|
Gravel Gravy posted:Camp Yorktown Camp The Hill
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 14:14 |
|
|
Disinterested posted:they basically do nothing so it's a lot of effort for not very much change to bin them That's not what the Gruadian has to say on the matter. (Also Charles is supporting all kind of new-age medicine, organ farming bullshit with your tax poundings.)
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
zoux posted:Actually, it was good. disagree.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:
hahaha sure we do the fact she gets to sit down with the prime minister weekly is to discuss the latest only way is essex
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
Randler posted:That's not what the Gruadian has to say on the matter. Makes sense given inbreeding doesn't produce the best organ tissue.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
Disinterested posted:I'm p. sure Americans like our royal family more than we do. its weird I don't like it only good monarchy is one written off in history books
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
V. Illych L. posted:r9k? r9k's thing is that it's a board like the rest of 4chan, but you are forbidden to post exactly the same thing anyone else posted in like the past either 2 years or forever on the board, a bot keeps track of everything that's been posted and deletes your post and basically probates you for steadily lengthening times for trying that. the idea is that it would encourage better posting but lol
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
the only good monarchy is a headless monarch
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:the only good monarch is a headless monarch
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:the idea is that it would encourage better posting but lol
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
CoolCab posted:hahaha sure we do abolish your monarchy transfer powers from the prime minister to a new, elected monarch eliminate queen bee's tax exemptions and make her pay her fair share elect yourself Lord Mayor of London and refuse her the right to leave the city.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
I love monarchs wish we had one.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:joss whedon, it turns out, is doing a space china series another one?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:the only good monarchy is a male headless monarch
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
ironic considering the facination with Kind David.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
euphronius posted:I love monarchs wish we had one. Butterflies are pretty cool
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
euphronius posted:I love monarchs wish we had one.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
joeburz posted:
unsurprising misogyny and homophobia coming from madonna
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:22
|
|
drake
|
Lotka Volterra posted:Butterflies are pretty cool arent they all dying out our somthing. Or is that bees and blue collar workers.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:abolish your monarchy the only counterargument (and i've not researched it to be fair) that i've heard to this (other then appeal to tradition or whatever) is that the terms of the monarchy's on paper power abdication was to turn a bunch of lands that were owned by the royal family over to be state controlled, managed and in practice owned. if we abolished the monarchy they would revert to their personal ownership, costing billions.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:23
|
|
|
please tell me someone else posted this https://twitter.com/ScottWalker/status/595277685250732032 ahahahahahaha oh my god
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
euphronius posted:arent they all dying out our somthing. Or is that bees and blue collar workers. youre not fooling anyone Monarch.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
CoolCab posted:the only counterargument (and i've not researched it to be fair) that i've heard to this (other then appeal to tradition or whatever) is that the terms of the monarchy's on paper power abdication was to turn a bunch of lands that were owned by the royal family over to be state controlled, managed and in practice owned. if we abolished the monarchy they would revert to their personal ownership, costing billions. can't you just pass a law saying they're state property first? parliamentary sovereignty and all that
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
nationalize the queen
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:25
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:can't you just pass a law saying they're state property first? parliamentary sovereignty and all that buddy if we could convince parliament to start seizing the means of production the monarchy would have already been long gone
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:26
|
|
|
CoolCab posted:the only counterargument (and i've not researched it to be fair) that i've heard to this (other then appeal to tradition or whatever) is that the terms of the monarchy's on paper power abdication was to turn a bunch of lands that were owned by the royal family over to be state controlled, managed and in practice owned. if we abolished the monarchy they would revert to their personal ownership, costing billions. take their lands as penalty for their tax dodging then privitize them. if they disagree, off with their heads.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:26
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:take their lands as penalty for their tax dodging the french revolution was a bad idea in 1793
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:nationalize the queen if the queen could not pay back all the back-taxes she owed, could a nation force her to sell herself to the highest bidders?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
CoolCab posted:the only counterargument (and i've not researched it to be fair) that i've heard to this (other then appeal to tradition or whatever) is that the terms of the monarchy's on paper power abdication was to turn a bunch of lands that were owned by the royal family over to be state controlled, managed and in practice owned. if we abolished the monarchy they would revert to their personal ownership, costing billions. so which invader family negotiated that? cuz props to them really
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yX5DshF-Hs
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:the french revolution was a bad idea in 1793 BAD REPUBLICAN VIRTUE SUPERCEDES MONARCHY FAR LEFT KILLED THE FRENCH REVOLUTION.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:please tell me someone else posted this yeah he bad BI NOW GAY LATER posted:the french revolution was a bad idea in 1793 it was, in fact, both cool and good
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:so which invader family negotiated that? cuz props to them really probably during either Victoria or Edward VII
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:invader family lol Considering British iles are really new - i think the ice receded 10,000 years ago? - is it a safe assumption the celts the Romans found there were the original peoples of that land?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:29
|
|
|
Lotka Volterra posted:drat AoU wasn't good but the man doesn't need to off himself you take that back.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:29
|
|
|
Monarchy is cool and fun. 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:29
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:the french revolution was a bad idea in 1793 actually it was a good idea
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:29
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:BAD whatever danton
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:29
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Monarchy is cool and fun. Yeah until you get into the Industrial Era.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 14:14 |
|
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:you take that back. just try to make me!!!!
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:30
|
|