Tezzor posted:I urge everyone to actually read the Leigh Alexander article in its entirety because it cuts to the bone of "gamers" so deep and so clean they're still weeping about it a year later It also cut Gamasutra's advertising revenue to the bone.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 16:52 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 05:29 |
|
Hadaka Apron posted:It also cut Gamasutra's advertising revenue to the bone. Congrats? GG censored Gamasutra? Good job, I guess?
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 16:54 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:Congrats? GG censored Gamasutra? Good job, I guess? They can't censor anything, they don't have any real power. Unless they graduated to a government while I was laughing about the absurdity of a serious panel about gamergate.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 16:55 |
|
Useful Distraction posted:No it's not. No? http://spjairplay.com/lets-do-it/ http://spjairplay.com/news/ Can you tell me why it isn't? Besides the fact that AGG folks really don't want it to be. Popular Thug Drink posted:Is anyone obligated to show up to whatever this thing is? You don't have to take your opponents seriously if they demand respect when advocating an absurd claim. Nope, but it's not going to be just GG folks there is it. Still going to be a neutral panel. Mr. Koretzky had no invested interest in just talking up GG. Still doesn't. He's been the subject of a profound amount of slandering just for putting this thing together despite the fact that even if you just look at his twitter https://twitter.com/koretzky he's not exactly flattering to GG. And now the GG panelists have no one to goad them into stupid footshooting. So long as they don't suddenly decide the neutral panelists are the enemy they're probably going to come off quite reasonable. This : http://journoterrorist.com/ highlights what prompted Airplay by the way.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 16:55 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:Nobody's going to care what the panelists discover except people who already agree with the panelists. Absolutely nobody cares. Right, the SPJ is only one of the oldest and most respected journalist organizations in America. Why would anyone care what they have to say about an issue involving journalism? Tezzor posted:Can we stop saying "anti Gamer Gate". We don't say "anti anti War on Christmas" or "anti Sharia America" we simply recognize opposition as denying the paranoid whining of delusional reactionaries Which makes it even more embarrassing that no one outside of Gamer Gate is willing to show up to debate these "delusional reactionaries."
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 16:55 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:This is a ridiculous standard for hobbyist journalism though. You'd need to find a journalist who is really into indie gaming but doesn't have any friends who are indie game devs. It's an impossible standard so you can keep accusing everyone with it. Maybe, maybe not. Milo is going to hammer in just how close game journalist (indie and mainstream) are with the people they are suppose to report on instead of a casual friendship between reporter and subject matter that tends to occur. Expect to see alot of the same quotes listed here: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/09/18/the-emails-that-prove-video-games-journalism-must-be-reformed/ Almost for certain that this line is going to quoted at some point from the GameJournoPros email list along with others that wanted some professional distance from the whole Zoe Post thing. quote:Who here hasn’t slept with a PR person or game developer? #AMIRITE quote:I would prefer not to be associated with this. It feels wrong to me. I think it feels very off to reach across the fence from journalist to subject in this way. I prefer professional distance, especially given the accusations being levied at us from outside.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 16:57 |
|
BexGu posted:Maybe, maybe not. Milo is going to hammer in just how close game journalist (indie and mainstream) are with the people they are suppose to report on instead of a casual friendship between reporter and subject matter that tends to occur. Expect to see alot of the same quotes listed here: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/09/18/the-emails-that-prove-video-games-journalism-must-be-reformed/ Is this going to address the fact that this is a problem in all kinds of hobby journalism due to the outlets relying on the people they're writing about to hook them up with the stuff to write about or is it just going to be wailing about games, and what are the odds that anyone on the panel is going to actually give a poo poo about game reviews
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:00 |
|
