|
The fact that it's from Eve Online makes it 300% funnier somehow. Edit: New page: Delta Echo posted:12 hours
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 21:06 |
|
|
Delta Echo posted:Wow. I'm pretty sure I just won this thread. I'd call this a master stroke, but I think we all know what stroke is being mastered here. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
You'd think somewhere in those 12 hours you'd have noticed Elsa's braid is on the wrong side.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
Pick posted:You'd think somewhere in those 12 hours you'd have noticed Elsa's braid is on the wrong side. That's to show that the crotch is ironic.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
It's Mirror Elsa.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
when Elsa sang let it go she was actually talking about her sexual repression and now she likes to suck and gently caress like the rest of us
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:24
|
|
|
Delta Echo posted:I claim full credit for all this win Hey retard, thanks for linking your 'trolling' to the EVE thread so get to join in on the pointing and laughing!
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:33
|
|
|
Joke's on all you guys, this guy works for PIXAR and this is a leaked screenshot of FROZEN 2, the first feature length film entirely animated in source filmmaker. They had to reverse-engineer the Brave hair technology to make sure Elsa's pubes were shaved the entire time
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
I wonder if any artists here could weigh in on a situation where your character requires foot and hand covering but apparently no underwear. Anyone? Anyone here at all?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:42
|
|
|
Pick posted:I wonder if any artists here could weigh in on a situation where your character requires foot and hand covering but apparently no underwear. Anyone? Anyone here at all? what do you mean that's how I dress every day
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:45
|
|
|
You know how some people really like to go rock climbing and just won't shut up about it?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
*spends 12 hours painting over an EVE screenshot* ha ha, I am so good at trolling
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
wow lots of dogpiling prudes ittPick posted:I wonder if any artists here could weigh in on a situation where your character requires foot and hand covering but apparently no underwear. Anyone? Anyone here at all? maybe you should try writing something other than false gods 
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
I don't think people who make their characters not wear underwear realize how gross vaginas can get
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
Voyager I posted:Hey retard, thanks for linking your 'trolling' to the EVE thread so get to join in on the pointing and laughing! Ahahaha Delta Echo posted:Creative Convention is getting trollt right now because they can't handle a capsuleer drawn as Elsa. Bahahaaha
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
A magnificent forums own goal.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:53
|
|
|
Listen comic artists need to be taken down a peg. We don't get owned by our decision to draw comics every god drat day or anything.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:54
|
|
|
Rincewind posted:A magnificent forums own goal. All my favorite threads are absolute clusterfucks right now
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
Troposphere posted:I don't think people who make their characters not wear underwear realize how gross vaginas can get I'd actually love to see a story about a vagina-havin' warrior that doesn't wear pants so they can just pee/ovulate during battle without having to clean up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
Fortis posted:maybe you should try writing something other than false gods Unless this is a big coincidence. In which case, holy crackers. I mean I suppose it's possible, however unlikely. Do you have an opinion on it? That image I posted that has a note reading 'false gods' in magic marker at the top of a column of character traits? Because color me interested in a rousing back and forth.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:01
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:interested in a rousing back and forth. Well that explains Kiki.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:02
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:My good sir, I see you've quite cleverly alluded to something mentioned earlier in the thread! I think it doesn't really mean anything and is kinda silly. I guess the intent is to get people to understand that not every character needs to be likable, relatable, or sympathetic, but... the easy way to express that is to just say that. I agree with FunkyAl on this; characters are stimulus->response. They are their own people, so they respond to stuff happening the way they would. To act like column A and column B are mutually exclusive is a little disingenuous. Compelling, dimensional characters can be likable and sympathetic. They can also be shitheels. They're individuals with their own minds. So... do that. You invent a person and you imagine what it would be like for them to exist. At the end of the day writing a character-driven story is really like running a simulation and seeing what everyone would do when things happen or other characters do things. To top it all off I don't get what's even meant by "False Gods" except "I am overdramatizing the point"
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
Does no one read the southeast-most post-its in that image, or what?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:14
|
|
|
Stop defending the dumb post-it note picture that makes vague vacuous statements that ultimately say nothing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:17
|
|
|
But that's what I'm saying, first it says they can RUIN STORYTELLING and then basically says that they're fine but can be misused. Oh, okay. You can misuse a lot of stuff, like brushing your teeth with an oreo or making a comic page 99% exposition text boxes. It boils down to "to make good characters, make them good characters, as opposed to bad ones".
