|
Asphyxious posted:There are unquestionably scum currently in those voting for me. Because you're getting bussed?
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 13:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 10:14 |
|
|
Still doesn't make sense to vote for me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 13:55
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Still doesn't make sense to vote for me. I will just go on faith that if it's all a brilliant town scheme you will explain it in time. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 13:56
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:I will just go on faith that if it's all a brilliant town scheme you will explain it in time.  there's no brilliant town scheme it's just the same poo poo I always do day one but I've aimed for "funny" instead of "callous". As always I'm keen to keep a bit of heat on me to keep scum guessing but I'm not sure where the idea that everything I'm doing is some grand plot. I'm a linguist not a loving wizard.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:00
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:
Oh, that idea came from you. I thought the earlier stuff was just Gaspy Not Too Comfortable Playing Scum 2: Scum Harder, but then you said the Beet case was all a joke to stir up reactions and look for suss bandwagon votes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:03
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Oh, that idea came from you. I thought the earlier stuff was just Gaspy Not Too Comfortable Playing Scum 2: Scum Harder, but then you said the Beet case was all a joke to stir up reactions and look for suss bandwagon votes. Yeah so that was a thing, but also intended as a parody of Beet's claims of "some day getting a lynch on me". I was more just saying dumb poo poo about Beet but then when some people started choking in with "yeah he's got a point" despite how utterly dense that was I thought I'd see where it went. My line of reasoning is day one tends to be pretty dull but generally it's all I get to participate in so I'm just having a laugh and scumhunting where I can.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:08
|
|
|
Choking = chiming
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:08
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Yeah so that was a thing, but also intended as a parody of Beet's claims of "some day getting a lynch on me". I was more just saying dumb poo poo about Beet but then when some people started choking in with "yeah he's got a point" despite how utterly dense that was I thought I'd see where it went. Yeah, but then is it even that scummy though, when you look at how the same town have voted on equally bad cases before? I don't know if that kind of gambit actually does distinguish anything in the end. But I do not know how to scumhunt, so I think I'll just sleep on this for now, nighters!
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:18
|
|
|
Anyhoo, I'm off to bed. See if you can restrain your lynch-lust till the morning.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:18
|
|
|
I'd rather not vote Asphyxious with very little nothing to go on, as he is a legit useful scum hunter if he is town. Same with Bif.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:22
|
|
|
I have come to the conclusion that Bees is behind it all.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:25
|
|
|
I am enjoying the relatively productive d1 we're having--instead of going for the default Anidav d1 (from which we hardly ever learn anything) we're actually talking about stuff. The day length is way more conducive to proper d1 scum hunting than the regular 12-hour "oh poo poo we've gotta lynch before deadline" steez and I'm guessing it'll be much harder for scum to hide behind silence/work/life excuses. People I'm looking at and why (in no particular order) Cumburgs: went weirdly hard against Beet about his stance against lynching Anidav straight away. MMG: Weird reasoning for voting Gaspy so far...in that I'm not sure if it's a joke vote or a serious one. From my perspective Gaspy is always inscrutable. Gaspy: Always loving inscrutable. I'll figure you out one of these days!  Kommando: looks suss to me but always looks really suss, possibly just his play style. The quieter players are harder to get a handle on  POST MORE FOLKS.Gough Suppressant posted:I'd rather not vote Asphyxious with very little nothing to go on, as he is a legit useful scum hunter if he is town. Same with Bif. Same. For me, Bif, Beet, and Gaspy are good because they bounce off each other and everyone else, and give me lots of fodder for analysis. I'd be happier to vote someone who's less consistently pro town. Old Dirty Cumburgs posted:I have come to the conclusion that Bees is behind it all. So you're saying...everything is bees?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:26
|
|
|
Mithranderp posted:
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
Your suspicion is totally fair, and I was uncharacteristically aggressive in that exchange. If it makes you all feel any better, there's been a method to my madness, and I've secretly been in-character this whole time
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:34
|
|
|
Anidav posted:But it's Auspol so they are all probably at work. Its hard to tell. Nah I was playing Pokemon D&D, and then I went to bed.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:36
|
|
|
everythingWasBees posted:Nah I was playing Pokemon D&D, and then I went to bed. Hey bees, are you scum? You gotta tell me if you're scum.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:37
|
|
|
Mithranderp posted:So you're saying...everything is bees? Beads?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:41
|
|
|
Old Dirty Cumburgs posted:Literally every crew is Matoi's crew, he posts in every crew. he was our's first
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:42
|
|
|
