|
The telepathic part might be true, but I think the new tires are too eager to please. "Oh, you want to turn a bit? I'll just turn a lot. A lot is always better than a little. Please love me."
|
# ? Mar 10, 2015 17:49 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:44 |
|
I had the same experience coming from lovely stock tires on my Ninjer to Pilot Street 2s. After I got used to how touchy it was, I frickin' love it. It is a bit unnerving at first, though.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2015 03:44 |
|
Anyone have any information for or against kendas? read through the OP and didn't see them mentioned
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 17:54 |
|
They're a cheap, older tire brand for street tires, dunno about their dirt stuff. V
|
# ? Mar 14, 2015 20:35 |
|
I used Kenda Kruze tires on my Roadstar. Inexpensive tires, but I didn't really put them through any hard use .. the Roadie is a cruiser. They lasted the hoped-for 8k miles (Roadie bad on tires)
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 05:25 |
|
Z3n posted:They're a cheap, older tire brand for street tires, dunno about their dirt stuff. V Wound up going with Dunlop D404s at the same price. They sold the rear out from under me so I'm getting that installed free on Friday. Even just having a front tire that isn't dry-rotting/almost bald is fantastic.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2015 07:08 |
|
Dunlop D404's Rock. Front one put on last saturday, rear one thrown on yesterday. I finally know what it's like to be able to turn, and keep a straight line, and not slide with a crosswind. Holy poo poo how am I still alive after last season?
|
# ? Mar 22, 2015 11:32 |
|
Ok, is there any reason not to get these Continental Conti-Motions for my '07 FZ6? http://www.amazon.com/CONTINENTAL-MOTION-70zr17-Front-55zr17/dp/B007N6RPSY/ref=cm_cd_ql_qh_dp_t $152 for 2 tires seems almost too cheap... I would be replacing pretty old Pilot Road 2's, so anything would be an improvement, and these have 60 4-5 star reviews and seem pretty legit.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2015 04:53 |
|
They're alright - better in the rain than the dry, in my opinion, but not bad tires and certainly better than what you have now.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2015 05:10 |
|
They're an okay tire, that's about it. I think they're a single compound tire, too. Don't see anything that says otherwise.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2015 05:40 |
|
As someone who had Conti Sport Attacks 2 previously on my bike, never again. I went from Pilot Powers to Contis (they were on the bike new) and hated them. Felt like poo poo. Threw some PP3s back on and all is right in the world. YMMV. Maybe all Conti tires don't suck. If you're used to PRs then nothing about a set of PR3s will do you wrong.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 00:47 |
|
I'm guessing the extra $200 is worth it to get PR4's over the contis?
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 13:57 |
|
I'd try to find a set of PR3s myself. You'll pay (probably) much less than you would for PR4s.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 14:32 |
|
I love my PR4s. The price difference was like fifty bucks when I bought them. 5k miles later and they still look great.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 15:18 |
|
Are some tires just prone to squaring off? I've got a set of Battlaxs that is near-perfect on the front but starting to square off a considerable bit after 4.5k miles. I relentlessly fling my bike and swerve around at every opportunity, so I was a bit surprised and disappointed to find that out.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 16:53 |
|
4.5k before your rear squares off on a battlax is pretty drat good honestly. I replaced mine at ~3000 when I switched to the PP3s the first time on the GSXR.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 17:10 |
|
Digital_Jesus posted:4.5k before your rear squares off on a battlax is pretty drat good honestly. I replaced mine at ~3000 when I switched to the PP3s the first time on the GSXR. Good to know, thanks. I just wish these drat things weren't so expensive/difficult to replace!
