|
I do like the idea of Franken as Sanders VP, and he's done a lot for my home state of Minnesota. However, Franken supported SOPA. It's not a good mark for him.
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 17:50 |
|
|
franken supports a lot of lame poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:11
|
|
|
CuteJen96 posted:I just donated 10 bucks to his campaign feels pretty good
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:12
|
|
|
Bernie Sanders
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
mysterious frankie posted:Bernie Sanders 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:21
|
|
|
If goons can give $16,000 to a racist hot dog man, why can't we give $1,600,000 to a socialist candidate man
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:23
|
|
|
Male Tears posted:If goons can give $16,000 to a racist hot dog man, why can't we give $1,600,000 to a socialist candidate man i see what u did there
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:I like that the narrative in this country is so skewed to the right that advocating for economic policies the GOP would have agreed with in 1970 is now full blown socialism. it's because you have to adopt an extremist name/identity to even have a real message anymore since there's so much bullshit everywhere that a fairly mundane or even-keel stance like that would just be completely lost in a sea of PERSONALITIES
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:28
|
|
|
i support smaller police forces that have less immunity from prosecution so i will call my party the ANARCHIST ESTABLISHMENT MURDERERS
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:30
|
|
|
mysterious frankie posted:Bernie Sanders Bernie Sanders
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:30
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:I like that the narrative in this country is so skewed to the right that advocating for economic policies the GOP would have agreed with in 1970 is now full blown socialism. Best part is it makes communism way more popular like legit kids parents watch fox news and heear how x/y good thing is communism and start to think "well maybe communism isn't so bad" allsimsayin is the right wing media machine is gonna be responsible for a commie revolution sometime in the next 50 years. i plan to be dead of old age and alcoholism first, how are you all gonna deal w/ it
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:30
|
|
|
CISMALES DID 9-11 posted:i support smaller police forces that have less immunity from prosecution so i will call my party the ANARCHIST ESTABLISHMENT MURDERERS oh i'm in college and that sounds COOL that makes me an INDIVIDUAL and gives me PURPOSE I WANT THAT LABEL!!!!
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:31
|
|
|
I'm just looking forward to Sanders ripping Hillary a new rear end in a top hat and exposing her as part of the big money problem in the debates.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:32
|
|
|
bernie?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:33
|
|
|
bernie sanders seems cool overall but i still wont vote for him (or anyone) also he is anti-GMO
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:34
|
|
|
Rename the white house to the Bern Ward
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:35
|
|
|
rezatahs posted:bernie? Sanders
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:36
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:bernie sanders seems cool overall but i still wont vote for him (or anyone) you're never gonna get a candidate with zero whackjob beliefs, the gmo thing is totally inconsequential
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:36
|
|
|
yes
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:36
|
|
|
Hector Beerlioz posted:Rename the white house to the Bern Ward
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:44
|
|
|
FrankenVader posted:I'm just looking forward to Sanders ripping Hillary a new rear end in a top hat and exposing her as part of the big money problem in the debates. Part of me is like "Bernie could really do damage to Hillary's campaign before she eventually wins the nomination and that could hurt her in the national race" but then I remember that the Democrats and the GOP are the same party with a few little differences about how they gently caress over the poor
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:bernie sanders seems cool overall but i still wont vote for him (or anyone) he wanted gmo labels. you know to give the consumer freedom of choice.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:47
|
|
|
rezatahs posted:he wanted gmo labels. you know to give the consumer freedom of choice. labelling implies that they are somehow dangerous, which would be detrimental to food producers because casual consumers would be more likely scared off. because people are stupid.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:50
|
|
|
Even if he won the election nothing would change.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:labelling implies that they are somehow dangerous, which would be detrimental to food producers because casual consumers would be more likely scared off. look we found him. he exists. the single issue anti-gmo label voter Kanthulhu posted:Even if he won the election nothing would change. this is not true however he won't win so it's safe to make these statements
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:53
|
|
|
but has he got a blimp
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
posting
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:labelling implies that they are somehow dangerous, which would be detrimental to food producers because casual consumers would be more likely scared off. so even though a large portion of the civilized world requires gmo labeling, allowing it in the exceptional usa would somehow destroy food producers? let me shed a tear for kraft foods 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
Kanthulhu posted:Even if he won the election nothing would change. this is basically True altho not for the usual "theyre all the same maaaan" reasons - because if theres anything u should have learned from the past 7 years its that the US government was intentionally designed from the ground up to be ponderous and easily gridlocked
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
Not gonna read the thread. On a scale of Rand Paul to Stalin, how socialist is Bernie Sanders?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:00
|
|
|
Nuclearmonkee posted:look we found him. he exists. the single issue anti-gmo label voter its not that, i dont vote
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
ReagaNOMNOMicks posted:Not gonna read the thread. he's .32 of a josip broz tito
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:labelling implies that they are somehow dangerous, which would be detrimental to food producers because casual consumers would be more likely scared off. nah you just gotta slap them on literally everything (since all food is to some extent GMO) and then people will ignore them like the california prop 65 warnings
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:its not that, i dont vote proud of you
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:labelling implies that they are somehow dangerous, which would be detrimental to food producers because casual consumers would be more likely scared off. I believe people have the right to know what kind of foods they are consuming. I'd be more in favor of tobacco products having an ingredients list than labeling GMO food (because GMO food is probably safe long-term) but we can't even get the government to do that. Go Bernie! I will legit vote for him, maybe even do some campaign work.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
Nocheez posted:I believe people have the right to know what kind of foods they are consuming. I'd be more in favor of tobacco products having an ingredients list than labeling GMO food (because GMO food is probably safe long-term) but we can't even get the government to do that. do you think that every food producer should label the exact lineage of all the plants they are consuming? how about all the pesticides used on it (which also holds true for "organic" farming)? because just saying "GMO" doesnt tell you poo poo about it.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
ReagaNOMNOMicks posted:Not gonna read the thread. triple-stalin w/ whipped creme
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
I don't think there's anything wrong with GMOs in principle but I don't see any reason to not label them as such.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:I don't see any reason to not label them as such. every food you have ever eaten is a GMO, its a dumb thing to placate dumb hippies
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 17:50 |
|
|
Neptr posted:Part of me is like "Bernie could really do damage to Hillary's campaign before she eventually wins the nomination and that could hurt her in the national race" but then I remember that the Democrats and the GOP are the same party with a few little differences about how they gently caress over the poor QFT
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:13
|
|