Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Mister Kingdom
Dec 14, 2005

And the tears that fall
On the city wall
Will fade away
With the rays of morning light

Mooseykins posted:

Vicki annoys me, I'm not sure why though. I'd like to skull gently caress her and tell her not to talk with her mouth full. I think that would make me feel better.

And it's superficial, but her teeth creep me out. It's like they're Chiclets instead of real teeth.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mooseykins
Aug 9, 2013

Triangle tits and an annoying sex voice?

Fuuuuck youuuuu sluuuut!

Wasabi the J posted:

I think you're actually one of those PornHub commenters IRL.

:ssh:

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

KakerMix posted:

I mean....women....in my shows....

There's two different things here.

When this story first blew up we saw all kinds of media people jumping to suggest that the show absolutely needed a woman. I'll give MattD1zzl3 the benefit of the doubt and assume his post is responding more to that side of things than the overall concept of a woman in a starring role on Top Gear. Trying to shoehorn someone in to the show just because of what's between their legs is idiotic and will make the show (or almost any other show where a casting decision is made primarily based on gender) worse.

That said, there's nothing wrong with a woman hosting the show either. I don't care what bits a presenter has as long as they can drive well enough to hoon the latest supercars around the airfield or whatever track they happen to be on, do dumb things in in contraptions built out of beater cars, and occasionally actually talk about some facts. Looking at the list of rumored names I have no idea how Jodie Kidd is as a presenter but she seems to know enough to talk shop and can certainly handle herself behind the wheel so I'd be willing to bet she'd at least be better on camera than Tanner Foust and there's no question she's a better driver than Adam Ferrara. Neither are very high bars but that's at least enough to show she could probably be entertaining to watch after a season or two of settling in. Sue Perkins on the other hand would likely be a nightmare as it seems like the only reason she got brought up in all this is some journalists looking for an anti-Clarkson. Putting her on Top Gear would be as nonsensical as choosing Chris Hardwick in that they're both decent on TV when in their element but neither seem to have the remotest interest in cars.

I think this BBC exec has her head on straight about it:

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/top-gear-could-be-fronted-by-a-woman-bbc2-boss-says-10194190.html posted:

BBC2 controller Kim Shillinglaw said she was not thinking of Jeremy Clarkson’s replacement “in terms of gender”.

“I worked with a lot with female presenters and when I used to work in science that was something across the piste that I really wanted to tackle,” Shillinglaw said.

“But I don't think I've ever approached an individual show thinking that was the way I want to cast it so I think it's an open book on that.

"We'll definitely look at some women, but it's not a driving priority."

Basically in my opinion anyone who really cares one way or another whether a woman is involved in hosting the next incarnation of Top Gear is wrong. If you think there must be a woman, you're wrong. If you think there can't be a woman, you're wrong. What matters is how good of a fit they are for the show's formula, whether they're yet another old straight white man or a transgendered biracial lesbian woman isn't relevant to entertaining me with cars. The Stig has proven that none of the normal human qualities are absolutely critical to being a valuable part of the show.

GutBomb
Jun 15, 2005

Dude?

Mooseykins posted:

Vicki annoys me, I'm not sure why though. I'd like to skull gently caress her and tell her not to talk with her mouth full. I think that would make me feel better.

What the gently caress?

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

spog posted:

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jun/04/top-gear-bbc-in-james-may-richard-hammond-jeremy-clarkson

Hammond and May are being offered a million quid per show, each, to stay on Top Gear with a series of rotating co-hosts.

The paper speculates that this could leave the door open for JC to return as a 'guest' presenter, or possibly come back full time in a future series.

EDIt not per show.

http://www.dailydot.com/entertainment/netflix-top-gear-jeremy-clarkson-hammond-may/?fb=dd

Rumors about Netflix may be true...

Shrapnig
Jan 21, 2005

GutBomb posted:

What the gently caress?

He said he'd like to skull gently caress her and tell her not to talk with her mouth full. It's right there in the post you quoted.

Backov
Mar 28, 2010

Shrapnig posted:

He said he'd like to skull gently caress her and tell her not to talk with her mouth full. It's right there in the post you quoted.

It's just that he's so triggered right now he can't even.

Olympic Mathlete
Feb 25, 2011

:h:


Goons in 'not understanding humour' shocker. The irony is ridiculous considering which website you're on too. :v:

To add something though, I really don't care what sex any of the presenters are so long as there's a bit of piss taking and joviality regarding challenges and such.

