|
triple sulk posted:i like the justification for a 980 by using three 2560 monitors don't you have a wife to uh n/m
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
I'm the $5.5B valuation for the company that makes Clash of Clans.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 12:39
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:text me
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 13:46
|
|
|
what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 14:08
|
|
|
http://consumerist.com/2015/06/05/google-issues-first-monthly-report-on-traffic-incidents-involving-its-self-driving-cars turns out that reality is in fact not a simulation following perfect rules, and people do unexpected things that cause accidents. epic fail for the goog.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 14:56
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:http://consumerist.com/2015/06/05/google-issues-first-monthly-report-on-traffic-incidents-involving-its-self-driving-cars The article herein clearly states that none of the accidents are the fault of the google car. These accidents would have occurred regardless of whether it was an Autonomous Vehicle or a regular drivered one. I hardly see how this is an 'epic fail' for Google.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:02
|
|
|
Shakespearean Beef posted:The article herein clearly states that none of the accidents are the fault of the google car. These accidents would have occurred regardless of whether it was an Autonomous Vehicle or a regular drivered one. I hardly see how this is an 'epic fail' for Google. a human being knows that people are going to run signs, change lanes without signaling, and generally break the rules. doesn't look like Google's self-driving cars can compensate for that. total fail.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:05
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:a human being knows that people are going to run signs, change lanes without signaling, and generally break the rules. doesn't look like Google's self-driving cars can compensate for that. total fail. but they were mostly the car getting rear ended so idk how that would be preventedb y a person?
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:09
|
|
|
EVGA Longoria posted:but they were mostly the car getting rear ended so idk how that would be preventedb y a person? moving the car when you see some rear end in a top hat looming in your rear view? that's standard defensive driving, which Google's fail cars are incapable of I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:10
|
|
|
EVGA Longoria posted:but they were mostly the car getting rear ended so idk how that would be preventedb y a person? a human being knows
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:11
|
|
|
EVGA Longoria posted:but they were mostly the car getting rear ended so idk how that would be preventedb y a person? probably by a person not suddenly freaking out and braking. ditto for the sideswiping, it's called defensive driving
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:12
|
|
|
my secret was always to get so shitfaced drunk I didn't care
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:13
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:moving the car when you see some rear end in a top hat looming in your rear view? that's standard defensive driving, which Google's fail cars are incapable of I guess. defensive driving requires some basic level of strategy, which clown cars equipped with weak ai suck at
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
Google's self-driving cars suffer from the same problems communism did; workable in a world where every car on the road is a self-driving car, but a complete fail in a world with a mix of different car systems. smh
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
there has never been an incident of a Google car colliding with another Google car efb
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:15
|
|
|
imagine a motionless, compliant google clown car being crushed into dust by a confused grandpa in a Buick forever.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:17
|
|
|
Stringent posted:there has never been an incident of a Google car colliding with another Google car i wonder if they've ever had ones driving anywhere near each other
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:20
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:imagine a motionless, compliant google clown car being crushed into dust by a confused grandpa in a Buick forever. hey, i drive a Buick! 
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:26
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:I'm the $10B valuation for the company that makes Farmville.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:43
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:moving the car when you see some rear end in a top hat looming in your rear view? that's standard defensive driving, which Google's fail cars are incapable of I guess. so wait you're stopped at a light and someone is coming up behind you fast; you run the light? 99/100 the person stops in time just fine
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:45
|
|
|
Shakespearean Beef posted:The article herein clearly states that none of the accidents are the fault of the google car. These accidents would have occurred regardless of whether it was an Autonomous Vehicle or a regular drivered one. I hardly see how this is an 'epic fail' for Google. Ah hmm yess and furthermore 'you're mother'
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:46
|
|
|
Condiv posted:probably by a person not suddenly freaking out and braking. ditto for the sideswiping, it's called defensive driving do the goog cars do anything besides brake when presented with an obstacle? having a car which by all accounts drives like a grandma and has near instantaneous ability to apply the brakes at maximum when presented with anything strange seems like it would cause a lot of people to follow close out of impatience and rear end it a bunch when it sees a piece of cardboard on the road and slams to a stop instead of just going around or over it like a normal person.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
normal people freak out and brake suddenly too, its not a uniquely google problem
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
i am of course assuming that the panic braking is relatively rare, this may be an incorrect assumption
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:imagine a motionless, compliant google clown car being crushed into dust by a confused grandpa in a Buick forever. this pleases me
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:a human being knows http://oglaf.com/descent/ ^ totally safe for work, except for the words.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:i don't know where else to post this why such expensive cases and also why the ethernet thing. instead of just having a cj make a cable for a penny. also why such sick graphics card for programming. ??
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 17:13
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:Google's self-driving cars suffer from the same problems communism did; workable in a world where every car on the road is a self-driving car, but a complete fail in a world with a mix of different car systems. smh i'm the human ability to avoid gettin t-boned by a dumbass running a stopsign
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 17:13
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:http://oglaf.com/descent/ thinking outside the box right there
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
"humans are terrible at driving and do not follow the rules and often smash into other cars doing these things, but it's the cars driving perfectly that are the problem"
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
cannot wait for the day when it is illegal for a human to operate a multi ton machine capable of moving fast enough to kill other humans instantly
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 18:21
|
|
|
Dessert Rose posted:cannot wait for the day when it is illegal for a human to operate a multi ton machine capable of moving fast enough to kill other humans instantly I cannot wait for the day when it is illegal for you to post.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
Dessert Rose posted:"humans are terrible at driving and do not follow the rules and often smash into other cars doing these things, but it's the cars driving perfectly that are the problem" goog cars have been in double the accidents per mile than the average human (even counting their cumulative miles). this indicates that google cars are causing accidents via their behavior hobbesmaster posted:i am of course assuming that the panic braking is relatively rare, this may be an incorrect assumption i wouldn't know for sure, but i'd assume it's not rare considering their accident rate
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
Condiv posted:goog cars have been in double the accidents per mile than the average human (even counting their cumulative miles). this indicates that google cars are causing accidents via their behavior wow, what a fail google.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
Dessert Rose posted:cannot wait for the day when it is illegal for a human to operate a multi ton machine capable of moving fast enough to kill other humans instantly *is mowed down by Google car succumbing to an off-by-one-error* *family gets to sue Google, Inc. instead of some guy* *family loses, is poor and destitute, mother turns to prostitution, children beg in the streets* Why do you hate families, Dessert Rose?
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
I can't wait until a google "engineer" accidentally flips the transit mode on the hidden internal Google Maps app to Transit and one of those cute little cars squishes someone into paste trying to get down the escalator to use BART.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 18:50
|
|
|
i'm curious if they're even testing these things in anything but the best circumstances (good sunny weather, no rain, wind, or ice, clean streets, etc.). i remember them having trouble with construction zones and locking up because of them
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
quote:"Our safety drivers routinely see people weaving in and out of their lanes; we’ve spotted people reading books, and even one playing a trumpet," i'm the idiot practicing trumpet while commuting to work how does that even work? was he driving with his knees?
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:*is mowed down by Google car succumbing to an off-by-one-error* gently caress families, all hail the technocracy
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:I can't wait until a google "engineer" accidentally flips the transit mode on the hidden internal Google Maps app to Transit and one of those cute little cars squishes someone into paste trying to get down the escalator to use BART. lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2015 19:07
|
|
