|
MrChupon posted:Is there a good channel to watch this on besides following on SCOTUSBlog? CNN is running commercials and terrorism stories and it is awful. Depends what you are looking for. If just SSM, it's virtually guaranteed that every network will cut to a story about that if released today. Possible death penalty too, or at least a ticker for it. Everything else seems out of the public eye.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 09:04 |
|
Oh man its gonna be a fun weekend!
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
So many dissents good god, each of the four dissenters wrote one. Suck on the throbbing gay cock of history, you assholes.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
We'll get a nice one from Scalia and something interesting from Roberts.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
That's it. Mandatory gay marriage for all!
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
Grey Fox posted:Each dissenter has written their own dissent ahahahahahha Yes. YES
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
Best pride weekend or BEST pride weekend?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
IT'S BEAUTIFUL
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03 |
|
It's nice to be a part of the civilized world.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:04 |
|
Grey Fox posted:Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha lmao how common is that?
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05 |
|
https://twitter.com/Qqmarriageequal/lists/bigottears
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05 |
|
Grey Fox posted:Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha Good I was running out of porn
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05 |
|
Kennedy is of course still reading. No way to know yet whether someone will read a dissent, although I would guess that someone might. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2015#sthash.CLW3LkqH.dpuf It's a thick one, as the four dissents might suggest. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2015#sthash.CLW3LkqH.dpuf For what it's worth, the opinion is not in a booklet form, either because it was too thick and/or it was finished too recently. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2015#sthash.CLW3LkqH.dpuf For all that writing, Kennedy better have talked about scrutiny.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05 |
|
alnilam posted:do i have to marry the nearest man No. But you do need to report to your local courthouse at 8AM Monday for your assigned gay marriage partner.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05 |
|
This is a good day.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05 |
|
Drone posted:So many dissents good god, each of the four dissenters wrote one. Suck on the throbbing gay cock of history, you assholes. If they all read their dissents, it will be a while until we learn about the other cases Get on with it, I want to know the other results!
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05 |
|
lol ssm took up three boxes
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06 |
The majority opinion is 103 pages long and Kennedy is reading that mothafucka aloud
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06 |
|
gently caress the dissents. I want to read RBG's concurrence.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06 |
The Warszawa posted:This is a good day. This is a good week.
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06 |
|
So only one other case left after Obergefell.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06 |
|
Drone posted:The majority opinion is 103 pages long and Kennedy is reading that mothafucka aloud "Now sit down and listen to me tell you why you suck"
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06 |
|
Zeroisanumber posted:gently caress the dissents. I want to read RBG's concurrence. "gently caress yeah"
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07 |
|
Wow, I thought we weren't expecting this ruling until next week? We're through the looking glass.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07 |
|
Grey Fox posted:Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha And they cross-joined each other's dissents. The butthurt will be epic, and I will drink those tears and laugh and laugh all day today.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07 |
|
Dzurlord posted:And they cross-joined each other's dissents. It's a literal legal circlejerk!
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07 |
|
quote:
Kennedy
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07 |
|
Oh my god Scalia I join THE CHIEF JUSTICE’s opinion in full. I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy. The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me. The law can recognize as marriage whatever sexual attachments and living arrangements it wishes, and can accord them favorable civil consequences, from tax treatment to rights of inheritance. 2 OBERGEFELL v. HODGES SCALIA, J., dissenting Those civil consequences—and the public approval that conferring the name of marriage evidences—can perhaps have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of special importance to me what the law says about marriage. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact— and the furthest extension one can even imagine—of the Court’s claimed power to create “liberties” that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention. This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:08 |
|
Eagerly awaiting Scalia's purestrain applesauce edit: oh hey ^^^^
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:09 |
|
*Scalia screams "loving Faggots" into the void.*
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:10 |
|
From the majority: "Especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships, this denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry works a grave and continuing harm. The imposition of this disability on gays and lesbians serves to disrespect and subordinate them. And the Equal Protection Clause, like the Due Process Clause, prohibits this unjustified infringement of the fundamental right to marry"
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:10 |
|
alnilam posted:From the majority: Hahaha just belt and bracering that fucker.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:11 |
|
xbilkis posted:Oh my god Scalia lol then quit if you don't agree with the job you have, you rotten old gently caress.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:11 |
"If you are among the many Americans--of whatever sexual orientation--who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not Celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it."
|
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:12 |
|
I'm gonna read the dissents and imagine they are dissenting to Loving.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:12 |
|
quote:"If you are among the many Americans--of whatever sexual orientation--who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not Celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it." loooool Roberts tears are delicious
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:12 |
|
Scalia's Dissent posted:Those civil consequences—and the public approval that conferring the name of marriage evidences—can perhaps have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of special importance to me what the law says about marriage. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:13 |
|
You might describe this decision as...crisp. refreshing. soul nourishing.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:13 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 09:04 |
|
Drone posted:"If you are among the many Americans--of whatever sexual orientation--who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not Celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it."
|
# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:14 |