|
Didn't Baker do Wednesday Comics Hawkman in a similar style. At least he fought dinosaurs.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 15:24 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 11:12 |
muscles like this? posted:He's half human. And he's also a mutant, which explains his flight and his greater-than-Atlantean strength. The guy's one of a kind in a lot of ways. Remember that time Venom ripped off his little wing ankles and Namor was like "I can't believe this pathetic tooth monster thing is the first one to do this poo poo to me." and just kept flying without em? Yeah.
|
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 16:39 |
|
Teenage Fansub posted:I think that looks neat The only acceptable use of photo backgrounds in comics is crazy Kirby photo collages.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 16:49 |
|
Backgrounds are one thing but the thought of a major company paying someone for making GBS threads out stuff in poser and then actually publishing it is just absurd
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 17:48 |
|
Opopanax posted:Backgrounds are one thing but the thought of a major company paying someone for making GBS threads out stuff in poser and then actually publishing it is just absurd
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 17:50 |
|
Opopanax posted:Backgrounds are one thing but the thought of a major company paying someone for making GBS threads out stuff in poser and then actually publishing it is just absurd redbackground fucked around with this message at 17:57 on Jul 9, 2015 |
# ? Jul 9, 2015 17:53 |
|
prefect posted:His dad was a honky. I laughed pretty hard when I learned that Namor had a last name and that it was McKenzie. Namor McKenzie.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 18:27 |
|
That second panel needs to be an avatar.redbackground posted:Oh, hi U.S. War Machine 2.0! U.S. War Machine 1.0 used Poser, also, but it was black and white, so it wasn't as egregious.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 18:50 |
|
Phylodox posted:I laughed pretty hard when I learned that Namor had a last name and that it was McKenzie. He changed it. He's now Namor T. Submariner.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 20:11 |
|
Phylodox posted:I laughed pretty hard when I learned that Namor had a last name and that it was McKenzie. He hates the dry-landers because they all call him Spuds after learning that.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 20:14 |
|
redbackground posted:Oh, hi U.S. War Machine 2.0! Paying Chuck Austen is also absurd
|
# ? Jul 9, 2015 20:45 |
|
redbackground posted:Oh, hi U.S. War Machine 2.0! I honestly think the poser stuff looks better without the lovely cartoon filter thrown over it. It's like they decided to smear Vaseline over the page to pretend they are still drawing.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 09:37 |
Die Laughing posted:Didn't Baker do Wednesday Comics Hawkman in a similar style. At least he fought dinosaurs. I recall real backgrounds and no computer effects on that one. That was also pretty much the only Hawkman story worth a drat in my lifetime.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 13:28 |
|
Is House of M worth reading?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 14:41 |
|
Unmature posted:Is House of M worth reading? Sure. It's not very long and iirc pretty light reading. I assume it's on Unlimited.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 16:20 |
|
Senior Woodchuck posted:I recall real backgrounds and no computer effects on that one. That's only because DC has never collected Ostrander's Hawkworld series.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 16:25 |
|
The Convergence mini was nice.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 16:35 |
|
Poser comics are so bad. So bad!!! The fact Kyle Baker of all people went down that path makes me so disappointed and genuinely confused. I had no idea.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2015 22:51 |
|
It's mostly the laziness that gets me. I understand why an artist would do it: even in the best of circumstances you won't make poo poo as a comics artist. And I owe why an editor would go along with such half assed work: a good chunk of comics fandom don't care about art beyond looking "realistic" and if you're tracing poser models how can you miss a deadline? But even in the hands of someone who really, really, really knows what's up (Kyle Baker) it always looks utterly stiff and lifeless. Without twisting the composition at least a little it's almost impossible to create a line of action. It's much harder to guide the eye along the page. And the rigging on all of the models is questionable at best and a nightmare at worst. Even stick figures are more respectable than poser.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2015 00:12 |
|
redbackground posted:Oh, hi U.S. War Machine 2.0! I didn't know Xavier Renegade Angel had a crossover episode with Iron Man!