Olympic Mathlete fucked around with this message at 13:10 on Jun 8, 2015

MattD1zzl3
Oct 26, 2007
Probation
Can't post for 4 years!
Yes I certainly don't mind a female presenter who is a natural fit. But top gear for years has been a very blokey show. It irks me when you see names batted around and there's an overarching attitude of "we need to be sure to get someone in there who isn't a white straight male". To me as a viewer and fan that point in isolation isn't a priority, and I worry about the show changing for the worse. It's not like ghostbusters where I can simply ignore one top gear and watch another.

If it happens organically, great. If it comes as a decision based on company policy, it's a fraud and I hope it fails. I feel a lot more passionately about doctor who than TG, which will be hard to mess up.

MattD1zzl3 fucked around with this message at 17:49 on Jun 8, 2015

InitialDave
Jun 14, 2007

I Want To Believe.

MattD1zzl3 posted:

Yes I certainly don't mind a female presenter who is a natural fit. But top gear for years has been a very blokey show. It irks me when you see names batted around and there's an overarching attitude of "we need to be sure to get someone in there who isn't a white straight male". To me as a viewer and fan that point in isolation isn't a priority, and I worry about the show changing for the worse. It's not like ghostbusters where I can simply ignore one top gear and watch another.
I'm not sure about Ghostbusters, but that's because Melissa McCarthy is quite irritating, rather than "Wimmin in mah movies", plus (as with Mad Max), I think the poo poo about how "feminist" it will be as a film is largely a circlejerk by agenda-driven commentators on either side.

With Top Gear, if one of the new presenters ends up being a woman, and as with Jodie Kidd, it's because they're into cars, fair enough. If it smells of them getting the spot in order to try some social engineering/demographics bollocks, I'd be against it.

MattD1zzl3 posted:

If it happens organically, great. If it comes as a decision based on company policy, it's a fraud and I hope it fails.
So pretty much this.

MattD1zzl3 posted:

I feel a lot more passionately about doctor who than TG, which will be hard to mess up.
Obligatory "You're ten years too late".

The MUMPSorceress
Jan 6, 2012


^SHTPSTS

Gary’s Answer

88h88 posted:

Goons in 'not understanding humour' shocker. The irony is ridiculous considering which website you're on too. :v:

To add something though, I really don't care what sex any of the presenters are so long as there's a bit of piss taking and joviality regarding challenges and such.

I'm not sure saying " I want to face gently caress someone" Is humour. More like a statement.

I'd like to skullfuck you and tell you not to post with your mouth full? See how that's not funny, like at all?

The new presenter should be Clarkson in a wig and frock.

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

LeftistMuslimObama posted:

I'm not sure saying " I want to face gently caress someone" Is humour. More like a statement.

I'd like to skullfuck you and tell you not to post with your mouth full? See how that's not funny, like at all

I'm imagining you saying this in a stereotypical whiny "that's not funny" tone and it's hilarious, so...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwMukKqx-Os

quote:

The new presenter should be Clarkson in a wig and frock.

Introducing our new presenter, Jeri Clarkson!

Olympic Mathlete
Feb 25, 2011

:h:


LeftistMuslimObama posted:

I'm not sure saying " I want to face gently caress someone" Is humour. More like a statement.

I'd like to skullfuck you and tell you not to post with your mouth full? See how that's not funny, like at all?

This is more because you can post while having your mouth full rather than the idea itself not being funny but instead of putting rude thoughts in your head about a mouth full of cock and someone trying to speak I'll just leave it there. *ahem* :bigtran:

Daric
Dec 23, 2007

Shawn:
Do you really want to know my process?

Lassiter:
Absolutely.

Shawn:
Well it starts with a holla! and ends with a Creamsicle.

wolrah posted:

I'm imagining you saying this in a stereotypical whiny "that's not funny" tone and it's hilarious, so...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwMukKqx-Os


Introducing our new presenter, Jeri Clarkson!

Jennifer, duh

spog
Aug 7, 2004

It's your own bloody fault.

MattD1zzl3 posted:

Yes I certainly don't mind a female presenter who is a natural fit. But top gear for years has been a very blokey show. It irks me when you see names batted around and there's an overarching attitude of "we need to be sure to get someone in there who isn't a white straight male". To me as a viewer and fan that point in isolation isn't a priority, and I worry about the show changing for the worse. It's not like ghostbusters where I can simply ignore one top gear and watch another.

