|
I can't wait for the whole story to come out. Sounds like they knew instantly they had a huge gently caress up on their hands and didn't even try to cover it up. Even a year ago I don't think this would have happened, so maybe we are making some progress. Once more details come out, the big test will be to see whether or not he is indicted for a criminal offense. Just from what has been released so far it sure sounds like it could be a possibility.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 01:51 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 21:16 |
|
FAUXTON posted:Except that the license for belligerence and perception of neighborhood free-fire zones where a cop can just gun anyone down and back-in a justification that their victim can't refute due to a case of death are contributing factors to those different social and systemic factors. Minor factors. Far greater things are at play.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:27 |
|
tezcat posted:The problem is officers will always use that excuse and only when caught on camera will they see any kind of justice. See former officers Michael Slager & Ray Tensing. The answer is to put cameras on them, even if you remove the guns, but specially if you don't.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:30 |
|
DrNutt posted:This is why officers shouldn't bring loving firearms into every goddamn interaction with the public. But I'm quoting Judakel about guns so I am all for this, so why are you mad? I am just telling you it is perfectly justified under the previously defined conditions. Pohl posted:Guns are the solution to our problems. As someone who wants to ban guns, I find this interpretation hilarious. Judakel fucked around with this message at 03:35 on Aug 12, 2015 |
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:33 |
|
nm posted:It is like in every state. It generally is manslaughter if you're sober and a couple ofnother things. Certain dui violations can be a felony such as habitual offenders or with a child in the car, in which case you can be charged with felony murder if someone dies as a result.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:37 |
|
ozmunkeh posted:Probably more to do with him being new and not yet "one of the guys". You can bet that if he had 10 years to his name he would have been backed to the hilt as is usually the case with these murders. I really doubt it. This guy basically charged in alone like Rambo after being told to hold position and drew down on the first person he saw in there. It's unlikely someone with 10 years would've done it but its such an absolute insane violation of departmental regulations that there's no way to justify it. quote:At a news conference, Chief Johnson said Officer Miller made bad decisions in communicating with other officers and initially approaching Mr. Taylor on his own without a plan for an arrest. There were other officers at the scene, the chief told reporters, including Officer Miller’s training officer, who tried to use a Taser to subdue Mr. Taylor. Outside of actually saying "He went in there specifically to shoot someone" they can't make it more clear how badly Miller hosed up. pentyne fucked around with this message at 03:47 on Aug 12, 2015 |
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:44 |
|
Judakel posted:I am all for this, so why are you mad? I apologize, I had you mixed up with LeJackal. Nonetheless, the idea that societal factors in the US justify the cops gunning down unarmed people because of the extremely unlikely scenario that that person is able to get the cops gun from them and kill them with it, is absolutely reprehensible.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:46 |
|
The Insect Court posted:I always hear this kind of argument from gun nuts, and trying to beat a path through a thicket of circumlocution always ends up reducing it to "America's got scary black people, so it's different". Other countries have urban blight and inner-city gang violence, you are aware of that? Aside from our cops wielding guns - which many European countries do not allow - there is also the matter of our history. Many blacks justifiably hate the police. Many blacks are utterly fed up. Much of the police is taught to have an adversarial relationship with them; starting with outright racist affiliations in the past and continuing with a culture of fear today. We are in a pretty unique situation as far as the relationship between the police and the poor black communities.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:46 |
|
DrNutt posted:I apologize, I had you mixed up with LeJackal. Nonetheless, the idea that societal factors in the US justify the cops gunning down unarmed people because of the extremely unlikely scenario that that person is able to get the cops gun from them and kill them with it, is absolutely reprehensible. The scenario is the only thing that justifies. Which is why we need to use cameras in order to verify.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:48 |
|
Judakel posted:Aside from our cops wielding guns - which many European countries do not allow - there is also the matter of our history. From slavery to the new cash crop. I really wonder how much of government revenue, on a local and state level, is funded on the backs of black people through fines.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 03:50 |
|
Pohl posted:Even a year ago I don't think this would have happened, so maybe we are making some progress. Once more details come out, the big test will be to see whether or not he is indicted for a criminal offense. Just from what has been released so far it sure sounds like it could be a possibility. I also haven't seen nearly as much blaming the victim. Maybe I'm just not watching the right channels, but I've seen a lot of talking to his teammates and family and treating it as a tragedy despite that the guy was having some kind of break when he got killed. pentyne posted:Outside of actually saying "He went in there specifically to shoot someone" they can't make it more clear how badly Miller hosed up. What kind of person signs up to be a rookie cop at age 49? Post-Ferguson says to himself "You know, I'd like to be a first-year radio-car cop."