INH5 posted:Right, the SPJ is only one of the oldest and most respected journalist organizations in America. Why would anyone care what they have to say about an issue involving journalism? I'm talking about the participants, not the moderators. INH5 posted:Which makes it even more embarrassing that no one outside of Gamer Gate is willing to show up to debate these "delusional reactionaries." It's embarassing for the gamergaters who crave letgitimacy and approval from the mainstream, not any individual who is unwilling to expose themselves to more personal attacks. BexGu posted:Maybe, maybe not. Milo is going to hammer in just how close game journalist (indie and mainstream) are with the people they are suppose to report on instead of a casual friendship between reporter and subject matter that tends to occur. Expect to see alot of the same quotes listed here: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/09/18/the-emails-that-prove-video-games-journalism-must-be-reformed/ Indie game journalism is a tiny field. They're mad that they can't find an innocent person in jail. It's so evidently a strange claim that I don't understand how some people can't recognize it as a waste.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:00 |
|
Hadaka Apron posted:It also cut Gamasutra's advertising revenue to the bone. Thus essentially proving the point
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:01 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:I'm talking about the participants, not the moderators. Personal attacks... from whom? Do the Gamergaters recieve no attacks? I can't say I've seen that to be true in watching all this. Certainly not when so many seem to believe there are no bad tactics, only bad targets.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:02 |
|
The Snark posted:No? No. Cause the actual Society of Professional Journalists has no involvement in this, it's just a single member of their organization doing this. In fact, the SPJ has denied him the use of their national logo on his personal "spjairplay" website. This is no more "an SPJ thing" than a random World Health Organization member setting up a private twitter meetup and labeling it a "WHO thing."
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:04 |
|
INH5 posted:Right, the SPJ is only one of the oldest and most respected journalist organizations in America. Why would anyone care what they have to say about an issue involving journalism? With rare exceptions, nobody is willing to show up to debate creationists either. Is this evidence of their factual basis? They certainly claim so. Or is it evidence that they are shitheads whose debate techniques revolve solely around lies, slander and whining? Who can say
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:05 |
Neo Rasa posted:Plus usually the best material to make people become AGG comes from just observing the GG echochamber, so tI don't think any AGG presence is really needed. Yeah, basically. I've never remotely given a poo poo about any of the "AGG" people. I'm "anti-Gamergate" solely based on stuff I've seen from gamergate and that it's largely a lot of people being willfully blind to sexism/racism in popular culture or actively attempting to discredit feminist causes. This isn't a two sides thing where thinking GG is full of poo poo means I have to buddy up with Wu/Anita/whoever. The enemy of my enemy isn't necessarily my friend.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:07 |
Black Baby Goku posted:The era of The Victim is the saddest moment in leftist politics. I'd say more so the era of the economically wealthy hijacking leftist politics and ignoring half of leftist politics. But then again there has always been leftist infighting. Those drat Trots and Stalinists!
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:10 |
|
The Snark posted:Personal attacks... from whom? Do the Gamergaters recieve no attacks? I can't say I've seen that to be true in watching all this. Certainly not when so many seem to believe there are no bad tactics, only bad targets. Gamergate is so ridden with personal attacks against their opponents that it appears a fair amount of gamergater's time is spent trying to worry out 'trolls' and 'false flags'. This is an occasion where saying "both sides do it!" is an obvious deflection, as far as I'm aware no gamergaters have been driven from their homes with threats of sexual assault and violence.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:10 |
Popular Thug Drink posted:Congrats? GG censored Gamasutra? Good job, I guess? Did you get upset when people boycotted South African and Israeli products in the 1980s?
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:12 |
|
Fluo posted:Did you get upset when people boycotted South African and Israeli products in the 1980s? That was a sarcastic post calling back the opinions of some probated posters who are still lurking this thread, who felt that wal-mart refusing to sell a game is censorship.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:13 |
Popular Thug Drink posted:Gamergate is so ridden with personal attacks against their opponents that it appears a fair amount of gamergater's time is spent trying to worry out 'trolls' and 'false flags'. This gamergate guy sounds like a Batman villain, do you have a link to his blog or tumblr?
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:13 |
|
Imagine a Gamer trying to debate in real life. "There is a massive sinister conspiracy to censor my videogames. On September 25, 2014, @AmyRoseFan420 posted: 'censorship is not an inherent evil.' I'm sure her FORTY Twitter followers find this acceptable, but I do not. Cunts."
