|
Azuth0667 posted:Isn't there a federal law preventing employers from discriminating based on religion? In a 5-4 decision: It's freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. 
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 04:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 05:22 |
|
|
Phone posted:In a 5-4 decision: It's freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. More like, "In a 5-4 decision: 'What are you usually doing just after mid-day on Friday?' is upheld as a totes legit interview question. It is the finding of the court that the plaintiff is the real racist."
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 04:52
|
|
|
Azuth0667 posted:Lets say I own a zoroastrian doughnut shop and I decide to hire people. I decide since I'm not reading 1000+ applications that I'm only going to hire other zoroastrians. The other potential employees decide to sue and I'm allowed to go "but, but, but, we're zoroastrian" to circumvent a federal law? How does that work? Why are you running a religious non profit donut shop?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:02
|
|
|
Pohl posted:Why are you running a religious non profit donut shop? Because I make poor business decisions.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:06
|
|
|
Dashcam footage shows Arizona cop intentionally run over suspectquote:Then, in a decision that Marana police Chief Terry Rozema says probably saved Valencia's life, Officer Michael Rapiejko drives his cruiser onto the sidewalk and rams Valencia. Once again: James Holmes got taken alive and unharmed. Brown guy gets this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:15
|
|
|
Azuth0667 posted:Because I make poor business decisions. gently caress you, have you ever even had a Zoroasted donut made in a proper Zoroaster?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:20
|
|
|
Azuth0667 posted:Because I make poor business decisions.  By the word of Zoroaster, no business decision is poor when it involves Ahura Mazda.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:22
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:Dashcam footage shows Arizona cop intentionally run over suspect He got taken alive and unharmed because was sitting in his vehicle and obeying commands. This guy was walking towarda pedestrians with a weapon and not obeying commands, or, a reasonable loving time to ram someone with a vehicle rather than shooting them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:23
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:He got taken alive and unharmed because was sitting in his vehicle and obeying commands. This guy was walking towarda pedestrians with a weapon and not obeying commands, or, a reasonable loving time to ram someone with a vehicle rather than shooting them. 1) Fine, Oswald then. 2) No pedestrians in the film. He's walking down an empty street.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:26
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:
 avatar size please.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:28
|
|
|
Azuth0667 posted:
What size is avatar size? e: 125x125? 
FAUXTON fucked around with this message at 05:33 on Apr 16, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:29
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:What size is avatar size? About 30 meters high. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:33
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:
Not gonna lie, I'm tempted to convert to this religion. That's loving fantastic. chitoryu12 posted:The minigun is probably a mixture between wanting to seem cool and show off our power and people with little understanding of collateral damage being the ones in charge of deciding on presidential defense weaponry. I'm honestly surprised crazy people haven't tried things like semi-trailers, those seem to have a pretty good bit of momentum behind them. Though I confess that White House motor defenses are not something I have much knowledge of, maybe there are too many barriers to get much direct speed in a semi.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:33
|
|
|
Aurubin posted:Weren't moats generally kept disgusting on purpose to dissuade invaders? Somebody come up with a joke linking this to Republicans, I'm tired. There was rarely any moving water involved, so yeah they were disgusting pits of stagnant water.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
Mo_Steel posted:Not gonna lie, I'm tempted to convert to this religion. That's loving fantastic. Considering the street in front of it is closed off with heavy bollards, yeah, not really working out too well. But I'm going to drop this topic before Lowtax gets Yet Another Call from the SS.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
Mo_Steel posted:I'm honestly surprised crazy people haven't tried things like semi-trailers, those seem to have a pretty good bit of momentum behind them. Though I confess that White House motor defenses are not something I have much knowledge of, maybe there are too many barriers to get much direct speed in a semi.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:1) Fine, Oswald then. A typical white guy wouldn't have been able to get shot during a prison transfer.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:37
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:What size is avatar size? Amazing thanks  .
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 05:48
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:1) Fine, Oswald then. This was posted a month or two ago during Black death #9845897325 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2014/dec/28/womshoots-hixsneighborhood/280032/ Crazy white woman drives around taking pot shots, then points her gun at the cops.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 06:07
|
|
|
gently caress off Chipotle, you are not in the tipping class of restaurants
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 06:07
|
|
|
Judging me on the content of my character?! That's...that's just like racism!
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:As far as I know the anti-air defenses of the White House are predominately NASAMS and similar SAM launchers. [Hank Hill voice] Are you telling me that the blessed White House is defended by a weapons system made by Europeans? Bwahhh!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 06:36
|
|
|
Why are americans loving pussies when it comes to anything. Wah wah a gyrocopter were all gonna die. If that had been a suicide bomber and had ended up killing all the congressmen that would of only been a improvement. gently caress those turds.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 06:54
|
|
|
PerpetualSelf posted:Why are americans loving pussies when it comes to anything. We're not pussies on pedophiles, you godless monarchist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 06:59
|
|
|
PerpetualSelf posted:Why are americans loving pussies when it comes to anything. Dear secret service, when we say eat the rich we mean that they should be stripped of their title and assets and made to suffer a pedestrian life. SA is literally going into the library of congress and goons still talk like drunken stalinists. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 07:18
|
|
|
RuanGacho posted:Dear secret service, when we say eat the rich we mean that they should be stripped of their title and assets and made to suffer a pedestrian life. Such is life.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 07:35
|
|
|
PerpetualSelf posted:Why are americans loving pussies when it comes to anything. Are you the Dr Lexus from Idiocracy?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 07:36
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:People with bad opinions aren't a protected class, sorry. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 09:35
|
|
|
Don't judge me for the content of my character, you racist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 10:50
|
|
|
Azuth0667 posted:Lets say I own a zoroastrian doughnut shop and I decide to hire people. I decide since I'm not reading 1000+ applications that I'm only going to hire other zoroastrians. The other potential employees decide to sue and I'm allowed to go "but, but, but, we're zoroastrian" to circumvent a federal law? How does that work? THe act only applies when a Buisness is asked to partake in an activity that conflicts with their convictions . Bakery shop by law cannot not do Buisness with zoroastrian, but if the doughnut shop is asked to make doughnuts with fake dicks going through them then the Buisness can say no. If the doughnut shop is asked to deliver doughnuts to aN anti-semItic / anti-democracy zoroastrian party then they can say no. Truthfully, the whole loving thing was stupid to start off with and libtards made a big deal out of it for nothing. But it was meant to be a smoke and mirror situation politicly just like ferguson, and all that other poo poo. Bill Clinton signed the act in 1992 and Hilary supported RFRA ACT. it was to protect native Americans whine wanted to smoke peyote for religious reasons. Now Hillary does not support it because her failed attempt to run to. The administration made a big deal out of it at the same exact time as the Iran nuke deal. This took some media focus off the nuke deal and set it towards the controversial RFRA. Hillary sought the opportunity for political gains from this to increase support. This is modern politics
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
Karnegal posted:gently caress off Chipotle, you are not in the tipping class of restaurants do you tip streetfood vendors
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
Edit: Oh gently caress, I did not mean to turn this into a tipping thread. Those are worse than circumcision threads. gently caress it, I edited all of that out. This is not a thread about tipping. Pohl fucked around with this message at 13:07 on Apr 16, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:04
|
|
|
drakegrim posted:But it was meant to be a smoke and mirror situation politicly just like ferguson, and all that other poo poo. Oh boy, and from what devious trick were these smoke and mirrors distracting everyone's attention? Another Benghazi?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:04
|
|
|
On the topic Of Hillary, in or out? Banghazi scandal- that should have disqualified her right off the bat Bill Clinton pedo scandal- wtf? Email scandal- every self respecting dod contractor or civil servant knows they would have lost their security clearance or been locked up for this poo poo She is a hot head with a fowl mouth. Not good for representing Americans, but then again
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:07
|
|
|
drakegrim posted:On the topic Of Hillary, in or out? Is this what we're calling the Lewinsky scandal now?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:08
|
|
|
drakegrim posted:On the topic Of Hillary, in or out? Source your quotes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:09
|
|
|
So is Drakegrim for real or are they just a markov chain generator?
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:09
|
|
|
"Hillary was not a sufficiently premium lay to keep the notorious horndog Bill Clinton from cheating on her with interns, minor celebrities, underaged prostitutes. Do you really want a President with such weak-assed head game?" - at least one Foxnews contributor, within the next 12 months.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:11
|
|
|
Oh no, not a foul mouthed President! Good heavens! I do declare this coarse language shall give me the vapors!  *fans self vigorously*
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 05:22 |
|
|
PupsOfWar posted:"Hillary was not a sufficiently premium lay to keep the notorious horndog Bill Clinton from cheating on her with interns, minor celebrities, underaged prostitutes. Do you really want a President with such weak-assed head game?" - at least one Foxnews contributor, within the next 12 months. I'll be surprised if it's not the next 12 days
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2015 13:13
|
|