|
Joementum posted:Too bad Newt got trashed in song at the Grammies that year. I wanna believe that is real. Tell me it is.
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 12:36 |
|
|
O'Malley's ramping up the suspense about his announcement. Whatever could he be announcing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se-H0tiKNf8
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:20
|
|
|
Zelder posted:Why are you so angry? You seem really angry. What? I have no idea what you are talking about. I use bad language a lot, is that what you are talking about?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:22
|
|
|
Joementum posted:O'Malley's ramping up the suspense about his announcement. Whatever could he be announcing? That he needs guitar lessons? 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:22
|
|
|
Pohl posted:I'll take the bait. Of course, everyone is going to focus on the bait-hooking first few lines. But starting out with a few suggestive first sentences is basically journalism-101 to get people to continue reading. It's just in this particular case, it looks bad 43 years later, out of context.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:25
|
|
|
Inferior Third Season posted:Did you ad the whole thing? Honestly, no. It bored the poo poo out of me. I set out to read so I could see what his message was but it was just horrible writing and I couldn't be bothered with it. The thing that pisses me off is exactly what you said, people are going to try and use it against him some 40 years later. That might matter if it was a consistent message, but it isn't. He didn't have a racist news letter and he didn't have a few friends hold a guy down in college so he could cut the guys hair. The conservative press is trying to make comparisons to poo poo like that and it isn't even close to the same thing.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:32
|
|
|
Pohl posted:I was born early 1973. I'm not saying my age makes me wiser than younger people, but he wrote that poo poo in 1972. I think he has probably grown and matured a lot since that time. Yep we should take someone's age and the social context of the time period into account before we judge them for actions in the past. (Unless you're Mitt Romney)
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:39
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Yep we should take someone's age and the social context of the time period into account before we judge them for actions in the past. Mitt Romney's still a horrible person even after the social context of the time period is taken into account. He protested in favor of the Vietnam War then dodged the draft for a French vacation.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:41
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Yep we should take someone's age and the social context of the time period into account before we judge them for actions in the past. I'm pretty sure forcefully holding someone down and cutting their hair off would be hosed up in the social context of 9th century Scandinavia, let alone 20th century America.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:42
|
|
|
Pohl posted:Honestly, no. It bored the poo poo out of me. I set out to read so I could see what his message was but it was just horrible writing and I couldn't be bothered with it. Read -> comprehend -> post After the first couple titillating lines, it reads like any other leftist gender role screed from the 70s. In context, it doesn't need much defending. Outside of that context, you should just read the damned thing or not comment on it.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:42
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Yep we should take someone's age and the social context of the time period into account before we judge them for actions in the past. I tried to answer any stupid Mitt Romney comparisons in my It isn't even close to the same thing you shitlord. Delta-Wye posted:Read -> comprehend -> post I should have read it. I still think my point stands that it doesn't matter because it was 40 years ago and that isn't his message. It was a one time thing. You were right to slap me down, however. I deserved that. Pohl fucked around with this message at 13:59 on May 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:48
|
|
|
The sanders article is a poorly written critique of gender roles being harmful. that doesn't stop me from raising a very skeptical eyebrow when he suggests that as a result of these gender roles, men get off to the idea of physically a used women. Maybe I'm just defensive because I've been jerking to the wrong ideas all my life, women who aren't physically abused. Also wow that piece was boring it's a page long and I almost couldn't finish it.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 13:54
|
|
|
We have the first attack ad of 2016. It is from America's Liberty PAC (Rand Paul) and goes after "Capitulating Canadian" Ted Cruz. It's a doozy https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7qy-4CBBZo&t=15
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:02
|
|
|
Pohl posted:I tried to answer any stupid Mitt Romney comparisons in my original post. Right, your underlying logic that people can grow and mature is apparently only applicable to events in 1972 when someone is in their 30s. Applying the same logic to an event in 1965 when someone is in their teens is spurious... because... you said it was.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:02
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Right, your underlying logic that people can grow and mature is apparently only applicable to events in 1972 when someone is in their 30s. Applying the same logic to an event in 1965 when someone is in their teens is spurious... because... you said it was. No physical harm, not a consistent message, no news letter... at this time, as far as we know it was a one time thing in a lovely leftist newsletter 40 years ago. You are insane if you think this compares to anything people talked about with Romney or Paul.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:07
|
|
|
Drastic Actions posted:That he needs guitar lessons? That his band is planning to play at Hillary's inauguration?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:08
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Right, your underlying logic that people can grow and mature is apparently only applicable to events in 1972 when someone is in their 30s. Applying the same logic to an event in 1965 when someone is in their teens is spurious... because... you said it was. Yes why would anyone here continue to believe that Romney is still a sociopath? 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:09
