|
It's an official nba youtube playoff promotion but honestly those gifs are better because you dont have to hear Dick Vitale say 'baby' 50 times
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 02:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 04:25 |
|
Mirotic loving went off in the fourth quarter and it owned.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:23 |
|
Since when did Mike Wilbon start posting in SAS?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:24 |
|
I want the Raptors to face Atlanta in the 1st round
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:28 |
|
BWV posted:Since when did Mike Wilbon start posting in SAS? Sorry, I'm a less rational Northwestern homer than that dude.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:29 |
|
https://vine.co/v/OYl1ABJrw32 Niko status: still owning. Most points in the 4th quarter among all players in the NBA since the all star break.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:29 |
|
@jennydialcreech: McHale said he is going to have to start throwing Howard out there bc the Rockets are low on bodies. Didn't give a date, but sounds soon. @Jonathan_Feigen: As @jennydialcreech mentioned, McHale said could play Howard "pretty soon." Don't be surprised if "pretty soon" synonymous w/ 'Wednesday." Seems like a solid approach to injury recovery
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:30 |
|
R.D. Mangles posted:Sorry, I'm a less rational Northwestern homer than that dude. hahaha I was talking about the "HE DOESNT EVEN WATCH THE GAMES" talk. If I wanted to make fun of a Bulls homer I'd call someone Sam Smith
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:32 |
|
Holy poo poo that James Harden one
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 03:41 |
|
I love David West:quote:David West retweeted That tweet was in response to D-Dub tweeting an interview with Xavier's men's bball coach.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 04:26 |
|
PantsFreeZone posted:Where's LeBron's?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 04:37 |
|
Lockback posted:Love was friends with Ricky too, and I think Kevin Martin and him got kinda close last year, but Martin seems like a basketball-shooting robot who is going to go be roomates with Rick Adelman after her retires. They never hung out. My friend worked for the wolves in 2011. Love was always by himself or with Pek.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 04:38 |
|
quote:Hardwood Paroxysm @HPbasketball
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:24 |
|
skillz that killz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFLAfVvWEBk
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:24 |
|
just going to make the first round exit even more beautiful
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:26 |
|
BWV posted:skillz that killz ahaha this rules
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:36 |
|
N: http://i.imgur.com/cwG1Qm2.gifv V: This Zach LaVine kid seems like he might be good
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:50 |
|
Anybody have that image with Steve Kerr as the most successful first year coach and then lists all the other most successful first year coaches-- all of which had awful, awful, awful, awful careers?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 05:55 |
|
Blinkman987 posted:Anybody have that image with Steve Kerr as the most successful first year coach and then lists all the other most successful first year coaches-- all of which had awful, awful, awful, awful careers? I mean much like Dunleavy, Pringles, et al you have a situation where a new coach is given a lot of talent and manages to not gently caress it all up so it'll be hard to tell how good or bad Kerr is until he faces some adversity.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 06:00 |
|
Anyone know how the ABA MVP was determined? I'm guessing player vote (as the NBA did back then) but I'm not sure.Blinkman987 posted:Anybody have that image with Steve Kerr as the most successful first year coach and then lists all the other most successful first year coaches-- all of which had awful, awful, awful, awful careers? This one? Here are those teams by SRS: code:
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 06:20 |
|
Along with that discussion of rookie coaches having poor sustained success, can someone explain how Avery Johnson was so successful with Dallas? I mostly think of him as an outmatched coach and there aren't a lot of people who disagree with that. Now they were a good team before and after he left but those were with 2 great coaches themselves and while it's obviously a good roster it wasn't ridiculously stacked either.
Spring Break My Heart fucked around with this message at 00:05 on Mar 25, 2015 |
# ? Mar 24, 2015 06:53 |
|
Zogo posted:Anyone know how the ABA MVP was determined? I'm guessing player vote (as the NBA did back then) but I'm not sure. Yes, thank you. Yeah, this Warriors team is historically good and it's infuriating as someone who hates the Bay Area / Warriors fans / Steph Curry's fetal alcohol syndrome head. =(
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 07:01 |
|
INSPECTAH DECK posted:Along with that discussion of rookie coaches having poor sustained success, can someone explain how Avery Johnson was so successful with Dallas? I mostly think of him as an outmatched coach and there doesn't a lot of people who disagree with that. Now they were a good team before and after he left but those were with 2 great coaches themselves and while it's obviously a good roster it wasn't ridiculously stacked either. He inherited a team with good players and got them to play some defense. They'd been good for a while. Nellie laid the groundwork for that team for sure. I always felt they were built specifically to defeat San Antonio. Turns out Baron Davis can push guards he outweighs by 30 lbs around pretty easily. (Nellie knowing exactly how to attack Dirk helped a lot too) I wonder if the Jazz series would have been closer if he hadn't hosed up his hamstring.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 09:10 |
|
Blinkman987 posted:Yes, thank you. Honestly it's pretty great if you hate Mark Jackson
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 09:30 |
|
IcePhoenix posted:N: http://i.imgur.com/cwG1Qm2.gifv He's not
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 12:03 |
|
Cool Buff Man posted:He's not http://on.nba.com/1vmwxlB
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 12:08 |
|
His 3p% is kinda what's important here. If he can get that to stabilize in the 38-40 range he'll be a decent SG as a off-ball shooter, slasher and secondary ball-handler. I mean, good is a pretty strong word, but the guy's been playing better and has some promise.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 12:28 |
|