|
# ? Jul 12, 2015 07:24 |
|
okay this is a long shot. Years ago when livejournal was a thing there was one called scans_daily that got so popular that Warren Ellis and Gail Simone became regular contributors. Warren Ellis in particular posted a comic that was not modern, had fairly normal looking art, bur had actions and dialog that were completely insane, main character was wandering around babbling about some kind of drug influenced philosophy, waving his hands around to mold things out of "air jelly", driving a car off a cliff screaming "Do you see what I see?" Of course the whole blog was deleted and googling doesn't help when I can't remember much besides Warren Ellis posting it, but does anyone know what I could possibly be talking about.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2015 16:49 |
|
Could it have been Stardust the Super-Wizard by Fletcher Hanks? That was batshit insane, but I'm not sure if it was the right kind of batshit insane.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2015 19:33 |
|
Unmature posted:Is House of M worth reading? I re-read it recently and it's ok but then I'm really into alternate reality nonsense. The Doom/Fantastic Four mini is great fun at the very least.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2015 19:39 |
|
Big Bad Voodoo Lou posted:Could it have been Stardust the Super-Wizard by Fletcher Hanks? That was batshit insane, but I'm not sure if it was the right kind of batshit insane. No it wasn't Stardust. The setting did not have superheros or magic. It mostly took place in a forested area.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2015 19:52 |
|
Acne Rain posted:okay this is a long shot. Was it Shade: The Changing Man? I can't remember the exact scene you're describing but it fits the bill for all the individual elements.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 22:53 |
|
COMPUTEEEER GRAPHIIIICS Thank god we're over that and no one ever used a computer ever again.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 07:04 |
|
Cyphoderus posted:Was it Shade: The Changing Man? I can't remember the exact scene you're describing but it fits the bill for all the individual elements. again no, I would've remembered if it was that. Nothing was weird about the visuals.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 08:18 |
|
I'm sure this has probably been asked and answered but what in the gently caress happened to Peter Parker & Mary-Jane's kid that just disappeared in the 90's. I only found out about it due to Spider-Girl years ago and as I understand it Mary-Jane & Peter have a kid, Osbourne has her kidnapped then....? Nobody ever gives a poo poo about it again? Like I said I never read the original issues and only know about it due to Spider-Girl where she turned up fine.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 18:55 |
Krypt-OOO-Nite!! posted:I'm sure this has probably been asked and answered but what in the gently caress happened to Peter Parker & Mary-Jane's kid that just disappeared in the 90's. A clusterfuck caused by writers not agreeing with each other about anything happened to her.
|
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 19:04 |
|
Lurdiak posted:A clusterfuck caused by writers not agreeing with each other about anything happened to her. If I remember correctly 90's Spiderman was the biggest clusterfuck to ever happen in comics.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 19:08 |
|
Krypt-OOO-Nite!! posted:I'm sure this has probably been asked and answered but what in the gently caress happened to Peter Parker & Mary-Jane's kid that just disappeared in the 90's. http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2013/02/14/abandoned-love-whatever-happened-to-peter-and-mary-janes-baby/
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 19:11 |
|
Madkal posted:If I remember correctly 90's Spiderman was the biggest clusterfuck to ever happen in comics. Come on you are acting like there is a 35 part series on what went wrong.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 19:12 |
|
redbackground posted:http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2013/02/14/abandoned-love-whatever-happened-to-peter-and-mary-janes-baby/ Wait so they re-conned it so that Norman just had Mary Jane poisoned and that killed her child or he had the kid taken but it died? or it might still be out there? I can't even tell what might the truth due to the muddled storyline. You'd think any of those would be enough to have Parker think gently caress it and just kill Osborne.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 19:32 |
|
She's at the same place Batman's kid went for like twenty five years. Just wait for Morrison to pitch a Spider-Man & Daughter story.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 19:42 |
|
She would have gotten Mephisto-magicked out of existence along with the marriage, presumably?
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 20:58 |
|
CapnAndy posted:She would have gotten Mephisto-magicked out of existence along with the marriage, presumably? There was mention of a daughter when they made the deal but it was implied to be one not yet born. Speaking of that event, it completely killed my interest in Spider-Man so I never read an issue after it but did they ever explain why he went back to the mechanical webshooters?
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 21:10 |
|
CapnAndy posted:She would have gotten Mephisto-magicked out of existence along with the marriage, presumably? Yup. Mephisto even mentions that the baby would've become the greatest superhero in history before casting his magic divorce spell.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 21:14 |
|
muscles like this? posted:There was mention of a daughter when they made the deal but it was implied to be one not yet born. I was hoping it was going to be "because everyone agreed that 'The Other' was effing stupid and we'll never speak of Morlun and Spider-Totems again" but then the whole of Spider-verse revolved around him and
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 21:44 |
|
ecavalli posted:Yup. Mephisto even mentions that the baby would've become the greatest superhero in history before casting his magic divorce spell. All so an 90 year old women can continue living.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 22:00 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 11:12 |
|
Madkal posted:All so an 90 year old women can continue living.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2015 22:02 |