|
amazing
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:27 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:42 |
|
wait is there something wrong with return arg < 0
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:29 |
|
Illusive gently caress Man posted:i live in brooklyn, which is probably cheaper than sf. I live with roommates but a decent 1 bedroom is definitely affordable on this salary. lol. you're gonna be really disappointed if you want to live in the city
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:30 |
|
BattleMaster posted:wait is there something wrong with return arg < 0 no, it's that the brace is on the wrong line
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:32 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:lol. you're gonna be really disappointed if you want to live in the city brooklyn isn't any cheaper than the city now
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:32 |
|
gonadic io posted:no, it's that the brace is on the wrong line no, it's that the function is incorrectly named for appropriate c style
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:34 |
|
MeruFM posted:is that from the movie? no.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:34 |
|
gonadic io posted:no, it's that the brace is on the wrong line no, the problem is that it's a predicate with no ?
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:37 |
|
the problem is that the printf could overflow the array
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 23:41 |
|
BattleMaster posted:wait is there something wrong with return arg < 0 also as if anybody would write an isNegative function in tyol 2015,just use a lambda function if you're working in a crippled language that doesn't have partially applied functions.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 00:09 |
|
i'm the malloc wish y'all would be the free
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 00:13 |
|
I never even looked at it very closely; god drat it's an onion of terribleness with layers upon layers
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 00:27 |
|
nothin wrong w/this imo.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 01:45 |
|
triple sulk posted:nothin wrong w/this imo.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 02:00 |
|
as long as it compiles
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 02:39 |
|
triple sulk posted:nothin wrong w/this imo. But it's a JPEG.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 04:26 |
|
wait I know how to make it bettercode:
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 04:41 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:wait I know how to make it better haven't you read the coding standards? follow the naming scheme, always check your return values, don't use magic numbers, and be sure to use const code:
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 05:12 |
|
Somebody just paste enterprise fizz buzz here and get it over with
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 05:49 |
|
gonadic io posted:Somebody just paste enterprise fizz buzz here and get it over with searched it up was hoping for fizz and buzz factories oh wait, i didn't go deep enough this delights me highly
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 05:54 |
|
Illusive gently caress Man posted:and a thorougly deece six point five coffeetable fucked around with this message at 07:44 on Sep 9, 2015 |
# ? Sep 9, 2015 07:19 |
|
150,000
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 07:28 |
|
six point one seven figures
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 07:35 |
|
I choose to assume that six point five means $6.50/hr
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 10:32 |
|
Soricidus posted:I choose to assume that six point five means $6.50/hr a deece six fitty
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 10:38 |
|
MeruFM posted:searched it up
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 01:29 |
|
Kilroy posted:I interviewed someone who wrote several functions and two classes to implement FizzBuzz. I would have stopped him but morbid curiosity kept me in check. We ended up hiring him. that sounds fair for an entry job
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 03:09 |
|
tbh I would hire anyone who knew what a class was at this point
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 04:40 |
|
keep going you guys are making me feel better about my job search
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 05:52 |
|
Bloody posted:tbh I would hire anyone who knew what a class was at this point thats me mate. thats the level youre looking at
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 06:02 |
|
echinopsis posted:thats me mate. thats the level youre looking at your better than a lot of devs I've worked with
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 07:33 |
|
and why not too
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 09:34 |
|
Field name: Active Description: whether or not the account is active. T = true, F = false Format: text(1) Example: "yes" Thanks specification. Thacification.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 10:49 |
|
Kilroy posted:I interviewed someone who wrote several functions and two classes to implement FizzBuzz. I would have stopped him but morbid curiosity kept me in check. We ended up hiring him. I hired a guy that did fizz buzz just fine and he ended up being a completely poo poo programmer. It was then I realized that I was the completely poo poo programmer for thinking fizz buzz was a good measure of programming ability.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 12:16 |
|
did you know? fizzbuzz is literally the lowest possible bar you can set for programming aptitude nontechnical women and children can probably fizz a buzz
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 12:17 |
|
i literally could've fizzbuzzed with no extra coaching when i was like 6 or something it would've been in qbasic but still
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 12:22 |
|
Kilroy posted:I interviewed someone who wrote several functions and two classes to implement FizzBuzz. I would have stopped him but morbid curiosity kept me in check. We ended up hiring him. A while back I saw a person coding up Conway's Game of Life using a Cell class with two subclasses, LiveCell and DeadCell.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 12:45 |
|
suppose 90% of programmers can pass fizzbuzz suppose programmers from that 90% send out 5 resumes before being hired, and suppose the other 10% send out 45 resumes. then that 10% of programmers will account for 50% of all CVs received this is why a jawdroppingly easy test is so powerful in hiring
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 12:48 |
|
No back-of-the-envelope calculation is necessary, the standard explanation is "We'll stop asking Fizz Buzz at interviews when people stop failing it".
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 12:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:42 |
|
i literally dont understand how anyone applying for a programming job wouldn't be able to fizzbuzz
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 13:01 |