If it happens organically, great. If it comes as a decision based on company policy, it's a fraud and I hope it fails. I feel a lot more passionately about doctor who than TG, which will be hard to mess up.

I am sure I read somewhere that the BBC was keen to get a female presenter in there, since women couldn't relate to the programme if it were all men.

Which, if you think about, is vastly more offensive than anything Jezza has said in his whole career.

What the new team need to have is a genuine rapport - where you believe that they are real friends and enjoy knocking stuff off each other. And I am struggling to think of any duo/trio where I believe that is true.

David Mitchell and Lee Mack, perhaps?

InitialDave
Jun 14, 2007

I Want To Believe.

wolrah posted:

Introducing our new presenter, Jeri Clarkson!

:): "Jeri.."
:j: "Me!"
:) "...Clarkson"

wolrah
May 8, 2006
what?

Daric posted:

Jennifer, duh

Only if the Porsche is actually faster.

Militant Lesbian
Oct 3, 2002
https://twitter.com/BBCTwo/status/607969669140475904

Sair
May 11, 2007

spog posted:

I am sure I read somewhere that the BBC was keen to get a female presenter in there, since women couldn't relate to the programme if it were all men.

Which, if you think about, is vastly more offensive than anything Jezza has said in his whole career.

I'm not following your logic here.

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

"Saying that women can't relate to an all-male cast is sexist because it assumes their brains aren't as capable as mens', who are known for their enthusiastic support of all-female shows such as The View. Furthermore,"

Symphoric
Apr 20, 2005


Comparing Top Gear to The View in any significant way is so painfully stupid I felt embarrassed just reading that post.

Anyway, here's a thing about the lost films airing on BBC2 (Spoilers in it, I guess).

http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/top-gear-tv-series-22-remaining-episode-trailer-2015-06-08

Cojawfee
May 31, 2006
I think the US is dumb for not using Celsius

Twitter is blocked where I am, what does this say?

Scherloch
Oct 28, 2010

Yeah!

spog posted:

David Mitchell and Lee Mack, perhaps?

You could probably throw in Rob Brydon as well.

spog
Aug 7, 2004

It's your own bloody fault.

Cojawfee posted:

Twitter is blocked where I am, what does this say?

quote:

Three men (and The Stig). Two films. One more episode. #TopGear. Coming soon.

And the video from above

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

Symphoric posted:

Comparing Top Gear to The View in any significant way is so painfully stupid I felt embarrassed just reading that post.

The View is ultimately just a talk show, but men shun it because it's hosted by women and has a certain reputation because of it.

Top Gear is ultimately just a variety show, but women shun it because it's hosted by men and has a certain reputation because of it.

That's all I was saying, no need to get butthurt over it.

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

MY CHOSEN FORM OF MASS MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT IS A SACRED EXPRESSION OF HUMANITY AND SHALL NOT BE SULLIED BY ASSOCIATION WITH ANOTHER PIECE OF MASS MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT

spog
Aug 7, 2004

It's your own bloody fault.

Enourmo posted:

The View is ultimately just a talk show, but men shun it because it's hosted by women and has a certain reputation because of it.

Top Gear is ultimately just a variety show, but women shun it because it's hosted by men and has a certain reputation because of it.

That's all I was saying, no need to get butthurt over it.

But you were wrong:

http://advertising.bbcworldwide.com/home/mediakit/reachaudience/topgear

quote:

Top Gear’s unique entertaining nature appeals to a broad audience – 40% of the audience are female!
Core audience: males 18-35 passionate about cars and driving

I've never once watched TG and thought that I would enjoy it more if at least 50% of the presenters had ovaries like mine.

Symphoric
Apr 20, 2005


Enourmo posted:

That's all I was saying, no need to get butthurt over it.

You pretty much stated, in a typically goony way, that no man could ever enjoy a show featuring all women, and then you choose the loving View as the horse to hitch your wagon to. Even most women hate The View, and I'm pretty sure more people watch a single episode of Top Gear than the number who watch The View in an entire month, and it certainly isn't all dudes.

Anyway, my butt remains entirely unhurt.

