SCOTUS 2023: Rice pilaf from Louisiana...is that like an ISIS video?

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > SCOTUS 2023: Rice pilaf from Louisiana...is that like an ISIS video?

«‹›838 »

Capt. Sticl: Jul 24, 2002; In Zion I was meant to be
'Doze the homes
Block the sea
With this great ship at my command
I'll plunder all the Promised Land!

MrChupon posted:

Is there a good channel to watch this on besides following on SCOTUSBlog? CNN is running commercials and terrorism stories and it is awful.

Depends what you are looking for. If just SSM, it's virtually guaranteed that every network will cut to a story about that if released today. Possible death penalty too, or at least a ticker for it. Everything else seems out of the public eye.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 9, 2024 10:12

Luminous Obscurity: Jan 10, 2007; "The instrument you know as a piano was once called a pianoforte, because it can play both loud and quiet notes."

Oh man its gonna be a fun weekend!

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

Drone: Aug 22, 2003; Incredible machine

So many dissents good god, each of the four dissenters wrote one. Suck on the throbbing gay cock of history, you assholes.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

SLOSifl: Aug 10, 2002

We'll get a nice one from Scalia and something interesting from Roberts.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

richardfun: Aug 10, 2008; Twenty years? It's no wonder I'm so hungry. Do you have anything to eat?

That's it. Mandatory gay marriage for all!

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

Grey Fox: Jan 5, 2004

Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

Slate Action: Feb 13, 2012; by exmarx

Grey Fox posted:

Each dissenter has written their own dissent ahahahahahha

Yes. YES

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

Parasara: Sep 17, 2014; Next time I see that woman, I'm shooting her, and not in the knee.

Best pride weekend or BEST pride weekend?

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

TotalHell: Feb 22, 2005; _{Roman Reigns fights CM Punk in fantasy warld. Lotsa violins, so littl kids cant red it.}

IT'S BEAUTIFUL

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:03

Zeroisanumber: Oct 23, 2010; Nap Ghost

It's nice to be a part of the civilized world.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:04

alnilam: Nov 10, 2009

Grey Fox posted:

Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha

lmao how common is that?

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05

Mr Ice Cream Glove: Apr 22, 2007

https://twitter.com/Qqmarriageequal/lists/bigottears

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05

sexpig by night: Sep 8, 2011; by Azathoth

Grey Fox posted:

Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha

Good I was running out of porn

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05

Green Crayons: Apr 2, 2009

Kennedy is of course still reading. No way to know yet whether someone will read a dissent, although I would guess that someone might. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2015#sthash.CLW3LkqH.dpuf

It's a thick one, as the four dissents might suggest. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2015#sthash.CLW3LkqH.dpuf

For what it's worth, the opinion is not in a booklet form, either because it was too thick and/or it was finished too recently. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2015#sthash.CLW3LkqH.dpuf

For all that writing, Kennedy better have talked about scrutiny.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05

ComradeCosmobot: Dec 4, 2004; USPOL July

alnilam posted:

do i have to marry the nearest man

No. But you do need to report to your local courthouse at 8AM Monday for your assigned gay marriage partner.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05

The Warszawa: Jun 6, 2005; Look at me. Look at me.

I am the captain now.

This is a good day.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05

Torrannor: Apr 27, 2013; ---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE

Drone posted:

So many dissents good god, each of the four dissenters wrote one. Suck on the throbbing gay cock of history, you assholes.

If they all read their dissents, it will be a while until we learn about the other cases

Get on with it, I want to know the other results!

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:05

Axel Serenity: Sep 27, 2002

lol ssm took up three boxes

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06

Drone: Aug 22, 2003; Incredible machine

The majority opinion is 103 pages long and Kennedy is :siren:

reading that mothafucka aloud :siren:

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06

Zeroisanumber: Oct 23, 2010; Nap Ghost

gently caress the dissents. I want to read RBG's concurrence.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06

Drone: Aug 22, 2003; Incredible machine

The Warszawa posted:

This is a good day.

This is a good week.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06

Torrannor: Apr 27, 2013; ---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE

So only one other case left after Obergefell.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06

sexpig by night: Sep 8, 2011; by Azathoth

Drone posted:

The majority opinion is 103 pages long and Kennedy is reading that mothafucka aloud

"Now sit down and listen to me tell you why you suck"

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:06

Slate Action: Feb 13, 2012; by exmarx

Zeroisanumber posted:

gently caress the dissents. I want to read RBG's concurrence.

"gently caress yeah"

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07

Optimus Subprime: Mar 26, 2005; Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?

Wow, I thought we weren't expecting this ruling until next week? We're through the looking glass.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07

Dzurlord: Nov 5, 2011

Grey Fox posted:

Each dissenter has written his own dissent ahahahahahha

And they cross-joined each other's dissents.

The butthurt will be epic, and I will drink those tears and laugh and laugh all day today.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07

sexpig by night: Sep 8, 2011; by Azathoth

Dzurlord posted:

And they cross-joined each other's dissents.

