|
Thanks, I think resetting to defaults should be enough.
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 17:34 |
|
|
New laptop? SSL issues? It couldn't be Superfish, could it? Edit: Ahh, I thought I read something about Firefox specifically revoking it. But yeah, it was months back, so I'm probably misremembering. xamphear fucked around with this message at 23:57 on Jul 30, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
xamphear posted:New laptop? SSL issues? It couldn't be Superfish, could it? Superfish would make all the things show up s valid certs due to its own built in certificate.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2015 23:42
|
|
|
Avenging Dentist posted:Probably the easiest way to do this is to install DOM Inspector. I used to use it a lot for Thunderbird development; it's a great way of figuring out how a UI element is defined/styled. Had a go at this, but can't figure out how to make it show UI elements, only elements in webpages. Help?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 18:25
|
|
|
Lum posted:Had a go at this, but can't figure out how to make it show UI elements, only elements in webpages. Help? Then you can use the "find a node to inspect by clicking on it" feature on the top left and click on the tabs/panel to figure out the element ids and class names.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 20:12
|
|
|
Lum posted:Had a go at this, but can't figure out how to make it show UI elements, only elements in webpages. Help?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2015 11:30
|
|
|
I really want to like uMatrix but starting all over with the "which of these domains might I need to allow to get this or that to load" game might be more than I care for.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
Running Firefox Developer Edition 41 x64 on Windows 10 x64 - it's not detecting Silverlight. Works fine in Chrome. Anyone else with this problem?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 16:27
|
|
|
Isnt silverlight eol?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 17:02
|
|
|
Acer Pilot posted:Isnt silverlight eol? If it is that kind of sucks because I don't think that Netflix has moved to Mozilla's HTML5 DRM thing yet.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:If it is that kind of sucks because I don't think that Netflix has moved to Mozilla's HTML5 DRM thing yet. Edit: Yeah I guess I'm wrong it isn't working on my work machine without Silverlight right now. Alereon fucked around with this message at 22:04 on Aug 4, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
Alereon posted:Didn't they move a year ago? I'm pretty sure I haven't had Silverlight installed on any of the systems I've been watching Netflix on. That's odd, Netflix asks me to install Silverlight on both Firefox and Chrome (x64 releases of both).
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
Might be regional, Netflix still uses Silverlight for me though with my region set to US.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
Read posted:Might be regional, Netflix still uses Silverlight for me though with my region set to US. Says on the Netflix website that Firefox isn't supported for HTML 5. Edge is. Odd.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2015 23:46
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:If it is that kind of sucks because I don't think that Netflix has moved to Mozilla's HTML5 DRM thing yet. They haven't, and I think they're the only browser that still requires silverlight (maybe Chrome too?).
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2015 19:57
|
|
|
computer parts posted:They haven't, and I think they're the only browser that still requires silverlight (maybe Chrome too?). Full list of supported platforms is here, and they seem to be dragging their feet with Firefox. Then again, Firefox still has a lot to do to get to where Netflix likely needs them to be.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
So since upgrading to win10 and switching to firefox (because chrome memory leaks like a motherfucker), I'm having some forums issues. When I open a thread, even when it's one I've never read before, the entire thread is marked as read already between clicking it and it opening. Jumping to first unread opens the right page, but just scrolls to the bottom. This is only happening on firefox, chrome still works fine, but it's such a memory hog 
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2015 20:13
|
|
|
Using a lot of memory doesn't mean a process has a memory leak. Are you sure you're not just confusing the overhead from Chrome's process architecture with a leak? Chrome uses all that memory for good reason (and people generally have enough spare RAM it doesn't matter, RAM that's not being used is not useful RAM).
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
Read posted:Using a lot of memory doesn't mean a process has a memory leak. Are you sure you're not just confusing the overhead from Chrome's process architecture with a leak? Chrome uses all that memory for good reason (and people generally have enough spare RAM it doesn't matter, RAM that's not being used is not useful RAM). Well, it might not be a leak, but I've only got 6 gigs (gonna upgrade once I find a new job), and it uses like 3-4 gigs, which means I can't use it to, say, stream while playing something else like I can with firefox.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
Latest Dev build just started enforcing addon signing, so of course like half the addons I depend on were immediately disabled. *sigh*, I want to leave this enabled because it's trying to do the right thing but there's no way I can use this browser like this. Disabled addon signing requirement via about:config
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 04:56
|
|
|
Tivac posted:Latest Dev build just started enforcing addon signing, so of course like half the addons I depend on were immediately disabled. Weird that they're not already signed; are you downloading add-ons from somewhere other than AMO?
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 04:57
|
|
|
Avenging Dentist posted:Weird that they're not already signed; are you downloading add-ons from somewhere other than AMO? HTTPS Everywhere, Privacy Badger, SALR, & Menu Editor were all disabled. Didn't try reinstalling from AMO because some of those are betas.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 07:15
|
|
|
Tivac posted:SALR I'm waiting for the AMO admins to get back to me so I (hopefully) won't have to change the extension's ID. e: It probably goes without saying but this whole thing is really annoying. e2: SALR passes all automated validation checks otherwise. 
astral fucked around with this message at 00:18 on Aug 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
What's the best option for youtube downloading in firefox?
