|
what is so weird about tweeting shirtless pics to people you work with. it's not like they are strangers
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 04:14 |
|
|
Mulaney Power Move posted:what is so weird about tweeting shirtless pics to people you work with. it's not like they are strangers I find it funny that this dude thinks that sending a shirtless pic to Darren Young would impress him. His entire job is grappling with dudes who generally have better physiques than this guy, but yes I'm sure your abs will make him swoon.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:52
|
|
|
Mulaney Power Move posted:what is so weird about tweeting shirtless pics to people you work with. it's not like they are strangers There is absolutely nothing weird or strange about showing your hot bod to your co-workers and then proceeding to specifically reference your shared homosexuality and I will loving fight anyone who says otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:54
|
|
|
I do kind of think it's gross that Darren Young is posting this in public as if he needs to play the respectability politics game of both race and sexuality. But obviously that dude needs to get fired or never work on that show again. So what do I know?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
waffle iron posted:I do kind of think it's gross that Darren Young is posting this in public as if he needs to play the respectability politics game of both race and sexuality. That poor, poor thirsty gentleman 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
if someone comes at you like "hey! I'm naked and gay! you're gay too! lets buttstuff!", the threshhold for being a dick has been appropriately breached. Also DY's pretty much unfirable so he might as well see how far he can push it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
Dude straight-up sexually harassed Darren Young and people are like "well what's the big deal???"
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
waffle iron posted:I do kind of think it's gross that Darren Young is posting this in public as if he needs to play the respectability politics game of both race and sexuality. Isn't publicly shaming people for their creepy internet come-ons one of the more popular online activities right now? There's like a bajillion blogs for that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
WadeBartender posted:That might be D-Young's actual boyfriend I dunno It is. I know that from watching D-Young's interview with Renee on the Network.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
Lady Naga posted:Dude straight-up sexually harassed Darren Young and people are like "well what's the big deal???" secretly, we all want unsolicited dick pics flooding our private message boxe.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:09
|
|
|
coconono posted:secretly, we all want unsolicited dick pics flooding our private message boxe. No loving way dude 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
coconono posted:if someone comes at you like "hey! I'm naked and gay! you're gay too! lets buttstuff!", the threshhold for being a dick has been appropriately breached. Darren's WWE endorsed out of ring media profile means he rides the clean cut black man and palatable and monogamous gay man angles pretty hard. Which are certainly great things but sends the message that there is only one right way to be black and and only one right way to be gay. He can publicly shame some other dude all day as far as I'm concerned. But he's gone from being in one box to another.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
 loving lol, ZZ is still gonna win. Somebody fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Aug 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:36
|
|
|
waffle iron posted:Darren's WWE endorsed out of ring media profile means he rides the clean cut black man and palatable and monogamous gay man angles pretty hard. He's a black, gay man who got sexually harassed by a Co worker. loving lol if you think the WWE was going to do anything about this if he didn't make it public.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
he really does sound lazy as poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Mulaney Power Move posted:he really does sound lazy as poo poo No wonder he's stolen the hearts of all you WEAK AMERICANS
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:42
|
|
|
Skeezy posted:
Checks out: 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 21:51
|
|
|
And I would walk 1.1 miles!
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
Skeezy posted:
do you think he got chicken fries.....or hell.....SPICY Chicken fries???
