|
Tirade posted:Also not one woman among them. I don't want to go all 
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:32
|
|
but I think women are somehow less predisposed to having poo poo political views.
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:30 |
|
|
Tirade posted:Also not one woman among them. I don't want to go all Could it possibly have something to do with the regressive nature of the members of the party rather than the nobility of women?
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:32
|
|
|
I see your bishop  And raise you a.... poo poo, i guess i just call your bishop.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:34
|
|
|
Tirade posted:Also not one woman among them. I don't want to go all There is just something so appealing about a return to the cultural values and social constructs of the 1950's. I can't understand why the women aren't queuing up to join either.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:43
|
|
|
Be still my beating ~fart~
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:45
|
|
|
Birb Katter posted:Could it possibly have something to do with the regressive nature of the members of the party rather than the nobility of women? Basically every opinion poll that splits responses by gender has shown women have more progressive views than men.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:46
|
|
|
All I see are space lizards in human suits who are out to get me and control the Political landscape. FAKE EDIT: Accursed undiagnosed paranoid schizophrenia. hooman fucked around with this message at 07:57 on Apr 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:54
|
|
|
fliptophead posted:Does withdrawing the ambassador actually mean anything? In civilization 5, denouncing a rival civilization automatically withdraws your ambassador and you have to renegotiate to exchange embassies if you want to normalize relations again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:34
|
|
|
Serrath posted:In civilization 5, denouncing a rival civilization automatically withdraws your ambassador and you have to renegotiate to exchange embassies if you want to normalize relations again. Now how will we track Indonesia's fleet movements?!
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:39
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Basically every opinion poll that splits responses by gender has shown women have more progressive views than men. Women do not like the status quo as much as men because women do not benefit from it as much as men. This is not surprising.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:41
|
|
|
norp posted:I see your bishop  Call.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:56
|
|
|
I'll meet your sexualised imagery and raise you a first dog:
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 10:17
|
|
|
Are 9 lives too high a price to pay for brevity in FDOTM comics? I suggest not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 10:25
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:
poo poo. If you're going to play at least take the jokers out of the deck. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 10:28
|
|
|
women only have "progressive" views relative to the patriarchy
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 10:35
|
|
|
Pickled Tink posted:I'll meet your sexualised imagery and raise you a first dog: I'm not Snoop Dogging this one.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 10:45
|
|
|
Pickled Tink posted:I'll meet your sexualised imagery and raise you a first dog: I gotta ask, is this garbage posted out of irony or what? serious question.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 11:09
|
|
|
It's gone past a point where he can get a real job so he just churns out whatever and doesn't even care. I'd do the same thing and spend the rest on meth to even out how dead I felt inside.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 11:49
|
|
|
Besides the photoshopping that is one strangely proportioned body ms Palin is sporting.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:00
|
|
|
i got banned posted:It's gone past a point where he can get a real job so he just churns out whatever and doesn't even care. This is the one I reckon that turned him to the pipe. There's no coming back after going as batshit crazy as this...  You would be weeping at your desk daily dreading the next deadline.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:01
|
|
|
It's wordy political satire and Australians don't like reading things that are confronting let alone with cartoons on them political satire works best when you point out their failings with humour using words that convey meaning succinctly.  see fig.1 A biting commentary on the inability of the Irish to fit in when the niggers just accept the status quo because questioning things gets you whipped. I miss the 1800s i got banned fucked around with this message at 12:08 on Apr 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:03
|
|
|
How long has First Dog been doing that thing with the bucket on Tony's head anyway? It's never been funny. If anything it makes him look way more appealing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:09
|
|
|
"paper bagging" someone to make them more attractive is probably beyond his scope of satire though, right? Why not just use a paper bag if that's the joke. What's with the bucket?
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:15
|
|
|
I will be honest. This isn't exactly what I was expecting from Pope today but he is so ahead on points lately he can draw whatever the gently caress he likes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
Would you ever dob in anyone you cared about to our completely incompetent law enforcement forces and expect a different result?
