|
redbackground posted:I've only made my way down about 10 characters, but uh, sounds as if Mortal Kombat 4 was Not Very Good. Remember in the mid-90's when every game company figured that polygons was the way to go and that every tried and true 2D franchise needed to evolve into 3D no matter how ill-equipped they were because Nintendo was able to pull it off? That's Mortal Kombat 4.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:00 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 15:50 |
|
Gavok posted:Remember in the mid-90's when every game company figured that polygons was the way to go and that every tried and true 2D franchise needed to evolve into 3D no matter how ill-equipped they were because Nintendo was able to pull it off? That's Mortal Kombat 4. The people behind Sonic the Hedgehog are still at this point 20 years later interestingly enough.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:16 |
|
Sonic's the notorious one but the one that always springs to my mind when people talk about the polygon ceiling is Earthworm Jim 3D.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:32 |
|
Not Bubsy?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:34 |
|
Wheat Loaf posted:Sonic's the notorious one but the one that always springs to my mind when people talk about the polygon ceiling is Earthworm Jim 3D. That's exactly what was going through my head when making that description. That and Castlevania and Bubsy. At least Sonic had the Dreamcast games.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:36 |
|
Gavok posted:At least Sonic had the Dreamcast games. ...aaaaand? Maybe go back and take another look at those games.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:42 |
Gavok posted:Remember in the mid-90's when every game company figured that polygons was the way to go and that every tried and true 2D franchise needed to evolve into 3D no matter how ill-equipped they were because Nintendo was able to pull it off? That's Mortal Kombat 4. I still think MK4 was less of a disaster than some of the PS2-era games.
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:51 |
|
Gavok posted:That's exactly what was going through my head when making that description. That and Castlevania and Bubsy. Two of the three 3d Castlevania games were actually good, just not great. Two of Four if you count the n64 games as two different ones instead of one and an expansion pack.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2015 23:59 |
|
Mr. Maltose posted:Two of the three 3d Castlevania games were actually good, just not great. Two of Four if you count the n64 games as two different ones instead of one and an expansion pack. I can't actually figure out which ones you mean because even at the minimum there were five 3D Castlevanias. Castlevania 64, LoI, CoD, LoS and LoS2.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 00:21 |
|
I will totally cop to forgetting Lord of Shadows even existed.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 00:25 |
|
Mr. Maltose posted:I will totally cop to forgetting Lord of Shadows even existed. I honestly assumed you'd remembered that and forgot the PS2 ones!
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 00:29 |
|
I am the world's biggest Curse of Darkness fan, I just never picked up the most recent games for p. obvious reasons.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 00:33 |
|
Theyre not still making terrible 3d bubsy or earthworm jim games, though.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 00:40 |
|
I'll be honest, I like Lord of Shadows 1 and 2 (and the PC/DS 2d one which is pretty cool as it's much more like the older games) but mostly for how dumb they are and how hammy most of the actors go. And how the Belmonts are suddenly Scottish (and cast correctly for that. All Scots dudes, not Americans/Canadians doing bad accents, which is neat)
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 01:03 |
|
Unmature posted:It'll probably be easy to pitch since there's never been a show like that before. Eh, it's Dexter's lab with profanity.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 01:17 |
|
Starsnostars posted:Nah that guy's list was solid with Cole so low down and best series Time Force's Wes and Eric high up the list. Gavok posted:At least Sonic had the Dreamcast games. Busby was never good and honestly, Sonic Adventure is a mess. An ambitious mess, but a mess. Sonic Adventure 2 was better, though, and Sonic Heroes is underrated. When I think of good 3D Sonic, I think of the Sonic R soundtrack. Rhyno posted:Eh, it's Dexter's lab with profanity. So, that one episode of Dexter's Lab? Man, that was such a letdown. WickedHate fucked around with this message at 01:21 on Jul 25, 2015 |
# ? Jul 25, 2015 01:19 |
WickedHate posted:Busby was never good and honestly, Sonic Adventure is a mess. An ambitious mess, but a mess. A popular Let's Play group had regularly had arguments about whether or not Sonic Adventure holds up, then they replayed it, and one of them's mind got shattered by how bad it is and how his brain had embellished the memories over time.
|
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 01:21 |
|
Lurdiak posted:A popular Let's Play group had regularly had arguments about whether or not Sonic Adventure holds up, then they replayed it, and one of them's mind got shattered by how bad it is and how his brain had embellished the memories over time. Game Grumps started doing Sonic Adventure too recently and it's pretty much the best thing ever. WickedHate fucked around with this message at 01:33 on Jul 25, 2015 |
# ? Jul 25, 2015 01:25 |
|
Gaz-L posted:Not Bubsy? I never played any of the Bubsy games. Which is surprising because it probably would've fit into the sort of progression of games I was into: Sonic on Mega Drive; Earthworm Jim on PC; Super Mario Bros on GBC; Crash Bandicoot and Spyro on PS1; Ratchet and Clank on PS2. I don't really play many games very more. The few I do are all on Steam.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 01:34 |
|
Gavok posted:Remember in the mid-90's when every game company figured that polygons was the way to go and that every tried and true 2D franchise needed to evolve into 3D no matter how ill-equipped they were because Nintendo was able to pull it off? That's Mortal Kombat 4. I was a big Mortal Kombat fan since Mortal Monday, but that turd killed all interest I had in the series. That and the death of arcades helped. That article is a good read, but my IPhone5 refuses to load the links to the other pages.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2015 02:09 |
|
wrong thread
|
# ? Jul 29, 2015 22:52 |
|
I recently started reading the Uncanny X-Men from #1 and to my surprise I really like it. It got me thinking I've always liked the X-Men but there's massive gaps in what I've read of them. So I thought I'm already at the start why not just keep reading till the modern day? I know this is a path to madness but gently caress it I'll give it a go. So is there a good reading list out there for the X-Men and all it's spin-off series' and the one offs and the flashbacks?