VVVV Edit: I wouldn't mind a woman on the show either, but as many others have said, it would be dumb and offensive to just push one on to the show to serve some corporate mandate or quota. They need someone who can fit the flow of the show enough that she doesn't come across as just a gimmick. VVVV

Symphoric fucked around with this message at 21:45 on Jun 8, 2015

Fender Anarchist
May 20, 2009

Fender Anarchist

fake edit: nevermind

i for one wouldnt mind having a woman or two up there but my opinions are poo poo just like me so illj ust shut the gently caress up forever

meatpimp
May 15, 2004

Psst -- Wanna buy

:) EVERYWHERE :)
some high-quality thread's DESTROYED!

:kheldragar:

Enourmo posted:

The View is ultimately just a talk show, but men shun it because it's hosted by women and has a certain reputation because of it.

Top Gear is ultimately just a variety show, but women shun it because it's hosted by men and has a certain reputation because of it.

That's all I was saying, no need to get butthurt over it.


Enourmo posted:

MY CHOSEN FORM OF MASS MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT IS A SACRED EXPRESSION OF HUMANITY AND SHALL NOT BE SULLIED BY ASSOCIATION WITH ANOTHER PIECE OF MASS MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT

You're chain-gunning replies and telling someone else not to get butthurt. :psyduck:

Mustache Ride
Sep 11, 2001



I...uh...



I want to see these episodes now. Badly. Hammond and May seem to be in "Don't give a gently caress" mode in them. Its glorious.

Wasabi the J
Jan 23, 2008

MOM WAS RIGHT

Mustache Ride posted:

I...uh...



I want to see these episodes now. Badly. Hammond and May seem to be in "Don't give a gently caress" mode in them. Its glorious.

It's two hours of drunk may playing a recorder and cooking in the top gear lab.

Symphoric
Apr 20, 2005


Mustache Ride posted:

I...uh...



I want to see these episodes now. Badly. Hammond and May seem to be in "Don't give a gently caress" mode in them. Its glorious.

I want that jacket.

hopterque
Mar 9, 2007

     sup
That's clearly hammond's evil twin.

pik_d
Feb 24, 2006

follow the white dove





TRP Post of the Month October 2021

hopterque posted:

That's clearly hammond's evil twin.

Evil Hammond is a short Robert Downey Jr.?

cool kids inc.
May 27, 2005

I swallowed a bug

hopterque posted:

That's clearly hammond's evil twin.

Hammond's from the Darkest Timeline and May is just..well May. It's pretty great.

Delsaber
Oct 1, 2013

This may or may not be correct.


In this universe, Hammond owns a Tantalus Field and used it to get rid of Clarkson.

sbaldrick
Jul 19, 2006
Driven by Hate

Mustache Ride posted:

I...uh...



I want to see these episodes now. Badly. Hammond and May seem to be in "Don't give a gently caress" mode in them. Its glorious.

Hammond looks like I did the last time I got laid off, poor fucker.

I hope all the studio segments involve them ripping on Clarkson right up till he shows up in the last bit, where they really rip on hi!.

One Swell Foop
Aug 5, 2010

I'm afraid we have no time for codes and manners.

Mustache Ride posted:

I...uh...



I want to see these episodes now. Badly. Hammond and May seem to be in "Don't give a gently caress" mode in them. Its glorious.

Look into my eyes, don't look around the eyes, only into the eyes, you WILL love this Opel Kadett like your child and refer to it as Oliver, aaand you're back in the room.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

spog
Aug 7, 2004

It's your own bloody fault.
It;s really a shame that we don't have the TG News right now:

'Two-Jags' Prescott is now 'Two-Bans' Prescott.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/john-prescott-banned-from-driving-after-being-caught-speeding-in-his-jaguar-10305479.html


quote:

Former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott has been banned from driving for six months after he was caught speeding in his Jaguar.

Lord Prescott was caught driving at 60mph in a 50mph zone when he was driving through Lincolnshire, after spending a day helping his son David move house. The former Hull East MP already had nine points on his license when he arrived at Grantham Magistrates Court. He was given another three points for speeding, bringing his total points up to 12, which is an automatic ban. He will be allowed behind the wheel again in November.

This is not the first time Lord Prescott has been caught speeding. In July 1988, March 1989, January 1991 and January 1997 he was caught speeding. He was fined for the first two instances, but the 1991 incident saw him banned from driving for 21 days after he was stopped on the M1 doing 105mph. In 1997, he was stopped by police for driving on icy roads at 80mph on the M62. Police had, at the time, recommended people drive at a maximum of 30mph due to the weather

Jezza only has had one speeding ticket.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply