|
WickedHate posted:See also her and McIntosh's comments on Fallout 4 and Hotline Miami. Was it over twitter? Because I have a sinking feeling McIntosh hijacks her twitter every time something doesn't agree with him. He has a real bug up his rear end for things he doesn't like. Which, as far as I can see, involves any kind of violence in any media ever.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:15 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 14:13 |
|
boom boom boom posted:I liked it when she called out Binary Domain for having a Japanese prostitute, because having a prostitute in a game is bad enough, but making the prostitute Asianand speak with an accent is racist and otherizing. Apparently unaware of the fact that Binary Domain was a Japanese game made by Japanese people. p sure that Japanese people did not make the English localization.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:16 |
|
EDIT: /\ the Japanese characters of Binary Domain mostly have Japanese VAs in the localized version and the game is set in Japan.Jimbot posted:Was it over twitter? Because I have a sinking feeling McIntosh hijacks her twitter every time something doesn't agree with him. He has a real bug up his rear end for things he doesn't like. Which, as far as I can see, involves any kind of violence in any media ever. Yeah, both accounts were talking about how anyone who cheered at the Doom 4 trailer was psychotic and a danger to society, basically.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:18 |
|
Mokinokaro posted:EDIT: /\ the Japanese characters of Binary Domain mostly have Japanese VAs in the localized version and the game is set in Japan. I don't recall the moment in question from the videos, but if the game is set in Japan then ok, that is a stretch.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:21 |
|
Binary Domain is a game everyone should play. Big Bo is one of video game's greatest characters. It's only flaw that game had was that team British got side-lined about half-way in. We needed more of team no-nonsense.
Jimbot fucked around with this message at 00:32 on Aug 3, 2015 |
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:24 |
|
Oh, it's the "Anita Sarkeesian is actually kind of a bad critic" derail.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:24 |
|
DStecks posted:I don't recall the moment in question from the videos, but if the game is set in Japan then ok, that is a stretch. Yeah, it's about an international team fighting robots in Japan BravestOfTheLamps posted:Oh, it's the "Anita Sarkeesian is actually kind of a bad critic" derail. She is an internet critic, and discussion is happening. Not sure how that's a derail.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:31 |
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:Oh, it's the "Anita Sarkeesian is actually kind of a bad critic" derail. I didn't see anyone saying she is bad, people just disagreeing with a few points from her video. far more on the rail then talking about US crime drama. Also what are you implaying? we criticize critics here all the time, disagreeing with a part of antia's video is fine along we don't call for her head. Cyron fucked around with this message at 00:42 on Aug 3, 2015 |
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:32 |
|
boom boom boom posted:What? Okay, sorry. Captain Heavily Sexualized Violence And Also Animalrapemerica
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 00:57 |
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Okay, sorry. Captain Heavily Sexualized Violence And Also Animalrapemerica What?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 01:01 |
|
Some kind of veiled reference to the Bush Administration?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 01:18 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:Some kind of veiled reference to the Bush Administration? I think it's lyrics to a song I've never heard.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 01:59 |
|
Three pages ago is an unfathomably long time, admittedly
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 02:36 |
|
Hey dude if you're trying to do some cool guy callout just do it instead of being coy because spoiler no one actually cares
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 02:54 |
|
Yeah this is not the way to get noticed. Better you stay ignored if you're just going to antagonize everyone. This is our thread for antagonizing Doug Walker.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 02:58 |
|
Jimbot posted:Was it over twitter? Because I have a sinking feeling McIntosh hijacks her twitter every time something doesn't agree with him. He has a real bug up his rear end for things he doesn't like. Which, as far as I can see, involves any kind of violence in any media ever.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 03:43 |
|
Max Wilco posted:McIntosh seems to take issue with some bizarre stuff. He came down on the trailer for Rise of the Tomb Raider, saying that it was irresponsible because it endorsed the idea of climbing a mountain without proper equipment. The two pillars of Social Justice, feminism and mountaineering. e X fucked around with this message at 03:48 on Aug 3, 2015 |
# ? Aug 3, 2015 03:45 |
|
#yesallfreeclimbers
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 03:54 |
|
e X posted:and I think he may retracted on it though, because I when I went to find the tweet in question, the only thing I could find was a reference to it on Rhianna Pratchett's Twitter (it said the tweet was unavailable). I was only able to find via the archived version. So it's possible he changed his mind about the critique and deleted the tweet in response. Max Wilco fucked around with this message at 04:00 on Aug 3, 2015 |
# ? Aug 3, 2015 03:57 |
|
All these so-called 'social justice' on Twitter is complete bullshit, I feel like Twitter is full of a bunch of loving mongoloids retweeting hashtags and trends for no reason other than they're topical and somehow important. I feel like activists who support the 'free the nipple' campaign never heard of streaking or nude beaches before (to be honest, I never cared for most modern online campaigns because I have better things to do). But seriously, all I'm asking is for Twitter (and Tumblr) to grow some loving balls.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:24 |
|
Please tell us more about how cool you are.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:28 |
|
Junior Jr. posted:But seriously, all I'm asking is for Twitter (and Tumblr) to grow some loving balls. Tumblr already grows balls on plenty of things as-is .
