|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:stop grepping code and install the silver searcher (ag) instead grep is a generic trademark, i grep with ag all the time
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 00:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:32 |
|
|
ag is so loving good like i used to use ack and then i tried ag and it searched like 100mb of code in ten seconds and i was like choco uninstall ack
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
anyone got any good books on OS programming? i feel like reading something incredibly dry and boring
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Awia posted:anyone got any good books on OS programming? i feel like reading something incredibly dry and boring The bible apparently explains TempleOS
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
Awia posted:anyone got any good books on OS programming? i feel like reading something incredibly dry and boring are you sure you don't want compiler programming instead?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 01:55
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:are you sure you don't want compiler programming instead? thats a step too far Space Whale posted:The bible apparently explains TempleOS lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
Space Whale posted:The bible apparently explains TempleOS yeah it's all in the gnu testament
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Awia posted:anyone got any good books on OS programming? i feel like reading something incredibly dry and boring Lions, maybe?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 02:02
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:Lions, maybe? looks dry enough to me!
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 02:07
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah it's all in the gnu testament uuuggGGGHHH
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah it's all in the gnu testament aaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:well we're talking about refactoring code here so let's assume that you have access to whatever debugging routine you like.you work on embedded stuff right, so real hardware can't give feedback? very frequently nope! even just staying on chip you'll run into numerous write only volatile registers, nevermind when you start moving off chip to like a dac or radio or something. sometimes you'll get status bits that'll provide some insight but just as often you won't. I realize this has wandered far from the original topic but sperging in tangential directions is fun
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 03:10
|
|
|
given a scope and poo poo though hell yeah probe everything and make sure the new thing looks the same as the old thing
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 03:10
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah it's all in the gnu testament thanks dad 
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 03:19
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah it's all in the gnu testament
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah it's all in the gnu testament lolllllll
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 04:05
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah it's all in the gnu testament lolirl
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 06:02
|
|
|
Awia posted:anyone got any good books on OS programming? i feel like reading something incredibly dry and boring the Tanenbaum book with the Minix source
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 07:35
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:Lions, maybe? oh, that's right, that's actually around now legitimately, not just in illegal photocopies and such. Tannenbaum's Minix book was basically intended to be a clean-room replacement for the Lions book, which also ran on the computers students had (PC/XT and up), and which also taught some about microkernels too. I've only read the original, not the revised version that also covers virtual memory (and used the 386 as its baseline), but it was good and clear and honestly not that dry or boring.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 07:42
|
|
|
Dessert Rose posted:ag is so loving good idk ack is instant for me
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 10:36
|
|
|
got my degree award, 2.1, now to start inflicting my bad code in the real world 
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 10:41
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:got my degree award, 2.1, now to start inflicting my bad code in the real world congrats valeyard, you're exactly as qualified a programmer as i am! (okay mine was in maths + compsci)
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 10:46
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:congrats valeyard, you're exactly as qualified a programmer as i am! thanks! yeah difference also is that you were 1% away from a 1st, and i will probably be just 1% over the line to get that 2.1. dont have individual class results yet, but it must have been decent to offset a low gpa from last year, god bless "exit velocity"
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 11:59
|
|
|
current terrible programmer status:code:
gonadic io fucked around with this message at 13:41 on Jun 12, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 13:36
|
|
|
i hope i manage to scrape a 2.1, my dissertation was dogshit and it counts for 3 out of 16 modules
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 15:11
|
|
|
Awia posted:i hope i manage to scrape a 2.1, my dissertation was dogshit and it counts for 3 out of 16 modules I was going to ask, you must be getting those results soon
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 15:18
|
|
|
my module results might be back tbh, but im too scared to look
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 15:22
|
|
|
rrrrrrrrrrrt posted:ugh this archaic notion of source code being tied to files in a filesystem is so distasteful. I much prefer a binary blob that contains all my object state
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
an access app is probably better than a mongo/node app
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
probably?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:an access app is probably better than a mongo/node app i once saw a student project that was a java applet that used ms access and only could run on a single machine right after that was a ruby one that used mongo and failed during the presentation
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:17
|
|
|
Awia posted:i hope i manage to scrape a 2.1, my dissertation was dogshit and it counts for 3 out of 16 modules What does this mean? I'm unfamiliar with this numbering system.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:34
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:What does this mean? I'm unfamiliar with this numbering system. degrees are split into classes 1st, 2nd and 3rd and a 2nd has 2 subclasses a 2.1 or a 2.2 1st is a really good pass, 2.1 is a good pass, 2.2 is an alright pass and a 3rd is a you tried hard
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:38
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:What does this mean? I'm unfamiliar with this numbering system. a first is the best, which about 15% of graduates get a 2.1 is the second best, which about 50% of graduates get a 2.2 is the third best, which about 30% of graduates get a third is the worst, which about 5% of graduates get this is what happens when you have eight-hundred-year-old universities
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:38
|
|
|
in every grade system we've ever had in denmark, theres always been unofficial versions creeping in with arrows up or down, or like "a very big 9" or a "small 10"
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
to confuse even further universities can have their own bespoke internal grading systems that will be translated to the normal degree classes upon completion
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
lol if you didn't go to one of those postmodern colleges that just doesn't give out grades at all
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 17:59
|
|
|
a number between 1 and 4 seems pretty straightforward, maybe just use that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 18:00
|
|
|
fleshweasel posted:a number between 1 and 4 seems pretty straightforward, maybe just use that? you can also pass a degree with honours or without
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:32 |
|
|
coffeetable posted:a first is the best, which about 15% of graduates get Uh I'm pretty sure it goes, "First is the worst; second is the best; third is the nerd with the hairy chest." Sometimes, "Zero is the hero," too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2015 18:03
|
|