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:29
|
|
|
Is it wrong of me to buy shares in big tobacco to punish Indonesia? Condemnation seems to be doing sweet gently caress all.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:35
|
|
|
Any country that lets children smoke cigarettes is a country I can get behind 100% because we are overpopulated and humans suck
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:44
|
|
|
If people can post First Dog every day I can keep everyone appraised of Gerard Henderson's latest writings.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 12:54
|
|
|
Laserface posted:http://www.betootaadvocate.com/uncategorized/what-crisis-how-to-buy-a-sydney-apartment-on-a-29000-salary/ I had to check if it was written April 1st.  E: quoted wrong one. Wistful of Dollars fucked around with this message at 16:13 on Apr 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 16:02
|
|
|
Anyone with ties to print media fellates real estate as it's pretty much the only ad revenue they have.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 16:08
|
|
|
Who was it that worked for the AEC? Got a question I need to ask, some vote counts are missing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 16:24
|
|
|
Nibbles! posted:Anyone with ties to print media fellates real estate as it's pretty much the only ad revenue they have. That used to be true, but seems like starting to see a few more articles in print media pointing out the craziness that is Australian real estate at the moment. I can only assume even real estate ads aren't paying any more, and the newspapers are now subsisting entirely on change people drop into th busking hats strategically placed outside every major newspaper office these days.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 18:25
|
|
|
Hey Pickled Tink, you should do a First Dog megapost in the Politoons thread, I've read some complaints there today about comics with too many words. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 20:49
|
|
|
Murodese posted:Who was it that worked for the AEC? Got a question I need to ask, some vote counts are missing. They must have fallen off the back of a truck.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 23:00
|
|
|
Zetsubou-san posted:Hey Pickled Tink, you should do a First Dog megapost in the Gas Chamber, I've read some complaints there today about comics with too many words.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 23:28
|
|
|
You can't abuse human rights in defiance of international law and then criticise others for doing the same. How did this weaken our ability to plead for mercy for our own citizens? "Only a pathetically weak leader would execute the powerless to prove his strength." That's Fairfax journalist Peter Hartcher's assessment of the cruel and inhumane way in which Jokowi put humanity and judicial rigour aside in the lead-up to the executions of Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran. He's right. But substitute the words "people smuggler" for "drug smuggler" and ask yourself this: how is Indonesia's unjust, hard-line, domestically focused mistreatment of foreigners any different to ours? Australia too has refused to acknowledge the humanity of foreigners; Australia too has mistreated people in defiance of international law; Australia too has defended its policies using hyperbolic language - all on the basis that punishing a few will save many more. But will Jokowi's actions stop drug smuggling any more than Australia's mistreatment of refugees and their children will prevent people smuggling or stop people fleeing war and unrest? In the end, Indonesia isn't the only country punishing the weak and the powerless for the sake of a weak and powerless leader's grasp at popularity. Something to remember in the next few days is that you lose any claim to moral superiority if you only selectively choose to be compassionate. Human rights are universal, not optional. Many in Australia have criticised Indonesia for pleading clemency for its own condemned nationals overseas - but you can't abuse human rights in defiance of international law and then criticise others for doing the same. As Tony Abbott said today: It was completely unacceptable for Indonesia to proceed as it did when critical legal processes were yet to run their course, raising serious questions about Indonesia's commitment to the rule of law. These executions significantly weaken Indonesia's ability to plead mercy for its own citizens facing execution around the world. So what of our refusal to allow for appeals for refugees, to retrospectively change the law, to ignore refoulement contraventions, to designate unborn children "illegals", toexcise the Australian mainland from Australia's migration zone? When the Prime Minister boasts that his Government won't "succumb to the cries of human rights lawyers", why should he expect Jokowi's government to do this? And what of our casual treatment of Indonesia's borders in the name of our "sovereign" ones? How did this weaken our ability to plead for mercy for our own citizens? And how do our human rights abuses affect our ability to lecture others on theirs - a particularly pertinent point, given our bid to join the UN Human Rights Council, even as the new Sri Lankan government accuses the Abbott Government of being silent about the Rajapaksa regime's human rights abuses in return for cooperation on Australia's asylum seeker policy? What happened in Indonesia last night was terrible - but so too is what is happening every day in our detention centres and on the seas. The same secrecy, the same defiant cruelty, the same indignantly self-righteous sophistry. Chan and Sukumaran definitely did not deserve such a punishment for a foolish mistake they made as young men, but why do children and babies, brought by their parents or born in detention, deserve the punishment meted out to them by the Australian Government and its contractors - a life spent in detention without rights or adequate medical and other care? If only the Government acted as quickly on reports of sexual abuse in detention as it has in regards to these poor Australian men. And if only our Government - whether Liberal or Labor - recognised that you only have moral authority if you exercise and respect, rather than dodge or ignore, your moral obligations. If only. It's a tragedy for all of us, whether Indonesian or Australian. http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-29/barnaby-joyce-calls-for-death-penalty-discussion/6432286 CATTASTIC fucked around with this message at 00:01 on Apr 30, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 23:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:30 |
|
|
Also laughing at Barnaby on TV calling for a 'discussion' on the death penalty in Australia.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 23:59
|
|