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:14 |
Fluo posted:This gamergate guy sounds like a Batman villain, do you have a link to his blog or tumblr? Drunkposting is always a bad idea, though I've never heard of it leading to shitheaded individualism before.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:15 |
|
Fluo posted:This gamergate guy sounds like a Batman villain, do you have a link to his blog or tumblr? If you type "gamergate" into google, you should find a decent amount of substantiation. The most high profile aspects of gamergate in the mainstream media are how female critics, game developers, and journalists were driven from their home by threats of sexual assault and violence. I doubt that all of these articles are based in dishonest or biased reporting.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:16 |
|
INH5 posted:Which makes it even more embarrassing that no one outside of Gamer Gate is willing to show up to debate these "delusional reactionaries." "Ha, no one will debase themselves by having intellectual toddlers scream at them! How utterly embarrassing for those people not to show up!" I mean do you even read what you write or can you not see from up your own rear end in a top hat?
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:16 |
Popular Thug Drink posted:That was a sarcastic post calling back the opinions of some probated posters who are still lurking this thread, who felt that wal-mart refusing to sell a game is censorship. Well you're confusing voting with your wallet and a multinational retail corporation which makes billions. One is a collective group of people going out their way to not buy something from a multinational retail corporation, the other is a multinational retail corporation refusing to supply a product. It confuses me as a leftist why a lot of people like you seem so overtly Conservative in all but name. Someone earlier nailed it when talking about N-17 rated movies. Now you're going to go "but why doesn't wal mart sell snuff films" and then we're back to the ad homs and all good faith debating is out the window again.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:18 |
|
Literally The Worst posted:Is this going to address the fact that this is a problem in all kinds of hobby journalism due to the outlets relying on the people they're writing about to hook them up with the stuff to write about or is it just going to be wailing about games, and what are the odds that anyone on the panel is going to actually give a poo poo about game reviews Unless the neutral moderators bring that fact up, then no, it isn't going to come up. That's what happens when you leave your political opponents completely unopposed on the debate floor. And this really shouldn't be that hard. I can just off the top of my head think of a dozen embarrassing questions that someone could ask Milo solely regarding his conduct during GG. Popular Thug Drink posted:It's embarassing for the gamergaters who crave letgitimacy and approval from the mainstream, not any individual who is unwilling to expose themselves to more personal attacks. Vocal people opposed to GG have spent the last 5/6 of a year endlessly saying that the reason GG can't win is that it doesn't have legitimacy and approval from the mainstream. Useful Distraction posted:No. Koretsky isn't a random SPJ person, he's the director of SPJ's Region 3, which covers Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. That's a pretty big deal. Tezzor posted:With rare exceptions, nobody is willing to show up to debate creationists either. Is this evidence of their factual basis? They certainly claim so. Or is it evidence that they are shitheads whose debate techniques revolve solely around lies, slander and whining? Who can say Actually, plenty of people do show up to debates with creationists. One prominent recent example is Bill Nye.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:19 |
|
INH5 posted:Actually, plenty of people do show up to debates with creationists. One prominent recent example is Bill Nye. Yo, real quick, do me a solid and tell me the first three words in Tezzor's post that you are responding to with this.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:21 |
|
I like how 'plenty' means 'one guy a year ago'.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:22 |
|
Fluo posted:Well you're confusing voting with your wallet and a multinational retail corporation which makes billions. I said my post was sarcastic. That indicates I was not speaking 100% sincerely, for the purposes of humor. I'm not sure what you're going for here. I'm only responding as a courtesy to tell you that I am confused by your post and will ignore it. INH5 posted:
I'm not one of those people. I dont' think gg can win because they do not have a legitimate argument. An absurd stance doesn't get less absurd through repetition.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:22 |
|
It was also very controversial that Bill Nye did that and a lot of people didn't think he should have. In fact he probably shouldn't have.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:23 |
Effectronica posted:Drunkposting is always a bad idea, though I've never heard of it leading to shitheaded individualism before. You should stop posting then.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:23 |
|
INH5 posted:
...so? That still doesn't make this "an SPJ thing," he's not acting with the blessing of the actual organization. It's just a guy privately organizing a meetup for gamergaters.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:23 |
|
Useful Distraction posted:...so? Didn't you read? He is A Pretty Big DealTM, and he carries the full weight of the SPJ behind his actions. I mean sure, the SPJ itself hasn't actually endorsed it, but if they were against it why aren't they controlling their employee's every thought and action? You ever think of that, smart guy?
