Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Trin Tragula
Apr 22, 2005

100 Years Ago

Just guess what the verdict is from British and French intelligence on the possibility of a gas attack at Ypres. Go on, guess. You'll never guess. It's a good excuse to make a few points about gas. There's heavy fighting at the Battle of Shaiba, any possibility of a breakthrough at the Battle of Woevre is given up, and the Allied Brewery Traders (not the Brewers) takes out an advert using the same font as is used for War Office recruiting-adverts to protest against the recent flood of enthusiasm for temperance.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!
EDIT: Fixed now

Fangz fucked around with this message at 11:43 on Apr 14, 2015

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Kanine posted:

what are some of your favorite :black101: kinds of moments in various wars throughout the ages?

I always liked Rudolfo Hernandez playing chicken with death and winning.

To be perfectly clear: Dudes unit was spammed with korean artillery, decided to hang back and shoot the attackers while his friends retreated, his rifle broke, and so he bayonet charged the enemy. Somehow, he killed 6 people with his knife (and fists, as he was disarmed mid-murder-tornado), before going down. In spite of being cut in the face, shot and hit multiple times by shrapnel, he survived the war and died of old age.

Also, anything to do with gurkhas :black101:

I literally just picked a random Gurkha VC recipient, and this is what it came up with:

quote:

On 5 March 1945 at Snowdon-East, near Tamandu, Burma (now Myanmar), Gurung and his unit were approaching Snowdon-East. His company became pinned down by an enemy sniper and were suffering casualties. As the sniper was inflicting casualties on the section, Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung, being unable to fire from the lying position, stood up fully exposed to the heavy fire and calmly killed the enemy sniper with his rifle, thus saving his section from suffering further casualties.

The section advanced again but came under heavy fire once again. Without waiting for orders, Gurung dashed out to attack the first enemy fox-hole. Throwing two grenades, he killed the two occupants and without any hesitation rushed on to the next enemy fox-hole and killed the Japanese in it with his bayonet. He cleared two further fox-holes with bayonet and grenades. "During his single-handed attacks on these four enemy fox-holes, Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung was subjected to almost continuous and point-blank Light Machine Gun fire from a bunker on the North tip of the objective." For the fifth time, Gurung "went forward alone in the face of heavy enemy fire to knock out this position. He doubled forward and leapt on to the roof of the bunker from where, his hand grenades being finished, he flung two No. 77 smoke grenades into the bunker slit." Gurung killed two Japanese soldiers who ran out of the bunker with his Kukri, and then advanced into the cramped bunker and killed the remaining Japanese soldier.

Gurung ordered three others to take up positions in the bunker. "The enemy counter-attack followed soon after, but under Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung's command the small party inside the bunker repelled it with heavy loss to the enemy. Rifleman Bhanbhagta Gurung showed outstanding bravery and a complete disregard for his own safety. His courageous clearing of five enemy positions single-handed was in itself decisive in capturing the objective and his inspiring example to the rest of the Company contributed to the speedy consolidation of this success.

Tias fucked around with this message at 10:43 on Apr 14, 2015

Tevery Best
Oct 11, 2013

Hewlo Furriend

HEY GAL posted:

So like last year someone asked how old the practice of representing units as squares on a map was, and I said that my dudes do it, and that I had seen sketches made either at the time or shortly beforehand as a memory aid, but that I couldn't find them. I finally found them:

Imperialist battle array. People thought this was the plan for the battle of Luetzen, but it isn't--it's a plan for a battle that didn't end up happening; the same deployment was used at Luetzen but the specific units had changed. I don't know if this is in Wallenstein's own handwriting. Note the fortifications--Wallenstein is extremely defensive, and prefers to fight from behind trenches or field fortifications. At Luetzen he ended up deploying on a sunken road, which his infantrymen dug into all night, new units fitting themselves in all along the line by candlelight as they arrived.
How do you mean "a battle that didn't end up happening"? Was it that the plan was prepared well in advance and just never ended up getting used, or that the two armies had already met, but one of them decided to bail just before the fight?

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

Tevery Best posted:

How do you mean "a battle that didn't end up happening"? Was it that the plan was prepared well in advance and just never ended up getting used, or that the two armies had already met, but one of them decided to bail just before the fight?
First one, I think. Deployments are planned a long time in advance.

