|
when does smythe probe us?
|
# ? May 29, 2015 22:52 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 09:52 |
|
Space Whale posted:when does smythe probe us? i was blustering i dont think i have that kind of pull with the big man
|
# ? May 29, 2015 23:41 |
|
c maths sa stroud showed up and is large
|
# ? May 30, 2015 04:19 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i was blustering i dont think i have that kind of pull with the big man Well dammit I got all excited for nothing
|
# ? May 30, 2015 06:55 |
|
lol at writing maths when the forums don't support latex
|
# ? May 30, 2015 09:27 |
|
MeruFM posted:lol at writing maths when the forums don't support latex um i think you mean LATEX
|
# ? May 30, 2015 10:09 |
|
Bloody posted:c maths sa stroud showed up and is large hope you've got a quiet weekend ahead
|
# ? May 30, 2015 10:51 |
|
Jabor posted:um i think you mean LATEX
|
# ? May 30, 2015 11:26 |
|
lahtec
|
# ? May 30, 2015 11:48 |
|
Jabor posted:um i think you mean \latex
|
# ? May 30, 2015 11:57 |
|
MeruFM posted:lol at writing maths when the forums don't support MathML
|
# ? May 30, 2015 15:14 |
a LATEX BBCode tag would be pretty cool IMO
|
|
# ? May 30, 2015 18:50 |
|
VikingofRock posted:a LATEX BBCode tag would be pretty cool IMO itll never happen
|
# ? May 30, 2015 18:54 |
|
i could it add it into SA Needful easily enough - there are javascript libraries for latex parsing of course, but it would obviously rely on other people actually using it to also see the results
|
# ? May 30, 2015 18:59 |
|
im not entirely sure we use maths enough to make it useful
|
# ? May 30, 2015 19:02 |
|
true, nor would i like to see that much maths either
|
# ? May 30, 2015 19:04 |
|
Just imagine the elegance of our pissing matches though.
|
# ? May 30, 2015 19:07 |
|