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:30 |
|
Junior Jr. posted:All these so-called 'social justice' on Twitter is complete bullshit, I feel like Twitter is full of a bunch of loving mongoloids retweeting hashtags and trends for no reason other than they're topical and somehow important. I feel like activists who support the 'free the nipple' campaign never heard of streaking or nude beaches before (to be honest, I never cared for most modern online campaigns because I have better things to do). Man and I thought I was being an irritating internet badass
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:32 |
|
Junior Jr. posted:All these so-called 'social justice' on Twitter is complete bullshit, I feel like Twitter is full of a bunch of loving mongoloids retweeting hashtags and trends for no reason other than they're topical and somehow important. I feel like activists who support the 'free the nipple' campaign never heard of streaking or nude beaches before (to be honest, I never cared for most modern online campaigns because I have better things to do). Watch out everyone, this is one badass, he is going to take down all of our hashtags.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:32 |
|
Neddy Seagoon posted:Tumblr already grows balls on plenty of things as-is . They placed most of their balls in a 'convention' they couldn't even afford.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:32 |
|
Junior Jr. posted:All these so-called 'social justice' on Twitter is complete bullshit, I feel like Twitter is full of a bunch of loving mongoloids retweeting hashtags and trends for no reason other than they're topical and somehow important. I feel like activists who support the 'free the nipple' campaign never heard of streaking or nude beaches before (to be honest, I never cared for most modern online campaigns because I have better things to do). Twitter activism is very low effort and is really only there to make yourself feel good. It's nice to feel like your making a difference in stuff but hashtags rarely change anything, if at all. It's good for raising awareness but for changing anything? Nope. That's why I think McIntosh is a blowhard. He raves on his and his girlfriend's twitter accounts but with 140 character limits you can't say anything noteworthy or useful. His energy would be better spent on a blog and use his twitter to link to it. Better yet, promote or fund games that he wants to see more of rather than complain he's tired of seeing violent games or Tomb Raider isn't following regulation mountaineering standards or some-such inane silliness.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:38 |
|
Wheat Loaf posted:Honestly, I actually quite like how Hbomberguy described it a while back - Sarkeesian is, to some of these people, a kind of "load-bearing feminist". She is the most prominent commentator who critiques computer games from a feminist perspective, and is thus emblematic of all commentators who critique games from a feminist perspective. Thus, if only she can be destroyed, then the entire edifice of feminism in game criticism will come crumbling down with her. Well, I mean, that's how it works in video games... Kill the big bad and then the whole island/spaceship/planet asplodes and then you get a poorly translated congratulation text and maybe a victory image.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:43 |
|
Jimbot posted:Twitter activism is very low effort and is really only there to make yourself feel good. It's nice to feel like your making a difference in stuff but hashtags rarely change anything, if at all. It's good for raising awareness but for changing anything? Nope. That's why I think McIntosh is a blowhard. He raves on his and his girlfriend's twitter accounts but with 140 character limits you can't say anything noteworthy or useful. His energy would be better spent on a blog and use his twitter to link to it. Better yet, promote or fund games that he wants to see more of rather than complain he's tired of seeing violent games or Tomb Raider isn't following regulation mountaineering standards or some-such inane silliness. If you're really going to complain about the status of video games and how violent/sexist they are, then you're better off making an article or a documentary about it. The main problem though is trying to stay unbiased. I get that if you're opinionated, you may have to throw in your own two cents to the status, but if you become too biased or too focused on 'here's what these people should to video games' and all that, you're losing your main purpose of making a point or a speech about whatever it is you're focusing on. I know it seems obvious, but I get the feeling McIntosh and Sarkeesian haven't grasped that yet and they're spending too much time focusing on what they went rather than analysing what the mainstream want. Also, they seem to miss the point of certain games like when they tweeted the E3 trailers to DOOM, feeling shocked over how 'too gory and violent' the game is and how people are 'cheering over bodies being ripped apart'...when that's the whole point of DOOM in the first place.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:51 |