Tevery Best
Oct 11, 2013

Hewlo Furriend
Why? To practice? Given how erratic unit movements and logistics in 30YW seem to be, it doesn't really look like you can rely all that much on a given unit being there when you need it.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
In tawdry military commercialism chat, Australian supermarket chain Woolworths are trying to drum up ANZAC day sales with a dignified memorial lovely meme generator.

Rabhadh
Aug 26, 2007

Tevery Best posted:

Why? To practice? Given how erratic unit movements and logistics in 30YW seem to be, it doesn't really look like you can rely all that much on a given unit being there when you need it.

I know their private lives are chaotic but these guys are professional soldiers, and knowing where you need to be when in contact with the enemy is essential, the officers have square root tables carved on their pike shafts so they can get poo poo organised quicker.

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

Rabhadh posted:

I know their private lives are chaotic but these guys are professional soldiers, and knowing where you need to be when in contact with the enemy is essential, the officers have square root tables carved on their pike shafts so they can get poo poo organised quicker.
Their short-weapons, those dudes don't carry pikes.

And even if the specific people you've labeled don't all show (which happened at Luetzen; Pappenheim's people were at Halle at the time since I think it's common to disperse your army when you travel, Pappenheim learned that poo poo was going down at midnight, left Halle by two in the morning, and arrived on the field at twelve noon, just in time to get killed), someone will. The Imperial deployment at Luetzen looked almost identical in form to that sketch, just the individual regiments were different.

Edit: Speaking of kings of Sweden who get shot in the head:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-blazing-career-and-mysterious-death-of-the-swedish-meteor-39695356/?no-ist
The button story is a little too pat, but it's a good story...and we get a look at another wizard military leader, this time one who's also capable of protecting his army for a while. Now I may be wrong, but don't the wounds look like they were made at close range? Those fractures around the bullet holes look like they were made by expanding gas, if I remember that one forensic pathology class I took forever ago.

HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 12:44 on Apr 14, 2015

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

HEY GAL posted:

Those fractures around the bullet holes look like they were made by expanding gas, if I remember that one forensic pathology class I took forever ago.

Expanding gas from what exactly? The gas in the barrel escaping? Cause that would mean the firearm had to be insanely close to his head.

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

Jobbo_Fett posted:

Expanding gas from what exactly? The gas in the barrel escaping? Cause that would mean the firearm had to be insanely close to his head.
Right, and ever since he died, people have been wondering whether or not it was murder.

Power Khan
Aug 20, 2011

by Fritz the Horse
If you shoot something pointblank, it will leave burn marks and residue of the powder on the thing that you shot?

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

JaucheCharly posted:

If you shoot something pointblank, it will leave burn marks and residue of the powder on the thing that you shot?
But this body is 300 years old, so I don't know if the people who did the autopsy could find any.

Power Khan
Aug 20, 2011

by Fritz the Horse
You can make out something like hematomes on mummies without much equipment and powder burns aren't that subtle. If the shooter stood a meter away or so, the whole side of the head where the entry wound is would show burn marks, sprayed all over like black dots. If the gun was set directly to the skull, you'd see the area around the entry would be completely charred, and it leaves a characteristic ring around the wound. You'd have to try very hard not to spot something like that.

Bacarruda
Mar 30, 2011

Mutiny!?! More like "reinterpreted orders"

HEY GAL posted:

Right, and ever since he died, people have been wondering whether or not it was murder.

None of the contemporary eyewitness accounts mention someone walking up to him and pulling the trigger, though. The speculation has always been that "lone gunman" shot him from a greater distance, which probably wouldn't have left powder burns on him.

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

Bacarruda posted:

None of the contemporary eyewitness accounts mention someone walking up to him and pulling the trigger, though. The speculation has always been that "lone gunman" shot him from a greater distance, which probably wouldn't have left powder burns on him.

Seems like a button-bullet would have pretty terrible ballistics.

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

HEY GAL posted:

So like last year someone asked how old the practice of representing units as squares on a map was, and I said that my dudes do it, and that I had seen sketches made either at the time or shortly beforehand as a memory aid, but that I couldn't find them. I finally found them:


This may just be from playing Pike&Shot but why do they like to arrange their units in a checkerboard fashion?

