|
So I have 100' of some T-Max 100 that expired in 1994 and I will probably be using that for a while. I also pushed it to 400 for more crunch.  Untitled by Dev Luns, on Flickr Untitled by Dev Luns, on Flickr
pootiebigwang fucked around with this message at 05:13 on Mar 17, 2015 |
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 09:35 |
|
|
dat contrast
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 05:25
|
|
|
dat dogge
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 09:51
|
|
|
gonerfest ftw
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
Chill Callahan posted:gonerfest ftw
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 14:41
|
|
|
for all of us that hate money, KEH is having a 15% off everything used sale today with code LUCKY15.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 15:59
|
|
|
Really debating whether I should bite the bullet on a used nikkor 105 f2.5 with that deal.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 16:34
|
|
|
If you're going to own a telephoto for a 35mm it's that. It's smaller and better than pretty much every alternative.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
That gets me a 300mm f/4.5 for like $100.  E: And ordered! DJExile fucked around with this message at 19:01 on Mar 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 16:46
|
|
|
BANME.sh posted:Really debating whether I should bite the bullet on a used nikkor 105 f2.5 with that deal. I hate my photos less when I use that lens, it's real nice.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
Yeah I ordered one minutes after making that post 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2015 21:37
|
|
|
Spedman posted:I hate my photos less when I use that lens, it's real nice. Re-post this in your favourite flavour of gear thread, get a new thread title.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
I got my hands on a bunch of weird expired film today 2x AGFAcolor XRS 1000 120 - expired 1990 1x AGFAcolor XRS 400 120 - expired 1990 1x AGFAPAN VARIO-XL ASA 125-1600 120 - expired 1984 1x AGFAORTHO 25 135 - expired 2000 4x Rollei IR 400 120 - expired 2011 Do I need to do anything special to shoot the IR film? How do I meter for it and does the IR focus ring dot really make a difference if I am shooting stopped down landscapes?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
I give up, what is it?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2015 17:32
|
|
|
It's some funky bacteria at Yellowstone shot with a red filter. I think I have a color shot of it somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2015 20:41
|
|
|
Two new things for me yesterday: ran a roll of Ultrafine Extreme 400 through a new to me Koni-Omega Rapid. The Koni is a beastly 6x7 wedding camera and when I went back through the medium/large format thread a few weeks ago, it stuck out as a cheap way to shoot some 6x7 (and build muscle mass). Shot the UF400 at box speed and developed in Rodinol per guide for HP5 - has anyone else tried this stuff? Excuse the hasty scans, wanted to get these done as ASAP to function check the camera....there are fingerprints   KORapid_UFxtreme400_Rodinol_testroll-2 by Bud_lish, on Flickr  KORapid_UFxtreme400_Rodinol_testroll-1 by Bud_lish, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 13:26
|
|
|
Looks like newton rings to me
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
Def newton rings.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 18:19
|
|
|
So I have three rolls of film slide from a family trip in the 1980s that I was asked to get developed, how feasible is it to get semi usable images off of this assuming the film it's self hasn't turned to dust? I also have one roll of panatomic-x film from the same vintage I want to develop as well, anything in particular I should be aware of developing film older than I am?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 18:27
|
|
|
bobmarleysghost posted:Def newton rings. Weird, didn't think I flipped the better scanning holder glass but I'll look later. The negs were still kinda curled, but not the worst I've scanned. Any other culprits?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 18:29
|
|
|
Were they curling downward onto the scanner glass?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
Ezekiel_980 posted:So I have three rolls of film slide from a family trip in the 1980s that I was asked to get developed, how feasible is it to get semi usable images off of this assuming the film it's self hasn't turned to dust? What slide film is it? If it's an E6 film you should be fine - if it's an E4 or Kodachrome you may be out of luck. I've had Kodacolor-X (1963-1974) film developed with vaguely usable results Similarly, I've developed 1960s-vintage Verichrome Pan, and shot Panatomic-X that expired in the Eisenhower administration, both without much issue. If I remember correctly, Panatomic-X has pretty good latent image properties, so you should be able to get decent results developing it as normal, or maybe adding 10%.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 19:35
|
|
|
Slide film is ektachrome 64 and 200 Says e-6
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