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 20:44 |
|
Krypt-OOO-Nite!! posted:I recently started reading the Uncanny X-Men from #1 and to my surprise I really like it. If you're doing it through Unlimited it won't work as they barely have any of the New Mutants or X-Factor, and there are significant gaps in UXM as well.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 20:44 |
|
Krypt-OOO-Nite!! posted:I recently started reading the Uncanny X-Men from #1 and to my surprise I really like it. I'm fond of this one. http://www.comicbookherald.com/chris-claremont-era-x-men-reading-order-guide/
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 21:16 |
|
Krypt-OOO-Nite!! posted:I recently started reading the Uncanny X-Men from #1 and to my surprise I really like it. I don't have a good list for you, but I think UncannyXMen.net can help. http://uncannyxmen.net/continuity/x-men-primer Rachel and Miles are going through the X-Men more or less in order. You can go through their archive and see how they are organizing things. Though they will be skipping large chunks once the line splits into a dozen titles. http://www.rachelandmiles.com/xmen/
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 21:19 |
|
^ cheers guys. It was listening to the Rachel & Miles podcast that had me read the first issues in the first place. zoux posted:If you're doing it through Unlimited it won't work as they barely have any of the New Mutants or X-Factor, and there are significant gaps in UXM as well. That's a bit of a downer, especially since the fact that I haven't read any New Mutants or original X-Factor was a big part in me thinking about just this daft idea in the first place. But to be honest I'm at the rate I'm going I won't be a the 80's for a year or two. So I can live in hope that they'll be up by then. (Hopefully)
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 21:32 |
|
Krypt-OOO-Nite!! posted:^ cheers guys. They won't. I originally wanted to do the same thing as you but: 1)they weren't on MU 2) I actually cannot stand old comics dialogue. I ended up starting with Morrison's New X-men and then reading every X-book published from that point on because they have more or less everything after 2000.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 21:34 |
|
^ There a reason why there's little to no chance of New Mutants/X-factor turning up or is Marvel just not bothered about them? I'm not a massive fan of 60's/70's comics dialogue in general but foe some reason these have grabbed me. It might just be the old style wackiness but I'm really liking them, even if professor X can be a massive cock most of the time and Magneto is like something out of the 60's Batman show. Morrison's X-Men is pretty much where I started with the X-Men comics. I'm from the UK and didn't really get into "superhero" comics until I was fifteen and started picking stuff up from my city's comic book shop at mostly random and luckily for me that was during the Morrison run. Krypt-OOO-Nite!! fucked around with this message at 22:04 on Jul 30, 2015 |
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:01 |
|
zoux posted:They won't. Assuming they haven't been lost to time I bet they'll show up eventually. I would recommend at least going back and reading Claremont's Uncanny X-Men if you can get past the purple prose, more than probably any other book it defined the DNA (no pun intended) of X books for the next 3 decades.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:02 |
|
Skwirl posted:I would recommend at least going back and reading Claremont's Uncanny X-Men if you can get past the purple prose, more than probably any other book it defined the DNA (no pun intended) of X books for the next 3 decades.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:30 |
|
Bronze Age wordiness has never really put me off. It's just the way comics were, and they usually managed to fit in a lot of story in each issue for all the words. I get why some readers don't like it, but for me it's not really a big deal.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:34 |
|
Bang, you're dead, from my teke that can smash mountains, or my psychic knife, which is the focused totality of my telekenesis.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:36 |
|
zoux posted:Bang, you're dead, from my teke that can smash mountains, or my psychic knife, which is the focused totality of my It's like you've never even read Claremont.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:40 |
|
quote:Avenger’s Annual 10. Rogues first appearance. This is a must-read. You will never understand Rogue if you don’t read this. Seriously.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:48 |
|
Not just to the X-Men, but Claremont's X-run is super influential to comics as a whole. It's one of the runs that changed how things were done in the business. And hey if you're too lazy to read it you can just check out my stupid tumblr: http://www.theclaremontyears.tumblr.com
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 22:52 |
|
Don't read a stupid tumblr, the actual issues are great if you can get past the often stilted dialogue.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 23:03 |
|
irlZaphod posted:Don't read a stupid tumblr, the actual issues are great if you can get past the often stilted dialogue. Hey now, he can do both.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 23:21 |
|
After about the 3rd issue or so of Claremont's X-Men I developed a talent for just skipping past the dialogue that was merely plot recaps or explanations of how someone's powers worked, it reads a lot more briskly at that point.
|
# ? Jul 30, 2015 23:59 |
|
It becomes like "THWIPP" at a certain point. You know what it says, and you just slide on past it.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2015 00:11 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 15:50 |
|
Skwirl posted:After about the 3rd issue or so of Claremont's X-Men I developed a talent for just skipping past the dialogue that was merely plot recaps or explanations of how someone's powers worked, it reads a lot more briskly at that point. He'll change his tune once he sees my unbreakable adamantium claws which slice through anything like paper.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2015 00:12 |