MikeCrotch
Nov 5, 2011

I AM UNJUSTIFIABLY PROUD OF MY SPAGHETTI BOLOGNESE RECIPE

YES, IT IS AN INCREDIBLY SIMPLE DISH

NO, IT IS NOT NORMAL TO USE A PEPPERAMI INSTEAD OF MINCED MEAT

YES, THERE IS TOO MUCH SALT IN MY RECIPE

NO, I WON'T STOP SHARING IT

more like BOLLOCKnese

StashAugustine posted:

This may just be from playing Pike&Shot but why do they like to arrange their units in a checkerboard fashion?

HEY GAL can confirm, but I think it's due to:

1. Providing space for musketeers to retreat into.
2. Allowing units to rotate in/out of combat when they were exhausted or being pushed back.

SeanBeansShako
Nov 20, 2009

Now the Drums beat up again,
For all true Soldier Gentlemen.

sullat posted:

Seems like a button-bullet would have pretty terrible ballistics.

Smoothbore barrel don't care. He just wanna shoot.

TheFluff
Dec 13, 2006

FRIENDS, LISTEN TO ME
I AM A SEAGULL
OF WEALTH AND TASTE
Someone at the Defence Research Agency Defence Materiel Administration (this dude) actually did a bunch of test firings to try to replicate the hole back in the... 80's? and came to the conclusion that it was the boring explanation (grapeshot from the fortress). Peter Englund wrote an essay about Swedish political murders centered around Karl XII which is well worth reading: http://www.peterenglund.com/textarkiv/mordslumpskott.htm

It's a pity none of his books about the 30YW and the Swedish great power era have been translated. Same thing with his essay collections, there's a ton of interesting stuff in there that hasn't been translated either.

TheFluff fucked around with this message at 17:43 on Apr 14, 2015

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

StashAugustine posted:

This may just be from playing Pike&Shot but why do they like to arrange their units in a checkerboard fashion?

During this era, armies were often led by bishops.

PittTheElder
Feb 13, 2012

:geno: Yes, it's like a lava lamp.

Nenonen posted:

During this era, armies were often led by bishops.

:vince:

Power Khan
Aug 20, 2011

by Fritz the Horse
I'd bet that they did it, because :Romans:

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!
I always wonder how these manipular formations could have been effective in practice. The idea of cycling in fresh troops sounds good, but you are banking a lot on your ability to withdraw in an orderly fashion in the middle of a melee.... What if the enemy doesn't cooperate?

Rocko Bonaparte
Mar 12, 2002

Every day is Friday!

Fangz posted:

I always wonder how these manipular formations could have been effective in practice. The idea of cycling in fresh troops sounds good, but you are banking a lot on your ability to withdraw in an orderly fashion in the middle of a melee.... What if the enemy doesn't cooperate?

I would imagine they are mobile enough to withdraw so long as they don't end up grappling, and grappling with somebody is pretty dumb to do when your opponent has a lot of friends right next to them.

Murgos
Oct 21, 2010

Fangz posted:

I always wonder how these manipular formations could have been effective in practice. The idea of cycling in fresh troops sounds good, but you are banking a lot on your ability to withdraw in an orderly fashion in the middle of a melee.... What if the enemy doesn't cooperate?

Well, lots of different things got tried. These formations didn't often appear out of thin air and what you are seeing are the ones that worked.

Rhymenoserous
May 23, 2008

PittTheElder posted:

Because people can barely drive in two dimensions as it is.

My Dad constantly rants about how his generation thought we'd all be in flying cars by now despite clear practical reasons it will never happen. One time he was in the middle of one of these rants and we passed someone who had flipped their SUV over on its roof on a perfectly clear day with no traffic. And it was on fire. I simply stated "Now imagine that guy flying over your house."

Self driving electrics are a far more interesting concept.

