-Confederate publication at some point.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 03:50 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:The state department and DoD have their own 'internet' for classified stuff and unless someone from state/dod/nsa went to where the server was and hooked it in, classified material could not have been sent to it unless she saved it to a flash drive and moved it to a regular computer. This is assuming that Hillary Clinton and the people she communicates with are robots who were incapable of expressing information and ideas unless they could attach a file from a secured network. This is retarded, on the face of it. But it's good that, like I said, I'm railing against progressives who are going to attempt to defend Clinton for something indefensible - and there are people who will surely defend Clinton against the indefensible.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:00 |
|
How could you possibly communicate and express classified information unless it was on the state department domain?? - someone who does not understand how human communications or computers work.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:01 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:How could you possibly communicate and express classified information unless it was on the state department domain?? - someone who does not understand how human communications or computers work. Yeah, well, prove it. *all communications on a homebrew email server which weren't sorted by Clinton's staff have been destroyed*
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:04 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:Dude, that's not even the worst story about Lindsey Graham to break today. I'd say that whoever did that oppo dump should have waited till a day when Lindsey wasn't shooting himself in the foot, but that would be a long wait . . . Why on earth would anyone be dedicating any oppo research to Lindsay Graham, this story could quite possibly help him in the primary (in that his numbers have literally nowhere to go but up). comes along bort posted:Tbf you try finding qualified Republican staff from South Carolina who haven't written for a neo-Confederate publication at some point. Even most Southern Republicans have been savy enough not to openly admire David Duke.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:12 |
|
ReindeerF posted:I wonder if Truman would seem engaging today, or cold and off-putting. He's like every President's favorite modern President. Aw shucks factor off the scales, but I've no clear idea what he'd look like with today's media on his rear end. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN_UJJ9ObDs It's like a scary-as-hell Bobby Jindal. e: Also that Graham logo has GOT to be a photoshop. It HAS to be. I know conservatives are loving human trash with no self-awareness but SOMEONE in that julep-swilling cockup's office HAD to be like "YO LINZ, THINK YOU'RE LAYING THE HITLER ON A LITTLE THICK HERE." "Security through Strength" with a loving red/white/black eagle? Seriously? Is he going to announce a continental Anschluss next month? FAUXTON fucked around with this message at 04:20 on Mar 12, 2015 |
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:16 |
|
'Blah blah blah indefensible blah.' We were never going to read those e-mails anyway, even if she did use a .gov address. gently caress anyone who's trying to make this a thing.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:27 |
|
FAUXTON posted:e: Also that Graham logo has GOT to be a photoshop. It HAS to be. I know conservatives are loving human trash with no self-awareness but SOMEONE in that julep-swilling cockup's office HAD to be like "YO LINZ, THINK YOU'RE LAYING THE HITLER ON A LITTLE THICK HERE." "Security through Strength" with a loving red/white/black eagle? Seriously? Is he going to announce a continental Anschluss next month? I feel there's an Ernst Rohm joke in there if you put just a little more effort into it.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:40 |
FAUXTON posted:e: Also that Graham logo has GOT to be a photoshop. It HAS to be. I know conservatives are loving human trash with no self-awareness but SOMEONE in that julep-swilling cockup's office HAD to be like "YO LINZ, THINK YOU'RE LAYING THE HITLER ON A LITTLE THICK HERE." "Security through Strength" with a loving red/white/black eagle? Seriously? Is he going to announce a continental Anschluss next month? Service guarantees citizenship!
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:47 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:This is assuming that Hillary Clinton and the people she communicates with are robots who were incapable of expressing information and ideas unless they could attach a file from a secured network. This is retarded, on the face of it. But it's good that, like I said, I'm railing against progressives who are going to attempt to defend Clinton for something indefensible - and there are people who will surely defend Clinton against the indefensible. It's possible she's been sharing classified stuff inappropriately, I'm just saying it probably wasn't done via her private email server. Classified information being shared over her email is the only real thing that could stick from this for everyone not already reflexively voting R.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 04:48 |
comes along bort posted:I feel there's an Ernst Rohm joke in there if you put just a little more effort into it. Lindsey Graham's thing has always been jumping that extra quarter-twitch every time a Real Conservative Man says "FROG" , and these days it's getting really really hard to be the craziest, furthest-jumping frog.