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:26 |
|
The Snark posted:Thank you, listening to Leigh presently. The entire point is that they aren't sitting on their rear end and simply typing words on the computer. They are actually going out there and forming panels and doing stuff.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:26 |
Ogmius815 posted:It was also very controversial that Bill Nye did that and a lot of people didn't think he should have. In fact he probably shouldn't have. Yeah... creationists have a very d&d style of debating. Throw as much poo poo out there that it'd take a mass amount of effort to put out. So once you put out and debunked one bonfire there is another 10 freshly lit A.K.A Gish Gallop.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:27 |
|
Has anyone played any good video games lately? Here is a list of my favorite games (in no particular order):
Now it's your turn: post some of your favorite games! (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:28 |
|
Hadaka Apron posted:But the pro-GG people aren't moderating Airplay. It doesn't really matter. The entire thing about this whole poo poo storm is the belief that there's some external force responsible for the ills afflicting it, be it SJWs, unethical journalism or whatever which is a convenient scapegoat that allows for creating the idealised enemy responsible for everything. The truth of the matter is that there isn't any. It is not some evil force that is destroying it, it's that it's rotten to the core. There is no mythical bogeyman that is responsible for why people feel the way they do, the reason is themselves and the monster they created and gave life to. Appealing to some external force, be it the moderate, or in the recent case the SPJ allows people to believe that the object they respect so much actually does care and we just need some people to see our way of thinking to make it all better. There is no magical panacea that will make the bad feelings go away, because people are not even willing to acknowledge there is a problem, let alone take the necessary steps to fix it.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:28 |
Popular Thug Drink posted:Gamergate is so ridden with personal attacks against their opponents that it appears a fair amount of gamergater's time is spent trying to worry out 'trolls' and 'false flags'. Chris von Csefalvay argued that Gamergate wasn't a hate movement and got a lot of harassment. quote:Q: After being displayed on Randi Harper’s twitter did you receive any difference in negative attention or more specific threats? http://s2b20blog.mukyou.com/the-hidden-face-of-hypocrisy-randi-harper-part-3/
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:29 |
|
Hadaka Apron posted:Chris von Csefalvay argued that Gamergate wasn't a hate movement and got a lot of harassment. I'm going to repeat this part of the post you quoted just in case you did not read it the first time. quote:This is an occasion where saying "both sides do it!" is an obvious deflection, as far as I'm aware no gamergaters have been driven from their homes with threats of sexual assault and violence.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:30 |
Popular Thug Drink posted:I said my post was sarcastic. That indicates I was not speaking 100% sincerely, for the purposes of humor. I'm not sure what you're going for here. I'm only responding as a courtesy to tell you that I am confused by your post and will ignore it. I think you're missing the point of my post. You're treating a group of people as some kind of hivemind borg monolith.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:31 |
|
INH5 posted:Unless the neutral moderators bring that fact up, then no, it isn't going to come up. That's what happens when you leave your political opponents completely unopposed on the debate floor. Funny I was about to say it's what happens when you're only paying lipservice to an issue because you don't actually care about the issue at large, you care about it as a smokescreen for your other bullshit.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:32 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 05:29 |
Popular Thug Drink posted:I'm going to repeat this part of the post you quoted just in case you did not read it the first time. So it doesn't count because he chose not to leave his home?
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2015 17:33 |