kustomkarkommando posted:who are the unions backing in the labour leadership anyway? too early to say
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 00:45 |
|
|
Disinterested posted:I wonder at what 0% of intensity holyfield has to fight romney at to not simply kill him by accident very low, I'm sure like, even though he's also old, he could seriously injure romney easily if he doesn't make a conscious and deliberate effort to not do so
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
Disinterested posted:too early to say biding their time eh still can't believe there isn't a single candidate just repeatedly screaming "RENATIONALISE THE RAILWAYS" as loud as possible over and over again
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:11
|
|
|
kustomkarkommando posted:biding their time eh are there any people remaining in labour that think that besides the deluded ukmt-ers who keep joining it
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:12
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:lol one of the people running for labour leader says the uk should always be running a surplus Someone with worse opinions then me
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
kustomkarkommando posted:biding their time eh how're they doing anyway? i heard some republican today touting the uk as a success of public/private partnership or some poo poo in rail re: amtrak and the philly wreck here in the states
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:are there any people remaining in labour that think that polls show a strong majority in favour so i don't know why there isn't
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:13
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:are there any people remaining in labour that think that a lot of the union people and some old backbenchers but ed's defeat will be taken as a knock against the left of the party and so they'll try to find someone else in all likelihood
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
I love how we had like 80 years of sound macro economic theory showing how states should spend in the face if recessions and the uk is like "nah gently caress that"
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:14
|
|
ReidRansom posted:how're they doing anyway? i heard some republican today touting the uk as a success of public/private partnership or some poo poo in rail re: amtrak and the philly wreck here in the states don't ever listen to people who champion british rail privatization the way it was done initially was a total car crash and now it's costing a load to make only marginal improvements whereas if you look at nationalised rail it was loving cost efficient but nobody ever invested anything in it euphronius posted:I love how we had like 80 years of sound macro economic theory showing how states should spend in the face if recessions and the uk is like "nah gently caress that" you say this like it's a mania unique to the UK
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
whats the situation wrt vote fraud in the UK asking for a friend
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
It's not unique to the uk yeah
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:how're they doing anyway? i heard some republican today touting the uk as a success of public/private partnership or some poo poo in rail re: amtrak and the philly wreck here in the states if you like paying high fares to ride on cramped trains while the profit is entirely from government support payments, you'll love privatized british passenger rail!!!
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:16
|
|
Berke Negri posted:whats the situation wrt vote fraud in the UK there isn't a lot of it if that's what you mean
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
Disinterested posted:
america has managed to dodge it for multiple things the brits have done it to
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
Disinterested posted:there isn't a lot of it if that's what you mean Srs frage: why were the polls so wrong
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
Disinterested posted:there isn't a lot of it if that's what you mean I meant how to do it you know *begkns to cram salmon colored trot papers into an attache* just never mind I'll be going
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:18
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:america has managed to dodge it for multiple things the brits have done it to mostly what happened in the uk is that spending increases were frozen so the cuts were in real terms rather than nominal but yeah you have a better government when it comes to economics although obama did insist on that absurd tax cut when he took office
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:18
|
|
euphronius posted:Srs frage: why were the polls so wrong a whole host of reasons, including the fact that people don't like to admit voting conservative and issues internal to the polling industry for example a few people did have polls showing a con lead but didn't print them because they broke with the consensus of other polls there was some issue with postal votes at this election but it wouldn't have swung much even in the worst case scenario
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
haha just realised euphronius got a red title
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
Disinterested posted:a whole host of reasons, including the fact that people don't like to admit voting conservative and issues internal to the polling industry That does not sound like much to me.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
this reminds me I should buy an attache
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
kustomkarkommando posted:haha just realised euphronius got a red title It upsets me Whomever did it: you win
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:22
|
|
euphronius posted:That does not sound like much to me. there's plenty of articles floating around trying to dissect the problem
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
euphronius posted:That does not sound like much to me. the constituency system means that a poll that's wrong by a couple of percent could be wrong by dozens and dozens of marginal seats it's, uh, complicated
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Berke Negri posted:this reminds me I should buy an attache i prefer a satchel myself, but to each
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Disinterested posted:there's plenty of articles floating around trying to dissect the problem Why would people lying break conclusively towards the Tories.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Why would people lying break conclusively towards the Tories. because tories are scum and everyone knows it, and people don't generally admit to being scum
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:27
|
|
|
I only wrote that because of the consonance.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:27
|
|
|
euphronius posted:I love how we had like 80 years of sound macro economic theory showing how states should spend in the face if recessions and the uk is like "nah gently caress that" VERY SERIOUS PEOPLE HAVE IDEAS OK
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:27
|
|
|
Berke Negri posted:i propose to usher in the new government EMarx reveals what poo poo fucker chat thread regular didnt vote five 
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:i prefer a satchel myself, but to each i have a messenger bag from Zara but its not ideal to do anything with straps during the summer when it is 120 degrees out
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
Or assonance . Idk
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Why would people lying break conclusively towards the Tories. there's a phenomenon called the Shy Tory Factor wherein Tory voters do not want to admit they are Tory voters it's been talked about in previous elections as well
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
exclamation marx i am not angry, just very disappointed
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
the most shocking thing is your 4 vote
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
this is the only time i vote
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
kustomkarkommando posted:there's a phenomenon called the Shy Tory Factor wherein Tory voters do not want to admit they are Tory voters Is there like evidence of it or is it supposition. Seems like there would be shy labour voters too.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
poo poo i forgot to vote 1, let me correct that
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 00:45 |
|
|
guess we now have a a start on figuring out who our lurker audience is
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:30
|
|