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:01 |
|
Judakel posted:Aside from our cops wielding guns - which many European countries do not allow - there is also the matter of our history. Great Britain is the only major country with regular officers that are unarmed. Norway and New Zealandd and Iceland and a few others keep firearms in the cars, but receive training for them and have them at the ready. New Zealand uses supervisor authorisation, Norway uses officer's own discretion. And that's pretty much it. Elsewhere firearms are required to be be on your person at all times and many countries require officers that patrol important areas to have rifles or SMG's. China has two patrol police forces, The People's Police and The People's Armed Police. TPP receives revolvers and pistols plus training on firearms but doesn't have to carry them at all times, and the practices vary based on the jurisdiction. People's Armed Police are armed at all times. Vahakyla fucked around with this message at 04:05 on Aug 12, 2015 |
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:02 |
|
jfood posted:From slavery to the new cash crop. The system is almost literal tax farming. I'm actually more disguted by the continual police sourced oppression and harassment then all the killings by the police (not that it isn't a big problem). Using state power to keep millions of people in generational poverty and oppression just to help pay for lovely suburbs' budgets via continual petty fines is monstrous and just comically evil.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:08 |
|
DrNutt posted:I apologize, I had you mixed up with LeJackal. Nonetheless, the idea that societal factors in the US justify the cops gunning down unarmed people because of the extremely unlikely scenario that that person is able to get the cops gun from them and kill them with it, is absolutely reprehensible. The situation is that cops are going to keep murdering people. As been obviously demonstrated by the times cops have killed people in wheelchairs, those on the ground surrendering to them, in their custody, etc, the police have no need for an actual threat of harm because they readily perceive one whole cloth. It is essentially victim-blaming. "If only people weren't so capable then cops wouldn't have the beat and murder them. Its their own fault for being so threatening!" You know, except for all the sickly, injured, or paralyzed folks they murder.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:17 |
|
PostNouveau posted:I also haven't seen nearly as much blaming the victim. Maybe I'm just not watching the right channels, but I've seen a lot of talking to his teammates and family and treating it as a tragedy despite that the guy was having some kind of break when he got killed. Media outlets have also noticeably avoided the stereotypical "scary gang" photos of black people shot by police, since I want to say Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:18 |
|
jfood posted:From slavery to the new cash crop. Yeah, between that and our for-profit prison system (a real growth industry folks)!