holy poo poo i thought first day was usually the vote random person and hope they're scum day. this is a thing. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:48
|
|
|
current thoughts on scum is that anidav is bad at mafia, and either matthew beet or cburgs, if not both, are probably scum. because jesus christ you two.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:55
|
|
|
also i started skimming at some point why're y'all voting for that machine gun person?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:56
|
|
|
Old Dirty Cumburgs posted:Hey bees, are you scum? You gotta tell me if you're scum. nah im town
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:57
|
|
|
so uh ##unvote i guess i'm not sure how people managed to appear scummy on day one but they managed it
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
this thread moves extremely quickly and I am glad for long days I'm having a really hard time getting a read on anyone because there's a lot of super defensive talk d1 anidav lynch is very quickly becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy because he begs to avoid it which makes people get annoyed at him but he seems to do it no matter what so I don't really feel like it's worth pursuing, this time personally, I will be very interested to see how people's banter from today matches up to banter from tomorrow. maybe some inconsistencies will appear because we don't suddenly have a whole bunch of new data to look at
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:09
|
|
|
whats for dinner posted:this thread moves extremely quickly and I am glad for long days by "no matter what" I mean whether he's scum or town, vanilla or powered
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:09
|
|
|
everythingWasBees posted:so uh ##unvote i guess I am going to trust you, friend, and hope you trust me when I say that I, too, am of the town.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:12
|
|
|
Old Dirty Cumburgs posted:I am going to trust you, friend, and hope you trust me when I say that I, too, am of the town. ##vote Old Dirty Cumburgs
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:20
|
|
|
everythingWasBees posted:##vote Old Dirty Cumburgs Bees... I'm keepin' my vote on MMG, though He's bandwagon-y, he's overzealous to say "I'm town! Soooo town! Mr. Town of town right here!" and it rings false.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:21
|
|
|
whats for dinner posted:personally, I will be very interested to see how people's banter from today matches up to banter from tomorrow. maybe some inconsistencies will appear because we don't suddenly have a whole bunch of new data to look at That's an interesting thing to say, why do you believe we won't have data?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:21
|
|
|
Kat Delacour posted:That's an interesting thing to say, why do you believe we won't have data? I didn't say that at all? I was talking about the usual start-of-day where we find out who was killed (if anyone), how many and any other interesting stuff and people with night roles have their results and can start their strategies for the day
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:23
|
|
|
whats for dinner posted:I didn't say that at all? I was talking about the usual start-of-day where we find out who was killed (if anyone), how many and any other interesting stuff and people with night roles have their results and can start their strategies for the day also because it's a 36 hour day and most auspol people have gone to sleep it seems?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:24
|
|
|
Old Dirty Cumburgs posted:Bees... He's right about the bandwagons on day one, though. Usually you don't have enough to perform any sort of linguistic analysis and you don't have any voting record with confirmed town or scum, so you can only really do a random vote. A bandwagon is a good way to guarantee a lynch, which begins generating data for informed decisions, and also is the day where a town lynch is least impactful on town iirc.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:29
|
|
|
everythingWasBees posted:He's right about the bandwagons on day one, though. Usually you don't have enough to perform any sort of linguistic analysis and you don't have any voting record with confirmed town or scum, so you can only really do a random vote. A bandwagon is a good way to guarantee a lynch, which begins generating data for informed decisions, and also is the day where a town lynch is least impactful on town iirc. The latter, more than the former, is the most compelling part of the argument.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:33
|
|
|
Asphyxious can I ask specifically what type of linguistics you have studied because my girlfriend is a linguist too and she very rarely uses it as as a stand-in for the word 'cop' or 'lawyer' so I'm a bit curious
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:39
|
|
|
Sulla-Marius 88 posted:Asphyxious can I ask specifically what type of linguistics you have studied because my girlfriend is a linguist too and she very rarely uses it as as a stand-in for the word 'cop' or 'lawyer' so I'm a bit curious FORENSIC linguistics.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:41
|
|
|
Given everything I have ever read about forensic science in general it sounds like a wonderful way to get a lot of innocent people thrown in prison
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:43
|
|
|
Like in CSI when they get an expert in to look at someone's suicide note and the expert is all like like BUT WAIT THE WRITER OF THIS NOTE WAS LEFT HANDED AND THE VICTIM WAS RIGHT HANDED, WE'VE GOT A HOMICIDE!!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:44
|
|
|
Hm exactly the sort of thing a child-murdering paedophile would have written. Book him Danno
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 10:14 |
|
|
Basically anything with the word "forensic" in it immediately brings to my mind mind a procedural "DOING SCIENCE TO GET THE BAD GUY" montage.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2015 15:46
|
|