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 11:29
|
|
|
Read posted:Using a lot of memory doesn't mean a process has a memory leak. Are you sure you're not just confusing the overhead from Chrome's process architecture with a leak? Chrome uses all that memory for good reason (and people generally have enough spare RAM it doesn't matter, RAM that's not being used is not useful RAM). If it pisses away tons of ram, and never releases it, for tabs I've not access in days, or for tabs I close, it may as well be. It uses double the ram of FF for the same number of tabs. On 16GB system you're OK for a while unless you open hundreds of tabs. On 4GB, which many people have, it dies quick. FF + the unload tab extension means I can browse freely without going above 1Gb most of the time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 12:41
|
|
|
Newf posted:What's the best option for youtube downloading in firefox? YouTube Video and Audio Downloader
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2015 13:11
|
|
|
my 24 gb of ram are giggling at this ram conversation
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
Celexi posted:my 24 gb of ram are giggling at this ram conversation Yeah and I could use over 32GB of RAM with chrome if I don't install an extension to unload tabs. I have hundreds because I don't understand closing browser tabs or doing anything except opening more tabs "for later." In Firefox I have to restart my browser somewhat frequently because I often push it into a state where the garbage collector stops performing. If I don't do something intensive, like opening a bunch of YouTube tabs at over on top of my already bloated browsing habits, it doesn't happen because the GC can keep up. Can't wait for 64 bit Firefox, even if it's like six months behind by now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 01:21
|
|
|
lmao that is some pretty bad tab hoarding
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
Lprsti99 posted:So since upgrading to win10 and switching to firefox (because chrome memory leaks like a motherfucker), I'm having some forums issues. When I open a thread, even when it's one I've never read before, the entire thread is marked as read already between clicking it and it opening. Jumping to first unread opens the right page, but just scrolls to the bottom. This is only happening on firefox, chrome still works fine, but it's such a memory hog So, this got sidetracked determining if I used the exact correct term for why I switched from chrome. Does anyone have an idea why the forums would be acting up for me? Actually, it turns out that opening a thread will randomly mark other threads read too, for some reason  .E: Never mind, no idea what was causing it, but refreshing firefox through their site seems to have sorted it. Lprsti99 fucked around with this message at 01:58 on Aug 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
This is working well, thank you.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
Celexi posted:lmao that is some pretty bad tab hoarding I have tab groups I haven't opened for over a year. I am living the dream.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 04:55
|
|
|
I've been using this addon and I've noticed that it fucks up downloading ogg audio-only for some odd reason. I'm not sure why, my ffmpeg is up to date (though I'm not sure if it even uses it, and I've had no trouble pulling ogg audio from the webms myself), but directly downloading ogg audio with this addon produces terrible blips in the sound.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 05:14
|
|
|
Desuwa posted:I have tab groups I haven't opened for over a year. I did too, but I closed them before realizing that my unloader addon needed to be updated. Sigh.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 05:49
|
|
|
quote:Yesterday morning, August 5, a Firefox user informed us that an advertisement on a news site in Russia was serving a Firefox exploit that searched for sensitive files and uploaded them to a server that appears to be in Ukraine. patch your foxes
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 14:08
|
|
|
Possibly since updating to 39.0.3, I can't seem to detach tabs anymore. Its the wierdest thing! Anyone else run into something like this recently? I'm fairly light on extensions (Firebug, Ghostery, Privacy Badger), and not really sure what to try outside of drastic 'flatten profile' type things. I *am* running Windows 10, but Firefox has been playing nice. (Hell, Firefox has been running *great* for me in 10. This little niggle aside, it feels faster and more responsive. Maybe its just in my head, or perhaps the upgrade just cleared some old cruft out) magimix fucked around with this message at 18:54 on Aug 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
I just tried pulling a tab out and it went into a new window just fine. Using Windows 10 as well.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 19:34
|
|
|
hooah posted:I just tried pulling a tab out and it went into a new window just fine. Using Windows 10 as well. Thanks for that. Now I know it's worth pursuing certain other options. (So weird though! Like, what a strange thing to have stop working ).Edit: This just gets all the stranger... I had Facebook open, and was typing a message to someone via the chat thing. The screen flashed, there was 'boing' noise, my message vanished mid-sentence. *But*, mouse-scope behaviour on that page changed, and... I can detach tabs again. What the gently caress is even going on And for the record, I *did* do stuff like close my browser. So loving wierd. But whatever. I'm too busy having a tab-detach-party  magimix fucked around with this message at 20:16 on Aug 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
Why can't I see most of the buttons on the new YouTube player when it's embedded? I've tried enabling everything Google/YT-related in uMatrix as well as completely disabling uMatrix and uBlock, but no luck. Everything's peachy on YouTube proper.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2015 13:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 17:34 |
|
|
I can see the buttons just fine on the new YouTube player. Do you have any addons installed like Youtube Center?
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2015 17:13
|
|
