|
Definitely send me the code. I have been learning VBA for Excel macros and need a new challenge.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 13:48 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 15:34 |
|
Spoeank posted:How many teams/where did you pick? Only if he gets hurt
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 14:08 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Definitely send me the code. I have been learning VBA for Excel macros and need a new challenge. Sure. Most of the heavy lifting is done by various existing commands here that were already written into my python install (pythonXY), but there's a chance people have already written VBscripts for this stuff as well if you google around. Apologies in advance for the table-breaking. code:
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 14:09 |
|
Alright. First overall pick in a standard scoring league. Who do you take? Right now I'm split between Bell, AP, and Charles. Leaning Bell, though, even with the suspension.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 14:10 |
|
CompeAnansi posted:Alright. First overall pick in a standard scoring league. Who do you take? I like Charles myself, even in non-ppr, though the other two are also fine. He is just so impeccably reliable, has no red flags (suspension, possible rust etc), and has a solid handcuff for protection. Consensus rankings have him third, but with a crazy low variance (so everybody uniformly agrees that he should be near the top).
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 14:15 |
|
RCarr posted:Anyone here ever do a Yahoo Pro ($20) public league? I too am interested in this. I would play in your league RCarr but I think that would defeat the point of taking all our goon knowledge and wrecking pubbies. Is this a fair payout structure? Can I find a better one, the ones here are basically full.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 14:38 |
|
Tiptoes posted:Pfft. "Minimizing risk" only gets you so far. You have to adapt quickly in this game and half of the fun for me is being willing to go out on a limb for certain guys. RBs are just inherently risky to begin with. Even Eddie Lacy could wind up getting a high ankle sprain and become a liability. But when I look at CJA's three-down ability and Kubiak's excellent running games over the last several years, I see a guy who could wind up being the #1 RB at the end of the year. I have zero problem taking a player like that in the first. I understand your point about taking some risk, but at the 1st round you really need to preserve that pick for someone most likely to produce at a high level rather than someone pretty likely to produce at a high level. Basically all we're arguing at this point is what our/your risk tolerance should be, and that's like asking someone to like a specific ice cream flavor. If you have a high risk tolerance for the first two rounds, then do whatever makes you warm in the pants because it's your team. I've personally whiffed on too many high-upside guys in the early rounds that I no longer draft as riskily as I used to and prefer to make my risky moves in later rounds where the potential for disaster is less amplified.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:07 |
|
CompeAnansi posted:Alright. First overall pick in a standard scoring league. Who do you take? Take PPR out of the equation and I go AP because He Mad. The OL is not that good but Purple Jesus will part the sea.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:07 |
|
CompeAnansi posted:Alright. First overall pick in a standard scoring league. Who do you take? I picked third and it went: AP, Bell, Charles. I would have preferred AP, then Charles, then Bell. As good as Bell is, the two-week suspension is a not-insignificant handicap. So much so that I initially shat my pants when I saw I was opening Wk 1 against Bell's owner, then realized he would be SSPD and broke into my happy dance.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:15 |
|
Michael Corleone posted:I too am interested in this. I would play in your league RCarr but I think that would defeat the point of taking all our goon knowledge and wrecking pubbies. Is this a fair payout structure? Can I find a better one, the ones here are basically full. The payout structure is $100 for first, $60 for second, and $20 for third. I'd prefer more for 1st place, but I guess it's not too bad. They actually throw you in a random league when you join, so I don't think we could play together, even if we wanted to. The yahoo rankings seem really weird, I'm hoping to take advantage of that. I draft tonight at 8, so I'll let you know how it goes.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:37 |
|
CompeAnansi posted:Alright. First overall pick in a standard scoring league. Who do you take? In standard, I'd go Charles > AP > Bell - Bell would take 1st in a PPR. Anyone have any good DFS effort posts I could read? I've done general DFS strategy and theory reading (there's tons of stuff out there) but goons always have a more entertaining take on these things IMHO.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:38 |
|
Amergin posted:In standard, I'd go Charles > AP > Bell - Bell would take 1st in a PPR. Check back a few pages I think someone linked a page where you could dl 4for4s guide on dfs leagues.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:42 |
|
RCarr posted:The payout structure is $100 for first, $60 for second, and $20 for third. I'd prefer more for 1st place, but I guess it's not too bad. They actually throw you in a random league when you join, so I don't think we could play together, even if we wanted to. The yahoo rankings seem really weird, I'm hoping to take advantage of that. I draft tonight at 8, so I'll let you know how it goes. Cool, let me know. I am going to try an auction one, if I can find it, I know they had them for Baseball a couple years ago when I looked into it, but then everything got wrecked and they started the Pro Leagues like close to halfway through the season this year iirc from the FBB threads.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:48 |
|
Soooo was I wrong for taking Lacy with my first pick?
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:49 |
|
A Man and his dog posted:Soooo was I wrong for taking Lacy with my first pick? A good back on a good team with a legendary QB? No that is still a good pick. If your early in the first take whichever player you like. There seems to be 2 competing theories for first round drafting with a lot of grey in between. Minimize risk, and grab a player with a high ceiling. Lacy checks both boxes. Paint Crop Pro fucked around with this message at 15:55 on Aug 18, 2015 |
# ? Aug 18, 2015 15:53 |
|
So, just checking, but the rule for 2 QB leagues/Superflex is always go QB/QB first 100 percent of the time no matter what right?