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:42 |
|
http://abc13.com/news/woman-accuses-officer-of-going-too-far-during-traffic-stop/905180/quote:A Spring woman says she was sexually assaulted by a deputy during a traffic stop earlier this summer. It's disgusting that you can essentially be raped in public. At least those other cops took the guy to a hospital before violating him.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:42 |
|
The gently caress? .02 ounces? Hahhahaha
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:45 |
|
All right, so I guess I made a lovely post about the thread so I'm going to put up or shut up. I want to say straight up, I am fully aware of the systematic racism because of the cases on the news. The biggest question to me though is what are the most solid ways that we can fix this? We have body cameras, which with the Sam DuBose case worked, but still a man is dead. The body cameras have shown to be flawed for accountability. What about recruiting more intelligent cops? Cops with higher test scores are denied a job more often then those with lower test scores. Why is this? I would much rather have a more observant cop than one that isn't, to be fair. i learned in a classroom about cops, taught by a cop that there is a lot of grey area. One of the things that I've read in the thread, and correct me if I'm wrong, is that many of the cops train to fear the situation and forgot how to de-escalate. How can the departments retrain an entire precinct? Can they? Is it something that could cost a lot of money locally? If so, is there a way for say, larger cities like NY and LA to ask for funding to retrain the departments. If this is solely a racist thing, what would be the best way to go about it? Would it be best to fire the more racist cops? How would you know if your cop is racist if he is not spouting epithets all the time? Would you check the man's facebook or would that go against rights? I think with the whole situation there is gently caress ton of noise and too many holes into fixing the problem. I'm absolutely for the movements against police brutality but the main question is, what is the best way to tackle against police brutality that isn't just putting a band-aid on a quartered stomach.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 04:50 |
Dexo posted:The gently caress? That's half a gram, which would be a nugget the size of a bottle cap.
|
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 05:02 |
|
My Face When posted:All right, so I guess I made a lovely post about the thread so I'm going to put up or shut up. Severely punish Officers who are found to be lying of police reports involving any use of force. Make it so if you are fired from one police department for incompetence or a brutality issue you are blacklisted from being an officer elsewhere. Give some actual loving penalties to officers that gently caress up and remove the stigma of an officer reporting another officer for breaking the rules. Real Accountability tends to fix most things
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 05:05 |
|
Dexo posted:Severely punish Officers who are found to be lying of police reports involving any use of force. Make it so if you are fired from one police department for incompetence or a brutality issue you are blacklisted from being an officer elsewhere. Okay, that sounds decent. How would this be made? Would there need to specifics for there to be put on the black list? Should it be started on the local level? State? Federal? What about unions? quote:Give some actual loving penalties to officers that gently caress up and remove the stigma of an officer reporting another officer for breaking the rules. Real Accountability tends to fix most things What kind of penalties? What is the best way to get rid of stigma?
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 05:16 |
|
My Face When posted:What about recruiting more intelligent cops? Cops with higher test scores are denied a job more often then those with lower test scores. Why is this? I would much rather have a more observant cop than one that isn't, to be fair.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 06:00 |
|
Judakel posted:Aside from our cops wielding guns - which many European countries do not allow - there is also the matter of our history. We are generally speaking in a pretty unique situation as far as the existence of our (I would add concentrated) poor black communities.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 06:05 |
|
Welp, looks like Tyrone Harris' family's contention that he was unarmed and running away wasn't accurate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzinr9VUP2A
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 06:16 |
|
FourLeaf posted:She is charged with two misdemeanors: resisting arrest and possession of marijuana. Investigators say they found .02 ounces of marijuana on her. On her, or in her?
