|
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/polls/2015/jul/whats-more-important-san-diego-comic-con-or-charge/results/
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 15:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
let's see i went to this website and found it worthwhile to paste in to the something awful forums but as for writing any sort of summary or explanation............neop
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 15:57
|
|
|
an explanation would've spoiled it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 16:13
|
|
|
Comic con probably brings in more money to the city than any NFL team does
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 16:19
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:Comic con probably brings in more money to the city than any NFL team does It also contributes a lot more to an influx of unsavory characters with terrible body odor than the raiders do. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 16:23
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:It also contributes a lot more to an influx of unsavory characters with terrible body odor than the raiders do. Well you take the good with the bad
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
Brannock posted:http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/polls/2015/jul/whats-more-important-san-diego-comic-con-or-charge/results/ My hometown has one of the bigger cons in the country.  I am so sorry, Ross.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:It also contributes a lot more to an influx of unsavory characters with terrible body odor than the raiders do. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
The Pasadena city council voted 11-0 against allowing an nfl team using the Rose Bowl as a temporary home
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 16:14
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:The Pasadena city council voted 11-0 against allowing an nfl team using the Rose Bowl as a temporary home Pasadena is my least favorite part of Los Angeles and this just sealed it. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:27
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Pasadena is my least favorite part of Los Angeles and this just sealed it. It's relevant because it leaves the LA Coliseum as the only real viable option. And I doubt they're gonna shove two teams in there for a temporary basis
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
Any idea on which team would be more likely to get the Coliseum?
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:32
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Any idea on which team would be more likely to get the Coliseum? I think it'll depend on which of the two stadiums actually starts getting built. If it's Inglewood, logic would say it's the Rams. If it's Carson, it'll be the Chargers
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:35
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:I think it'll depend on which of the two stadiums actually starts getting built. If it's Inglewood, logic would say it's the Rams. If it's Carson, it'll be the Chargers and the raiders get an aircraft carrier, perfect
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:36
|
|
|
Raku posted:and the raiders get an aircraft carrier, perfect Mark Davis will do as he's told because he has no choice unless he wants to sell the team
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
Raku posted:and the raiders get an aircraft carrier, perfect Make them a traveling team. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
Let the A's have the coliseum and build the thunderdome in the south parking lot.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 18:29
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:Mark Davis will do as he's told because he has no choice unless he wants to sell the team Yes, because that's worked out so well for the NFL in the past.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 20:09
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:It's relevant because it leaves the LA Coliseum as the only real viable option. And I doubt they're gonna shove two teams in there for a temporary basis As part of the lease, the Coliseum is literally not allowed to host 2 NFL teams
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Make them a traveling team. They're already the most travelled team so gently caress it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Raku posted:and the raiders get an aircraft carrier, perfect They're not going to San Diego, though?
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
If the raiders and chargers both move to LA is the assumption still that one of them would get moved out of the AFC west so that there are not two division rivals in the same city?
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
Kazak_Hstan posted:If the raiders and chargers both move to LA is the assumption still that one of them would get moved out of the AFC west so that there are not two division rivals in the same city? If they share a stadium, yeah, one will get moved to the NFC
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:If they share a stadium, yeah, one will get moved to the NFC Oof. Either way that ruins a few good rivalries. I guess I would prefer having the Raiders in the NFC and the Cards bounced to the AFC West. Mainly because I want to see the fights at Candlestitch when the Raiders play the Niners. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 01:47
|
|
|
Give the Seahawks back to the AFC where they belong. Trade for the Raiders.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Give the Seahawks back to the AFC where they belong. Trade for the Colts.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Give the Seahawks back to the AFC where they belong. Trade for the Raiders. Eh, I'd be ok with this. With Harbaugh gone we don't have any great rivalries in the division anymore. Plus the AFC loving blows and we could just advance directly to the AFCCG vs the Colts every year for the next decade. gently caress it, I'm down. Good luck dealing with the Carr2Cooper show.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 02:02
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Give the Seahawks back to the AFC where they belong. Trade for the Raiders. And I am so loving over this franchise I would be perfectly fine with Davis Jr curb stomping Jed York for a few years, bring it on.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 02:35
|
|
|
Seahawks to Oklahoma City, Chargers to Seattle. It's really quite simple.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
Cruel and Unusual posted:Seahawks to Oklahoma City, Chargers to Seattle. It's really quite simple. I approve
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 04:24
|
|
|
Seahawks to the WNBA, so Seattle has the professional basketball team they want so bad. New AFC west expansion team in Portland, preferably with some kind of raptor based name.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 06:06
|
|
|
I'm embarrassed that I know this, but Seattle already has a WNBA team.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 09:11
|
|
|
I did not know that and will almost certainly forget it. But if LA can have two NFL teams Seattle can have two WNBA teams.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 09:19
|
|
|
The Raiders in the NFC just seems wrong. When I think "AFC" I think of teams like the Steelers and the Raiders.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 14:48
|
|
|
Cruel and Unusual posted:Seahawks to Oklahoma City, Chargers to Seattle. It's really quite simple. Nah, I moved to Seattle to get away from the Chargers. Don't do this to me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
Brannock posted:The Raiders in the NFC just seems wrong. When I think "AFC" I think of teams like the Steelers and the Raiders. I am not sure there is any easy AFC West team to swap to the NFC. Aren't they pretty much all old AFL teams? Kind of the same deal in the NFC West, other than Seattle they all have deep NFC roots. Rams and Niners have been NFC West as long as there's been an NFL, and the cardinals are like the oldest continuous NFL franchise.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 20:41
|
|
|
Kazak_Hstan posted:I am not sure there is any easy AFC West team to swap to the NFC. Aren't they pretty much all old AFL teams? Kind of the same deal in the NFC West, other than Seattle they all have deep NFC roots. Rams and Niners have been NFC West as long as there's been an NFL, and the cardinals are like the oldest continuous NFL franchise. The entire AFC West were original AFL members, and I think the two teams that move divisions would be the Cardinals and Raiders. Dean Spanos has been the "Good Soldier" for the NFL and all the other owners love him, and the league has no love-loss for the Davis family or the Raiders. I'm not sure where I heard it, but it came out earlier this year that Mark Davis wouldn't be opposed to moving to the NFC either. The Niners are a dynasty franchise and wouldn't move, and the Rams have been NFC West forever. The Seahawks have somewhat established a rivalry with the Niners and I don't think they'll just move them back to the AFC after 12 years. The Cardinals have been a doormat through their entire history until recently, and haven't been in the NFC West for that long
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 20:53
|
|
|
Switch the Rams and the Chargers, nobody gives a poo poo about the Rams anyway. NFC West Seattle on top and smelly California teams below as their rightful place.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
Bad Moon posted:Switch the Rams and the Chargers, nobody gives a poo poo about the Rams anyway. Yeah this isn't going to happen
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
Moving one of the original AFL teams to the NFC is so loving stupid that's probably exactly what Goodell will do
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2015 21:01
|
|