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 17:31 |
|
If most of your riding is commute you can probably get two rears to a front to cut down on cost a bit. If you're doing any kind of spirited (or jackassery) riding and you're paranoid like I am I just do both tires every 3k-3.5k. E: I mean if you're buying sport tires you're really not getting them for longevity so nothing to be surprised at. Now if you're getting 4000 miles to a squared off rear on any kind of hard compound or touring tire somethin wrong. Digital_Jesus fucked around with this message at 17:38 on Mar 31, 2015 |
# ? Mar 31, 2015 17:34 |
|
I'd go through a set of tires a month at 3k intervals Thank god for pilot roads.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2015 23:21 |
|
Digital_Jesus posted:If most of your riding is commute you can probably get two rears to a front to cut down on cost a bit. If you're doing any kind of spirited (or jackassery) riding and you're paranoid like I am I just do both tires every 3k-3.5k. My Battlax is a sport touring tire. Is squaring at 4.3k miles a problem then?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 14:18 |
|
Maybe. Do you gun the throttle a lot on straights and do a lot of highway miles? I also have no clue what you ride.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 18:35 |
|
Digital_Jesus posted:Maybe. Do you gun the throttle a lot on straights and do a lot of highway miles? I also have no clue what you ride. I do a small amount of highway miles - they're probably 20-30% of the miles I ride. My bike is a 43hp Honda CTX700 and I do like to gun it, but how much damage can that much HP really do?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 21:45 |
|
It's probably more of a tire pressure issue.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 21:50 |
|
BlackMK4 posted:It's probably more of a tire pressure issue. I don't think so. I run 42psi, the maximum recommended by Honda for my bike, and I check it at least weekly, usually twice a week.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 22:28 |
|
Why are you keeping them inflated to the max psi?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 22:35 |
|
Radbot posted:I don't think so. I run 42psi, the maximum recommended by Honda for my bike, and I check it at least weekly, usually twice a week. I was going to give you poo poo but they actually do recommend 42PSI if you are adding over 200lb. Max psi and not a lot of weight will definitely wear the middle faster than normal.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 02:31 |
|
I had a Battlax (not sure which) on the rear of my K100, got a couple thousand miles out of it before it wore down in the middle. Yes I kept the air set to bike's spec. Replaced it with a lovely Shinko that felt about the same, got like 6k on it so far, still looks fine.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 02:57 |
|
El Jebus posted:I was going to give you poo poo but they actually do recommend 42PSI if you are adding over 200lb. Max psi and not a lot of weight will definitely wear the middle faster than normal. Hmm, didn't know that. Thanks. Yep, my gear and body definitely weigh more than 200lbs.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 13:57 |
|
Theres a $50 rebate right now on Dunlop Q3's - any downsides to these? looks like with a rebate I can get a set for $216. I have an 07 FZ6. Overkill? Any good in the wet? I had dunlop direzza ZII's on my miata and they were insanely sticky and these seems like a comparable bike tire.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 18:56 |
|
That's a pretty screaming deal, I'd go for it. They're not gonna be great in the wet, but they're going to be usable.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 18:59 |
|
Is there any specific attribute I should be looking for when searching for a tire that can handle gravel well? I assume that's included in "dry weather handling"?
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 20:31 |
|
Distanzias or something with a giant, chunky tread block is going to be your best bet. Otherwise, everything will be equally good/bad. Gravel is best handled by big tread blocks/knobbies, compound doesn't make much difference.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 21:18 |
|
Distanzias are about as good as it gets on gravel for still being good on the road. TKC-80s are more off-road but obviously shittier on road. They come in a variety of road bike sizes, I looked at trying them after the Distanzia but I just don't go off road that much any more.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 09:32 |
|
Voltage posted:I'm guessing the extra $200 is worth it to get PR4's over the contis? If you're looking for the middle of the road check out D404's I'm on them and they're a huge step up from the 5+ year old tires I was on before. My view of tires may be skewed. I love them, I'm on a cruiser though, so depending on what the bike is maybe not for you?
|
# ? Apr 11, 2015 07:10 |
|
I'm looking to do baby's first track weekend next month on my SV650 and since I'm no longer commuting on it I figured I'd swap out the Pilot Roads I have on there currently for some more track oriented tires. Is the BT-003 the right tire for that or should I be looking at something else? I figure the DOT tires are going to be wasted on me for now so no point in that. The BT-003s are only $240 for the set off motorcycle superstore which seems pretty reasonable.
|
# ? Apr 22, 2015 05:36 |
|
You can run those or just pick up a set of Q2/Q3/S20/Power Pure. The tires you have on now can be run up to fast B, at least, too.
|
# ? Apr 22, 2015 17:32 |
|
Digital_Jesus posted:Maybe all Conti tires don't suck. Nidhg00670000 posted:A few choice quotes about the ContiAttack SM from esteemed posters.
|
# ? Apr 22, 2015 17:52 |
|
BlackMK4 posted:You can run those or just pick up a set of Q2/Q3/S20/Power Pure. The tires you have on now can be run up to fast B, at least, too. Dunlop has a $50 rebate on the Q3s which brings it down to 185 for a set, so I guess I'll go with those.
|
# ? Apr 22, 2015 18:05 |
|
Considering new tires to replace the stock Dunlops on the DRZ400sm. I want to stay at 150/60/17 for the rear. I don't think they make PP3s in that size, are the PP 2CTs a decent substitute?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 07:16 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:44 |
|
Yeah. Also could just go with Contiforce SMs if you want more grip and fun.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 20:20 |