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 06:34 |
|
My Face When posted:All right, so I guess I made a lovely post about the thread so I'm going to put up or shut up. Body camera's is one slice of the the picture in terms of gathering evidence against officer misconduct. It's not meant to be a sliver bullet. As for Intelligent cops, it's bad HR hiring practices. While jumping ship is a factor, that is partially cause by how fragmented policing is in America. You have sheriffs, deputies, Highway Patrol, State Troopers, DEA, FBI, DHS, secret service, local/city police and god knows what else jockeying for people, training, jurisdiction and funding in a dozen different ways. Standardisation of police funding, training and benefits at least on the lower levels on a nationally would give you the "same" cop regardless of who was brought in so if someone jumps ship to the FBI, you know there is another trained officer in the pipe to replace the one you are losing. That one assumption does nothing but weaken good policing. Remember, the government has a monopoly on hiring police. There is no reason why it has to hire bad candidates just because a person might jump around the system. As for retraining, it would be best if done on a national level, like actually sending all new potentials to a national police academy/college with the cost of training removed locally. Then you start re-certifying every existing officer through this system to filter out the undesirables and you do this regardless of rank. It would take possibly decades, but by the end of it you would have a standardised police force with better and longer training. As for bad cops, the above points should help filter them out. The problem currently is that you don't do anything with them even if you find these people. A lot of people are looking for a quick fix, but that isn't going to happen. It would take an immense amount of political will to upend how policing works in America. Until you are willing to trash the existing system, the best you are going to get is the slow back and forth of police brutality and outrage.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 06:39 |
|
Awesome. I was not expecting a quick fix to any of this. This is years and years of bullshit that's finally come to light. I'm just trying to figure out the places to begin. I like the idea of national retraining, but it almost sounds like nationalizing the police into one thing can cause A LOT of complaints from right wing fanatics. Jade Helm is a great example on going ape poo poo over nothing. If this does go to the national level, I believe the right wing will tear it to shreads. There is also the population differences. A Chicago cop is different from a rural Texas cop in a town of 2,000 people. They may not want to know how to de-escalate a riot quite like Chicago.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 06:54 |
|
Honestly the day to day of a beat cop shouldn't be incredibly different regardless, when you recognize that urban police work doesn't actually resemble the opening scene to Predator 2.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 07:14 |
|
DrNutt posted:Honestly the day to day of a beat cop shouldn't be incredibly different regardless, when you recognize that urban police work doesn't actually resemble the opening scene to Predator 2. Yeah, this isn't a crazy complicated ideal. Just having cops walk around their communities and getting to know the people that live there should be an easy thing. Somehow we have to make this as difficult as possible.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 07:17 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:Welp, looks like Tyrone Harris' family's contention that he was unarmed and running away wasn't accurate: Thats fairly clear cut.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 11:02 |
|
serious gaylord posted:Thats fairly clear cut. Sure is. People are hiding from the police.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 13:17 |
|
jfood posted:From slavery to the new cash crop. Municipal fine programs (traffic citation, court fees, etc.) operate at a significant loss.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 14:21 |
|
Wait, cop finds reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, performs lawful search pursuant to protocol, discovers criminal activity?
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 14:46 |
|
The issue is that the "lawful search" and "protocol" bits are ridiculously immoral and should be axed, as applies to this situation. Suspected marijuana possession should never ever in any circumstances result in a non-consensual strip search or cavity search, that's loving horrifying.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 14:54 |
|
blarzgh posted:Wait, cop finds reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, performs lawful search pursuant to protocol, discovers criminal activity? Wait, it's both legal and in line with their protocol for cops to subject people to strip searches in public parking lots? Even if she had consented to the search (yeah right) that's completely horrific and you should be ashamed for glibly dismissing this invasion of privacy just because it's (apparently?) legal.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 15:00 |
|
blarzgh posted:Wait, cop finds reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, performs lawful search pursuant to protocol, discovers criminal activity? Yes that's one way to phrase it. Another way to phrase it is that the police sexually humiliated a woman in public with nothing but the smell of marijuana and her refusal to self incriminate to go on and with absolutely no oversight. But if you're okay with public, literally outdoor cavity searches done on a whim that after the fact can't be disproven, go ahead and bend over the hood and spread. In other words, as is the common argument in this thread, just because it's legal doesn't mean it's moral. I expect more from the police. Hell I expect more from humanity in general, and the fact that you're so blase about it makes me think you're a troll or severely hosed in the head.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 15:18 |
|
blarzgh posted:Wait, cop finds reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, performs lawful search pursuant to protocol, discovers criminal activity? By bringing this up in trial you can possibly set the groundwork to get laws that let rapist hide behind a badge changed. That's how it works. tezcat fucked around with this message at 15:25 on Aug 12, 2015 |
# ? Aug 12, 2015 15:22 |
|
The counter-argument: So, as long as my crack pipe fits in my butthole I can never get arrested? One weird trick! (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 15:23 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 21:16 |
|
blarzgh posted:The counter-argument: Then take them to the station and conduct the search in privacy. That's the point you missed.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2015 15:26 |