|
Starlord indicates they didnt have a 2nd date. Maybe there's none there because there isn't any there. Your last 2 complaints are that it's a common scenario which isn't really a complaint as much as an observation.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 07:40 |
|
Toady posted:This fall on the CW. You know, give it another ten years. I could totally see a legit Jurassic Park television series on TV.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:41 |
|
Robotnik Nudes posted:Starlord indicates they didnt have a 2nd date. Maybe there's none there because there isn't any there. No, my last 2 complaints are that it's bland. And if there's no chemistry or energy between the two leads, then why are they being given scenes where they have to verbally spar and ease in lots of exposition in between. Chemistry =/= Romantic Chemistry. It leads to clunky garbage like that scene.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:43 |
|
Dan Didio posted:No, my last 2 complaints are that it's bland. You don't know if it's bland because you've seen less than 2 minutes of it. Chris pratt is always fun to watch. People who believe that ideas and stories can be inherently bad or bland aren't making a legitimate criticism because every scenario can be called bland. The execution is what matters, and in this case, apart form Chris pratt being himself I don't see a real problem. there's not enough there to make an honest determination either way really.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:45 |
|
Why do you think I'm talking about the full film?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:54 |
|
Dan Didio posted:Why do you think I'm talking about the full film? I think you're just being negative for the sake of appearing to have an opinion. i don't think you're really talking about anything at all.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:55 |
|
Robotnik Nudes posted:I think you're just being negative for the sake of appearing to have an opinion. i don't think you're really talking about anything at all. lmao somebody stop me! I'm out of control!
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:57 |
|
Dan Didio posted:lmao somebody stop me! I'm out of control! No, you're just another boring nerd with canned opinions.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 07:58 |
|
I think you have a serious problem, man.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 08:00 |
|
Dan Didio posted:I think you have a serious problem, man.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 08:02 |
|
I thought it was alright. edit: though the ladies' acting seems a bit wooden.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 10:45 |
|
That was utter crap. Felt like a bad deleted scene. Bit less optimistic about this now.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 10:50 |
|
Yeah, bad scene. Still excited about the movie but if thats the extended look that supposed to get us to want to go...
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 11:01 |
|
Who cares about the acting in a scene with no dinosaurs. I'm just glad that Jurassic Park Starlord isn't going to be all >:| the whole movie
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 11:47 |
|
Macaluso posted:Who cares about the acting in a scene with no dinosaurs. I'm just glad that Jurassic Park Starlord isn't going to be all >:| the whole movie Well, I'd be a little bit concerned since the director (and one of the writers) was hired based on Safety Not Guaranteed which had good dialogue and acting (according to wikipedia). If the only thing he is here for sucks as hard as that scene then I am worried. We all know he wasn't hired for his great visual eye or his action direction skills, that's what the cgi-artists and second unit is for, just like on every Marvel movie, or any other big blockbuster nowadays. With Jurassic Park you could say "Well that certainly was a Steven Spielberg movie", whereas with this you will probably say "well that certainly was some movie with cgi dinosaurs".
