|
Xanderkish posted:Was...was that last one always there? Did I miss it every other time it was shown? What, the one with the dog? Yeah, as far as I know it's always been there.
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 21:30 |
|
|
Bottom line is that if you had posted some CH cartoons on January 6th the thread would've been unanimous in calling them ugly, racist poo poo. But (according to some) if you said that at any point on or after January 7th that meant you supported retributive killing by fundamentalists and hated free speech.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:It was the evidence planning that did him in, if he was just caught on video shooting the guy in the back they would have circled the wagons. poo poo, I have coworkers who still say the cop wouldn't have needed to shoot him if the kid hadn't done something to deserve it. Granted, "my coworkers" isn't even close to the same as "Conservatives in actual positions of power"
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:What, the one with the dog? Yeah, as far as I know it's always been there. Holy poo poo, this is like listening to a song you've heard hundreds of times and suddenly hearing an instrument you never noticed before. This thread is the gift that keeps on giving. the_steve posted:poo poo, I have coworkers who still say the cop wouldn't have needed to shoot him if the kid hadn't done something to deserve it. So Just-World type thinking. I always wondered why people liked to think in those terms. I always figured it was just not wanting to realize the world was more hosed up than you wanted to think it was, but I dunno, maybe there's other reasons too. Xanderkish fucked around with this message at 19:13 on May 1, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:10
|
|
|
 1That guy in the bottom left corner   2Hmmm how can I visually depict nobody watching?  3 4 5 6 7 8  9
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
Where's that evil windmill face when you need it?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:Where's that evil windmill face when you need it?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
I love the conservative trope of "alternative energy = bird genocide" so so so much EDIT: The bald eagle!!! 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
I love that Branco's only argument against renewable energy is STILL that some birds might die.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
Tritanomalicious posted:I love that Branco's only argument against renewable energy is STILL that some birds might die. He just cares that much about the environment.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:25
|
|
|
Zetsubou-san posted:
I'm goddamn tired of that monkey-man caricature.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:26
|
|
|
It's last name then full name, not first name then full name you loving clueless hack
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
Taciturn Tactician posted:It's last name then full name, not first name then full name you loving clueless hack Yeah that's the chief problem here.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
Not that he actually cares, but http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/08/25/3475348/bird-death-comparison-chart/  Also cats kill 1.4 - 3.6 billion birds every year http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v4/n1/full/ncomms2380.html
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
loving incredible.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:Agreed they didn't deserve to die. But I think we shouldn't avoid criticisms of their cartoons, and go all "They're dead! How dare you criticize a dead person's work?" either. But those criticisms have already been addressed and explained several times by people familiar with the culture, so really I don't get what's going on here.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
colonel_korn posted:
Obama likes to keep a severed head by his drone-desk. When no one is looking he whispers to it. quote:
Obama is Bad-rear end and so is renewable energy. A 007 cartoon. quote:
I might just be squeamish but holy poo poo what the gently caress Bennet. quote:
Never thought I'd see people pull a Palin on Hillary Clinton, but I guess I should never put it beyond a political cartoonist to creepily sexualize our female politicans,
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:31
|
|
|
WitchFetish posted:But those criticisms have already been addressed and explained several times by people familiar with the culture, so really I don't get what's going on here. The problem is that many times when someone criticizes the cartoons here instead of explaining to them how they're wrong people immediately claim that they're victim blaming.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
Xanderkish posted:I might just be squeamish but holy poo poo what the gently caress Bennet. You're just squeamish
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
zoux posted:Yeah that's the chief problem here. That has got to be one of the most recognisable references in the western world, it's absolutely unbelievable that he screwed it up. It's like getting a knock-knock joke backwards.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
I will take the unpopular opinion that they deserved to die, and at night I have trouble sleeping knowing that there are employees of Charlie Hebdo still at large.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
Did political cartoonists all see Attack of the 50 Foot Woman as kids and get a confusing boner that still haunts them later in life?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:38
|
|
|
colonel_korn posted:
Somebody got Obama a stuffed flaccid-cock-and-balls desk toy with little googly eyes on it as a gag gift at the White House Christmas party
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:42
|
|
|
Saint Sputnik posted:Did political cartoonists all see Attack of the 50 Foot Woman as kids and get a confusing boner that still haunts them later in life? Did you not?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 19:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
Saint Sputnik posted:Did political cartoonists all see Attack of the 50 Foot Woman as kids and get a confusing boner that still haunts them later in life?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
This is such a tortured metaphor that is violates the Geneva conventions
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
whats wrong with your head kid
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:07
|
|
|
WitchFetish posted:But those criticisms have already been addressed and explained several times by people familiar with the culture, so really I don't get what's going on here. "It's part of our ~cultural traditions~" isn't a good argument for or defense of anything.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:12
|
|
|
Xanderkish posted:Never thought I'd see people pull a Palin on Hillary Clinton, but I guess I should never put it beyond a political cartoonist to creepily sexualize our female politicans, Look, just because you're into gigantism doesn't mean all of us are.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:14
|
|
|
He actually drew Bernie Sanders sitting on Hillary Clinton's right side in such a way that her presence completely obstructs him from being anywhere other than to the right of her. HOW DO YOU gently caress SOMETHING UP THIS BADLY
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
Mellow Seas posted:Bottom line is that if you had posted some CH cartoons on January 6th the thread would've been unanimous in calling them ugly, racist poo poo. But (according to some) if you said that at any point on or after January 7th that meant you supported retributive killing by fundamentalists and hated free speech. Here's some recent covers from before January 6th. So very racist!   
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:19
|
|
|
Billy needs to stop believing the poo poo he hears on Huckabee.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:21
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:Steven Universe will ensure this trend continues for another generation. All I want to do Is turn Hilary into a giant woman
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:25
|
|
|
Those CH cartoons are very ugly and not in the cool grotesque way the British cartoons but in the "scribbled by a twelve year old" way.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:26
|
|
|
Billy's brother went on to receive three quarters of a million dollars from a bunch of bigoted pieces of poo poo so it's all good.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
WitchFetish posted:But those criticisms have already been addressed and explained several times by people familiar with the culture, so really I don't get what's going on here. Stop me if I'm being way out of line, but maybe "it's not offensive to French people" is not some kind of universally satisfactory statement.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:37
|
|
|
Maybe once you guys figure out the objective truth about Charlie Hebdo, we can finally settle whether Latuff is good or bad.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:43
|
|
|
Kajeesus posted:Stop me if I'm being way out of line, but maybe "it's not offensive to French people" is not some kind of universally satisfactory statement. Probably also helps to ask exactly which French people we're talking about, since to say it's not offensive to French people might be like saying Mad Magazine isn't offensive to Americans. Some people (sixth graders, from my experience) like it, others think it's poo poo. So maybe some French people might like them, but what about others? And what about, say, black French people, whose members of their race are the one being caricatured?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 21:30 |
|
|
I like this one a lot
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 21:04
|
|