The butthurt will be epic, and I will drink those tears and laugh and laugh all day today.

It's a literal legal circlejerk!

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07

Axel Serenity: Sep 27, 2002

quote:

The history of marriage is on
e of both continuity and change.
Changes, such as the decline of arranged marriages and the abandonment
of the law of coverture,
have worked deep transformations
in the structure of marriage, affecting aspects of marriage once
viewed as essential. These new
insights have strengthened, not
weakened, the institution. Changed understandings of marriage are
characteristic of a Nation where
new dimensions of freedom become
apparent to new generations

Kennedy

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:07

xbilkis: Apr 11, 2005; god qb
me
jay hova

Oh my god Scalia

I join THE CHIEF JUSTICE�s opinion in full. I write separately
to call attention to this Court�s threat to American
democracy.
The substance of today�s decree is not of immense personal
importance to me. The law can recognize as marriage
whatever sexual attachments and living arrangements
it wishes, and can accord them favorable civil
consequences, from tax treatment to rights of inheritance.

2 OBERGEFELL v. HODGES
SCALIA, J., dissenting
Those civil consequences�and the public approval that
conferring the name of marriage evidences�can perhaps
have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the
effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of
special importance to me what the law says about marriage.
It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it
is that rules me. Today�s decree says that my Ruler, and
the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a
majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The
opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact�
and the furthest extension one can even imagine�of the
Court�s claimed power to create �liberties� that the Constitution
and its Amendments neglect to mention. This
practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee
of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant
praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important
liberty they asserted in the Declaration of
Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the
freedom to govern themselves.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:08

Grey Fox: Jan 5, 2004

Eagerly awaiting Scalia's purestrain applesauce edit: oh hey ^^^^

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:09

Luminous Obscurity: Jan 10, 2007; "The instrument you know as a piano was once called a pianoforte, because it can play both loud and quiet notes."

*Scalia screams "loving Faggots" into the void.*

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:10

alnilam: Nov 10, 2009

From the majority:
"Especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships, this denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry works a grave and continuing harm. The imposition of this disability on gays and lesbians serves to disrespect and subordinate them. And the Equal Protection Clause, like the Due Process Clause, prohibits this unjustified infringement of the fundamental right to marry"
:hellyeah:

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:10

The Warszawa: Jun 6, 2005; Look at me. Look at me.

I am the captain now.

alnilam posted:

From the majority:
"Especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships, this denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry works a grave and continuing harm. The imposition of this disability on gays and lesbians serves to disrespect and subordinate them. And the Equal Protection Clause, like the Due Process Clause, prohibits this unjustified infringement of the fundamental right to marry"

Hahaha just belt and bracering that fucker.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:11

ReidRansom: Oct 25, 2004

xbilkis posted:

Oh my god Scalia

I join THE CHIEF JUSTICE�s opinion in full. I write separately
to call attention to this Court�s threat to American
democracy.
The substance of today�s decree is not of immense personal
importance to me. The law can recognize as marriage
whatever sexual attachments and living arrangements
it wishes, and can accord them favorable civil
consequences, from tax treatment to rights of inheritance.

2 OBERGEFELL v. HODGES
SCALIA, J., dissenting
Those civil consequences�and the public approval that
conferring the name of marriage evidences�can perhaps
have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the
effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of
special importance to me what the law says about marriage.
It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it
is that rules me. Today�s decree says that my Ruler, and
the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a
majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The
opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact�
and the furthest extension one can even imagine�of the
Court�s claimed power to create �liberties� that the Constitution
and its Amendments neglect to mention. This
practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee
of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant
praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important
liberty they asserted in the Declaration of
Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the
freedom to govern themselves.

lol then quit if you don't agree with the job you have, you rotten old gently caress.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:11

Drone: Aug 22, 2003; Incredible machine

"If you are among the many Americans--of whatever sexual orientation--who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not Celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it."

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:12

Harold Fjord: Jan 3, 2004

I'm gonna read the dissents and imagine they are dissenting to Loving.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:12

Axel Serenity: Sep 27, 2002

quote:

"If you are among the many Americans--of whatever sexual orientation--who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not Celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it."

loooool Roberts tears are delicious

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:12

Mr. Nice!: Oct 13, 2005; c-spam cannot afford

Scalia's Dissent posted:

Those civil consequences�and the public approval that conferring the name of marriage evidences�can perhaps have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of special importance to me what the law says about marriage. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today�s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:13

Slate Action: Feb 13, 2012; by exmarx

You might describe this decision as...crisp. refreshing. soul nourishing.

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:13

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 9, 2024 10:12

Grey Fox: Jan 5, 2004

Drone posted:

"If you are among the many Americans--of whatever sexual orientation--who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not Celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it."

"I'm not a bigot, but..."

# ? Jun 26, 2015 15:14

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > SCOTUS 2023: Rice pilaf from Louisiana...is that like an ISIS video?

«‹›838 »