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 12:10 |
|
This movie won't be good but I'm going to go see it because it has Chris Pratt riding a motorcycle with a gang of raptors and flying dinosaurs killing tourists.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 12:27 |
|
The movie won't capture the same feeling you got when you were 8, so it will be a bad movie.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 13:58 |
|
Dan Didio posted:The dialogue is atrocious and the scene is completely devoid of any kind of chemistry or energy? Unfortunately, these are the correct observations. Ah well.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 14:58 |
|
This movie went downhill the moment they revealed I-Rex wasn't called Diablosaurus Rex
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 15:02 |
|
That was a bad scene with poo poo acting and poo poo writing but I don't care because dinosaurs are rad. It's not like anyone expected this film to match or surpass the original in the first place, right?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 15:16 |
|
Doflamingo posted:That was a bad scene with poo poo acting and poo poo writing but I don't care because dinosaurs are rad. It's not like anyone expected this film to match or surpass the original in the first place, right? I would have liked it if it wasn't apparently trying to be some kind of rom com bullshit in the middle of the dinosaur action. I mean hell if Star Lord is the Raptor Man, why not have a few hanging out at his house? That's how Cheetah Man works.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 15:28 |
|
That scene would have been 500% improved by some raptors just chillin in the background, wandering around, maybe fighting over a mouse.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 15:46 |
|
feedmyleg posted:That scene would have been 500% improved by some raptors just chillin in the background, wandering around, maybe fighting over a mouse. To be fair, pretty much every (non-raptor) scene in the history of movies would be improved by that.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 15:51 |
|
this movie would be poo poo without star lord, be grateful spergs
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 16:51 |
|
Dan Didio posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4 Wow, that was surprisingly cringey. I thought I was watching an unfunny tryhard Parks & Recs episode for a minute there. If this is how Chris Pratt's going to act for the entire movie then I think he was horribly miscast.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:04 |
|
I kind of liked that scene, and I agree that it's nice to see Chris Pratt be funny rather than stoic, like the trailers kind of portray him. I do think its weird to market a dinosaur movie with a clip featuring exactly zero dinosaurs.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:05 |
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:I kind of liked that scene, and I agree that it's nice to see Chris Pratt be funny rather than stoic, like the trailers kind of portray him. They're going to be rendering the dinos until the very last day they can.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:08 |
|
The problem with that clip isn't really the acting or the dialogue, there is just something really off with the pacing.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:10 |
duz posted:They're going to be rendering the dinos until the very last day they can. Good, because they look like poo poo at the moment.
|
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:11 |
|
Yea I'm more worried that the dinosaur scenes will just be the same old poo poo and the CGI won't even be AAA work. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes is the new measuring stick, and if you're making a loving Jurassic Park sequel, you'd better strive to be as good or even better than what's come before. I know I'm too old for a new movie to reproduce what I felt seeing Jurassic Park for the first time, but I'm thinking more about the kids of today who will see this movie. If they watch it and say "those dinos look fake, this isn't as awesome as Planet of the Apes or Godzilla", then there is a problem.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:16 |
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:I kind of liked that scene, and I agree that it's nice to see Chris Pratt be funny rather than stoic, like the trailers kind of portray him.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:17 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:It was a commercial on MTV right? Maybe it was just marketing trying to hit the right demographic? Also it was less than 2 minutes of the film and its obviously from the character setup in the very early portion of the movie. Calm down nerds
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:48 |
|
Basebf555 posted:Yea I'm more worried that the dinosaur scenes will just be the same old poo poo and the CGI won't even be AAA work. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes is the new measuring stick, and if you're making a loving Jurassic Park sequel, you'd better strive to be as good or even better than what's come before. I know I'm too old for a new movie to reproduce what I felt seeing Jurassic Park for the first time, but I'm thinking more about the kids of today who will see this movie. If they watch it and say "those dinos look fake, this isn't as awesome as Planet of the Apes or Godzilla", then there is a problem. I think some of you guys are really overestimating the amount of people who are going to think the dinosaurs look bad
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 17:51 |
|
Macaluso posted:I think some of you guys are really overestimating the amount of people who are going to think the dinosaurs look bad Not only that, but these days making photo-realistic looking dinos is a lot easier than you might think for a big production studio with talented artists, I'm sure they'll handle it just fine.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:12 |
Excuse me but it's not autoerotica therefore it is unacceptable.
|
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:20 |
|
As long as it looks better than this, i'll be happy.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 18:56 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:It was a commercial on MTV right? Maybe it was just marketing trying to hit the right demographic? Ah, I see we're at the bargaining stage. This clip isn't damning for the whole movie by any means, but trying to excuse away that the scene is bad is really dumb. This is a bad scene. It could be a bad scene in a good movie, but we don't know that yet. We do know it is a bad scene in a movie with a bunch of cool dinosaurs so it probably doesn't matter in the long run.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 19:14 |
|
But its not that bad though. It isn't good, but I don't see why there is this sudden surge to slay the dragon of this scene.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 19:18 |
|
How strange that a 90-second dialogue only scene pulled from the middle of a movie no one has watched yet looks weird out of context.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 19:27 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 07:40 |
|
mr.capps posted:But its not that bad though. It isn't good, but I don't see why there is this sudden surge to slay the dragon of this scene.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2015 19:28 |