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:Does no one read the southeast-most post-its in that image, or what? I read it, it doesn't make the rest of it seem lest pretentious though  To each their own etcFlyinPingu posted:Stop defending the dumb post-it note picture that makes vague vacuous statements that ultimately say nothing. Man the Zen Pencils guy is just getting lazier
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:19
|
|
|
FWIW I see that image as the sort of Inspirational Motivational Image you see shared on the internet - well intentioned but rather woolly. I'm not sure it is actually worthy of this huffy argument people seem intent on having.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:19
|
|
|
FlyinPingu posted:Stop making posts that make vague vacuous statements that ultimately say nothing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:19
|
|
|
Fangz posted:FWIW I see that image as the sort of Inspirational Motivational Image you see shared on the internet - well intentioned but rather woolly. I'm not sure it is actually worthy of this huffy argument people seem intent on having. It's not worth having any conversation over at all, but Scribblehatch seems intent on starting some kind of meaningless dialogue about it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:20
|
|
|
Fangz posted:FWIW I see that image as the sort of Inspirational Motivational Image you see shared on the internet - well intentioned but rather woolly. I'm not sure it is actually worthy of this huffy argument people seem intent on having. I hate that poo poo and want to shut it down as many times as I see it lol VV those are moderately helpful VV FunkyAl fucked around with this message at 21:27 on Jul 28, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
Plenty of critics go "There is nothing relatable about ____" as if that's a point all by itself. When, meanwhile, I find nothing relatable about Spike Spiegel. Being relatable is not the point. They're not to be confused with the building blocks. When building a pizza you do not sprinkle the oregano before anything else. If anyone had taken the Wally Wood or Pixar lists to task, we'd be talking about those instead.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:When, meanwhile, I find nothing relatable about Spike Spiegel. Spike's an honest guy trying to do the right thing, so in a way this make a lot of sense.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:33
|
|
|
The woods panels are a quick reference cheat sheet for decent panel composition, not any sort of rule that's being championed. The pixar list is their specific perogative when it comes to storytelling, that list is mostly useless if you don't work at pixar/are trying to copy pixar outside of a couple of the less plot specific steps like reducing the number of characters.The thing with the post it notes is, like, a whole nother level of mind numbing and pointless, same with the discussion of precensorship(sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad, sometimes it's okay, it can be anything).
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:34
|
|
|
I'm hearing a names being called. Not a whole lot of extrospection. "Because it's DUMB and you brought up POINTLESS poo poo!" Yes yes yes. Very good. I think it's a fun image that does what it's meant to do: Spark discussion. And I'm confident the outlier of Sturgeon's Law will find its way here eventually. It takes the best of them to be devil's advocate.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:40
|
|
|
Honestly I think every character should have at least a shred of relatability because otherwise why is anyone gonna care what's going on in their heads? Entirely unrelatable 'characters' are more like forces of nature or beasts.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:42
|
|
|
Man I GUESS, but you posted em up there like they were all the big cheatsheet to writing comics It's some local single mom invents one weird trick to write all stories and now screenwriters hate her kinda poo poo. It's 2/3 good advice, but also meant to be internalized in a way that's less, "here's how you do things" and more "here's how these people did things, here's how it worked for them, here's what I think about their work, now I'm going to consider that along with countless billions of other things I have read an seen in an attempt to create a work of art others find compelling." It's abstract and complicated in a way helpful images like these either overlook or assume you're already considering
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:I think it's a fun image that does what it's meant to do: Spark discussion. I'm glad the thread is getting a lot of action but the discussion itself is actually kind of dull, I liked it better when people ITT were talking about making their comics :/ Also I doubt that "sparking discussion" was really what the image was meant to do? I think its intent was to guide writers but w/e
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
FunkyAl posted:Man I GUESS, but you posted em up there like they were all the big cheatsheet to writing comics As the "dumb moves in advertising" thread would say- BUT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IT SO IT WORKED or something
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:47
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:I'm hearing a names being called. Not a whole lot of extrospection. "Because it's DUMB and you brought up POINTLESS poo poo!" Yes yes yes. Very good. nobody wants to talk about it because it's asinine bullshit much like all of your posts
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 21:06 |
|
|
 if only I had poser then this fanart I made would have been done, but instead I spent twelve hours making this
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2015 21:52
|
|
