|
The FOD never comes out the other side. Ever.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 18:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 08:39 |
|
Rick_Hunter posted:You mean you didn't think 'Classic fencing response' ? You don't want any debris in your turbine. You probably also don't want to dent any of the internals, even by a little bit. I'm only guessing, I'm no turbine engineer, but the above posts about the engine that blow up, because some rather minor issues with an "abrasion" of some sorts.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 18:27 |
|
When poo poo is spinning at tens of thousands of rpm, the stress on the parts is immense. Any small defect (like a dent) with cause a local increase in stress and will likely be the cause of failure. Basically, every "ding" you hear is potentially destructive to the engine.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 18:30 |
|
hackbunny posted:not rock, it's concrete fenceposts. it can bend and crack like that without snapping because it has a core of rebar I have an asbestos roof on a 10k sq foot building on some land I own in Italy. It is still in good shape luckily. I feel like I should probably replace it sooner than later as it can only get more expensive to do so.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 18:36 |
|
Has anyone attempted or theorized a sort of fission-powered turbine? I don't mean like the Project Pluto ramjet, I mean something involving an aerosol suspension of a fissile substance that is compressed to critical mass by the engine cycle. This would obviously be extremely deadly, but would it work?
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 19:36 |
|
Uthor posted:When poo poo is spinning at tens of thousands of rpm, the stress on the parts is immense. Any small defect (like a dent) with cause a local increase in stress and will likely be the cause of failure. Got it. Ideal is hearing '............ *thump* '
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 20:01 |
|
VectorSigma posted:Has anyone attempted or theorized a sort of fission-powered turbine? I don't mean like the Project Pluto ramjet, I mean something involving an aerosol suspension of a fissile substance that is compressed to critical mass by the engine cycle. This would obviously be extremely deadly, but would it work? Not exactly what you're asking for, but close. And they actually built and tested it. HTRE-3
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 20:05 |
|
MrYenko posted:Not exactly what you're asking for, but close. And they actually built and tested it. Looks like a robot sitting on the toilet.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 20:13 |
Uthor posted:When poo poo is spinning at tens of thousands of rpm, the stress on the parts is immense. Any small defect (like a dent) with cause a local increase in stress and will likely be the cause of failure. And that's exactly what happened with the F-106B over Lake Superior. A minor manufacturing flaw in a single turbine blade caused a small abrasion on it. It reduced the lifespan of the blade enough that it snapped during operation, and that tiny little sliver broke off the next blade it hit, which broke off the next blade, and so on in a cataclysmic domino effect that caused the entire turbine to shred itself and blast through the engine in 1/4 of a second.
|
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 20:30 |
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:Looks like a robot sitting on the toilet.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 20:47 |
|
But what would the sign on the bathroom door have a picture of?
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 21:55 |
|
The Hman posted:But what would the sign on the bathroom door have a picture of? A toilet, duh.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 21:57 |
|
The Hman posted:But what would the sign on the bathroom door have a picture of?
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 22:01 |
|
MrYenko posted:Not exactly what you're asking for, but close. And they actually built and tested it.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2015 22:16 |
|
MrYenko posted:Not exactly what you're asking for, but close. And they actually built and tested it. looks like our old friend discovered some new parts
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 01:11 |
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 01:19 |
|
hello porker
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 01:25 |
|
PINING 4 PORKINS posted:hello porker _________/
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 01:37 |
|
Russian military procurement finest and least corrupt in all civilised world. if anyone tells you otherwise, report them to me and i'll pay the army to have them whacked.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 01:39 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:So I found that I actually still had the video I took of Ickes speaking in my Dropbox and I pulled it up to remind myself of the details. Don't worry, the F-106s weren't carrying the nuclear rocket; the Genies were kept locked up until they were needed, which obviously never happened. Wikipedia does have a picture of an F-106 firing an inert version! This reminds me of the Cornfield Bomber, which is only tenuously on-topic so I'll just post the Wikipedia link. My dad worked with the QF-106s in the early 90s and I've always thought those jets were extra neat.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 01:57 |
|
lol the tank crewman ducking into his turret
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 02:34 |
|
Did the warhead pop out right at the end there?