|
|
|
Pohl posted:No physical harm, not a consistent message, no news letter... at this time, as far as we know it was a one time thing in a lovely leftist newsletter 40 years ago. "No newsletter, just a newsletter - you can't compare them". Sure, okay.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:12
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:We have the first attack ad of 2016. It is from America's Liberty PAC (Rand Paul) and goes after "Capitulating Canadian" Ted Cruz. That ad makes no loving sense and I love it. Doozy doesn't describe it. Everyone needs to click that loving link. TheDisreputableDog posted:"No newsletter, just a newsletter - you can't compare them". lol
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
Delta-Wye posted:Read -> comprehend -> post Yeah it's not radically different than a lot of writing that was being done in feminist circles in the 70s, but it isn't well written or explained and he doesn't get into a substantive discussion of how things can be changed, which other people writing on the subject did.I get the impression he was just repeating au courant arguments instead of thinking deeply about it. That being said it's still dangerous and uh, problematic that he readily adopts a position that women have, as a class, universally had the same reaction to messed up and toxic gender roles; it's neither correct nor wise to say that all women fantasize about rape. And really he should have known that even then.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:17
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:We have the first attack ad of 2016. It is from America's Liberty PAC (Rand Paul) and goes after "Capitulating Canadian" Ted Cruz. Man what the gently caress even is this? Has Rand Paul been showing up to events in Grave Digger or something?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:20
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:"No newsletter, just a newsletter - you can't compare them". The first unimpeachable DisreputableDog post.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:21
|
|
|
mlmp08 posted:The first unimpeachable DisreputableDog post. That actually hurts me. I had the Ron Paul newsletter on my brain and I used the drat term twice when I meant to type something else, like underground leaflet. It loving pains me.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:26
|
|
|
Joementum posted:O'Malley's ramping up the suspense about his announcement. Whatever could he be announcing? Going for the Thad McCotter strategy I see. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4GrClpp5RE e: Not gonna lie, I'd briefly consider voting for the first candidate who can play the intro to Hot For Teacher.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:31
|
|
|
The only moral newsletter is my newsletter.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:36
|
|
|
Yet again, Hillary skates around all these mini-scandals! * Also a victim of hair-bullying (society forced her to dye it) * Clearly not submissive since Bill needs to go elsewhere for his power fantasies * Could never have strapped a pet to her car since she hasn't driven one in like 30 years 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:41
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:We have the first attack ad of 2016. It is from America's Liberty PAC (Rand Paul) and goes after "Capitulating Canadian" Ted Cruz. The shot of the US Capitol blowing up is really great optics!
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:43
|
|
|
Gravel Gravy posted:Yes why would anyone here continue to believe that Romney is still a sociopath? What's the story behind this image I can't ever remember.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:55
|
|
|
Benghazi.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
Shakenbaker posted:Man what the gently caress even is this? Has Rand Paul been showing up to events in Grave Digger or something? Probably not, that'd take way too much time that he could be spending at the gym. 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 14:59
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:What's the story behind this image I can't ever remember. Romney immediately held a press conference after the attack to directly call Obama out. Basically saw the whole thing as an opportunity for his election. Later led to the infamous "Please, proceed governor" moment. Gyges posted:Probably not, that'd take way too much time that he could be spending at the gym. But I thought P90X was Ryan's whole deal?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 15:02
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:We have the first attack ad of 2016. It is from America's Liberty PAC (Rand Paul) and goes after "Capitulating Canadian" Ted Cruz. Don't let AI see this, they've got a thing for old Geo Metros.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 15:06
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:What's the story behind this image I can't ever remember. R-Money dancing on Vilerat's grave.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 15:15
|
|
|
John Podesta in a pantsuit t-shirt.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 17:02
|
|
|
I always liked this one from 08: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC0jni46HCg
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 18:36
|
|
|
Linc's in! (on June 3), so the "Democratic" field will double by the end of next week.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
The Hillary Clinton comic book wonders if maybe Bill could get murdered by prostitutes in the White House who then take out Secret Service agents on their way to Hillary's bedroom. Just something Americans should keep in mind when they're voting next year.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
Gyges posted:Probably not, that'd take way too much time that he could be spending at the gym. "Attribution: Gage Skidmore" floored me.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:We have the first attack ad of 2016. It is from America's Liberty PAC (Rand Paul) and goes after "Capitulating Canadian" Ted Cruz. What the everloving gently caress? Everything about this says it's satire but it seems to be legit. They have Lindsay Graham in a pink Geo Metro, for gently caress's sake. Is this peak Poe or am I just gullible?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 12:36 |
|
|
Notahippie posted:What the everloving gently caress? The real world has become indistinguishable from the Onion. Poe's Law is obsolete, having become a tautology.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2015 19:25
|
|