Lockback posted:His 3p% is kinda what's important here. If he can get that to stabilize in the 38-40 range he'll be a decent SG as a off-ball shooter, slasher and secondary ball-handler. How about he breaks out the 10 PER range and maybe gets into positive win share territory and we can consider him eventually being "average"
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 12:34 |
|
seriously if you havent watched lavine's turnover reel i'd recommend getting a glass of expensive rum, flipping on yaketty sax, and letting the good times roll
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 12:58 |
|
Cool Buff Man posted:How about he breaks out the 10 PER range and maybe gets into positive win share territory and we can consider him eventually being "average" Antetokuonmpo, Afflalo, Korver, Bledsoe, Hayward, Dragic are all guards that had PERs in the 10 range their rookie year. Only about 10% of rookies end up with a PER above 15 their first year, and usually those are bigs. Seriously- rookies are, on the whole, not good basketball players their first year. I mean, LaVine is not a good player, but he has made improvements. He cannot play Point Guard though, that much is clear, though he doesn't have control over where they play him.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 13:25 |
|
He has nice form so he'll probably eventually be a good 3pt shooter. He has the potential yo be the best dunker ever. So if he starts jacking up 30 ft shots and dunks and never shoots anything else, he'll be my favorite player of alltime. From an entertainment standpoint.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 13:46 |
|
Zach LaVine is a 19 year old rookie with lots of raw talent and not much actual game time no poo poo he isn't good now. That doesn't mean he won't be in a year or two (it also doesn't mean he will be) jesus christ just enjoy the cool basketballman shots that led his team to an OT win
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:04 |
|
If the season ended today, the Sixers would have 3 first round picks (and a 17% chance at the Lakers pick).
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:14 |
|
I mean, playing PG when he shouldn't be is going to increase his turnovers and gently caress his advanced stats, but out of the < 100 teenagers who've played in the league, LaVine is one of the most inefficient by a few different metrics. Also Wiggins' current 13.0 PER would be good enough for 2nd Worst ROTY PER ever after the guy who won in 1958, whlie his .29 WS/48 would make him 5th worst ROTY after 3 dudes from 1958-80 and MCW. I guess I can mostly take this to mean that the Wolves are real bad this year. In other news, since All-Star Break, the Spurs are allowing fewer Opp 3PA than any other team, although their Opp3P% is leading the league. Assuming what we've seen recently with Opp3P% being as purely variable (if not moreso) as OppFT% holds true in this case, they might be in even better shape for the playoffs than we're figuring already. GSW is right down there with not allowing 3PAs either. I'd very much like to see a Spurs/GSW series.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:18 |
|
shouldn't we take the steadily decreasing rookie performance to be indicative of a larger gap between NBA level athletes and amateurs than existed in the past. I think the league as a whole takes things a lot more seriously than it used to so it stands to reason that the growing pains today would be greater than they used to be. e: the last genuinely good 'true rookie' was chris paul (griffin had a year to adjust to the nba)
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:30 |
|
I was thinking something similar, a more competitive league's going to mean more inefficient numbers upon acclimation, but I'm not sure the numbers quite match up to that--plus you could also assume that along those lines the rookies should be getting better like the league--plus population growth and better scouting means you have a way bigger pool to draw from. My guess is that the three years of college that top prospects usually had before entering the NBA is affecting rookie efficiency more than overall league quality--you're going to be more inefficient if you're entering the league without experience, and all the one-and-dones are young compared to previous top prospects. With that said, Kyrie Irving was 19 and completely sick just a few years ago when he won ROTY, and Kyrie, Durant and LeBron are the only 19 year olds to win it so far. Generational talent will still shine, you just don't get it every year.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:45 |
|
straight up brolic posted:shouldn't we take the steadily decreasing rookie performance to be indicative of a larger gap between NBA level athletes and amateurs than existed in the past. I think the league as a whole takes things a lot more seriously than it used to so it stands to reason that the growing pains today would be greater than they used to be. I'm not sure how much "adjusting" Griffen got to do after he was drafted then sat for a year. He was injured and likely not traveling with the team, or practicing with them, so he wouldn't have gotten that experience, which I feel is a big part of the difference between college and the pros. The other stuff I agree with tho. NBA schemes on both sides of the ball are just much more complex than college these days; it's not surprising that rookies struggle to learn it all. It's a different style of play, nearly a different sport.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:50 |
|
EvanTH posted:I was thinking something similar, a more competitive league's going to mean more inefficient numbers upon acclimation, but I'm not sure the numbers quite match up to that--plus you could also assume that along those lines the rookies should be getting better like the league--plus population growth and better scouting means you have a way bigger pool to draw from. My guess is that the three years of college that top prospects usually had before entering the NBA is affecting rookie efficiency more than overall league quality--you're going to be more inefficient if you're entering the league without experience, and all the one-and-dones are young compared to previous top prospects. Lebron had a sub .100 WS/48 his rookie year, even he struggled to be efficient.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:53 |
|
If you look at the stats, Griffin is doing about as well this year as he did his rookie year. Weird.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 14:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 04:25 |
|
So did Durant, his was one of the most inefficient ROTY seasons ever--but again that's all three 19 year old ROTYs right there. I don't got a problem with the overall point, but, I mean, MCW was 22 and the draft class didn't have immediately shining stars.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2015 15:01 |