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
Skeezy posted:
This seems really vindictive and weird. Was he just sitting on this picture waiting for that right moment to release the smoking gun? Or is he still hanging out by the performance center waiting for ZZ to show his true colors. Also maybe he got a burger lettuce wrapped or something.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
If ZZ is down with BK bringing back cheesy tots he has my vote
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
waffle iron posted:Darren's WWE endorsed out of ring media profile means he rides the clean cut black man and palatable and monogamous gay man angles pretty hard. I feel this is the main argument you are trying to make which might have some value in discussing but you're wrapping it in a commentary about the cameraguy which makes it seem like you're trying to argue that it's ok to send weird nudes to people who don't want them as long as they are monogamous gay black dudes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
HulkaMatt posted:If ZZ is down with BK bringing back cheesy tots he has my vote BK has a chicken nugget sandwich I wonder if ZZ is getting that or maybe 3
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:48
|
|
|
Angular Landbury posted:I feel this is the main argument you are trying to make which might have some value in discussing but you're wrapping it in a commentary about the cameraguy which makes it seem like you're trying to argue that it's ok to send weird nudes to people who don't want them as long as they are monogamous gay black dudes. I never said anything about it being ok. Just that Darren could have done this in private with management but I don't begrudge Darren for making his own choices. Maybe there were some "he" pronouns that got confused?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
tanner looks a lot like zz
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 23:11
|
|
|
Skeezy posted:
This is Art.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 23:16
|
|
|
Paige on Twitter posted:You helped us create change and then did your best to disrespect. Niceeeee jobbbbbbbb! Missed the segment, but I guess it really wasn't received well?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:20
|
|
|
PunkBoy posted:Missed the segment, but I guess it really wasn't received well? Terrible MizTV script that they couldn't read well at all, Bellas came out and talked trash, samey 6 diva tag match, still no stakes except nebulous "divas revolution!" where the only thing that is changing is match length/amount They still need good booking and story telling to make people care. The crowd was making GBS threads on it more than they should have but it isn't entirely the crowd's fault with that the women are being given on the main roster stil
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:23
|
|
|
It was so bad the crowd cheered The Miz telling them to shut up with his "When my hand goes up!" thing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:28
|
|
|
Call her Paige reigns from now on
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:29
|
|
|
The segment was poorly written unfunny poo poo and then they were wrestling the Bellas who are not good. I don't get why people aren't into this Divas Revolution. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:02
|
|
|
The more WWE tries, (or in this case pretends to try), to make it's women, (whoops Divas), seem important, the more it makes them seem irrelevant and subpar. gently caress you Kevin Dunn. gently caress you Vince. And gently caress all of us that allow the two of them to get away with it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:07
|
|
|
BrigadierSensible posted:The more WWE tries, (or in this case pretends to try), to make it's women, (whoops Divas), seem important, the more it makes them seem irrelevant and subpar. I'm actually impressed by the equality being shown. All we need is for Paige to start talking about her love of magic beans, and the booking will be just as horrendously bad as when they try to get men over. Maybe they could have the women start feuding with Big Show and Kane to really put it over the top
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 11:36
|
|
|
PunkBoy posted:Missed the segment, but I guess it really wasn't received well? Who's she talking to: the crowd, or the McMahons? The crowd was lame for the "we are awesome" chant (seriously guys, you bury Full Sail but then do exactly what they would do?) but the booking is killing this so-called divas revolution.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 15:35
|
|
|
The "We are awesome" chant was bad, but you can't try to turn multi-person matches where everybody trades wins into some empowerment angle, because it's exceedingly transparent and ineffective. This Diva's Revolution™ doesn't make me very confident that Stephanie will be much better than Vince when he's gone.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 16:02
|
|
|
Muddy Burphy posted:This Diva's Revolution™ doesn't make me very confident that Stephanie will be much better than Vince when he's gone. Yeah it's really scary that the Divas booking right now is them trying really hard to get something new over. Between that and Roman... yeesh
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 16:19
|
|
|
PunkBoy posted:Missed the segment, but I guess it really wasn't received well? Charlotte looked so dejected when she got no Woo love.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
waffle iron posted:I never said anything about it being ok. Just that Darren could have done this in private with management but I don't begrudge Darren for making his own choices. This is WWE management we're talking about. While not as completely incompetent as TNA would be, there's still way too many echelons. Plus darren young and the camera dude are independent contractors so the HR practice would be to fire the one that's cheapest to replace. Darren Young just expedited the process and we all got a bonus laugh out of it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
triplexpac posted:Yeah it's really scary that the Divas booking right now is them trying really hard to get something new over. Between that and Roman... yeesh The US Women's National Team and Ronda Rousey blew up in popularity because they were dominant in their respective fields. WWE is telling us that these women are special while making sure none of them stand out and it isn't working.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 18:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 04:14 |
|
|
Muddy Burphy posted:The US Women's National Team and Ronda Rousey blew up in popularity because they were dominant in their respective fields. WWE is telling us that these women are special while making sure none of them stand out and it isn't working. This in a nutshell. Too much too soon, nobody is shining in these factions.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 18:46
|
|