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 05:11 |
|
I would definitely not like to know more about Lindsey Graham. Frankly, I can guess quite enough already.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 05:26 |
|
Deep Hurting posted:I would definitely not like to know more about Lindsey Graham. Frankly, I can guess quite enough already. Do you like catillions amongst the myrtles on a warm summer night?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 05:57 |
|
Chokes McGee posted:You mean the ones that were already heavily slanted red to begin with and had democrats put up the weakest milquetoast dorks who ran away from a president who got uninsured people insurance for the first time in like ever? Sure do! Yes! That one. And in 2016 when the field is tilted blue and the Republicans put up a lovely candidate (I'm just assuming here, I'll admit) the email issue will be completely played out as far as swaying undecided people. I'm still thinking the reason this came out during the same media cycle as Bibi's speech is that it's being aired out preemptively by Hillary's own people. You think House Republicans weren't aware of her email address during their Benghazi investigations? They probably wanted to wait until closer to the election to raise it themselves, but now it's out a year and a half early and it will be old news when the election is in full swing.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 06:19 |
|
VanSandman posted:'Blah blah blah indefensible blah.' We were never going to read those e-mails anyway, even if she did use a .gov address. gently caress anyone who's trying to make this a thing. As I've stated already this is merely an attempt by left-Dems pretending they can alter 2016. Republicans aren't even a consideration on this one.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 12:07 |
|
Nonsense posted:As I've stated already this is merely an attempt by left-Dems pretending they can alter 2016. Republicans aren't even a consideration on this one. Are you saying that the lesson left-Dems learned from the GOP is that to make headway with the American people you need to keep the outrage machine fueled with meaningless non-stories?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 12:27 |
|
FAUXTON posted:e: Also that Graham logo has GOT to be a photoshop. It HAS to be. I know conservatives are loving human trash with no self-awareness but SOMEONE in that julep-swilling cockup's office HAD to be like "YO LINZ, THINK YOU'RE LAYING THE HITLER ON A LITTLE THICK HERE." "Security through Strength" with a loving red/white/black eagle? Seriously? Is he going to announce a continental Anschluss next month? The original logo was red/white/blue, but replacing the blue with black makes it better (The rest is unchanged)
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 12:43 |
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:Not quite. As much as D&D reflects fondly on that debate as some slam on Ryan, I seem to recall that snap polls right after the veep debate were evenly split on the winner, if not giving Ryan a slight edge. The general consensus was that people thought Biden was "too mean" to Ryan, or something like that.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 13:21 |
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:The general consensus was that people thought Biden was "too mean" to Ryan, or something like that. iirc that was the general Republican consensus.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 13:23 |
|
Flash polls of a VP debate are always going to be evenly split unless one of the candidates totally fucks up because nobody watches VP debates except rank partisans.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 13:27 |
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:The general consensus was that people thought Biden was "too mean" to Ryan, or something like that. Which shows once again how uninformed the average voter is. Ryan is the one who told a canned story about a family in a car accident to try and make a point during the debate and there's NO WAY he didn't know Biden's first wife and daughter were killed in a car crash. It was a blatant attempt to upset Biden and throw him off his game so he could "win" a debate.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:03 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:Yeah, well, prove it. *all communications on a homebrew email server which weren't sorted by Clinton's staff have been destroyed* Why do you keep saying homebrew? There's been no indication that it was anything of the sort or do you just not know that has a different meaning and you're going off that awful AP article?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:54 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 15:29 |
Chadderbox posted:Which shows once again how uninformed the average voter is. Ryan is the one who told a canned story about a family in a car accident to try and make a point during the debate and there's NO WAY he didn't know Biden's first wife and daughter were killed in a car crash. It was a blatant attempt to upset Biden and throw him off his game so he could "win" a debate. If Ryan had grabbed Biden by the hair and slammed his face on the table repeatedly those same people would have been pumping their fists in happiness. They don't care about "meanness" it's just they know in their hearts their lameass candidate got beaten clearly and fairly and they had to rationalize it somehow that Biden somehow cheated or was rude just like how Obama clearly got elected through underhanded tricks they can't quite explain.
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 16:00 |