TheFluff
Dec 13, 2006

FRIENDS, LISTEN TO ME
I AM A SEAGULL
OF WEALTH AND TASTE
http://www.svt.se/nyheter/vetenskap/mer-krut-i-vasas-kanoner

Huh. They apparently made and test fired a copy of one of the guns from the Vasa recently, and apparently it's much more powerful than they previously thought. The cannon ball has a muzzle velocity of about 350 m/s and easily punches through a replica of the Vasa's own side (70 cm of oak wood). Not only that, in one of the ballistic tests the ball punched through the ship side, bounced on the ground a few hundred meters downrange and continued into the forest where it broke a thick pine trunk. Skip to 01:25 or so and see it in slow motion.

e: also a video clip in English about halfway down this page: http://www.saabgroup.com/en/About-Saab/Newsroom/Press-releases--News/2014---12/Projekt-Vasakanon-lar-oss-mer-om-sjostrid-pa1600-talet/

TheFluff fucked around with this message at 20:41 on Apr 14, 2015

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

HEY GAL posted:

Which is one reason why I'm pretty surprised nobody made a good modern 30yw movie.

It didn't involve America and it's not part of American pop history. :shobon:
(Hell, even John Q. European has barely heard of it)

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME
I don't think Stash Augustine was talking about the relationship between the dudes in individual battalions, which is where leaving space for musketeers and rotating your dudes is an issue, I think s/he was talking about why the battalions are arranged catty-corner from one another in the Imperial sketch, and that's so they can support one another if they have to.

They might also be talking about the different symbols on the Swedish side in the Swedish sketch, where it's a square of circles, then a square of little symbols like musical notes, then another square of circles. I think that refers to the "Swedish Wedge," which is a rectangular formation, six deep, pike in the center and musketeers to either side.

HEY GUNS fucked around with this message at 21:06 on Apr 14, 2015

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

gradenko_2000 posted:

Wouldn't a "post-Fall of France Germany that doesn't invade anyone else" be much less susceptible to a British blockade because it now has an entire other country to feed it? To say nothing of how Germany would be able to trade with Russia.

My point is not that Britain could successfully blockade Germany in this scenario (if it pretty much rules all of Western Europe that's not going to work out well - note that historically Germany didn't experience WW1-style deprivation on the home front until it had lost the war), but that Germany likewise couldn't prevent Britain from maintaining the Empire. I suspect you'd end up with a Peace of Amiens-style stalemate for the time being.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

Fangz posted:

I always wonder how these manipular formations could have been effective in practice. The idea of cycling in fresh troops sounds good, but you are banking a lot on your ability to withdraw in an orderly fashion in the middle of a melee.... What if the enemy doesn't cooperate?

I'm kinda curious about the answer myself, but if the reason for the cycling of the troops is to make sure that tired troops get replaced by fresh ones, the answer might be as simple as "the enemy are also tired and not able to effectively stop you from falling back."

Jamwad Hilder
Apr 18, 2007

surfin usa
You're not going to be able to get through the gaps in a checkered formation without having to fight past the gauntlets between the units leaving the gap. You're also going to have to deal with units further back making their way up to plug the hole/relieve the forward formations. It would be very easy to end up isolated and behind a solid line of the enemy. So sure, it's possible to get through, but it's probably not smart unless you have overwhelming numbers.

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!

Jamwad Hilder posted:

You're not going to be able to get through the gaps in a checkered formation without having to fight past the gauntlets between the units leaving the gap. You're also going to have to deal with units further back making their way up to plug the hole/relieve the forward formations. It would be very easy to end up isolated and behind a solid line of the enemy. So sure, it's possible to get through, but it's probably not smart unless you have overwhelming numbers.
Sure, but we're talking the Romans here. They are always outnumbered.

Jamwad Hilder
Apr 18, 2007

surfin usa

Fangz posted:

Sure, but we're talking the Romans here. They are always outnumbered.

Right, but they're also professional soldiers and they're not ever fighting while in a checkered formation for significant periods of time. Maybe there's some overlap when the first line retreats through the second, but anyone who's dumb enough to chase Romans through the gaps is going to get killed pretty quickly if they haven't already been killed by the skirmishers between the two lines.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

The manipular legions weren't professional soldiers. When Marius reformed the legions to make them a professional army everyone got their equipment issued by the state and with the basis of the manipular system dissolved the tactics went as well.