I bought an 8x10  please help me make room for it by buying some of my film hoard: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3125105&pagenumber=213#post443035936
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:I bought an 8x10 Baller, what did you get?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
8th-snype posted:Baller, what did you get? I got a newer Cambo SC 
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 20:54
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:Were they curling downward onto the scanner glass? They were, and I remember thinking is that bad? I guess so.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
Film touching glass is how you get newton rings. Flip your film so the curl goes into the betterscanning glass and gets held flat.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
Bud posted:Koni-Omega Rapid. Why are these things so cheap?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:What slide film is it? If it's an E6 film you should be fine - if it's an E4 or Kodachrome you may be out of luck. I've had Kodacolor-X (1963-1974) film developed with vaguely usable results Similarly, I've developed 1960s-vintage Verichrome Pan, and shot Panatomic-X that expired in the Eisenhower administration, both without much issue. If I remember correctly, Panatomic-X has pretty good latent image properties, so you should be able to get decent results developing it as normal, or maybe adding 10%. It's all e6 aside from one roll of black and white, it's already been exposed 35 years ago so would I push it three stops and pray?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
Ezekiel_980 posted:It's all e6 aside from one roll of black and white, it's already been exposed 35 years ago so would I push it three stops and pray? I wouldn't push at all, personally. The one-stop-per-decade rule is for expired film that you're shooting now, not for developing latent images that are already there. Like I said, I've developed 50-year-old film at box speed and come out fine (less emulsion cracking from bad storage and stuff, or really poor blue layer properties in C22). Maybe add one stop for the Ektachrome if it's been stored poorly.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 06:04
|
|
|
Develop one roll at box speed, see how it is before proceeding with the other two.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 08:48
|
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:I wouldn't push at all, personally. The one-stop-per-decade rule is for expired film that you're shooting now, not for developing latent images that are already there. Like I said, I've developed 50-year-old film at box speed and come out fine (less emulsion cracking from bad storage and stuff, or really poor blue layer properties in C22). Maybe add one stop for the Ektachrome if it's been stored poorly. It's been in a closet in a bedroom the entire time so would that count as decent storage conditions?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 17:25
|
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:I wouldn't push at all, personally. The one-stop-per-decade rule is for expired film that you're shooting now, not for developing latent images that are already there. Like I said, I've developed 50-year-old film at box speed and come out fine (less emulsion cracking from bad storage and stuff, or really poor blue layer properties in C22). Maybe add one stop for the Ektachrome if it's been stored poorly. I got a (c-41) roll processed that had been sitting for 35+ years after exposure and didn't have anything special done with it. Came out fine, considering.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
Ezekiel_980 posted:It's been in a closet in a bedroom the entire time so would that count as decent storage conditions? Not great, but not really terrible either. Is the house air-conditioned?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:Not great, but not really terrible either. Is the house air-conditioned? unfortunately no
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
Ezekiel_980 posted:unfortunately no Checking your location, it's probably not that bad even then. I checked some weather history and summers just don't get that hot where you are. I would develop it without any particular special instructions, but the best advice is still probably this: Wild EEPROM posted:Develop one roll at box speed, see how it is before proceeding with the other two.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2015 00:07
|
|
|
chuckled a little bit
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2015 08:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 09:35 |
|
|
 The Flood Plain, Mont Saint-Michel by Cameron Mattis, on Flickr It's been a long time since I posted here, but my senior thesis show is this week and anyone in the New York area is welcome to drop by and look at art/drink free booze. Thursday, March 26th, from 6-8 PM at the Tisch School of the Arts, NYU. 721 Broadway, New York. My work is up in the windows of the building so you don't even have to walk in if you're too shy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2015 05:45
|
|