Space Whale posted:Just imagine the elegance of our pissing matches though. http://www.yummymath.com/wp-content/uploads/Parabolic-pee.pdf
|
# ? May 30, 2015 20:30 |
Space Whale posted:Just imagine the elegance of our pissing matches though. Or the quality of our zalgos
|
|
# ? May 30, 2015 22:09 |
|
great for an intro calc class but i would expect someone taking physics to take into account the angle of the dangle
|
# ? May 30, 2015 22:27 |
|
VikingofRock posted:Or the quality of our zalgos T̯̳͊͆̀̆͊͠h̻̠͖̩̝e̵̮͎ͣ ̷̭̪̺̟͈̪d̦̯͕͙̝̘̋ͧ̔̚e̖̱̥͍̦͓̓f͉͇̘̭̩ͬͬ̓̓͐͂̊i̠͓͈̩̙̬n̢͔̱̳̮̺͈̉i͈̼̹͊ͪ̑ͨͨt̸͖̪̰ͧͩ̏ė͙̦͖ͬͫ̽̓ͥͬ͝ ̜̝̠ͤ̾̇̈́ͣ̽̂ǐ̛̥̜̮͙ͪ̐ͦͅn̮̽͊̀̓̀ţ̬̺̯͚̲̋ͧ̀̎ͧ̍̌e̖̬̟͉̲̔ͦ̓̒͞ͅg̓͑r̴̞̂ḁ̛͚̪͖̹̦̳̒͂̂t̡͇̮̦͍̘̜̉ͯi͉̮̤̪̿̃̌͋o̦͍̻̔ͅn̢͎̳ͨ̏ ̥͓̮̝̓̏ͩ̔ͤo̮͎̼̲̟̞̟͌̃ͨ̂͛͌̈f̧̦̣͈̯̽ ̘̺͌͊̃̂a̶̞̘̙̫̳͍ͩͅ ̘͉͎̯̩̔̅ͣf̢̎̏̓̇͌ͥ̎ṵ̝͈͙̟̗̼͑ͮ̓͛̀́n͇̜̬̦̹̩̈̽ͣc̫̞͐̾͛͒͐͆̚t̡̝̮̮̣̑ͣ̚ͅī̞̳̺̯͛͛͂̓ö͚͕͈̞̬̼́ͫ̀ͬ̿̍̋n͍̣͆̐ ͋ͨ̔iͭ͊͂ͪ̑̂s̘̗̫̩͔̹ͅ ̞̫͔͚͔̔ͭ͆ͥ̊̏̚͞ͅȑ̠̥ͣ́̈́ëͬͯl̤̫a̻̫͊͗ͪ̓ͬͮ͠ẗ̜́̋e̥̦ͪ̎͂ͤ̆̚d̒͏̺̪̟ ̩̠͚̝͞t͚̜̩̘̏̽ͥ͗̀̇o̢̮̱͉̓̍̈͑̒̽̚ ̲͎i̍ͤ͐ͮ͠t̻͗̔̊͗̿ͦ͂s̬̱̦̖͙̒̎ ̗̰̱̹̻̓̋̒a͉ͭͧ͆͌͐̓n̷̫͔̻̬ͥ͋̋͗̈̌ͪͅt҉͕̺͎̤i̵̮̭̱ͧͪd̗͉̮͋͆̈e̶͕̻͑ͮ̾ͣ̄̃ͨr̨͙̐̃̀̅̔̑i̳̥̞ͣ͒͢v͓͙͇͙̈́a̸̤̯̭͖̾ͩ͊̈t̅͊̓͊̃͡i̧̦͖͓ṽ̑͗҉̖̮͚͈͖̭ͅe̝ͨ͑̄̿̔̅,̫̰̼̘̳͚ ̶͑̚a̰̪̱̱͛̇ͯn͛ͪͯ͆̈͏͖̼͖͙̟̼d́̏̄͜ ̜̙͆̀̀c̠͙̲̆̄a̭͉̪̘̦̅n͉̝̈ͧ̑̐ͪ͝ ͙͓͌͐̈́͆̐̚̚͠b̦́ͣ̾̏̾e͕̜̮͍̝̼ͩͥ̊ͅ ͔̣̏̓̅̂͒ṛ͆̉̒̔ͬe͔̱̋ͨͩͨ͘ͅv̨̝̲͕͗͛̽ē̟ͧͤ̚r̴̎ͭ̐̈́ͧ́s̭̹̻͈̣̭͔̉̓̋ͨ̀͝e̻͇̟͗͐̄ͫ̄̓͡d͜ ̓̄͌ͤb̖̩̝̤̺y̨̖̱̤̝̱̝͆ ͐̍͑̒ͨ͂҉̘̫̹d̢̮͇̜̱̩̦̍̆͐ͪͅiͯ̃̎ͦ̀f̳̤̳̼̟̙̃ͬf̛͓̣̼̺͈̯̀e͚̲͈̽̐ͨr͚͠e͒̿̂ͨ҉n̜͎̬͎̖͐̈́̈ͩ̿͠t̯̞̮̗̦̘̥ĩ͔̞ͬ̏ͥͯͯ͜a̙͚̣̓ͨ̚̕t̡̥̱ͨͩ͑͒̔͆̚į̘̽͌͗̉̐̽͋o̓ͥñ̸̳̤̪̄̌͂͑͐.̶̼͔ ̭ͨ̀ͦ̏ͦ͠
|
# ? May 30, 2015 22:30 |
|
FamDav posted:angle of the dangle mods
|
# ? May 31, 2015 02:16 |
|
i hate when people forget units.
|
# ? May 31, 2015 02:52 |
|
piss units
|
# ? May 31, 2015 03:20 |
|
homework is for nerds
|
# ? May 31, 2015 10:06 |
|
c f# s: oh wow, it's not enough to make sure that all the definitions are in the right order in a file, but all the files have to be in the right order too. why does anybody defend single-pass compiling again?