Jamwad Hilder
Apr 18, 2007

surfin usa
They still used the three line formation after the Marian reforms, what they phased out was the divisions based on age/social class/equipment since (as you mentioned) everything else was standardized.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

TheFluff posted:

http://www.svt.se/nyheter/vetenskap/mer-krut-i-vasas-kanoner

Huh. They apparently made and test fired a copy of one of the guns from the Vasa recently, and apparently it's much more powerful than they previously thought. The cannon ball has a muzzle velocity of about 350 m/s and easily punches through a replica of the Vasa's own side (70 cm of oak wood). Not only that, in one of the ballistic tests the ball punched through the ship side, bounced on the ground a few hundred meters downrange and continued into the forest where it broke a thick pine trunk. Skip to 01:25 or so and see it in slow motion.

e: also a video clip in English about halfway down this page: http://www.saabgroup.com/en/About-Saab/Newsroom/Press-releases--News/2014---12/Projekt-Vasakanon-lar-oss-mer-om-sjostrid-pa1600-talet/
Interesting. Some automatic translations...

quote:

For two weeks was shot over 50 shots with Vasa Cannon. They tested how far cannon firing and the accuracy and impact it has. The goal was a three by five meters large ship side in oak specially made in the Vasa Museum carpentry, Vasa as a model. Although there are historical accounts of battles, but Fred Hocker and the squad was still not certain that the cannon ball would go through. The first shot was a success. 10-kg ball made easy holes in the 45 centimeter thick side. But there was a small burst of Splinters were on the inside than what Fred Hocker expected.

- This guy than death, but he has fared well, said Fred Hocker, pointing to the screens behind the goal to be imagined crewmen.

But the second shot gave much shrapnel, and scientists can now say that the amount of deadly shrapnel depends more on where the ball hits than the ball speed. If you die or not depends on luck.

- A bullet can go here between us and we would do well if the ball just hit the shell and not a thicker knee or ribs, said Fred Hocker.

The tests also show that the guns had an astonishing firepower. Cannon balls leave the mouth at a speed of 350 meters per second, a little faster than sound. A bullet could go right through a ship. On the shooting range goes a bullet through the ship's side, bouncing on the ground, and then continue 500-600 meters into the forest where it pierces a rough pine.

quote:

In the early 1600s, Sweden was at war with many of its neighbors to the south. It was about controlling the trade of the Baltic Sea and to stop the Catholic expansion in the 30-year war. King Gustavus Adolphus did mighty battleship and the Vasa would instill fear and respect in the war against Poland. But why then had the Vasa so powerful cannons? The Vasa was in a transition in how waged war at sea. The tactic earlier was that each ship chose their own goals and shot until they could board the and take over the ship. Later on, the Marines go over to the line tactics in which the vessels more coordinated lay down the sides of the enemy and pushed together until the enemy surrendered. It required more guns. Vasa was in between. Gustavus Adolphus wanted many guns, but the ship design was old-fashioned high-acts for boarding, and the tactic was lame.

- Admiral believed that the decisive moment was the entering, so we just used the guns in the beginning of the battle to soften up the enemy a little. Gustavus Adolphus, who was an enthusiastic gunner, had the idea to use the ship and guns as the main weapon instead of boarding. But then you have to have more and heavier guns.

I don't see the article mentioning at what range the tests were fired. Also, no mention of this

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

SeanBeansShako posted:

Smoothbore barrel don't care. He just wanna shoot.
Not to mention that if you believe actual bullets won't kill your target, the lovely ballistics are outweighed by the fact that you have to find something that will work. And unlike what the people who killed Wallenstein did, you can't just dip the thing in holy water because you're a Lutheran.

Edit: Literal wizard-kings. The early modern period is so rad

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Chamale
Jul 11, 2010

I'm helping!



HEY GAL posted:

Not to mention that if you believe actual bullets won't kill your target, the lovely ballistics are outweighed by the fact that you have to find something that will work. And unlike what the people who killed Wallenstein did, you can't just dip the thing in holy water because you're a Lutheran.

Edit: Literal wizard-kings. The early modern period is so rad

I love everything about the wizard-kings idea and early modern ideas of magic.

  • Locked thread