Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Are you a
This poll is closed.
homeowner 39 22.41%
renter 69 39.66%
stupid peace of poo poo 66 37.93%
Total: 174 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

I wonder if we should listen to a human rights lobby group about human rights issues.

Nah let's defend the unlawful spying of a government agency that was under the stewardship of the prime minister of the country.

I wonder if we should question the motives of a lobby group that announces the results of a survey as part of a launch of an anti-spying campaign.

I guess thinking critically about stuff isn't worth doing when it supports your worldview.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

oohhboy
Jun 8, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
A lot of that has to do with the complexity of the the issue and the immediate impact of it. Snapper Quotas are easy to understand with it boiling down to a small handful of numbers and has quite immediate effects. Spying doesn't have that luxury of understanding nor is it announced or educated about nor are its effects fully understood. Key took two extremes, compared to to make one "Valid" in a extremely poor use of statistics and context.

If you swallowed that line Key feed you then you weren't thinking critically.

truther
Oct 22, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT THE BEARS

Butt Wizard posted:

I wonder if we should question the motives of a lobby group that announces the results of a survey as part of a launch of an anti-spying campaign.

I guess thinking critically about stuff isn't worth doing when it supports your worldview.
Motive or not, the results speak for themselves.

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free

Butt Wizard posted:

I wonder if we should question the motives of a lobby group that announces the results of a survey as part of a launch of an anti-spying campaign.

I guess thinking critically about stuff isn't worth doing when it supports your worldview.

Keep unironically supporting spying, I'm sure that's a cool and popular opinion to have.

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free
Up next he brings out "well I don't have anything to hide!" And we all laugh.

bobbilljim
May 29, 2013

this christmas feels like the very first christmas to me
:shittydog::shittydog::shittydog:

WarpedNaba posted:

A job with GCSB would be pretty rocking, though, free unlimited encrypted broadband!

Haha yeah, "free" "encrypted" "broadband"


Butt Wizard posted:

I guess thinking critically about stuff isn't worth doing when it supports your worldview.

pot, meet kettle?

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free

bobbilljim posted:

pot, meet kettle?

Actually he's never met a kettle before, and even if he did it was a campaign of lies by the left to discredit him, also there's 1080 in milk and Hagar isn't a journalist.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

I just want to point out that any poll showing what the public think of government policy that may or may not violate their rights or privacy is by definition meaningless, because people have no loving idea whether something the government does is good or bad for them. It follows that poll results will be skewed by whatever Campbell said last night or that thing they saw on stuff a little while ago or whatever the gently caress. People are ignorant idiots and polls of the public about whether x or y is a good idea are mostly pointless.

My two cents. Put me in a survey.

Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

Keep unironically supporting spying, I'm sure that's a cool and popular opinion to have.

I don't support spying for reasons outside of threat prevention i.e. what the GCSB is meant to do according to the strictest interpretation of the law.

bobbilljim posted:

pot, meet kettle?

gently caress, I'm doing that thing again where I don't froth at the mouth enough about loving NATIONAL or get so angry that John Key exists that my balls shrivel up to fit in with the thread. My bad.

whiter than a Wilco show
Mar 30, 2011

by FactsAreUseless
Everything else aside, lol at posting anything written by the Herald as unbiased, quintuple lol at using a self proclaimed unscientific survey ("I asked the 6 other retarded herald workers within earshot") as evidential support for any argument beyond "the Herald is retarded".

bobbilljim
May 29, 2013

this christmas feels like the very first christmas to me
:shittydog::shittydog::shittydog:

Butt Wizard posted:

what the GCSB is meant to do according to the strictest interpretation of the law.

If you believe that's what they are doing, then I have some great products to sell you at low low prices

Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

bobbilljim posted:

If you believe that's what they are doing, then I have some great products to sell you at low low prices

I don't think that's all they're doing and I never said I did.

El Pollo Blanco
Jun 12, 2013

by sebmojo

Butt Wizard posted:

quote:

Just over half of the survey respondents said they trusted Government to protect their right to privacy, while 40 per cent did not.

I wonder whether that same 50-ish% would say they trust a Labour Government to protect their right of privacy. Makes you think.

Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

El Pollo Blanco posted:


I wonder whether that same 50-ish% would say they trust a Labour Government to protect their right of privacy. Makes you think.

I suspect the percentages probably stay the same no matter who is in charge because the bulk of New Zealanders have no loving idea which way is up.

Butt Wizard fucked around with this message at 05:51 on Mar 23, 2015

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



Butt Wizard posted:

Amnesty International 'survey' shows that people don't want to be spied on. In other news, the sky is blue and the grass is green.

I wonder if there's any figures from something that isn't a human rights lobby group that might be a little more reliable?


http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11112107
You know this article says that 75% of New Zealanders don't want to be spied on, right?

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.

Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

Ghostlight posted:

You know this article says that 75% of New Zealanders don't want to be spied on, right?

It doesn't say they personally didn't want to be spied on, just that they had reservations about the GCSB doing so.

quote:

a total of 75.3 per cent were "very concerned'', "somewhat concerned'' or "a little concerned'' about plans to allow the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) to monitor New Zealanders as well as foreigners.

Big Bad Beetleborg
Apr 8, 2007

Things may come to those who wait...but only the things left by those who hustle.