|
# ? May 31, 2015 22:10 |
|
my friend, who is also 22 and doing comp sci at a different uni, just got a paper published and gets a free trip to Italy to present it at a conference gonadic io posted:c f# s: ARE there many people defending it?
|
# ? May 31, 2015 23:12 |
|
Valeyard posted:my friend, who is also 22 and doing comp sci at a different uni, just got a paper published and gets a free trip to Italy to present it at a conference i got 2 co-authored published papers before i was 20 theyre pretty lovely in bad journals though
|
# ? May 31, 2015 23:15 |
|
Awia posted:i got 2 co-authored published papers before i was 20 man, thats not loving around though
|
# ? May 31, 2015 23:20 |
|
Valeyard posted:man, thats not loving around though they got me into uni!
|
# ? May 31, 2015 23:22 |
|
i should be 'publishing' my first paper this week, hooray 'publishing' because there's no actual value in me getting it published or taking it to a conference since it's more a bioscience paper than a ML paper and im not in academia anyway. so it's just gonna get uploaded to biorxiv and the code stuck on github. but still!
|
# ? May 31, 2015 23:28 |
|
gonadic io posted:c f# s: it's not a pass thing, it's a side effect thing. modules can contain expressions to run at initialization time, so they have to be ordered into a dag
|
# ? Jun 1, 2015 00:18 |
|
coffeetable posted:MACHINE LEARNING AND MATHS i am following up on this incredibly good post from several pages ago to ask if you recalled what book this was my copy of strouds is in the mail rn
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 16:16 |
|
gonadic io posted:c f# s: can you redefine things? when would there ever be two possibly-correct orderings?
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 16:21 |
|
Share Bear posted:i am following up on this incredibly good post from several pages ago to ask if you recalled what book this was that said, the foundations of maths are pretty wide. you can get into logic, probability, set theory, graph theory, real analysis (think of 'analysis' as 'rigorous calculus' for now), discrete maths (combinatorics/counting) and a bunch of other stuff without needing much in the way of prerequisites, and they'll all serve well as intros to mathematical thinking. if any of those pique your interest, the easiest way to tell if you can handle a maths book is to read the preface (where the author will usually mention the audience it's intended for) then try to read the first chapter (usually titled 'preliminaries' or w/e) on Amazon or the author's website or LibGen. if it all seems very easy, you're probably ready for it. if there's stuff you're unfamiliar with in the first few pages, back off and find a more foundational book. nb: books for fresh undergrads are commonly titled 'a first course in'/'introductory'/'foundations of', but so are books for fresh postgrads. read the first chapter before buying!
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 17:36 |
|
coffeetable posted:i did; it turns out my first courses on maths at uni were supported just by notes. notes that are, in hindsight, not that great. instead im gonna say go with How to Prove It: A Structured Approach. it wasn't the first book on proof i read, but it's one of the best. the stuff it covers isn't directly relevant to linear alg or ML, but it turns up all over the place anyway and i think it works well as a friendly intro to mathematical thinking. word thank you very much if you're ever in nyc ill get you a beer
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 21:26 |
|
coffeetable posted:i did; it turns out my first courses on maths at uni were supported just by notes. notes that are, in hindsight, not that great. instead im gonna say go with How to Prove It: A Structured Approach. it wasn't the first book on proof i read, but it's one of the best. the stuff it covers isn't directly relevant to linear alg or ML, but it turns up all over the place anyway and i think it works well as a friendly intro to mathematical thinking. any good recs for stats? i have taken like four probability classes (and the typical haul of calc and linear algebra and poo poo) but basically no statistics and it seems like a huge gaping hole especially wrt ML
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 21:29 |
|
Share Bear posted:word thank you very much also this but boston
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 21:30 |
|
i will buy a battered, deep fried sausage for any yosposter in glasgow
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 21:31 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 09:52 |
|
i will buy a cob for any yosposter in nottingham
|
# ? Jun 2, 2015 21:33 |