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:05 |
|
Pretty much, yeah
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:10 |
|
Michael Corleone posted:Cool, let me know. I am going to try an auction one, if I can find it, I know they had them for Baseball a couple years ago when I looked into it, but then everything got wrecked and they started the Pro Leagues like close to halfway through the season this year iirc from the FBB threads. They definitely do have auction leagues. I was going to do that, but I've never done an auction draft before and I pussed out.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:12 |
|
the_american_dream posted:So, just checking, but the rule for 2 QB leagues/Superflex is always go QB/QB first 100 percent of the time no matter what right? Nah, I don't think so. First, how many teams? The more teams there are, the more you need to go QB/QB to ensure you have two quality starters. 1.01 and 1.02 should 100% be Rodgers and Luck. Somewhere in the next 15 picks should be Wilson, Peyton, Ryan, Newton, Brees, maybe Roethlisberger. But if you're like pick 5 through 8 or so and Rodgers, Luck, Wilson, and Peyton are already gone, I'd easily take a top RB. If I was pick 3, I'd be tempted to go for a top RB over any QB besides Rodgers and Luck.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:18 |
|
If anyone is interested, I started a thread for a new 12/14 Team PPR Auction League here - http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3737218
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:31 |
|
the_american_dream posted:So, just checking, but the rule for 2 QB leagues/Superflex is always go QB/QB first 100 percent of the time no matter what right? One would think so, but the answer as always is it depends. If you look at ADP there are a lot of QBs that go later and still produce value.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:41 |
|
Metapod posted:Only if he gets hurt He's going to get David Cobb'd, regardless of his health. Sankey just sucks.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:47 |
|
Franks Happy Place posted:He's going to get David Cobb'd, regardless of his health. Sankey just sucks. Could not disagree more.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 16:54 |
|
the_american_dream posted:So, just checking, but the rule for 2 QB leagues/Superflex is always go QB/QB first 100 percent of the time no matter what right? I've been in a 2QB, 3WR, 0.5PPR Keeper league for a few years now. This was my draft strategy last year: 1.05 - Jamaal Charles (keeper) 2.06 - Cam Newton 3.05 - Colin Kaepernick 4.06 - Marshawn Lynch (keeper) 5.05 - Matt Ryan In retrospect, I probably should have passed on either Newton or Kaepernick because there were guys like Julio Jones, A.J. Green, and Le'veon Bell were all still available before Newton/Kaep. Given that it's a 3WR league, I probably should have grabbed a top tier WR instead, and then gone for #3QB much later. I could have grabbed Eli Manning or Roethlisberger around the 7th/8th or even Ryan Tannehill in the 11th. My WR's were, quite literally, dogshit. Thankfully I was able to flip Matt Ryan for a top-tier WR, but I would never, ever, recommend drafting with the intent to trade that player. I just got very lucky that my league mates don't draft very well for a 2QB format. In short, I'd recommend trying to scoop up your first two QBs within the first five or six rounds (depending on value). You don't want to be the guy having to trot out Derek Carr every week because you waited until the 8th round for your second QB. That's also not even accounting for the fact that you need a fill-in for two weeks if your QBs have different bye weeks.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 17:16 |
|
RCarr posted:You would have been fine at 6. Giving up a 2nd round pick to move up 5 spots in the first makes no sense. Based on what players are left it really is giving up a third round pick value to get a top three player. Besides that it is the last pick of the third round. Look at the players available.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 17:39 |
|
Papes posted:Could not disagree more. Rotoworld posted:Titans coach Ken Whisenhunt said Saturday that fifth-round pick David Cobb will get action with the first-team offense this preseason.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 17:40 |
|
kiimo posted:Based on what players are left it really is giving up a third round pick value to get a top three player. Besides that it is the last pick of the third round. Look at the players available. So you're basically giving up Hill/Dez/Julio/OBJ + Frank Gore (or equivalent talent) for Jamaal Charles. I'd take the combo of those two over Charles any day. RCarr fucked around with this message at 17:49 on Aug 18, 2015 |
# ? Aug 18, 2015 17:46 |
|
AP fell to me at #3, I couldn't pass him up. Also, I snagged Dez at #23 overall...
