|
The MSJ posted:Insurgent IMAX poster Is the movie about a syringe? it's what the negative space suggests...
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 07:02 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 13:25 |
|
I like how Vader's helmet has eyes.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 10:53 |
|
Poster Six-Pack: How to screw up the features of your marquee attraction Edition Perry King IS Sasquatch IN... Believe it or not, this is actually the same flick as "Striking Back". Starring not-a-Yeti perry King Good Fred, great stuart, more effort needed on Roddy. And why is Fred riding a Moon Hopper made of his own severed head? ZOMBIE CHIBA! Giant Jim Kelly-in-a-Wind-Tunnel! (EDIT: Holy crap, I just realised the apparently-sleeping guy on the right is Harold Sakata) Worst. Godzilla. Ever. (It's "Destroy All Monsters", in case you're wondering. And no, King Kong does not appear in this film)
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 11:29 |
|
KinkyJohn posted:Is the movie about a syringe? it's what the negative space suggests...
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 12:10 |
|
KinkyJohn posted:Is the movie about a syringe? it's what the negative space suggests... Maybe spoilers? http://divergent.wikia.com/wiki/Serums
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:09 |
|
Distorted Kiwi posted:Worst. Godzilla. Ever. Holy crap. As a lifelong Godzilla fan and Italian-American, I felt compelled to look this up, and stumbled upon these gems: (Note that these are all still for a King Kong-less Destroy All Monsters) For contrast, here are the 'correct' posters for this film: Now I think I'm going to dig around for more blatantly lying Italian posters for kaiju films.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:31 |
|
Distorted Kiwi posted:
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:50 |
|
So that the inspiration for this Luke Skywalker figure.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 17:10 |
|
Opened a bunch of tubes I've been neglecting yesterday. Goddamn the Horkey FOTR is unbelievable.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 17:36 |
|
Improbable Lobster posted:It doesn't matter whether or not you make a profit on if it's a violation. Most companies just ignore people that aren't making money off it.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 17:41 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:Wouldn't it be an IP violation, not a copyright one? Assuming the work is not based off/includes parts of another work which the artist does not have copyright to. It's a picture of Skeletor. It's based off the toy / comic / cartoon / whatever. It's an IP violation because copyright is a kind of intellectual property. There is also a Skeletor trademark, but I doubt this picture would violate it. You cannot patent the concept of a Skeletor.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:03 |
|
I've been trying to patent the concept of a muscular skeleton for years and let me tell you it is impossible.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:11 |
|
The "creepy hooded skeleton" image wasn't exactly pioneered by Hannah Barbara.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:13 |
|
JohnnySavs posted:The "creepy hooded skeleton" image wasn't exactly pioneered by Hannah Barbara. No, but making that skeleton buff as all get out was https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34XqgEljCEw
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:16 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:It's a picture of Skeletor. It's based off the toy / comic / cartoon / whatever. It's an IP violation because copyright is a kind of intellectual property. There is also a Skeletor trademark, but I doubt this picture would violate it. You cannot patent the concept of a Skeletor.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:17 |
|
JohnnySavs posted:The "creepy hooded skeleton" image wasn't exactly pioneered by Hannah Barbara. Copyright violation is based on actual copying, not mere similarity, so what matters here is that the artist actually based the drawing on Skeletor. Not every creepy hooded skeleton is Skeletor, but that one is. A Buttery Pastry posted:You seem to be saying that it's a copyright violation (and thus also an IP violation), but I'm not sure how that can be the case? That painting of Skeletor takes the idea of Skeletor, but it doesn't use any parts of an existing work (as far as I know), which means it's not infringing on the copyright of any work featuring Skeletor. I am saying that. Derivative works are covered by copyright. Batman Begins, for example, was legally made because the filmmakers gained the right to make a derivative work of the original comics and the many other Batman works from which it was inspired. All of that was covered by copyright (and probably also some trademark stuff for promoting the movie as a BATMAN movie). Copyright can be somewhat non-intuitive. It isn't just where you photocopy something: adaptations, translations, etc. are all covered. It serves the goal of covering the full range of exploitation of an original idea, which can branch out in a lot of different ways. Also, what sort of intellectual property do you think it is if not copyright?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:31 |
|
That's not the best example. The filmmakers of Batman Begins were under contract to the owner of Batman.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:33 |
|
Aphrodite posted:That's not the best example. The filmmakers of Batman Begins were under contract to the owner of Batman. It's a little more complicated than that. The Batman copyright is owned by DC Comics, which is a subsidiary of Warner Bros. Warner Bros. has a license to use the character from DC Comics, which they were able to receive because they own the drat company. But a license will still have to have been granted as they aren't the same legal entity. But, sure, a cleaner example might be Fox having a license to make X-Men movies.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 18:41 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Also, what sort of intellectual property do you think it is if not copyright?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 19:12 |
