|
"It is a bulky, armoured track unit, which mounts a powerful antomantic reactor and is capable of carrying weapons heavier than even a Space Marine could easily manage."
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 01:16 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:15 |
|
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 01:21 |
|
Elite, deep striking soldiers used to break the enemy at critical junctures rolling in on their space marine seqways. Yep.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 01:32 |
|
It looks like it's supposed to be a mortar, but they made it too large to be man-portable and too small to be actual self-propelled artillery. Since when did the Space Marines run their designs through the Pentagon?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 01:38 |
|
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 01:45 |
|
See, I was thinking some weird sort of light anti-air. Isn't "heavier than even a Space Marine could easily manage" what terminators, tanks and dreadnoughts are for? And those dumb things that are like a terminator but not. And Guardsmen.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 01:55 |
|
osirisisdead posted:From the bad 40k thread: Wait, is this poo poo an official model?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 02:50 |
|
APPARENTLY IT IS FORGE WORLD! edit: Yep it's on their front page right now.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 02:53 |
|
I see they found the STC for a stand-on lawnmower.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 03:18 |
|
osirisisdead posted:APPARENTLY IT IS FORGE WORLD! It's also £6 CHEEPER than the normal GW Thunderfire cannon.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 08:16 |
|
I think that model would be significantly better if it was some weedy-rear end Adeptus Mechanicus dude instead of a spess mehreen driving it. Alternatively, have it be a giant cannon being carried around on a palanquin by battle servitors and piloted by a Master of the Forge who just walks behind it, pushing it along like the world's most lethal shopping trolley.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 08:39 |
|
osirisisdead posted:SPEESCH MUHRAINES! SIIIIINDDDDRRIIII!!!
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 08:56 |
|
Kavak posted:It looks like it's supposed to be a mortar, but they made it too large to be man-portable and too small to be actual self-propelled artillery. Since when did the Space Marines run their designs through the Pentagon? It is indeed supposed to be a mortar. A quad-barrelled mortar.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 09:01 |
|
ungulateman posted:I think that model would be significantly better if it was some weedy-rear end Adeptus Mechanicus dude instead of a spess mehreen driving it. Those are much better ideas.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 09:02 |
|
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 09:21 |
|
SRM posted:Would you believe these are all by the same guy who made everyone's favorite scrunt? These are beautiful and deserve to be on every page of every thread.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 10:56 |
|
Tacopocalypse posted:I see they found the STC for a stand-on lawnmower. Or the old NES Bionic Commando badguys.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 14:21 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:It is indeed supposed to be a mortar. A quad-barrelled mortar. looks like quad-barreled poo poo
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 14:32 |
|
I have decided to convert a Scrunt necromunda gang
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 19:40 |
|
Moola posted:I have decided to convert a Scrunt necromunda gang I... I... Please tell me that they'll be based on Oreos.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 21:39 |
|
I hope it's a gang of nothing but Scrunt juvies from House Goliath.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 22:14 |
|
do dwarves or skaven make a better base for converted scrunts?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 23:48 |
|
dwarves
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 23:51 |
|
Fsmhunk posted:do dwarves or skaven make a better base for converted scrunts? Orks would appear to be the base for the original scrunts.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 23:52 |
|
remember if, neck=true then, scrunt =false
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 23:56 |
|
I thought the Rapier (that's the stupid name for the track unit) trundles along and the Space Marines just watch it so it doesn't fall over or something. Anyways, Marine crew served weapons are stupid anyways. At best, there should be a pack of those things being herded and proded around by a Techmarine. /salt Well painted old silly beakies: Most dakka: Some 4Chan user posted:>that gun in mouth
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 13:32 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:Orks would appear to be the base for the original scrunts. They're made from the arrer boyz from the 6e WHFB starter set.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 19:37 |
|
Under 15 posted:They're made from the arrer boyz from the 6e WHFB starter set. nah they're clearly the snap fit black reach orks
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 19:42 |
|
So. What the gently caress is a scrunt? A horrible slapped together mess of a model?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:01 |
|
Electric Hobo posted:So. What the gently caress is a scrunt? A horrible slapped together mess? ftfy
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:03 |
|
Moola posted:nah they're clearly the snap fit black reach orks I'd still like to know what was the original, ill-conceived goal of the scrunts.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:14 |
|
JcDent posted:I'd still like to know what was the original, ill-conceived goal of the scrunts. Mutant lab assistant.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:19 |
|
Electric Hobo posted:So. What the gently caress is a scrunt? A horrible slapped together mess of a model? A miserable little pile of greenstuff.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:48 |
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 21:18 |
|
The scrunt conversation is especially confusing since apparently there was a successful scrunt kickstarter? Did Moola run it?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 21:46 |
|
Spiderdrake posted:The scrunt conversation is especially confusing since apparently there was a successful scrunt kickstarter? THOSE ARE SCRUNTS IN NAME ONLY! THEY HAVE NECKS NOT SCRUNTS
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 21:48 |
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 22:29 |
|
Moola posted:THOSE ARE SCRUNTS IN NAME ONLY! horrifying Hijo Del Helmsley posted:Their necks are the only reason they CAN look down. Spiderdrake fucked around with this message at 00:20 on Aug 10, 2015 |
# ? Aug 9, 2015 22:41 |
|
Spiderdrake posted:A legion of false scrunts, looking down on their true neckless cousins???? Their necks are the only reason they CAN look down.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 23:54 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:15 |
|
scrunts actually dont need necks, as their unusually large buldging eyes stick out of their skull so much that they have access to almost 180 of view without turning their head/body at all - Scrunt Fact no. 192
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 23:57 |