|
so it's a java for-each
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 14:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:36 |
|
|
triple sulk posted:
it sure the hell isn't.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 14:47
|
|
|
Stringent posted:it sure the hell isn't. screw you too
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 14:48
|
|
|
Why don't they call it a go-while loop???
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 14:56
|
|
|
foreach loops are the best kind
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 16:46
|
|
|
Bloody posted:foreach loops are the best kind thats why jQuery is win
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 16:48
|
|
|
for-in loops read better imho
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 17:08
|
|
|
Bloody posted:fold loops are the best kind
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
i'm probably leaving my job to go work at a hipster rails shop building angular/react front ends because i hate myself (it will probably be fun)
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
sounds fine except why rails that's like the out-of-touch hipster language unless they started more than 5 years ago
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
Power Ambient posted:i'm probably leaving my job to go work at a hipster rails shop building angular/react front ends because i hate myself (it will probably be fun) maybe it's because I'm getting a contact high from the kool-aid, but I have really enjoyed pretty much every experience I've had with react
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 20:00
|
|
|
Power Ambient posted:i'm probably leaving my job to go work at a hipster rails shop building angular/react front ends because i hate myself (it will probably be fun) use webapi backend + knockout frontend instead.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
rails is very bad but we're going to be building a new service from scratch and id ont really know what to use. go is neat but i hate that it doesnt have generics and i dont know that i want to try to get spun up on a new language while on a deadline.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 20:27
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:use webapi backend + knockout frontend instead.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:use llcoolj backend + knockout frontend instead.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:sounds fine except why rails they used to use node but it's for "deetlenerds" and now use headless rails so it should be interesting at least considering i'm a front-end dev and they know that lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 22:27
|
|
|
the best loop is the Convenient OO Loop
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 22:27
|
|
|
qntm posted:the best loop is the Convenient OO Loop nonono!!! that way be php
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:00
|
|
|
Power Ambient posted:they used to use node but it's for "deetlenerds" and now use headless rails so it should be interesting at least considering i'm a front-end dev and they know that lmao headless rails? like, no templates?
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
i'm assuming that means it's just like a rest api
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
that's also what i'm assuming what it means because 'no front-end' breaks my brain
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
or its something like phantomjs except in rails idk
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
Power Ambient posted:that's also what i'm assuming what it means because 'no front-end' breaks my brain or they actually just write and license libraries and as a front end developer you're literally gonna be a salesperson or a guy whogoes and explains how to use your code to other companies
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:25
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:headless rails? probably print statements scattered all over
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
or maybe its headless in that the client doesnt touch the templates directly but fucks around with poo poo in a cms? i know its not really headless but i could easily see some salesguy gently caress that up & sell based on that
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:rails is very bad but we're going to be building a new service from scratch and id ont really know what to use. go is neat but i hate that it doesnt have generics and i dont know that i want to try to get spun up on a new language while on a deadline.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:31
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:or maybe its headless in that the client doesnt touch the templates directly but fucks around with poo poo in a cms? or maybe its headless in that 
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:44
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:maybe it's because I'm getting a contact high from the kool-aid, but I have really enjoyed pretty much every experience I've had with react can't wait for react native
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2015 23:47
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:headless rails? i haven't been involved in rails projects for a year now but from what i understand, pretty much any new project using it is for backend stuff. any front end is using something else entirely. rails 2/3 apps are the new old garbage that no one wants to maintain.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:06
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:or maybe its headless in that the client doesnt touch the templates directly but fucks around with poo poo in a cms? one of my major innovations at my job has been removing the entire ERB partials that we would store in the DB and eval to render various dynamic content. i replaced it with a path to the erb and now we eval that instead
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:i haven't been involved in rails projects for a year now but from what i understand, pretty much any new project using it is for backend stuff. any front end is using something else entirely. yeah but what's the new garbage
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
i hate programming
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
thats unfair, i mostly just hate programs
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:can't wait for react native soon!
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:maybe it's because I'm getting a contact high from the kool-aid, but I have really enjoyed pretty much every experience I've had with react react owns bones and i say this as someone who has no need to ever touch it like drat some of the poo poo the react native team cooked up is tight as hell
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:thats unfair, i mostly just hate programs and programmers
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:i haven't been involved in rails projects for a year now but from what i understand, pretty much any new project using it is for backend stuff. any front end is using something else entirely. why the gently caress would you do that? activerecord is terrible poo poo if you're not using the templating and not (really) using the routing, rails has no advantages. i'd rather write a hundred APIs with sinatra and datamapper than put up with another rails project ever again (or, my real druthers: have a statically typed language at my job again)
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:why the gently caress would you do that? the other guy i'm going to be working with primarily on this is really into go. i dont love go but i think it's got to be a lot better than ruby. i think we're gonna do go.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 00:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:36 |
|
|
bad news it's not a lot better than ruby
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 01:01
|
|