|
Dave put up a response today. http://www.daverapoza.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-strange-thing-about-art-theft.html quote:The Strange Thing About Art Theft
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 20:59 |
|
Has social media started referring to this as 'Skeletor-gate' yet?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 23:12 |
|
4 years ago I drawed the tortoises in a half-shell hero. 8 years ago, I killed a hobo just outside of Reno.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 23:47 |
|
Just got another VHS lot (there's a handful here that were never released on DVD), some of these would've been a bitch to track down individually so I'm glad I got these all together at once. 52 Pick-Up, haven't seen it, but I love Frankenheimer, and I'm still on a Scheider kick after watching Sorcerer recently. Alien Warrior. No idea. Looks pretty lovely though! You'd think for a movie called BEER, it'd be a little easier tracking down info on this one. Nope. Another version, and hey, I'm pretty sure that's David Allen Grier on the cover. Deadly Force. Stoney Cooper will be the name of my next bong. Delta Force. gently caress YEAH CHUCK! Delta Force 2, please Chuck don't hurt'em! Haven't seen this one either, but I love Rodney so hopefully it's good. 8 Million Ways To Die. Is that supposed to be Jeff Bridges on the cover? Who the hell knows. The Emerald Forest. That poster's pretty blah, but that tagline is great. The Hidden. This movie loving owns. Hitz. Like Cuba Gooding Jr. there in the background, I have no idea what the gently caress's going on in this one. Lockdown. Starring that one guy! Love Letters. Yowza. Wondering if Jamie Lee Curtis pulls them titties out in this. Scandalous. Quite. Mannequin. A classic. That Andrew McCarthy is going places! Once Bitten. Jim Carrey's first movie. He had nowhere to go but down after this. Sean Connery is not putting up with your poo poo. Phantom of Death, again no idea, but Ruggero Deodato! The Sicilian. Sure, why not. Fast Talking. Another ultra-obscuro movie with no good images online. And finally, the motherfucking Dice-Man.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:28 |
|
RIP Paul Walker.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:48 |
|
What does Ryan Reynolds have to do with Paul Walker?
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:54 |
|
kiimo posted:What does My eyes adjusted.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:56 |
|
ruddiger posted:Phantom of Death, again no idea, but Ruggero Deodato! Michael York is turning into Donald Pleasance.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 01:16 |
|
profbobo posted:Opened a bunch of tubes I've been neglecting yesterday. Goddamn the Horkey FOTR is unbelievable. You have really nice paperweights
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 03:33 |
|
Character posters for Age of Adaline, a movie in which Blake Lively outs herself as an immortal and as such is the perfect woman to marry Deadpool who was cursed to never die by Thanos.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 04:33 |
|
ruddiger posted:Just got another VHS lot (there's a handful here that were never released on DVD), some of these would've been a bitch to track down individually so I'm glad I got these all together at once. 1: Cannon group and golan-globus = cheesy fun. 3: Rip torn was such an abuser it's hilarious. 4: Stoney Cooper's actor is named "Wings Hauser", that's an even better name! Holy poo poo! 8: Wow, I didn't know Roseanne Arquette was once pretty. She's great in that bruce willis hitman movie though! 9: Powers Booth, while an awesome name, always just reminds me of Sudden Death (not a bad movie, but I can't imagine him as a good guy now) 13?: M Emmit Walsh in a movie like that? Lmao. The 80's were so weird. 15: Cleavon Little? Oh man, what a fall from Blazing Saddles.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 06:06 |
|
Agents of SHIELD seems to be doing a poster for every post-winter break episode. I'm posting this one here for featuring the giant looming visage of Kyle MacLachlan.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 08:43 |
|
Is Hannibal Lecter in that show?
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 08:47 |
|
I'm not a huge Blake Lively fan but that series is like already nominated for a key art award, you can count on that.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 08:56 |
|
The MSJ posted:Character posters for Age of Adaline, a movie in which Blake Lively outs herself as an immortal and as such is the perfect woman to marry Deadpool who was cursed to never die by Thanos. They should've made the 2015 photograph an instagram filtered semi-nude selfie in a poorly lit bathroom while she holds up a giant iphone
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 13:36 |
|
CelticPredator posted:
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 14:49 |
|
The MSJ posted:Character posters for Age of Adaline, a movie in which Blake Lively outs herself as an immortal and as such is the perfect woman to marry Deadpool who was cursed to never die by Thanos. Neat idea absolutely cratered by the awful trailer and Blake's total lack of personality.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 17:14 |
|
Knowing nothing about that movie and having only seen the posters, my immediate thought was 'they're going to ruin this interesting premise by making it into a terrible romance, aren't they.' Then I checked the IMDB synopsis and yep.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 17:19 |
|
The romance is not the problem. Blake Lively is the problem.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 17:22 |
|
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 18:06 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 13:25 |
|
However dumb the movie ends up being I like that series of posters
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 18:44 |