Butt Wizard posted:

It doesn't say they personally didn't want to be spied on, just that they had reservations about the GCSB doing so.

Yeah I don't want to be spied on by the GCSB; I bet they don't even get a proper mirrored sunglasses budget like the good and cool agencies.

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free
Ah yes the semantics of "well they never said they didn't want another government agency, or anyone else, spying on them, just that they don't like it when it's specifically this one"

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



Butt Wizard posted:

It doesn't say they personally didn't want to be spied on, just that they had reservations about the GCSB doing so.
That's dissembling since that's the spying everyone is talking about.

Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

Ah yes the semantics of "well they never said they didn't want another government agency, or anyone else, spying on them, just that they don't like it when it's specifically this one"

Well that wasn't what I said at all. "Are you OK with being spied on as part of GCSB mass-surveillance?" and "How comfortable are you with an agency having the power to do something?" are two completely different questions.

Ghostlight posted:

That's dissembling since that's the spying everyone is talking about.

The same article also says that over half of the respondents largely trusted NZ authorities to respect their privacy so I don't know what the gently caress to make of it. 75% say it's a huge problem, but a portion of them are then going "Eh, whatever, it'll be fine"?

Moo Cowabunga
Jun 15, 2009

[Office Worker.




gently caress. Man. I really could have a beer right about now. Where's JK?

Big Bad Beetleborg
Apr 8, 2007

Things may come to those who wait...but only the things left by those who hustle.

Displeased Moo Cow posted:

gently caress. Man. I really could have a beer right about now. Where's JK?

Curb-stomping some detestable human rights lobbyists

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



Butt Wizard posted:

The same article also says that over half of the respondents largely trusted NZ authorities to respect their privacy so I don't know what the gently caress to make of it. 75% say it's a huge problem, but a portion of them are then going "Eh, whatever, it'll be fine"?
They're different questions. Just because you don't think it would actually invade your privacy doesn't necessarily mean you're for a widespread state surveillance policy and all the ominous things that entails/portends/enables beyond a government employee knowing how much my power bill is.

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

Displeased Moo Cow posted:

gently caress. Man. I really could have a beer right about now. Where's JK?

In Japan shilling beef and lamb. He's cutting his visit short so he can go campaign in northland

Moo Cowabunga
Jun 15, 2009

[Office Worker.




Good. We need a convention centre so we can serve up our own beef and lamb and slot jockeys

klen dool
May 7, 2007

Okay well me being wrong in some limited situations doesn't change my overall point.

Butt Wizard posted:

Amnesty International 'survey' shows that people don't want to be spied on. In other news, the sky is blue and the grass is green.

I wonder if there's any figures from something that isn't a human rights lobby group that might be a little more reliable?

Its Amnesty International, not some loving biased idealogical lobby group for fucks sake.

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!

bobbilljim posted:

Haha yeah, "free" "encrypted" "broadband"


Never said you'd be working in New Zealand, did I? :smuggo:

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free

klen dool posted:

Its Amnesty International, not some loving biased idealogical lobby group for fucks sake.

Yes but why else would they try and discredit good Ol' John unless they were dirty nazi leftists????

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



To be fair, the idea that people have an inalienable human right to express non-violent opinions without violent suppression from their government is leftist.

klen dool
May 7, 2007

Okay well me being wrong in some limited situations doesn't change my overall point.

BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

Yes but why else would they try and discredit good Ol' John unless they were dirty nazi leftists????

lol

Ghostlight posted:

To be fair, the idea that people have an inalienable human right to express non-violent opinions without violent suppression from their government is leftist.

Really? Am I that naive that I don't know this? Kinda-free speach is kinda in our kinda-constitution, is it only the left that wants one?

dusty
Nov 30, 2004

fong posted:

In Japan shilling beef and lamb. He's cutting his visit short so he can go campaign in northland

That's 2nd-best Korea you racist.

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free

dusty posted:

That's 2nd-best Korea you racist.



"Yeah mate that's the flag, it's choice aye?"

truther
Oct 22, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT THE BEARS
"That's Tim. Tim couldn't get the job even with us feeding him the other guys' notes lol"

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



klen dool posted:

Really? Am I that naive that I don't know this? Kinda-free speach is kinda in our kinda-constitution, is it only the left that wants one?
It was mostly a joke, but the concept of civil rights, which is intrinsically linked to human rights, is very much a left-wing proposition despite its wide acceptance today, especially in our widely left-leaning country.

Freedom of expression is in our constitution but blasphemy is still technically illegal and we're under a government that is quite happy to pass legislation that violates the Bill of Rights anyway.

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
Ugh, that embarrassing poo poo in the NZ embassy in Seoul got me a good long ribbing last I was up there.

Who brings Meat Jerky to something that's supposed to showcase our national cuisines and fine meat products?

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

"Yeah mate that's the flag, it's choice aye?"

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

dusty posted:

That's 2nd-best Korea you racist.



He was in Korea but he's in Japan now

Moo Cowabunga
Jun 15, 2009

[Office Worker.




Using my tax dollars :argh: etc etc etc

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

David Cunliffe's life is falling apart. He separated from his wife of 30 years just recently

herald are also running it as their front page story which is pretty poo poo

A friend of mine in Labour said that he's looking terrible, like you can tell he's trying really hard to seem happy but is not

  • Locked thread