|
the best way to fix a Linux is to replace it with windows
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 13:23 |
|
|
pram posted:i mean must i honestly remind you that YUM, and even DNF, is written in python notably rpm is not (because it would really suck to try and replace the python packages if the package system were written in python)
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 18:27
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:the best way to fix a Linux is to replace it with windows the best way to fix a windows shop is to quit and find a job with non-idiots
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:fixing a broken system is configuration management. if the system python is broken due to a hosed patch or something, i want cfg management to fix it, not barf of course cm tools depend on the system you idiot. how do you think modules like package work. how do you think ohai and facter work. lol man alive you're dumb https://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/latest/type.html#package-attribute-provider
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 18:32
|
|
|
pram posted:of course cm tools depend on the system you idiot. how do you think modules like package work. how do you think ohai and facter work. lol man alive you're dumb
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
Smythe posted:google is free if ur a nonprofit i'm a nonprofit but not in the way they probably mean
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
pram posted:armchair autism
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:ohai and facter both use private runtimes installed in /opt. not talking about the runtime you dolt
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 20:34
|
|
|
on the other hand, running a mail server is actually really easy, killing spam on it is really easy, I set up a postfix/mysql/dovecot thing on a linode last month, only had to kick it off the barracuda listing which was easy and I only have to pay $10/mo, not $5/user keeping ssl going is some bullshit, though, can't wait for letsencrypt
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 20:51
|
|
|
the problem with running a mail server isnt that its hard. its that your outbound mail will definitely be flagged by blacklist services randomly, or end up in peoples spam boxes. not to mention that dude probably doesnt know about SPF records or anything else
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 20:55
|
|
|
Yeah, if I didn't already know this stuff or if I had to make a cost benefit thing by comparing it to billing myself for those hours I wouldn't do it and would just do office 365 or some thing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
pram posted:i mean must i honestly remind you that YUM, and even DNF, is written in python no, you don't have to remind us, yum reminds us itself every time we run it and it takes five minutes to do anything
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
bsd is under the impression that if python is hosed on a rhel system (thus making ansible inop) that chef and puppet can magically fix it. because they apparently don't use yum or dnf to install or manage packages (hint they do)
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 22:53
|
|
|
hes tragically stupid. ansible and chef and puppet and salt all essentially do the same thing, and work the same way. the only difference is chef and puppet are intended for lifecycle management, which is why they live on the box and are intended to connect to a master
|
|
#
?
Aug 14, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
neither chef nor puppet has a working sdlc story right now the chef vendor is working on a huge enterprise-y closed source sdlc tool called 'delivery' but i don't really have high hopes for it
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 16:49
|
|
|
pram posted:bsd is under the impression that if python is hosed on a rhel system (thus making ansible inop) that chef and puppet can magically fix it. because they apparently don't use yum or dnf to install or manage packages (hint they do) this is a major deficiency in red hat which debian does not share i kinda hope the vmware replacement for dnf catches on
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 16:53
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:neither chef nor puppet has a working sdlc story right now same but yr posting
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
I just got back to working with fedora 22 and the gnome 3 feels nicer and all but how do I hide the menu bar forever on gnome-terminal, what the hell happened why can't I hide it forever anymore aaaaa
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
right-click, uncheck "Show menubar"
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 21:53
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:right-click, uncheck "Show menubar" but then when I open a new window it appears again, I have to do this every time
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 21:56
|
|
|
this seems like something you'd stick in the preferences, perhaps at the very top of the very first tab in order to make it really easy for the user to find
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 21:59
|
|
|
Edit -> Preferences -> uncheck "Show menubar by default in new terminals"
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2015 22:00
|
|
|
just started a new job today and was given a 27" or 29" late 2013 imac, 3.5GHz i7 and 8GB RAM, immediately improved it by installing linux
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Lysidas posted:just started a new job today and was given a 27" or 29" late 2013 imac, 3.5GHz i7 and 8GB RAM, immediately FTFY
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
literally pearls before swine
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Lysidas posted:just started a new job today and was given a 27" or 29" late 2013 imac, 3.5GHz i7 and 8GB RAM, immediately improved it by installing linux https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mbg1nEXQ1fI&t=39s
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
you put the worst desktop non-unix on something that was running the best desktop unix. you made a terrible mistake.
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Lysidas posted:just started a new job today and was given a 27" or 29" late 2013 imac, 3.5GHz i7 and 8GB RAM, immediately improved it by installing linux
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 03:18
|
|
|
Lysidas posted:just started a new job today and was given a 27" or 29" late 2013 imac, 3.5GHz i7 and 8GB RAM, immediately improved it by installing linux
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
Barnyard Protein posted:worst desktop non-unix have you seen windows anytime in the past 5 years? it's like looking into the abyss
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
so loving future posted:have you seen windows anytime in the past 5 years? no
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
so loving future posted:have you seen windows anytime in the past 5 years? it's like looking into the abyss on the other hand linux on the desktop
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 04:53
|
|
|
Lysidas posted:just started a new job today and was given a 27" or 29" late 2013 imac, 3.5GHz i7 and 8GB RAM, immediately improved it by installing linux smart move
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 04:56
|
|
|
ruby idiot railed posted:on the other hand linux on the desktop unironically better than windows
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 05:10
|
|
|
lmao isn't linux still loving slow to get from boot to desktop?
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 06:17
|
|
|
translation: nvidia's driver is terrible on suspend/resume and that's all we support
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 06:36
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:this seems like something you'd stick in the preferences, perhaps at the very top of the very first tab in order to make it really easy for the user to find Suspicious Dish posted:Edit -> Preferences -> uncheck "Show menubar by default in new terminals" oh my god I'm sorry I was freaking over this because I thought this option used to be on Profile Preferences
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 12:51
|
|
|
Soldier of Fortran posted:lmao it's pretty fast since  systemd came on the scenea typical ssd-having computer will boot linux in about five seconds these days, which is probably fast enough for most ppl
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2015 13:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 13:23 |
|
|
who cares about boot times, just suspend to ram imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2015 04:10
|
|
