|
AsInHowe posted:Now as always, gently caress Duke I knew there was a reason I preferred Chapel Hill. I just didn't know why until now. 
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 16:41 |
|
|
ufarn posted:I love the #analysis that using "Dr." makes him look more like a Washington outsider. +/- on Paul showing up in Perry White Rimmed Glasses before primary season is over? Im going 1/1 on it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 08:26
|
|
|
Is there an election podcast or something I can get daily discussion from, other than a segment or two on NPR's All Things Considered? Maybe just the Washington Post politics section?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 08:42
|
|
|
Cliff Racer posted:But on the other hand presidential tickets with a female lose 100 percent of the time too and there's twice as much data to back that up. I guess at least one precedent would be broken then. On the other, other hand, Bush tickets are only 1-3(3-3 all time) in the election while Clinton tickets are 2-0(4-1 historically).
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 09:19
|
|
|
Gyges posted:On the other, other hand, Bush tickets are only 1-3(3-3 all time) in the election while Clinton tickets are 2-0(4-1 historically). Aren't Bush tickets 5-1? 1992 is the only loss with wins in 1980, 84, 88, 2000, 2004.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 09:53
|
|
|
2000 was a technical loss. But yes, it should be 2-2 with a 4-2 all time. I somehow didn't count 88 as a win.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 10:09
|
|
|
Gyges posted:2000 was a technical loss. But yes, it should be 2-2 with a 4-2 all time. I somehow didn't count 88 as a win. No it wasn't? 80 should be counted as a loss though because Bush was in the primary but didn't win it, having to settle for VP.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 10:43
|
|
|
Josh Lyman posted:Is there an election podcast or something I can get daily discussion from, other than a segment or two on NPR's All Things Considered? Maybe just the Washington Post politics section? I listen to slate political gabfest which is weekly and also has hosts that are frankly annoying (but I still listen anyway) There's also an ok new yorker political opinion but that too is weekly
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 11:44
|
|
|
SOON
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 11:48
|
|
|
But all is not well for Randy. The Foundation for a Secure and Prosperous America is spending $1m to air this ad 80-100 times per day this week, including $300k for  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYSMN9X_5pY Best part: the voice clip they used of him saying Iran isn't a threat is from him calling in to Alex Jones.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 11:55
|
|
|
Rand presenting at Galt House Hotel is the most bingo thing in the GOP.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 12:11
|
|
|
Joementum posted:But all is not well for Randy. The Foundation for a Secure and Prosperous America is spending $1m to air this ad 80-100 times per day this week, including $300k for They might as well just play the Daisy ad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 12:18
|
|
|
Monmouth National Poll
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 12:53
|
|
|
Joementum posted:SOON Rand's campaign shirts: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 13:13
|
|
|
Wheeee posted:Saved America from the terrorists and got revenge on Saddam for 9/11! Defeated Saddam in '91!
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 13:15
|
|
|
Joementum posted:SOON
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 13:24
|
|
|
CRUZMENTUM is gaining steam, wrap it up JEBailures.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 13:45
|
|
|
This campaign owwwwwwnnnnnnnssssss.   
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 13:46
|
|
|
Wait, why does the GOP base hate Graham so much? Is it because he sometimes works on legislation with the dems to make sure at least some poo poo gets done?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:00
|
|
|
What the gently caress, Rand Paul already announced via his website. What's more, CNBC says his announcement is at 11:30am, not noon as previously reported. edit: At 9:03am ET, his donations total $24,547.14. Should be interesting to see how it progresses throughout the day. Josh Lyman fucked around with this message at 14:04 on Apr 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:01
|
|
|
Grey Fox posted:Wait, why does the GOP base hate Graham so much? Is it because he sometimes works on legislation with the dems to make sure at least some poo poo gets done? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:06
|
|
|
Joementum posted:This campaign owwwwwwnnnnnnnssssss. What even.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:11
|
|
|
Go on.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:17
|
|
|
Joementum posted:SOON Wait, this logo wasnt a placeholder? It looks like a loving convenience store sign. 3 for 1 butterfingers, free roller dog with purchase of 10 gallons of unleaded at Rand Quick Marts Inc. Real Name Grover posted:Go on. Nothing screams GOP "thoughtful" like wallpapered fake books. Theres some real pathos here. Spaceman Future! fucked around with this message at 14:23 on Apr 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:21
|
|
|
Joementum posted:SOON This is a visual campaign that will be so easy to Photoshop. DEFEAT THE WASHINGTON MACHINE KILL YOU'RE PARENTS RAND
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:25
|
|
|
Joementum posted:This campaign owwwwwwnnnnnnnssssss. Call me when they have a set of Rand Paul commemorative plates. Act now and I will buy some 9/11 commemorative coins.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:26
|
|
|
Has Monmouth University always done national polling?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
Lustful Man Hugs posted:What even. Wrap yourself up in His warmth.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:33
|
|
|
Spaceman Future! posted:Wait, this logo wasnt a placeholder? It looks like a loving convenience store sign. 3 for 1 butterfingers, free roller dog with purchase of 10 gallons of unleaded at Rand Quick Marts Inc. I read this as "boobs" at first. That works, too.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:34
|
|
|
Gravel Gravy posted:Call me when they have a set of Rand Paul commemorative plates. http://www.zazzle.com/rand_paul_ryan_2016_presidential_election_plate-115470376377326819 two hundred and ninety two reviews?  Lucky duck designs... this is so meta, is there an ARG or something lookoutbelow posted:I read this as "boobs" at first. That works, too. Speaking of, pretty sure that logo is actually photoshopped onto her chest.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:35
|
|
|
Spaceman Future! posted:Speaking of, pretty sure that logo is actually photoshopped onto her chest. Well that lawn sign sure as hell looks photoshoppped.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:39
|
|
|
Joementum posted:But all is not well for Randy. The Foundation for a Secure and Prosperous America is spending $1m to air this ad 80-100 times per day this week, including $300k for I can't help thinking this will backfire. The only way to counteract a sane foreign policy viewpoint (which a few of Paul's views are, if in isolation) is to pretend it doesn't exist, not publicize it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:39
|
|
|
Spaceman Future! posted:
It sure is. Probably the dimples are, too. (not onto her chest, though. You know what I mean.)
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:40
|
|
|
AsInHowe posted:This is a visual campaign that will be so easy to Photoshop. that was easy, you're right. I should have actually looked for a close font though. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:47
|
|
|
Why do republicans have terrible graphic design? Also this Why is Ted Cruz using a tear to represent his campaign 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:49
|
|
|
Spaceman Future! posted:http://www.zazzle.com/rand_paul_ryan_2016_presidential_election_plate-115470376377326819 that is a ridiculously overpriced and batshit crazy product
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:50
|
|
|
Spaceman Future! posted:http://www.zazzle.com/rand_paul_ryan_2016_presidential_election_plate-115470376377326819 Yes because if it's one thing conservatives like, it's change. This plate is barely worthy of pouring an obscene amount of purple/green ketchup on. Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Why do republicans have terrible graphic design? Because Republicans are the kind of group that would work with a design artist, get sent a first draft, and use it without paying the artist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:51
|
|
|
AsInHowe posted:This is a visual campaign that will be so easy to Photoshop. Looks like a pretty standard font. Guess I'll spend some time figuring out which it is specifically, because why not?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:53
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:that was easy, you're right. I should have actually looked for a close font though. "You're"
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 14:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 16:41 |
|
|
Sir Tonk posted:"You're" Yes, that's the meme... Which I don't exactly understand in the first place, I wasn't around for that. Anyone?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2015 15:11
|
|
