|
bowmore posted:Welp I did the Pottermore test and it gave me Ravenclaw. I'm a slytherin with a 12 3/4 inch sycamore dragon core wand, unyielding
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:09 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:47 |
|
10 1/4 inch, Rowan, Dragon, Surprisingly Swishy.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:11 |
|
Why do some people get insulted if you say they would be Hufflepuffe. My only exposure is to the movies.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:16 |
|
because Hufflepuff are the sidekicks
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:17 |
|
I have an old friend from high school who was SUPER into harry potter, like freakout levels, and got both a lightning bolt tattoo and a hufflepuff tattoo, on arm and lower leg respectively. She LOVED hufflepuff. But Hufflepuff is basically an entire house of neville longbottoms who don't get nearly as lucky as neville longbottom.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:19 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:Why do some people get insulted if you say they would be Hufflepuffe. My only exposure is to the movies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0Z5_wipT2o (this person taught me improv and is pretty cool)
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:21 |
|
MMM Whatchya Say posted:(this person taught me improv and is pretty cool) Whoa I've seen this before! Sweet.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:22 |
|
If you're not brave, ambitious or smart you're basically a complete moron worthy only of scorn.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:27 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:If you're not brave, ambitious or smart you're basically a complete moron worthy only of scorn. wow rude hufflepuff with a 13 inch wand, acacia with dragon core, quite flexible
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:39 |
|
bowmore posted:do the pottermore test and find out for real I did it in the past and got Slytherin (but that is probably what I wanted to get).
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:42 |
|
13 inch dogwood, phoenix feather core, solid.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:43 |
|
I got 34 inch maple with a large barrel profile.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 04:50 |
|
EccoRaven posted:wow rude It's not my opinion - just a summary of the video and/or popular opinion.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:00 |
|
I wonder what the difference in wood types (pliable, unyielding, etc) has on magic/duelling
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:03 |
|
I'm just going to keep imagining you're writing 'wang' and laugh and laugh
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:20 |
|
(download link)Nain is the Harry Potter roleplaying game I always wanted.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:20 |
|
CCKeane posted:Ravenclaw is pretty much the worst house. All of the other houses praise values and effort, Ravenclaw praises and worships talent. ravenclaw isnt the house for smart people, despite what stupid hat says. its the house for people who value the pursuit of knowledge above all else. its not like everyone in every other house is stupider than all the ravenclaws. that said rowling didnt understand her own houses bc hermione isnt in ravenclaw.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:32 |
|
Ravenclaws are also for the wise and the eccentric
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:36 |
|
GulagDolls posted:that said rowling didnt understand her own houses bc hermione isnt in ravenclaw. I don't wanna go into it but Hermione is well-written and does in fact belong in Gryffindor.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:38 |
|
Indeed.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:38 |
|
Speaking of Rowling's writing, my GF was reading the murder mystery she wrote under a pen name. I told her "The murderer will be the first person the detective talked to". "But the detective first talks to the brother who hired him!" - So guess how it ends
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:39 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:Speaking of Rowling's writing, my GF was reading the murder mystery she wrote under a pen name. I told her "The murderer will be the first person the detective talked to". "But the detective first talks to the brother who hired him!" - So guess how it ends Yeah. I read it too. I won't be reading the second one.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:41 |
|
BottleKnight posted:I don't wanna go into it but Hermione is well-written and does in fact belong in Gryffindor. she's not well-written, which is exactly why she belongs in gryffindor.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:42 |
|
supposedly values courage over knowledge, spends all of her time studying and learning things instead of doing bmx tricks. yeah ok. loving bullshit. also the stupid hat put me in the evil wizard house
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:44 |
|
her dentist parents instilled the importance of courage in her as they expertly delved into the mouth of many a screaming child
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:45 |
|
who even values bravery over everything else. like wtf. how is there a whole house dedicated to this.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:45 |
|
Regardless of how Rowling writes, the houses work how she wants them to because she is the author. She can't not understand how they work
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:46 |
|
Gulag you are 100% Ravenclaw, just look at the chart, dummy
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:47 |
|
people write about things they don't understand all the time. i know she doesn't understand several things about her own universe because it contradicts itself all the time.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:48 |
|
If she invented it, it works as she says it does. Writing about things you don't understand is for realms not controlled by your own imagination.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:50 |
|
the way she says it works in interviews and the way it actually works, as written, are two different things. she doesnt have a clue
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:52 |
|
The way it works in the book is a narrative device. The way it works in interviews is because of fanatics. OR It works a way in the books and she's revising it on the fly after the fact. It depends if you care about reading the book or fantasising and self inserting/writing fan fiction etc.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:54 |
|
I am so glad that I've never read or watched any of the Harry Potter books/movies. At some point, maybe I'll finish reading book 2 of ASoIaF, but epic fantasy novels got sort of tiring. I haven't actually even finished the WoT series or the SoT series. However, I kind of want to go back and read the Dragonlance books again just for funsies.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:55 |
|
if she was revising it after the fact she would probably say something along the lines of "it should have actually been like ____" as she did with ron getting married to hermione, the greatest of sins specifically she talks about slytherin house a certain way, all the time, that is contradictory to how it is presented in books 1-7 and movies 1-60
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:56 |
|
TMMadman posted:I am so glad that I've never read or watched any of the Harry Potter books/movies. Read the first 3 ASoIaF books. Then read Pratchett. GulagDolls posted:if she was revising it after the fact she would probably say something along the lines of "it should have actually been like ____" as she did with ron getting married to hermione, the greatest of sins Does it really matter? It's all fantasy.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 05:59 |
|
author is dead and gulag killed her
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 06:00 |
|
In your own head, it can be whatever you want it to be. Same goes for Authors when they put it on the page.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 06:02 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:Read the first 3 ASoIaF books. Then read Pratchett. oh can we only talk about things that matter??? is that it??? is that how this is gonna go?? FINE im going to go watch "ZOMBEAVERS" tomorrow
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 06:03 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:In your own head, it can be whatever you want it to be. Same goes for Authors when they put it on the page. its fine if its different in her head, but there is really only one interpretation of a childrens book, when its on paper. its not some deep thing with multiple meanings, just one meaning that wasnt what she apparently intended.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 06:04 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:47 |
|
which indicates to me that she is in fact a stupid idiot, and not as good a writer as whoever made zombeavers.
|
# ? Jul 8, 2015 06:07 |