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 17:49 |
|
dat one portagee posted:Also, I snagged Dez at #23 overall... poo poo I'd be happy to get Dez at 12.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 17:51 |
|
I absolutely destroyed my redraft work league last year - it was a 10 team, 1QB/2WR/2RB/TE/Flex/K/DST league with 0.2 PPR. I drafted and played the waiver wire well, but the biggest advantage I had over everyone was RB depth. This year we have more interest and it's going to be 14 teams, 0.5 PPR, and the commissioner has just informed me that he's concerned about RB scarcity (he got burned by being incredibly shallow at RB last year) and he's going to change one of the RB slots to another W/R/T flex. My initial reaction is that it's bullshit and I don't like it, but ultimately I'll roll with whatever they decide. My questions is how best do I take advantage of this change? Do I target one of the top tier RBs to just slot in there all year and then stock up mid-round receivers? Or do I go WR/WR and try to pull two elite guys while trying to build a stable of RB2s that I can slot in weekly based on matchups? Or do I not change my drafting strategy at all? Most of the people in this league are not good at fantasy sports and will almost solely rely on Yahoo's rankings. Draft order has not yet been decided and that will obviously play a huge role but I kind of feel like more people are going to jump on those early RBs now and maybe even overdraft some to shore up that one RB slot, so if I get lucky and can snag 2 of Dez/Julio/Jordy/DT/AJ Green I'd be money.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 17:54 |
|
Running well against the Falcons 2nd and 3rd string defense is hardly a tall feat. Let's see if he can do anything with the ones before declaring a timeshare.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 18:00 |
|
We need 4 more for this goon MFL to start http://football20.myfantasyleague.c...d
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 18:01 |
|
Gobias Ind. posted:I absolutely destroyed my redraft work league last year - it was a 10 team, 1QB/2WR/2RB/TE/Flex/K/DST league with 0.2 PPR. I drafted and played the waiver wire well, but the biggest advantage I had over everyone was RB depth. This year we have more interest and it's going to be 14 teams, 0.5 PPR, and the commissioner has just informed me that he's concerned about RB scarcity (he got burned by being incredibly shallow at RB last year) and he's going to change one of the RB slots to another W/R/T flex. My initial reaction is that it's bullshit and I don't like it, but ultimately I'll roll with whatever they decide. At 0.2 PPR I think RB's are still king and outproduce WR's, so I wouldn't change much. Why do you assume more people draft RB's when you've reduced the number of dedicated starting spots for them? Its Miller Time fucked around with this message at 18:07 on Aug 18, 2015 |
# ? Aug 18, 2015 18:02 |
|
Its Miller Time posted:At 0.2 PPR I think RB's are still king and outproduce WR's, so I wouldn't change much. Why do you assume more people draft RB's when you've reduced the number of dedicated starting spots for them? We're increasing to 0.5 PPR this year, if that changes anything. I might be overthinking it; I just know that a number of people in this league last year ended up with 0 or 1 reliable RBs, and I think their draft strategy this year might reflect that. They might see that there is only 1 RB slot and want to lock it up right away by grabbing an early back (perhaps over a more highly regarded WR). I could be way off with this assumption though...
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 19:33 |
|
Gobias Ind. posted:Draft order has not yet been decided and that will obviously play a huge role but I kind of feel like more people are going to jump on those early RBs now and maybe even overdraft some to shore up that one RB slot, so if I get lucky and can snag 2 of Dez/Julio/Jordy/DT/AJ Green I'd be money. It likely won't be any more different than it was before. Once you get your draft position, you can look at who will likely fall to you. If the elite RBs are taken, gobble up elite WRs and grab a Hill/Gore in 2nd/3rd. More flex just makes going WR/WR in the draft more viable.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 19:39 |
|
Gobias Ind. posted:We're increasing to 0.5 PPR this year, if that changes anything. I have a very similar if not exactly similar league setup, and I'm thinking of doing the opposite. Since only 1 RB is required each week, I'm basically loading up on high quality WR and picking round 5 or later lottery ticket running backs. I concede that my C.J. Spiller or Joique Bell is going to lose vs. my opponents AP or LeVeon Bell... but I'm pretty sure my combo of Antonio Brown, AJ Green and TY Hilton will more than make up for it.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 19:40 |
|
I would place a slight emphasis on targeting WR's since you can slot them in 3 different places instead of 2. But I wouldn't pass on a solid RB if one is available. Your WR depth is going to be more important than your RB depth so draft accordingly in later rounds. It will definitely depend on your draft position how much flexibility you have.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 19:42 |
|
I would lock up my RB slot in the first 2 rounds, grab a couple RB lottos late and otherwise totally focus on WR and TE
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 19:44 |
|
Prophecy120 posted:I have a very similar if not exactly similar league setup, and I'm thinking of doing the opposite. Since only 1 RB is required each week, I'm basically loading up on high quality WR and picking round 5 or later lottery ticket running backs. I concede that my C.J. Spiller or Joique Bell is going to lose vs. my opponents AP or LeVeon Bell... but I'm pretty sure my combo of Antonio Brown, AJ Green and TY Hilton will more than make up for it. This was my initial thought as well. Still got a couple weeks leading up to the draft to gauge what people might do and to determine my strategy going in. Ultimately it probably won't end up changing my picks in the first 5 or so rounds - after that I'll definitely have a bit more of a WR focus though. Wanted to put some feelers out here and see what you guys though. Thanks for the responses.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 19:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 15:34 |
|
Granted, I'm probably a little biased since my past 3 years in a big-money league my #1 picks have all been bust running backs. 2012 was McCoy, 2013 CJ Spiller & T. Rich, 2014 Peterson. I'll give Antonio Brown a chance to break my heart and tank my season this year.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2015 20:41 |