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 03:41 |
|
Rick_Hunter posted:You mean you didn't think 'Classic fencing response' ? No it's true, you never want to hear the Filmation Logo coming from a jet engine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9-FhELeX9M
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 04:00 |
|
Gentwise posted:To be fair, questionable locations of support beams probably contributed to plenty of the stuff in this thread. Speaking of support beams, during the climax of the hoverboard chase in Back To The Future II, they aimed the stuntpeople wrong and the stuntwoman on the left hits a pillar outside the clocktower/courthouse, which probably wasn't pleasant but also caused her to lose all forward momentum and miss the landing pad. They kept the take too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkyLnWm1iCs&t=155s Cheryl Wheeler A.K.A. The stuntwoman in question posted:The grand finale involved the bad guys (us) spinning out of control over a large pond, and crashing through a giant courthouse window. The grand finale was filmed separately and much time and planning had gone into the preparation of the stunt. There were four of us crashing through the window, and a cherry picker had pulled us back from the impact point approximately 50 or 60 feet. We were picked up at the hip, and our overhead wires were attached to a single arbor. When the cherry picker released us, we all swung towards the giant window with two white pillars on either side of it. Here's an article about all the too-familiar "It'll be fine" bullshit that went into such an obviously dangerous stunt. http://io9.com/the-hoverboard-scene-in-back-to-the-future-2-nearly-kil-1713294885
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 05:30 |
|
Cat Hatter posted:I hadn't noticed until I wrote this but, unless they put a morbid attention to detail into a second shot of the gang falling inside the courthouse, you can actually see her hit the concrete outside after they drop her. Yeah that looks real. The ground is actually visible, if it was a staged landing onto a mat I'd imagine it'd be cut off like it is inside.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 05:59 |
Yeah, that might be the real stuntwoman falling in there. Since it costs a good deal to do big stunts like this and they'd need to completely rebuild the window for any reshoots, they probably put one or two cameras inside as well to capture them crashing through and falling (since the stuntwoman suffered her major injuries from being released, so they didn't just swing the group through and then reshoot their landing on a new take indoors). So you're likely seeing not only her impact on the pillar, but also her body landing on the concrete. You can see how the stuntmen who landed properly inside land outside the camera frame so they wouldn't need to cut away to an impact.
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 06:48 |
|
That's about what I was thinking. Marty's "holy poo poo" perfectly sums up that scene.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 12:19 |
|
Man becomes hay bale is still one of the funniest drat things, but it's gotta be dangerous? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4kJtEcALA4
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 16:37 |
|
If by 'dangerous', you mean 'fake'? Then yes.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 17:17 |
|
Queen Gnome posted:Man becomes hay bale is still one of the funniest drat things, but it's gotta be dangerous? I'm guessing you've never seen the inside of a hay baler and/or have no idea how a baler works. There's all sorts of knives and pokey bits rotating around inside and if someone tried getting inside they would both be seriously injured and the baler would break. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BVtirYc6Pc Craptacular fucked around with this message at 18:07 on Jul 5, 2015 |
# ? Jul 5, 2015 18:00 |
|
Craptacular posted:I'm guessing you've never seen the inside of a hay baler and/or have no idea how a baler works. There's all sorts of knives and pokey bits rotating around inside and if someone tried getting inside they would both be seriously injured and the baler would break. Giant-rear end needles too.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 18:19 |
|
Thiiiiiiiiink abooooooowwwwtt thiissss Never forget North Bus Duct 1992-2012
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 19:33 |
|
Craptacular posted:I'm guessing you've never seen the inside of a hay baler and/or have no idea how a baler works. There's all sorts of knives and pokey bits rotating around inside and if someone tried getting inside they would both be seriously injured and the baler would break. I have not . A sad thing for someone who grew up in the countryside of the Midwest! Though when I have seen balers in the field, none of them had a chute on the end like the one in the fake video. Now I want a hay bale costume.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 19:58 |
|
http://www.wltx.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/07/05/man-dies-fireworks-head/29734471/quote:CALAIS, Maine - One young Maine man is dead after he put a fireworks mortar on his head and set it off, according to officials.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 21:32 |
|
Dillbag posted:http://www.wltx.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/07/05/man-dies-fireworks-head/29734471/ Do you think this is a polite way of saying his head exploded?
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 21:40 |
I wonder if his friends encouraged him to put the mortar bomb on his head or not.
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 21:43 |
|
Queen Gnome posted:Though when I have seen balers in the field, none of them had a chute on the end like the one in the fake video. I worked summers on my grandparent's farm during junior high and high school, and they had exactly the same John Deere baler in the previous video I linked, except it had a chute on the end that dropped the bales on the ground like in your video. I didn't get to bale much, I mainly got to ride on the back of a flatbed truck and stack bales picked up off the ground by a bale loader, like in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECLOU3Z-xWs I would have killed for something that kicked the finished bales direct from the baler up into a trailer like in the first video I linked, but I imagine removing them from the trailer would have been a lot more difficult and dangerous because they wouldn't have been stacked neatly. Craptacular fucked around with this message at 22:09 on Jul 5, 2015 |
# ? Jul 5, 2015 22:00 |
|
Dillbag posted:http://www.wltx.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/07/05/man-dies-fireworks-head/29734471/ Edit: The Journal of Pyrotechnics investigated mortar firework recoil, as far as I can tell the largest commercially sold mortars are 3" so yeah this should not have been instantly fatal unless he had a professional firework or it failed, or both. But either of those are easily possible! Alereon fucked around with this message at 22:24 on Jul 5, 2015 |
# ? Jul 5, 2015 22:05 |
|
Dillbag posted:http://www.wltx.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/07/05/man-dies-fireworks-head/29734471/ Someone didn't have the proper PPE.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 22:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 08:39 |
|
Three-Phase posted:Thiiiiiiiiink abooooooowwwwtt thiissss Workplace safety was WAY different in the 60's: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMWTEyYV7CA
|
# ? Jul 5, 2015 22:28 |