|
It is good to think about how violent our culture is imo
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:54 |
|
Junior Jr. posted:All these so-called 'social justice' on Twitter is complete bullshit, I feel like Twitter is full of a bunch of loving mongoloids retweeting hashtags and trends for no reason other than they're topical and somehow important. I feel like activists who support the 'free the nipple' campaign never heard of streaking or nude beaches before What? The entire point is that women's breasts are generally "nsfw" but men's aren't. Breaking the law and designated safe zones don't change that? Also mongoloids is a racial term.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 04:54 |
|
Can we go back to talking about cheesy crime procedurals?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:03 |
|
WickedHate posted:What? The entire point is that women's breasts are generally "nsfw" but men's aren't. Breaking the law and designated safe zones don't change that? One thing I don't get about making women's breasts exposed normal is if they're making it legal then what's the point of public decency? Also there are places where they have the freedom to get naked like in nude beaches, so I don't know why they're not happy to have some freedom at least. But for the most part, I'm just angry at Twitter. Also, you do know I mean the other kind of mongoloid, right?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:04 |
|
Twitter definitely constitutes a distinct group.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:06 |
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Twitter definitely constitutes a distinct group. Much like Mail or Phone.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:10 |
|
Junior Jr. posted:One thing I don't get about making women's breasts exposed normal is if they're making it legal then what's the point of public decency? Also there are places where they have the freedom to get naked like in nude beaches, so I don't know why they're not happy to have some freedom at least. But for the most part, I'm just angry at Twitter. If you think men's exposed breasts are fine but women's breasts alone are disgusting you're part of the problem, no one's asking to walk around with their genitals hanging out, and it isn't about women who want to have their breasts out, it's about the existance of a double standard that sexualizes and censors a part of women's bodies for no reason when the same isn't done to mens' breasts. It's basically the same thing as hardcore Islam saying women have to be entirely covered up but men can walk around fine. Also, "they should be happy to have SOME freedoms" is a horrible argument(and again, doesn't understand what's actually being argued). In fact so is "what the mainstream wants" and so is "uh that's the whole point of the game", and I'm saying that as someone who cringed hard at Anita's comments. Junior Jr. posted:Also, you do know I mean the other kind of mongoloid, right? That's not much better since that specifically means "person with down's syndrome". Down's syndrome sure is funny, harhar. WickedHate fucked around with this message at 05:18 on Aug 3, 2015 |
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:12 |
|
Junior Jr. posted:so I don't know why they're not happy to have some freedom at least.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:15 |
|
Why weren't blacks happy with Jim Crow? They weren't slaves anymore jeez.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:17 |
|
WickedHate posted:If you think men's exposed breasts are fine but women's breasts alone are disgusting you're part of the problem, no one's asking to walk around with their genitals hanging out, and it isn't about women who want to have their breasts out, it's about the existance of a double standard that sexualizes and censors a part of women's bodies for no reason when the same isn't done to mens' breasts. It's basically the same thing as hardcore Islam says women have to be entirely covered up but men can walk around fine. I never said exposing women's breasts were disgusting, if someone wants to get naked if they have a reason then I have no problem with that; but if making both genders' sexual organs uncensored becomes legal, wouldn't that just make more sexism like when guys catcall some girls to 'show their tits', or is it supposed to have some counter-effect like if we saw more dicks and boobs out in the open we don't think they're sexy anymore? Also, if it's legal, wouldn't if influence kids and make them think 'if they're doing it, then I should do it too'? Look, I don't care what they do with their bodies, but there must be some standards we can agree on.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:26 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 14:13 |
|
Jay O posted:The Finer Arts > Rapidly Going Deaf > Internet Critic Discussion Thread 3.0: I Can't Believe It's Not GBS
|
# ? Aug 3, 2015 05:31 |